Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C1175175 (
SARS
)
19,188
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
(
SARS
) has recently recognized as a new human infectious disease. A novel coronavirus was identified as the causative agent of
SARS
. This report summarizes the hematological findings in
SARS
patients and proposes a hypothesis for the pathophysiology of
SARS
coronavirus related abnormal hematopoiesis. Hematological changes in patients with
SARS
were common and included lymphopenia (68% - 90% of adults; 100% of children, n = 10), thrombocytopenia (20% - 45% of adults, 50% of children), and leukopenia (20% - 34% of adults, 70% of children). The possible mechanisms of this coronavirus on blood system may include (1) directly infect blood cells and bone marrow stromal cells via
CD13
or CD66a; and/or (2) induce auto-antibodies and immune complexes to damage these cells. In addition, lung damage in
SARS
patients may also play a role on inducing thrombocytopenia by (1) increasing the consumption of platelets/megakaryocytes; and/or (2) reducing the production of platelets in the lungs. Since the most common hematological changes in
SARS
patients were lymphopenia and immunodeficiency. We postulate that hematopoietic growth factors such as G-CSF, by mobilizing endogenous blood stem cells and endogenous cytokines, could become a hematological treatment for
SARS
patients, which may enhance the immune system against these virus.
...
PMID:The effect of SARS coronavirus on blood system: its clinical findings and the pathophysiologic hypothesis. 1284 98
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
(
SARS
) is a new human infectious disease. The causative agent of
SARS
is a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV). This report summarizes the hematological findings in
SARS
patients and proposes the possible mechanisms of
SARS
-CoV related abnormal hematopoiesis. Hematological changes in patients with
SARS
are common and include lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and occasionally leukopenia. A significant decrease was also observed in peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte subsets and it was related to onset of
SARS
. A number of potential mechanisms may be involved. The development of auto-immune antibodies or immune complexes triggered by viral infection may play a major role in inducing lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia. Moreover,
SARS
-CoV may also directly infect hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells via
CD13
or CD66a inducing their growth inhibition and apoptosis. The receptor for group I and III CoV is aminopeptidase N (
CD13
).
CD13
has been identified in human bone marrow CD34+ cells, platelets, megakaryocytes, myeloid cells, and erythroid cells, but not in lymphocytes. The common receptor for group II CoV is CEACAM1a (CD66a). CD66a is an adhesion molecule expressed on bone marrow CD34+ cells, platelets, granulocytes and activated lymphocytes. In addition, glucocorticoids could induce lymphopenia and the use of steroids may account for the decrease of lymphocytes in some
SARS
patients. The increased consumption of platelets and/or the decreased production of platelets in the damaged lungs are a potential alternative but often overlooked mechanism that can contribute to thrombocytopenia in severe critical pulmonary conditions.
...
PMID:Hematological findings in SARS patients and possible mechanisms (review). 1525 84
We have recently demonstrated that the
severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus (SARS-CoV) receptor angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) also mediates cellular entry of the newly discovered human coronavirus (hCoV) NL63. Here, we show that expression of DC-SIGN augments NL63 spike (S)-protein-driven infection of susceptible cells, while only expression of ACE2 but not DC-SIGN is sufficient for entry into nonpermissive cells, indicating that ACE2 fulfills the criteria of a bona fide hCoV-NL63 receptor. As for
SARS
-CoV, murine ACE2 is used less efficiently by NL63-S for entry than human ACE2. In contrast, several amino acid exchanges in human ACE2 which diminish
SARS
-S-driven entry do not interfere with NL63-S-mediated infection, suggesting that
SARS
-S and NL63-S might engage human ACE2 differentially. Moreover, we observed that NL63-S-driven entry was less dependent on a low-pH environment and activity of endosomal proteases compared to infection mediated by
SARS
-S, further suggesting differences in hCoV-NL63 and
SARS
-CoV cellular entry. NL63-S does not exhibit significant homology to
SARS
-S but is highly related to the S-protein of hCoV-229E, which enters target cells by engaging
CD13
. Employing mutagenic analyses, we found that the N-terminal unique domain in NL63-S, which is absent in 229E-S, does not confer binding to ACE2. In contrast, the highly homologous C-terminal parts of the NL63-S1 and 229E-S1 subunits in conjunction with distinct amino acids in the central regions of these proteins confer recognition of ACE2 and
CD13
, respectively. Therefore, despite the high homology of these sequences, they likely form sufficiently distinct surfaces, thus determining receptor specificity.
...
PMID:Highly conserved regions within the spike proteins of human coronaviruses 229E and NL63 determine recognition of their respective cellular receptors. 1691 12