Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0948265 (metabolic syndrome)
 24,271 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

LADA or type 1.5 diabetes is a slowly progressive form of autoimmune diabetes of adults and represents a considerable proportion (about 5-10%) of all diabetic patients. Associations with high risk HLA genotypes and autoimmune phenomena (GAD, IA2, ICA) show similarities with type 1 diabetes, but phenotypical characteristics of these patients do not allow the correct identification without screening of GAD antibodies. The relatively low antibody titers against islet-cell antigens in LADA patients may be sign of a less aggressive form of autoimmune diabetes and could be responsible for the long non-insulin requirement phase of this diabetes type. Similar as in prediabetic relatives of type 1 diabetic patients the risk for beta cell failure in adult "type 2 diabetic" patients increases with the number of antibodies positive. Consequently, low titers of GAD--in particular in elderly patients--do not predict a progressive and rapid loss of beta-cell failure, when associations with high risk genotypes or other islet-cell antibodies are lacking. Patients with LADA share insulin resistance with type 2 diabetic patients, but display a more severe defect in stimulated beta-cell capacity than patients with classical type 2 diabetes. With respect to features of the metabolic syndrome, patients with LADA have lower BMI, blood pressure and triglyceride levels compared with classical type 2 diabetes patients. Early identification of LADA patients will be mandatory, when effective immune interventions are available for prevention of the beta-cell destructive process and insulin requirement of these patients.
 ...
PMID:Progress in the characterization of slowly progressive autoimmune diabetes in adult patients (LADA or type 1.5 diabetes). 1146 May 97

According to the most recent classification of diabetes mellitus the latent autoimmune diabetes in adults belongs to the group of type 1 autoimmune diabetes mellitus, as a slowly progressive form. It is not clear whether LADA is a distinct clinical entity or it is a part of the clinical spectrum of type 1 diabetes mellitus. The authors compare the antropologic (body mass index, waist to hip ratio), immunologic (occurrence of islet cell cytoplasmic autoantibodies and autoantibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase and tyrosin phosphatase), genetic (HLA DR and DQ alleles known to be associated to type 1 diabetes mellitus) characteristics and occurrence of the features of the metabolic syndrome in the groups of type 1 and type 2 diabetes and LADA. 81 type 1 and 190 type 2 diabetics and 38 LADA patients were involved into the study. Freshly diagnosed type 1 diabetics served for controls of the autoantibody study: 48 patients manifested < or = 16 years of age and 89 type 1 diabetics manifested above 16 years of age. The three main diabetic groups differed in age: the average age in the type 1, type 2 and LADA groups were 37, 63 and 58 years respectively. There was no difference among the three groups in gender. The duration of the disease differed significantly between the type 2 and LADA groups (4.0 and 8.0 years respectively). In spite of the shorter duration of the disease in the LADA group, compared to the type 2 diabetics the frequency of insulin dependency was significantly higher in the LADA (81.6%) than in the type 2 group (46.7%). The BMI and WHR were comparable between the type 1 and LADA patients (average values were 23 and 0.83 in type 1 patients and 23.25 and 0.89 in LADA). The type 2 group differed significantly from type 1 and LADA (average values were 29.1 and 0.5). The concentration of glycated hemoglobin was comparable in the three groups. But there was a significant difference in HbA1c concentration between the freshly diagnosed subgroups of type 1 and LADA patients: 10.85% and 8% respectively. The fasting C-peptid levels were significantly higher in the sera of type 2 diabetics (0.75 pmol/l) compared to type 1 (0.2 pmol/l) and LADA patients (0.29 pmol/l). There was a significant difference in C-peptid concentrations between the type 1 and LADA groups, too. The insulin deficiency in LADA seemed to be not as severe as in type 1 diabetes. The serum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels were significantly higher and the HDL cholesterol concentration significantly lower in type 2 diabetics comparing to type 1 and LADA patients and there was no significant difference in this respect between the type 1 and LADA groups. The frequency of occurrence of hypertension differed no significantly between type 2 and LADA, but that of in type 1 diabetes was significantly lower than both type 2 and LADA. The occurrence of multiple autoantibodies (ICA + GADA + anti-IA2) was much more frequent in type 1 diabetes compared to LADA. In the sera of LADA patients the occurrence of ICA and GADA alone or ICA + GADA was characteristic (31.5% - 21.1% - 15.8% respectively). There was no difference between type 1 diabetes and LADA in the occurrence of the alleles of the MHC kown to be associated with type 1 diabetes. The occurrence of the haplotypes HLA DQ2/DR3 and/or DQ8/DR4 was observed in two thirds of type 1 diabetic and LADA patients. Chronic diabetic complications were observed in all of the groups and there was only a secondary connection of the complications with the type of the diabetes. Based on the results the authors suggest that LADA is a part of the clinical spectrum of type 1 diabetes of autoimmune origin.
 ...
PMID:[Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults(LADA): part of the clinical spectrum of type-1 diabetes mellitus of autoimmune origin]. 1177 Jan 76

Differentiation of the various forms of diabetes is necessary for therapeutic reasons. Typical signs of type 2 diabetes are age over 40, obesity, and other markers for metabolic syndrome, a positive famitory, gradual development of the classical symptoms, and no evidence of ketosis. It is important to distinguish this from LADA (latent autoimmune diabetes of adulthood), a form of type 1 diabetes mellitus. To establish this differential diagnosis antibody testing is employed. Antibody tests in patients with newly manifest diabetes make good sense when the clinical diagnosis is not unequivocal, that is, to distinguish it from type 2 diabetes, MODY diabetes, hereditary and secondary forms. At present, immunodiagnosis is used too often in unambiguous cases of type 1 diabetes, but too rarely in supposed type 2 diabetes. As a rule, LADA patients are GADA-positive. If MODY diabetes is suspected, a genetic examination is indicated. In patients with GDM, antibody testing with GADA makes sense, in particular in slim patients receiving insulin treatment, since these patients have a high risk for developing a postpartum diabetes already in the first years.
 ...
PMID:[Diabetes mellitus--differential diagnosis]. 1680 91