Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C1140680 (ovarian cancer)
 28,141 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An early phase II cooperative study of Gemcitabine Hydrochloride (abbreviated to "gemcitabine" herewith) was conducted in patients with a variety of solid tumors (i.e., lung cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon/rectum cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer and breast cancer) at 56 institutions. The aim of the first step (Step I) was to investigate the feasibility of gemcitabine in a variety of different solid tumors, including lung cancer regarding efficacy and safety. The aim of the second step (Step II) was as a result of step I (Responses were observed) to continue to investigate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in chemonaive patients with non-small cell lung cancer. As a Step I study, gemcitabine was administered once weekly at a dose of 800 mg/m2 for a consecutive 3-week period followed by a week of rest, in multiple courses. Among the 29 eligible patients with lung cancer, partial response (PR) was achieved in 3 patients (25.0%, 95% confidence interval: 5.5-57.2%) out of 12 chemonaive patients. Adverse reactions (grade 3 or higher) seen in 29 patients with lung cancer were neutropenia (27.6%), leukopenia (13.8%), decreased hemoglobin (13.8%), thrombocytopenia (10.3%), malaise (6.9%), anorexia (3.4%), nausea/vomiting (3.4%), diarrhea (3.4%), dyspnea (3.4%) and interstitial pneumonia (3.4%). In other types of solid tumors, PR was achieved in 2 (8.7%) out of 23 eligible patients with cervical cancer and in 1 (5.3%) of 19 eligible patients with ovarian cancer, while the use of analgesics became unnecessary in 1 patient with pancreatic cancer. Incidence as well as severity of main adverse reactions in these patients were comparable to those seen in patients with lung cancer. A Step II study, in which gemcitabine was administered once weekly at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 to chemonaive patients with non-small cell lung cancer, was conducted, referring to the results of Step I and clinical studies conducted overseas. The results of the Step II study demonstrated PR in 5 (14.3%, 95% confidence interval: 4.8 - 30.3%) out of 35 eligible patients with non-small cell lung cancer and that the main adverse reactions were comparable to those seen in the Step I study, posing no tolerability problems in particular.
 ...
PMID:[An early phase II study of gemcitabine hydrochloride (LY 188011). Gemcitabine Cooperative Study Group for Early Phase II]. 893 92

We encountered two chemotherapy cases related to anticancer drug-induced colitis. Case 1 was a 35-yo-female with a recurrence of ovarian cancer. She was treated with intraarterial infusion consisting of continuous 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/day 5 days/week x 4) following low-dose consecutive cisplatin (20 mg/day 5 days/ week x 1). The catheter was inserted into the abdominal aorta about 2 cm above the carina of the common iliac arteries. Six weeks after the start of chemotherapy, severe abdominal pain and melena occurred. Case 2 was a 68-yo-female with an endometrial cancer recurrence. The same intraarterial chemotherapy used in case 1 was was initiated. Four weeks after the start of chemotherapy, before intraarterial infusion of CDDP, she suffered from constipation and than diarrhea, abdominal pain and melena. Both cases were diagnosed as anticancer drug-induced colitis with the pathological findings from colon biopsy and the clinical course, and improved in about 1 month with the discontinuation of intraarterial infusion, fasting and TPN. Intraarterial infusion of only CDDP caused both patients no intestinal symptoms, so it is supposed that intraarterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil induced the colitis. Anticancer drug-induced colitis should be taken into consideration as a rare but possible course of chemotherapy-related complication with intraarterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil.
 ...
PMID:[Anticancer drug-induced colitis--case report and review of the literature]. 908 99

