Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UNIPROT:A7KAX9 (grit)
 1,275 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) ceramic coatings are bioactive coatings that have been shown to stimulate bone apposition onto ceramic-coated implants. TCP and HA ceramics have well-documented differences in physical properties, but both types of ceramics are used for stimulation of bone ongrowth to cementless endo-prosthetic components clinically. However, little is known about the difference in osteoconductive properties between these coatings when inserted into trabecular bone in a controlled experimental situation. Unloaded cylindrical gritblasted titanium (Ti-6A1-4V) implants (6 x 10 mm) coated with either hydroxyapatite (HA) or tricalcium phosphate (TCP) ceramic were inserted into the proximal humerus of 20 skeletally mature dogs. The implants were initially surrounded by a 2 mm gap. Each animal received one HA-coated implant and one TCP-coated implant. All dogs were sacrificed 6 weeks after surgery. Results were evaluated by histomorphometry and mechanical push-out test. Push-out tests demonstrated that HA-coated implants were 10-fold stronger fixated in comparison to TCP-coated implant. Bone ongrowth was significantly higher for HA-coated implants compared to TCP-coated implants. Bone volume in the gap showed a tendency to less bone volume around HA-coated implants compared to TCP-coated implants but this difference was insignificant. As expected almost all of the TCP coating were resorbed after 6 weeks and almost none of the HA coating. HA-coated implants with a grit-blasted surface provide a favorable early mechanical implant anchorage most likely due to superior ceramic stability compared to TCP-coated implants.
 ...
PMID:Improved bone anchorage of hydroxypatite coated implants compared with tricalcium-phosphate coated implants in trabecular bone in dogs. 1022 6