Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C1140680 (ovarian cancer)
 28,141 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The ATP-based chemosensitivity assay has proved particularly useful for the evaluation of new anti-cancer agents and combinations. The majority of our publications in this area have concentrated on topoisomerase inhibitors. Comparison of mitoxantrone with doxorubicin convinced us that these two agents were not completely cross-resistant and led to the design of the mitoxantrone + paclitaxel regimen which is now in clinical practice. Re-assessment of treosulfan in uveal melanoma led to the design of a new regimen combining this alkylating agent with gemcitabine, again with rapid introduction of this combination to clinical practice. The assay has recently been used to examine the concentration-activity curve to determine which tumours might benefit from liposomal preparations capable of delivering 4-16 times the standard dose without cardiotoxicity. Assay-directed use of Caelyx is producing encouraging results, and we are now examining this drug in combination with others. We recently showed that XR5000, a combined inhibitor of topoisomerase I and II, was effective against melanoma as well as ovarian cancer, but at concentrations which were unlikely to be achieved in patients. These data confirm our suggestion that use of the assay could reduce the time to introduction of new anti-cancer drugs and the cost of this process.
 ...
PMID:Chemosensitivity testing as an aid to anti-cancer drug and regimen development. 1252 4

BRCA1 is implicated in cellular responses to DNA damage, thereby substantially contributing to maintenance of the genome integrity. Mutations in the BRCA1 gene occur in breast and ovarian cancer and mutations that disable p53 are frequently found in human cancers, often accompanied by mutations in additional genes, contributing to tumor progression or high-grade malignancy. Therefore, the role of BRCA1 in the sensitivity to anticancer agents in p53-deficient cells was investigated using p53-deficient mouse knockout cell lines either deficient or proficient in Brca1 function. We report that Brca1-deficiency in p53-null cells was associated with increased sensitivity to the topoisomerase I poisons camptothecin and topotecan, the topoisomerase II poisons doxorubicin, mitoxantrone and etoposide, and to the platinum compounds carboplatin and oxaliplatin, but not to the antimetabolites 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine and the taxanes docetaxel and paclitaxel. The increased growth inhibition to doxorubicin after loss of Brca1 correlated with increased cell killing caused by increased apoptosis. The data presented here indicate that Brca1 modulates p53-independent DNA damage response pathways and they support the case of a role of Brca1 to protect cells from apoptosis-mediated cell death in p53-deficient cells. These results suggest a higher chemotherapy susceptibility of cells disabled in both functions and they foster the concept that functional inhibition of BRCA1 may be a valuable adjunct to anticancer agents to increase the efficacy of chemotherapy in the treatment of p53-mutated cancers.
 ...
PMID:The effect of loss of Brca1 on the sensitivity to anticancer agents in p53-deficient cells. 1268 87

Tafluposide (F 11782), a novel epipodophylloid with a unique mechanism of interaction with both topoisomerase I and II, has shown outstanding antitumor activity in vivo against a panel of experimental human tumor xenografts. The aim of this study was to evaluate its cytotoxicity against fresh tumor cells taken from patients. Cells derived from bone marrow, peripheral blood, malignant effusions or solid biopsies from 84 patients with either hematological or solid tumors were exposed continuously to 0.8-100 nuM tafluposide for 48 h, 96 h or 7 days. Cell survival was measured using an MTT assay or the ATP assay and LC(50) values (drug concentration required for 50% cell kill) were calculated. Tafluposide showed significant cytotoxicity against cells derived from either hematological or solid tumors, with a marked inter-patient variation. There was no significant difference between the effect of tafluposide in samples from untreated or previously treated patients (p>0.05 for all cancer types). Whilst tafluposide appeared to show weak (p<0.05) cross-resistance with the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), there did not appear to be any correlation with the effect of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan (p>0.05) in either hematological or solid malignancies. True synergism was identified when combining tafluposide with cisplatin in ovarian cancer [combination index (CI)=0.14, 0.79] and with etoposide in AML (CI=0.49, 0.63 and 0.78). Our results suggest that tafluposide is a strong candidate for inclusion in clinical trials, particularly in hematological malignancies.
 ...
PMID:Ex vivo effects of the dual topoisomerase inhibitor tafluposide (F 11782) on cells isolated from fresh tumor samples taken from patients with cancer. 1285 90