The effect of oral etoposide on CA-125 serum levels was evaluated in 17 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and progressive disease during, or relapsing after, prior chemotherapy. Only three patients had measurable lesions at extraperitoneal sites. Five had no measurable lesions. The oral etoposide dose was 50 mg b.d. for 7 days every 3 weeks, escalating to 10 or 14 days and continued until clinical progression. CA-125 after 4 courses was compared to baseline (CA-125 ratio). The rate of change of CA-125 (s, slope of the exponential regression curve) during the first 4 courses was compared to s over a similar period before treatment. One patient had a clinical partial response. Two other patients had a biochemical response (CA-125 ratio <0.5). Although the biochemical response rate was modest (12.5%), a decrease of s was observed in 14/16 patients (P = 0.02). The mean change of s represented an increase of mean doubling time from 52 to 693 days. No patients were withdrawn because of toxicity. General malaise, nausea, diarrhea, and anemia were the most important side effects. At the given dose schedule, oral etoposide shows activity in advanced ovarian cancer if the rate of change of CA-125 is used as a measure of activity.
 ...
PMID:Effect of low-dose oral etoposide on serum CA-125 in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. 926 62

Five promising new drugs for gynecological cancer were reviewed. Taxans (Paclitaxel: Taxol and Docetaxel: Taxotere) diterpenoid plant products enhance the polymerization of tublin. Taxol showed significant activity for platinum refractory ovarian cancer in a phase 1 clinical trial in the United States. The combination with cisplatin (CDDP) showed superior results to CDDP plus Cyclophosphamide and has been recognized as a new standard in adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. The major toxicities are myelosuppression, alopecia, and hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). HSRs were overcome by pretreatment with anti-histamines and over 24 hours administration. It was also reported that Taxol was administered safely by over 3 hours infusion with reduced myelotoxicity, but the incidence of HSRs may be increased. Clinical trials of intraperitoneal administration and combination with Carboplatin (CBDCA) are ongoing. Taxotere, an analog of Taxol, is also effective as Taxol with a low incidence of HSRs. Topoisomerase inhibitors (Irinotecan hydrochloride: CPT-11 and Topotecan) have promising antitumor activity for ovarian and cervical cancer. CPT-11 is a semisynthetic camptothesin analog developed in Japan. It was also effective for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, such as mucinous and clear cell carcinoma. An adverse effect was observed in the combination of CPT-11 and CDDP. The phase 1 clinical trial showed a 40% response rate against recurrent ovarian cancer. CPT-11 50-60 mg/m2 (day 1,8,15) and CDDP 50-60 mg/m2 (day 1) are a recommended schedule. The major toxicities are neutropenia and diarrhea. Thrombocytopenia is not severe and diarrhea is also controllable. Topotecan is also a promising topoisomerase inhibitor and reported superior result to Taxol for platinum refractory ovarian cancer. A phase II trial is ongoing for ovarian and cervical cancer in Japan. Nedaplatin, a new analog of cisplatin, has similar activity especially for cervical cancer with less myelotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.
 ...
PMID:[Promising new drugs for gynecological cancer]. 935 Feb 38

JM216 [bis-acetato-ammine-dichloro-cyclohexylamine-platinum(IV)] is an oral platinum complex that is currently in phase II trials in ovarian cancer and lung cancer on a daily-times-5 schedule. This trial examined an alternative schedule of two doses given 12 h apart, which may be better tolerated by patients. A total of 19 patients were given 50 cycles of treatment at doses ranging from 150 to 350 mg/m2 b.i.d. The study was stopped before the MTD was reached due to non-linear pharmacokinetics. Toxicity was similar to that encountered in previous phase I studies, with nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea being seen at all dose levels, although this was generally mild and short-lived, and grade 3 and 4 myelosuppression being seen at dose levels ranging from 250 to 350 mg/m2. There was no nephro-, oto-, or neurotoxicity, but one patient had an allergic reaction at 300 mg/m2 on the fifth and sixth cycles. No response was seen, but two patients with mesothelioma had stable disease and received six cycles. There was considerable interpatient variability in plasma pharmacokinetics at all dose levels. There was no relationship between dose and AUC (dose 1 and dose 2) or Cmax after dose 1. In a limited number of patients the first dose was given in the morning rather than in the evening, apparently resulting in lower AUC, Cmax and Tmax values at the 250-mg/m2 dose level, but this was not seen in one patient at 300 mg/m2. This study confirms that the pharmacokinetics of JM216 is non-linear and highly variable due to saturable absorption and that the daily times 5 schedule is the optimal schedule for further phase II trials.
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of oral JM216 given twice daily. 965 14

