Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C1291077 (
bloating
)
1,674
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Tegaserod is a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) receptor partial agonist which has been investigated for the treatment of
irritable bowel syndrome
(
IBS
). Specifically, it binds with high affinity to human 5-HT4 receptors, thereby stimulating the release of neurotransmitters and the peristaltic reflex in vitro. Small bowel transit (increased colonic filling over 6 hours) was accelerated in patients with constipation-predominant
irritable bowel syndrome
(
IBS
) receiving oral tegaserod 2mg twice daily for 1 week compared with those receiving placebo. In addition, there was a mean 20% increase of proximal colonic emptying in these patients. Oral tegaserod 2 (p < 0.05) or 6mg twice daily improved symptoms of abdominal discomfort,
bloating
and constipation (assessed using a Subjects' Global Assessment Scale) compared with placebo in patients with constipation-predominant
IBS
in a double-blind, dose-ranging study. The most frequent adverse events in patients with constipation-predominant
IBS
receiving oral tegaserod were transient diarrhoea and flatulence. No clinically relevant changes in blood pressure, pulse rate, QRS or QTc interval were reported with tegaserod doses of 25 to 100mg.
...
PMID:Tegaserod. 1049 76
Though the basic science of the
irritable bowel syndrome
is far from certain, and the clinical science is often confusing, it is still possible to make some sense of the syndrome in a clinical context. These common complaints of altered bowel patterns, pain and
bloating
are extremely common and vary greatly in the impact they have on person's lives. From 'non-patients' who do not present for medical care to those who seek referral to multiple specialists, the spectrum is well known. If sense is to be made, the physician must understand the patient's major symptoms, how and to what degree they disturb their lifestyle, what is the patient's knowledge about and understanding of the syndrome, what has been done before, and why the patient is now presenting. What are the expectations and potential frustrations anticipated with this present consultation? A positive diagnostic approach can be taken but care is necessary to assuage lingering fears of organic disease, to correct misconceptions of the syndrome, to settle existing frustrations of the patient, and to educate. With these approaches, managing
irritable bowel syndrome
can be rewarding, though demanding.
...
PMID:Irritable bowel syndrome: making sense of it all. 1058 Sep 24
This review explores a broad range of patient characteristics that might be considered when selecting patients for inclusion into drug trials for
irritable bowel syndrome
(
IBS
). These characteristics have been chosen according to the author's perspective and a review of the literature based on a Medline search encompassing references to
IBS
(clinical, pharmacologic, and drug trials) from 1966 to 1998. The focus is to improve patient selection, which until now has concentrated predominantly on physical symptoms.
Irritable bowel
symptoms involve both physical and psychological domains in an inseparable way, the interaction profoundly affecting the physical manifestations of the condition, the patient's interpretation of these physical changes, the ability of the patient to cope with these symptoms, the extent to which the patient feels the need to seek treatment, and the response to different types of treatment. Selection criteria need to take both physical and psychological domains into account. When defining the disorder for purposes of patient selection, a simple definition of long-standing abdominal pain and
bloating
associated with alternating diarrhea and constipation (after the exclusion of organic disease) may still be the most practical. The Manning and Rome criteria have been reasonably well validated, especially when the constellation of symptoms is used as a unit; however, their applicability to men and the elderly is not as well validated and deserves further attention. Other patient characteristics that may be useful in the future in deciding suitability for a trial, or predicting response, include symptom pattern, length of symptom history, whether the condition was triggered by enteric infection, whether a patient is in primary, secondary, or tertiary care, psychological characteristics, a history of physical or sexual abuse, and possibly visceral sensitivity testing or autonomic dysfunction. Different studies may be required for primary care and tertiary care patients, who may differ in their psychological characteristics. Studies should also include patients across the demographic spectrum who are likely to require treatment for this condition, including adolescents and the elderly. The type of drug being tested will also influence patient selection, depending on whether it is fast or slow acting, and its predominant pharmacologic effects and side effects. This has particular relevance in relation to the presence of diarrhea or constipation, how prominent the symptom of pain is, and whether the drug has psychotropic or anxiolytic effects. Because of the recognition that
IBS
patients compose a heterogeneous population, precise characterization of patients, and targeted drug therapies are likely to lead to better therapeutic results. Further attention also needs to be paid to the type of drug under investigation, in relation to these different patient characteristics.