Although the prognosis for women with endometrial cancer confined to the uterus is relatively good, with a 5-year survival of approximately 90%, women with advanced or recurrent disease have a much poorer outcome. Systemic hormonal therapy with progestins improves survival in progesterone-receptor-positive tumors but chemotherapy is indicated as front-line therapy for most patients with this disease. Few single chemotherapy agents achieve response rates greater than 20%. The combination of doxorubicin and cisplatin is the first-line treatment of choice but the response and survival rates are still low compared to ovarian cancer treatments and more active regimens are needed. Treatment options for second-line chemotherapy are even more limited because of low response rates and toxicity issues related to prior radiation therapy. The topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, is being investigated for the treatment of endometrial cancer. In previously treated patients, single-agent topotecan achieved a response in 10% of patients and disease stabilized in 55% of patients. The combination of topotecan and cisplatin is being studied in chemotherapy-naive elderly patients. Topotecan is also active in uterine papillary serous carcinoma, an aggressive form of the disease that generally does not respond to chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Treatment options for endometrial cancer: experience with topotecan. 1312 93

The survival at 5 years, of patients with ovarian cancer, has steadily improved since 1960, when surgery and alkylating agents were the only initial modalities employed to cope with the usual late presentation of the disease. In the 1980s, cisplatin and then carboplatin became established as the most active drugs, alone or in combination with other drugs. In the last decade, the antimicrotubulin drug paclitaxel, and the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan were noted to be active after failure of platinum drugs. These drugs, as well as others with known activity in the second-line setting, such as the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, gemcitabine and oral etoposide, all play a role in the treatment of these patients and likely prolong survival without eradicating the disease. The plight of these patients has stimulated new areas of drug development. Here, the evolution of the current therapeutic strategy, the scientific rationale for cytotoxic and non-cytotoxic agents and their status at present are reviewed. 'Targeted' drug trials, in contrast to trials studying cytotoxic drug analogues, currently represent only a minor portion of clinical trials in ovarian cancer.
 ...
PMID:Emerging treatments for ovarian cancer. 1461 Sep 22

The research team of Dr. Monroe E. Wall and Dr. Mansukh C. Wani of Research Triangle Institute discovered two first-in-class life-saving chemotherapeutic agents. Camptothecin, first isolated and identified from Camptotheca acuminata, was found to kill cancer cells uniquely via topoisomerase I poisoning. Presently, two first-generation analogues of camptothecin are used to treat ovarian, colorectal, and small-cell lung cancers, and several second-generation analogues are in clinical trials. Taxol, first isolated and identified by Wall and Wani from Taxus brevifolia, was found to inhibit cancer cell growth via the stabilization of microtubules. In 1992, taxol was approved for refractory ovarian cancer and today is used against breast and non-small cell lung cancers and in Kaposi's sarcoma. While there have been numerous reviews of these molecules individually, this review offers an integrated account of the research team of "Wall and Wani" and the significance of their discoveries to chemistry, biology, and clinical medicine.
 ...
PMID:Camptothecin and taxol: historic achievements in natural products research. 1498 46

Topotecan (TPT) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor, and like the other drugs of this family, it is believed to act in a specific way on cells in S phase at the time of treatment. Exploiting a new method, coupling a particular experimental plan with computer simulation, a complete quantitative study of the time dependence and dose dependence of the activity of cell cycle controls has become feasible, and the overall scenario of events after treatment can be reconstructed in detail. We were able to demonstrate that the response of an ovarian cancer cell line to 1 h of treatment with TPT is not limited to inhibition of DNA synthesis, leading to cell death, but involves G(1) and G(2)-M checkpoints. G(1) and G(2)-M block, recycling, and death follow specific dose-dependent kinetics, lasting no less than 3 days after treatment. We also found that cells treated outside S phase contribute significantly to the overall activity. The utility of this analysis was demonstrated by reproducing more complex treatment schemes in which low TPT concentrations were applied for 1 h three times at 24-h intervals. In this case, the simulation clarified the origin of the auto-potentiation observed with repeated 0.2 micro M treatments, in which the cytotoxicity, particularly against S-phase cells, was higher than the cytotoxicity in cells treated with 10 micro M only once. We believe that this approach will help us to understand the complexity and heterogeneity of the response of a cell population to a drug challenge and could help us to establish the rationale for drug scheduling or drug combinations.
 ...
PMID:Cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of topotecan decoded by a novel mathematical simulation approach. 1508 99