Retinoids have been shown to be potent inhibitors of epithelial carcinogenesis. Recent evidence has demonstrated that retinoid actions are mediated through nuclear receptors, which are proteins encoded by the retinoic acid receptor and retinoid X receptor gene families. These receptors are activated by binding to specific retinoids; of the known naturally occurring retinoids, 9-cis retinoic acid is unique in its ability to bind to both receptor families. Because of its unique receptor-binding characteristics, 9-cis retinoic acid may have biological activity not possible with other retinoids. For this reason, we conducted a Phase I trial of 9-cis retinoic acid in adult patients with solid tumors. Twenty-two patients were treated twice daily with p.o. 9-cis retinoic acid at doses ranging from 20 mg/m2/day to 150 mg/m2/day. The patients had non-small cell lung cancer (n = 8), breast cancer (n = 5), colorectal cancer (n = 3), head and neck cancer (n = 2), nonmelanoma skin cancer (n = 2), or ovarian cancer (n = 2). The dose-limiting (WHO grade III) toxic effects, which occurred at the 150-mg/m2/day dose level, were headaches and diarrhea. Less severe (grades I and II) toxic effects included cheilitis, dry skin, conjunctivitis, fatigue, hypertriglyceridemia, alkaline phosphatase elevation, myalgia/arthralgia, and hypercalcemia. Of the 15 patients evaluable for tumor response, no objective responses were observed. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a reduction in peak 9-cis retinoic acid plasma levels with chronic administration. Based on this study, the recommended Phase II dose of 9-cis retinoic acid in adult patients with solid tumors is 100 mg/m2/day administered in a divided dose twice daily.
 ...
PMID:Phase I trial of 9-cis retinoic acid in adults with solid tumors. 981 71

Topotecan does not convincingly alter the grim prognosis of ovarian cancer in failure or relapse after treatment with platinum salts. The only comparative trial has not yet been published; available results suggest that 20% of women had at least a partial response on topotecan, compared to 14% on paclitaxel (no statistically significant difference). The place of paclitaxel in the treatment of ovarian cancer also remains to be determined, especially in combination with other drugs. Like paclitaxel, topotecan has marked haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity: nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and stomatitis. Topotecan solution does not contain the solvent Cremophor EL degrees , contrary to paclitaxel solution. It does not therefore require preliminary steroid administration, and does not prohibit the use of PVC-based infusion devices.
 ...
PMID:Topotecan: new preparation. No proven benefit. 1018 83

This review summarizes the results reported in preclinical and clinical trials of three novel anticancer drugs developed and tested in Japan. In phase II trials, Irinotecan, a semisynthetic analog of camptothecin, has yielded response rates exceeding 20% in non-small-cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cervical cancer, and non-Hodgkini's lymphoma. It was modestly active on pancreatic cancer and was not active on acute leukemias. Dose-limiting toxicities were leukopenia and diarrhea, and other major toxicities were nausea, vomiting, and alopecia. Amrubicin, a totally synthetic anthracycline, exhibited both higher efficacy on human tumor xenografts and cardiotoxicity milder than that of doxorubicin in preclinical studies. The dose-limiting toxicity in phase I trials was leukopenia. In phase II trials, amrubicin has shown activity equivalent to that of doxorubicin on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, response rates exceeding 20% on non-small-cell lung cancer, and a response rate of 78.8% on untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. S-1 is an oral formulation consisting of ftorafur (an analog of 5-fluorouracil), 5-chloro-2, 4-dehydropyrimidine, which inhibits degradation of 5-fluorouracil, and potassium oxonate, which reduces gastrointestinal toxicity, at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. In phase I trials, dose-limiting toxicities (myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicities) were judged to be milder than those induced by UFT (ftorafur plus uracil). The response rates obtained in phase II trials were 40-49% on advanced gastric cancer, 35.5% on colorectal cancer, 37.5% on head and neck cancer, and 40.7% on breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Novel anticancer drugs in Japan. 1023 66