...
PMID:Entry criteria for drug trials of irritable bowel syndrome. 1058 73
This article reviews the evidence that psychiatric disorders have an adverse influence on the outcome of
irritable bowel syndrome
(
IBS
) and relates this to the close relationship between psychological symptoms and severity of abdominal pain,
bloating
, and diarrhea. Therefore, accurate measurement of psychological symptoms may be an important aspect of trial design for
IBS
therapy. The importance of psychological distress and health anxiety in differentiating "consulters" and "nonconsulters" for
IBS
is reviewed. The consequences of excluding from a trial people with certain types of psychiatric disorder or with a known past history of sexual abuse are considered.
...
PMID:The relationship between psychosocial parameters and outcome in irritable bowel syndrome. 1058 76
Personality changes have been reported in chronic constipation. Hostility is an important personality factor involved in psychosomatic disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate hostility in patients with chronic constipation. Sixty subjects with chronic constipation (24 males, 36 females, mean age 44.5 years) were investigated with the hostility scale of the Minnesota Multiphasic Inventory. The patients were divided in four groups according to their symptoms: functional chronic constipation (Group I, n = 18),
irritable bowel syndrome
expressed as chronic constipation and abdominal pain (Group II, n = 21),
irritable bowel syndrome
expressed as chronic constipation, abdominal pain and
bloating
(Group III, n = 13) and
irritable bowel syndrome
expressed as chronic constipation alternating with episodes of diarrhoea (Group IV, n = 8). Twenty-five clinically healthy subjects were investigated as controls. Hostility was as follows (mean +/- SD): 68 +/- 9 in group I, 62 +/- 12 in group II, 70 +/- 14 in group III, 56 +/- 12 in group IV and 40 +/- 12 in controls. The scores were significantly higher in all groups of patients with constipation versus controls (p < 0.01; < 0.001; < 0.001; < 0.02, respectively). These data suggest that hostility is increased in patients with chronic constipation. It is rather a feature of the functional bowel disorders than of constipation, as symptom, only.
...
PMID:Hostility in patients with chronic constipation. 1082 20
Fructose and lactose malabsorption are characterized by impaired duodenal fructose transport or by the deficiency of mucosal lactase, respectively. As a consequence, the nonabsorbed saccharides reach the colon, where they are broken down by bacteria to short fatty acids, CO2, and H2.
Bloating
, cramps, osmotic diarrhea, and other symptoms of
irritable bowel syndrome
are the consequence and can be seen in about 50% of carbohydrate malabsorbers. We have previously shown that fructose as well as lactose malabsorption were associated with signs of mental depression. It was therefore of interest to investigate possible interactions between fructose and lactose malabsorption and their influence on the development of signs of depression. In all, 111 otherwise healthy volunteers (81 females and 30 males) with gastrointestinal complaints were analyzed by measuring breath H2 concentrations after an oral dose of 50 g lactose and of 50 g fructose one week apart. They were classified as normals, isolated fructose malabsorbers, isolated lactose malabsorbers, and combined fructose/lactose malabsorbers. All patients filled out a Beck's depression inventory-questionnaire. Twenty-five individuals (22.5%) were neither fructose nor lactose malabsorbers (group 1), 69 (62.2%) were only fructose malabsorbers (group 2), 4 (3.6%) were only lactose malabsorbers (group 3), and 13 (11.7%) presented with fructose and lactose malabsorption together (group 4). Isolated fructose malabsorption and combined fructose/lactose malabsorption was significantly associated with a higher Beck's depression score. Further analysis of the data show that this association was strong in females (P < 0.01), but there was no such association between carbohydrate malabsorption and early signs of depression in males. In conclusion, the data confirm that fructose malabsorption may play a role in the development of mental depression in females and additional lactose malabsorption seems to further increase the risk for development of mental depression.