Rubitecan [Orathecin, 9-nitrocamptothecin, 9NC, RFS 2000] is a topoisomerase I inhibitor extracted from the bark and leaves of the Camptotheca acuminata tree, which is native to China. Rubitecan is an oral compound being developed for the treatment of pancreatic cancer and other solid tumours by SuperGen. One of the major benefits of rubitecan is that it can be administered in an outpatient setting, so patients can be treated in their homes. Rubitecan was isolated by the Stehlin Foundation in the US. SuperGen is currently awaiting regulatory approval in the US and the EU for rubitecan in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. At the BIO-2004 conference, SuperGen announced it is seeking a partner for rubitecan for territories outside the US. SuperGen acquired exclusive worldwide rights to rubitecan from the Stehlin Foundation in 1997 except in Mexico, Canada, Spain, Japan, the UK, France, Italy and Germany. SuperGen has also received approval from the US FDA to use its own manufactured rubitecan in clinical trials. SuperGen and the Stehlin Foundation have an 8-year research agreement that secures global rights to other camptothecins and additional anticancer compounds for the former. In December 1999, SuperGen and Abbott signed a worldwide sales and marketing agreement for rubitecan. Under the terms of the agreement, Abbott had exclusive distribution and promotion rights for rubitecan outside the US, and co-promotion rights with SuperGen within the US. In return, Abbott made an initial equity investment in SuperGen. SuperGen and Abbott Laboratories ended their collaboration agreement in February 2002 by mutual consent with SuperGen stating that the dissolution of the agreement was based on commercial motivation rather than anything to do with rubitecan's safety or efficacy. Abbott no longer has rights or obligations to purchase shares of SuperGen stock or an option to purchase up to 49% of the company. For its part, SuperGen will no longer receive milestone payments worth up to $US57 million. SuperGen has formed a clinical and business alliance with US Oncology (created by the merger between American Oncology Resources and Physician Reliance Network in the US), and will collaborate on clinical trials of rubitecan. SuperGen believes that this relationship will increase the patient population available for trials and enable it to market the drug directly to Oncologists. SuperGen and Capital Research and Management Company have completed a $US16.6 million private placement transaction that will enable future funding for the rubitecan programme as well as other oncology programmes. In July 2004, SuperGen's European subsidiary, EuroGen Pharmaceuticals, submitted a Marketing Authorisation Application for rubitecan in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. The application will be reviewed under the EMEA Centralised Procedure. In June 2003, the EMEA granted SuperGen orphan drug status for rubitecan for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. The US FDA has also granted orphan drug status for rubitecan in the treatment of pancreatic cancer and fast-track status for rubitecan for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer that is resistant or refractory to chemotherapy. SuperGen has conducted three phase III pivotal trials in patients with pancreatic cancer. A phase III randomised trial in chemotherapy-naive patients was conducted at 132 centres throughout the US. The trial enrolled approximately 994 patients who were randomised to receive rubitecan or gemcitabine. Enrollment was completed in October 2001. Another phase III trial has compared rubitecan with the most appropriate chemotherapy in chemotherapy-resistant patients. Enrollment of over 400 patients at 200 medical centres across the US was completed in June 2001. Results from the trial were presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO-2003) [Chicago, US; 31 May - 3 June 2003], after they had been compiled, analysed and submitted to the FDA. The results of the study showed that rubitecan could not help all chemotherapy-resistant patients, but could increase survival in those that do respond. The other phase III pivotal trial was conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer who had failed treatment with gemcitabine. This trial completed enrollment in October 2001, and had enrolled approximately 448 patients. SuperGen is conducting phase II trials of rubitecan in patients with solid tumours in the UK, Italy, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark. Each trial will enroll 100-150 patients with various tumour types, including colorectal, lung, breast, gastric, prostate, cervical and head and neck cancers. Phase I/II trials are underway to investigate rubitecan as a radiosensitiser in patients with lung cancer, and phase II trials in patients with breast cancer are also being conducted. A phase II study in ovarian cancer patients is also being conducted. Results from an ongoing phase II study in cancer patients have shown that rubitecan was effective against chordomas, a rare type of bone cancer. Phase II studies are also underway in haematological malignancies including myelodysplastic syndrome (preleukaemia) and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. In February 2000, SuperGen announced that its IND submission for rubitecan had been approved by the Therapeutics Products Programme of Canada. The company stated that it intended to begin clinical trials in Canada in the near future. In February 2004, SuperGen announced an offering of shares of its common stock to finance the commercialisation of rubitecan capsules. In July 2003, SuperGen was granted a US patent covering combination therapies with chemotherapeutic anthracycline agents and structural modifications that may one day lead to next-generation rubitecan compounds. In December 2002, SuperGen was granted US patent No. 6,482,830, covering its polymorphic formulations of rubitecan. The patent also covers a class of polymorphs that are similar to the one at the centre of rubitecan. In addition, SuperGen was also issued US patent No. 6,485,514 in December 2002, covering the local delivery of rubitecan via stents and/or catheters to sites of proliferating cells. Stent- or catheter-delivered rubitecan may be beneficial in certain types of cardiac procedures, such as ablation or angioplasty, as well as for direct injection into a certain number of solid tumours. SuperGen is also developing an inhaled, liposomal formulation of rubitecan. It acquired the worldwide rights to this formulation from the Clayton Foundation in December 1999. Inhaled rubitecan is in clinical trials in the US for the treatment of lung cancer and pulmonary metastatic cancer.
 ...
PMID:Rubitecan: 9-NC, 9-Nitro-20(S)-camptothecin, 9-nitro-camptothecin, 9-nitrocamptothecin, RFS 2000, RFS2000. 1535 30