The purpose of the present study was to examine whether its is possible to successfully replace ondansetron (OND) with metoclopramide (MCP) in patients exposed to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy who did not experience severe nausea and vomiting while undergoing OND treatment during their first chemotherapy cycle. After switching to MCP, patients continued with this drug for three cycles, provided that they had adequate control of nausea and vomiting. Otherwise, they were switched back to OND. There were 76 patients, 60 women and 16 men, whose median age was 56 (mean 58) years. Karnofsky performance status score was 100 in 18 patients, 90 in 23, and 80 in 11 patients. No patient had previous chemotherapy. Thirty-four patients had breast cancer and received fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 500 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2. Twelve patients had small cell lung cancer and received carboplatin 400 mg/m2 + etoposide 120 mg/m2 x 3 days. Twenty patients with ovarian cancer received carboplatin 350 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2. Ten patients had cancer of unknown primary and received carboplatin 400 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, and etoposide 120 mg/m2 x 3 days. The OND schedule consisted of methylprednisolone 40 mg intravenous bolus followed by OND 8 mg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by OND 4 mg orally x 3 on the same and the next 2 days. Patients who did not experience nausea and vomiting with OND continued with an MCP schedule consisting of methylprednisolone 40 mg bolus followed by MCP 2 mg/kg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by MCP (20 mg x 4 on the day of therapy and the next 2 days after). Patients who failed with MCP or OND continued with OND. Considering our results as a whole, the intensity of nausea does not appear to influence the results of Gralla's scale. The results of Gralla's scale do not appear to be affected by the analysis of the antiemetic results and nausea on the next 2 days following chemotherapy administration. Overall, patients received 145 cycles with OND and 159 cycles with MCP. Of the 76 patients receiving OND-based antiemetic regimen during the first cycle, 13 (21%) experienced severe vomiting (Grade 2, 3) and the remaining 63 (79%) had mild or no vomiting (Grade 0, 1). Patients with Grade 0, 1 vomiting (63, 83%) continued with MCP in the second cycle. The final number of patients who failed on MCP, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy increased to 33 (43%); 43 (57%) were able to complete chemotherapy with MCP. Headache occurred in 15 (10%) cycles with OND and 8 (5%) with MCP. Flushing was noted in 12 (8%), and constipation occurred in 43 (30%) of OND cycles, and extrapyramidal manifestations occurred in 3 (5%) of patients receiving MCP. Diarrhea was noted in 3 (2%) of cycles with OND and in 28 (18%) with MCP. The cost ratio between MCP and OND was 1:14. If we administered OND only in patients who needed it, the overall cost decreased to 44%. Following the strategy applied in the present study, the cost decreased to 47%.
 ...
PMID:Antiemetic prophylaxis with ondansetron and methylprednisolone vs metoclopramide and methylprednisolone in mild and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. 1051 44

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) is a nucleoside analog with antitumor activity against a variety of malignancies. The critical enzyme cytidine kinase is saturated at plasma concentrations achieved after a 30-min infusion at conventional doses. Prolonged infusion time may yield higher intracellular dFdCTP concentrations. A phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine, given by infusion for 3 h, in heavily pretreated patients. Twenty-seven patients (13 head and neck cancer, seven sarcoma, three esophageal cancer, three non-small-cell lung cancer and one ovarian cancer) were enrolled. Twenty patients were defined as refractory at first- or second-line chemotherapy. Four different entry dose levels (300, 400, 450 and 500 mg/m(2)) were evaluated for gemcitabine administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The MTD was defined as 450 mg/m(2), with granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia and asthenia being dose limiting. The maximum grade III/IV patient toxicities for hemoglobin, leukocytes, neutrophils and platelets for all doses were 7, 19, 19 and 11%, respectively. Non-hematological toxicities included asthenia, nausea/vomiting and diarrhea. Thus, gemcitabine administered at a fixed 3-h infusion was well tolerated up to 450 mg/m(2) in heavily pretreated patients. Myelosupression and asthenia were dose-limiting toxicities.
 ...
PMID:Phase I trial of weekly gemcitabine at 3-h infusion in refractory, heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors. 1159 51


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>