...
PMID:Carbohydrate malabsorption syndromes and early signs of mental depression in females. 1096
I believe there are four essential elements in the management of patients with
irritable bowel syndrome
(
IBS
): to establish a good physician-patient relationship; to educate patients about their condition; to emphasize the excellent prognosis and benign nature of the illness; and to employ therapeutic interventions centering on dietary modifications, pharmacotherapy, and behavioral strategies tailored to the individual. Initially, I establish the diagnosis, exclude organic causes, educate patients about the disease, establish realistic expectations and consistent limits, and involve patients in disease management. I find it critical to determine why the patient is seeking assistance (eg, cancer phobia, disability, interpersonal distress, or exacerbation of symptoms). Most patients can be treated by their primary care physician. However, specialty consultations may be needed to reinforce management strategies, perform additional diagnostic tests, or institute specialized treatment. Psychological co-morbidities do not cause symptoms but do affect how patients respond to them and influence health care-seeking behavior. I find that these issues are best explored over a series of visits when the physician-patient relationship has been established. It can be helpful to have patients fill out a self-administered test to identify psychological co-morbidities. I often use these tests as a basis for extended inquiries into this area, resulting in the initiation of appropriate therapies. I encourage patients to keep a 2-week diary of food intake and gastrointestinal symptoms. In this way, patients become actively involved in management of their disease, and I may be able to obtain information from the diary that will be valuable in making treatment decisions. I do not believe that diagnostic studies for food intolerances are cost-effective or particularly helpful; however, exclusion diets may be beneficial. I introduce fiber supplements gradually and monitor them for tolerance and palatability. Synthetic fiber is often better-tolerated than natural fiber, but must be individualized. In my experience, excessive fiber supplementation often is counterproductive, as abdominal cramps and
bloating
may worsen. Antidiarrheal agents are very effective when used correctly, preferably in divided doses. I use them in patients in anticipation of diarrhea and especially in those who fear symptoms when engaged in activities outside the home. I encourage patients to make decisions as to when and how much to use. However, almost always, a morning dose before breakfast is used (loperamide, 2 to 6 mg) and, perhaps again later in the day when symptoms of diarrhea are prominent. I prefer antispasmodics to be used intermittently in response to periods of increased abdominal pain, cramps, and urgency. For patients with daily symptoms, especially after meals, agents such as dicyclomine before meals are useful. For patients with infrequent but severe episodes of unpredictable pain, sublingual hyoscyamine often produces rapid relief and instills confidence. In general, I recommend that oral antispasmodics be used for a limited period of time rather than indefinitely, and generally for periods of time when symptoms are prominent. For chronic visceral pain syndromes, I recommend small doses of tricyclic antidepressants. These agents are especially effective in diarrhea-predominant patients with disturbed sleep patterns but may be unacceptable to patients with constipation. I educate patients that side effects occur early and benefits may not be apparent for 3 to 4 weeks. I consider using SSRIs in low doses in patients with constipation-predominant
IBS
; cisapride, 10 to 20 mg three times per day, also may be beneficial. When taken with drugs that inhibit cytochrome P450, cisapride has been associated with serious cardiac arrhythmias caused by QT prolongation, including ventricular arrhythmias and torsades de pointes. These drugs include the azole fungicides; erythromycin, clarithromycin, and troleandomycin; some antidepressants; HIV protease inhibitors; and others. In patients with
IBS
with mild to moderate co-morbid depression, I have found that the use of SSRIs such as paroxetine, fluoxetine, or sertraline may be beneficial. It is important to tell patients that anxiety and disturbed sleep may occur during the first 10 days and benefits may not occur for 3 to 4 weeks. I prescribe a small amount of a short-acting benzodiazepine such as alprazolam, 0.5 mg two times per day, to control these symptoms. For generalized anxiety without depression, buspirone or clonazepam may be useful. I have found that patients who also have associated panic disorder may benefit from a benzodiazepine, tricyclic antidepressant, or an SSRI. However, these patients are best managed in conjunction with a psychiatrist or psychologist. I consider the use of alternative therapies in patients who fail to respond to conventional measures and who are receptive to alternative strategies. These include general relaxation techniques such as biofeedback and hypnosis therapies.