An international meeting on 'New Drugs in Cancer Therapy' was held at the National Tumor Institute of Naples, on 17-18 June 2004. The first session of the meeting focused on analogs of conventional anti-cancer drugs, such as taxanes, platinum compounds, anthracyclines and topoisomerase I inhibitors. The data of a phase II trial of BMS-247550, an epothilone B analog, in patients with renal cell carcinoma were reported. Data were also presented on BBR-3464, a trinucleate platinum analog which was developed on the grounds of greater potency, a more rapid rate of DNA binding and the ability to induce apoptosis regardless of the p53 status of the cell. Pegylated-coated liposomal formulation doxorubicin (Caelyx) has shown efficacy in metastatic breast cancer and in advanced ovarian cancer; sabarubicin is a third-generation anthracycline with equal or superior potency to doxorubicin or idarubicin in a variety of human tumor cell lines of different histotypes. The main mechanisms of resistance to topoisomerase I inhibitors were discussed; data on diflomotecan were reported, showing a narrow therapeutic index of the drug. The second session of the meeting focused on the ErbB family as a target for anti-cancer therapy. Recent evidence of a correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations at exons 18-21 and clinical response of advanced non-small cell lung cancer to gefitinib therapy was commented on. The issue of the association between ErbB2 expression and gefitinib activity was addressed, while clinical data of a phase II study of gefitinib in advanced breast cancer were presented. Monoclonal antibodies targeting EGFR represent another worthwhile way to interfere with EGFR-driven signal transduction. Cetuximab is reaching market registration in advanced colorectal cancer; in particular, due to the results of the BOND study. The recently presented results of the Bonner study strongly support the activity of this drug in head and neck cancer. A step forward in the research on anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies may be represented by humanized monoclonal antibodies, such as EMD 72000 and ABX-EGF. Imatinib mesylate is probably the most outstanding example of an effective targeted therapy--its activity in gastrointestinal stromal tumors was so exciting that the drug reached the market without undergoing phase III evaluation. The third session of the meeting was on angiogenesis inhibitors. Drugs may interfere with the angiogenic process via different mechanisms and there is a sound rationale for combining anti-angiogenic agents with chemotherapy or multiple anti-angiogenic strategies. Clinical results obtained with direct anti-angiogenic agents have been negative up to now, but some exciting results have been seen with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). A few VEGF-tyrosine kinase inhibiting small molecules, such as ZD6474, AZD2171 and PTK/ZK, are undergoing clinical trials. The fourth session of the meeting was on interference with intracellular signal transduction. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors exert their action by interfering with either pro-Ras or RhoB farnesylation. Several clinical studies of different phases with compounds belonging to this class have been carried out, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy; unfortunately, all of them have turned out to be negative. Cell cycle inhibitors, such as CYC-202 and BMS-387032, represent a class of interesting compounds which are in the early phase of development and whose clinical results are eagerly awaited. Another strategy to achieve cell cycle inhibition is to target heat shock protein 90, a molecular chaperone required for protein folding. Clinical data on depsipeptide, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with activity in T cell lymphoma, were presented. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid is another small molecular weight inhibitor of HDAC activity. Phase I/II clinical trials have shown low toxicity and evidence of anti-tumor activity; on the other hand, this compound has potential for synergism with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and biologicals.
 ...
PMID:New drugs in cancer therapy, National Tumor Institute, Naples, 17-18 June 2004. 1565 20

There is a growing interest regarding the use of camptothecins (CPTs) for the management of ovarian cancer. Since topoisomerase I has been established as a prime target of these drugs in other experimental models, it was important to determine whether sensitivity to CPTs in ovarian cancer cells is also correlated with the cellular level of this enzyme. Despite the 7-fold increase in topoisomerase expression achieved by adenovirus-mediated expression, the sensitivity to a CPT derivative (topotecan), was not improved compared with control cells harboring an endogenous level of the enzyme. This observation is in accordance with the similar level of topoisomerase I activity found in control and overexpressing cells and suggests that these cells may efficiently regulate the enzyme activity. Indeed, topoisomerase I overexpressing cells are characterized by a lack of alkaline phosphatase sensitivity and elimination of the hyperphosphorylated form of the protein. Taken together, these observations strongly suggest that an alteration in the phosphorylation state of topoisomerase I could limit its activity and prevent improvement of CPT response in ovarian cancer cells. In addition, a limited extent of topoisomerase I phosphorylating activity was found in nuclear extract of OVCAR-3 cells. Hence, providing enhancement in topoisomerase I expression may not result in improvement of CPT response in ovarian cancer cells because of an efficient control of the phosphorylation state of the enzyme.
 ...
PMID:Altered phosphorylation of topoisomerase I following overexpression in an ovarian cancer cell line. 1646 90


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>