...
PMID:Irritable Bowel Syndrome. 1109 67
Irritable bowel syndrome
(
IBS
) is the most common disorder diagnosed by gastroenterologists and one of the more common ones encountered in general practice. The overall prevalence rate is similar (approximately 10%) in most industrialized countries; the illness has a large economic impact on health care use and indirect costs, chiefly through absenteeism.
IBS
is a biopsychosocial disorder in which 3 major mechanisms interact: psychosocial factors, altered motility, and/or heightened sensory function of the intestine. Subtle inflammatory changes suggest a role for inflammation, especially after infectious enteritis, but this has not yet resulted in changes in the approach to patient treatment. Treatment of patients is based on positive diagnosis of the symptom complex, limited exclusion of underlying organic disease, and institution of a therapeutic trial. If patient symptoms are intractable, further investigations are needed to exclude specific motility or other disorders. Symptoms fluctuate over time; treatment is often restricted to times when patients experience symptoms. Symptomatic treatment includes supplementing fiber to achieve a total intake of up to 30 g in those with constipation, those taking loperamide or other opioids for diarrhea, and those taking low-dose antidepressants or infrequently using antispasmodics for pain. Older conventional therapies do not address pain in
IBS
. Behavioral psychotherapy and hypnotherapy are also being evaluated. Novel approaches include alosetron; a 5-HT(3) antagonist, tegaserod, a partial 5-HT(4) agonist, kappa-opioid agonists, and neurokinin antagonists to address the remaining challenging symptoms of pain, constipation, and
bloating
. Understanding the brain-gut axis is key to the eventual development of effective therapies for
IBS
.
...
PMID:Management of the irritable bowel syndrome. 1175 47
The
irritable bowel syndrome
(
IBS
) is one of the most common gastrointestinal conditions encountered by general practitioners, and it accounts for a great deal of the workload of gastroenterologists in secondary care. Research to date indicates that several factors contribute to the development of
IBS
, of which disturbed gastrointestinal motility, altered visceral perception and psychosocial factors are regarded as the three most important mechanisms interacting in the development of this disorder. Most pharmacological research has been based on these insights. Several agents capable of modulating either motility or sensitivity are currently under investigation. Potential drugs in the treatment of diarrhoea-predominant
IBS
are the more selective antispasmodics, such as the M3-receptor antagonists (e.g. zamifenacin, darifenacin). In constipation-predominant
IBS
the colokinetic effects of the selective 5HT4 agonists prucalopride and tegaserod are of great interest. Since altered visceral perception is thought to play an important role in the genesis of abdominal pain and
bloating
in many patients with
IBS
, new drugs are targeted at modulating the sensitivity, such as 5HT3 antagonists (e.g. alosetron), kappa-agonists (e.g. fedotozine) and somatostatin analogues. Furthermore, psychosocial factors should not be overlooked, since these appear to be of great influence on the clinical outcome of
IBS
.
...
PMID:New developments in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. 1123 89
Irritable bowel syndrome
(
IBS
) is common in primary care practice and in gastroenterology clinics and is occasionally seen in psychiatric clinics. The symptoms include abdominal cramping,
bloating
, and pain, as well as diarrhea, constipation, or both. Treatment includes patient education and reassurance, dietary modification, medications if necessary, and consideration of psychological interventions. The etiology of
IBS
is poorly understood. Research suggests a role for bowel dysmotility, altered pain perception, history of physical and sexual abuse, and psychiatric disturbance, though none of these factors alone has been proven to cause
IBS
.
...
PMID:Irritable bowel syndrome: overview of diagnosis and treatment. 1128 Aug 40
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>