Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0948265 (metabolic syndrome)
 24,271 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Recent epidemiological data have reaffirmed that elevated plasma triglyceride and low HDL-cholesterol levels are important risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease. The rationale for the clinical use of fibric acid derivatives, which are designed to correct this metabolic nexus, is now on firmer ground. The mechanism of action of fibrates on lipoprotein metabolism has recently been elucidated at the molecular level and involves the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha 1 in the liver, with the net effect of improving the plasma transport rates of several lipoproteins. Other potential anti-atherothrombotic effects include the inhibition of coagulation and enhancement of fibrinolysis, as well as the inhibition of inflammatory mediators involved in atherogenesis. These consequences probably underpin the favourable effects of fibrates seen in recent angiographic and clinical trials. Two important clinical trials on the effect of gemfibrozil (Veterans Administration-HDL-Cholesterol Intervention Trial) and bezafibrate (Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention Study) have recently been completed in subjects with elevated triglyceride, low HDL and normal or near-normal LDL-cholesterol levels. The results testify to the efficacy of these agents in decreasing the incidence of cardiovascular events, particularly in patients with multiple risk factors and plasma triglyceride levels of over 2.2 mmol/l. The findings of these trials are compared with the statin-based Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study, with a recommendation that future studies in appropriately selected patients should examine the synergistic effect of the fibrate/statin combination. The absolute risk reduction in the incidence of coronary events in the Veterans Administration-HDL-Cholesterol Intervention Trial compares favourably with the statin trials. The therapeutic aspects of the efficacy and safety of fibrates are reviewed. Besides primary mixed hyperlipidaemias, particular indications for the clinical use of fibrates include type 2 diabetes, the metabolic syndrome and renal insufficiency. The St Mary's, Ealing, Northwick Park Diabetes Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Study has suggested that fibrates may decrease the incidence of coronary events in type 2 diabetes, but this hypothesis will be more extensively tested in the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study, Fenofibrate in Event Lowering in Diabetes Study and Lipids in Diabetes Study projects. Although significant new knowledge has accrued over the past few years concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of fibrates, the success of these agents in clinical practice depends on the availability of methods for assessing cardiovascular risk as well as on treatment guidelines, which as presently designed and recommended may be inaccurate and suboptimal.
 ...
PMID:Fibrates, dyslipoproteinaemia and cardiovascular disease. 1068 50

The triglyceride (TG) level is one of several lipid parameters that can aid prediction of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. An elevated plasma TG level is strongly associated with an increased risk of CHD. Hypertriglyceridemia, the second most common dyslipidemic abnormality in hypertensive subjects after increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), is defined by the National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) as a fasting TG level of > 2.26 mmol/l (> 200 mg/dl) and is recognised as a primary indicator for treatment in type IIb dyslipidemia. Raised TG levels can be present in individuals at risk for CHD when the total cholesterol is normal. However, not all individuals with raised TG levels have increased risk of CHD. Factors such as: diet, age, lifestyle, and a range of medical conditions, drug therapy and metabolic disorders, can all affect the TG level. In some of these circumstances, other factors protect against the risk of CHD, and can minimise or negate the effect of the risk factors present. Although TG reducing therapy has been shown to be associated with an improved clinical outcome, more research is needed to determine whether this is an independent effect of TG reduction or an effect of normalising the overall lipid profile in hypertriglyceridemic patients. Further trials are required to quantify the clinical benefits of lowering TG to 'target' levels and to confirm targets defined by NCEP-II (shown in Table 1). The role of TG in CHD pathogenesis is thought to involve several direct and indirect mechanisms, such as effects on the metabolism of other lipoproteins, transport proteins, enzymes, and on coagulation and endothelial dysfunction. More research is required to fully elucidate the role of TG, the ways in which it can influence other risk factors and the mechanism of its own more direct role in the atherogenic process. Patients with hypertriglyceridemia have been shown to respond well to dietary control and to the use of lipid lowering drugs such as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors (known as statins), fibrates and nicotinic acids. However, recent retrospective real-life clinical studies show that only 38% of patients receiving some form of lipid-lowering therapy achieved NCEP-defined LDL-C target levels, demonstrating the need for the use of more aggressive treatment. In hypertriglyceridemic patients, the newer statins, cerivastatin and atorvastatin, have shown comparable efficacy in reducing TG compared with the older statins. Achieving NCEP target lipid levels has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in dyslipidemic individuals, including high-risk patient groups such as those with additional risk factors, existing heart disease, diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome. Although the latest clinical studies investigating combination therapies, i.e. dual therapy with both a statin and a fibrate, have demonstrated them to be effective for overall control of lipid parameters and reducing coronary events, it is not yet clear whether this offers any significant advantage over monotherapy. Results from ongoing longer-term end-point clinical studies may provide further information in this area and consequent reviews of primary care management policies for dyslipidemia. Statin monotherapy may be a reliable option for primary care treatment of dyslipidemia (including hypertriglyceridemia).
 ...
PMID:Hypertriglyceridemia: a review of clinical relevance and treatment options: focus on cerivastatin. 1146 48

This report is based on the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults, which was recently issued by the National Institutes of Health of the United States of America. Also known as the Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III, this new report updates two earlier such reports on high cholesterol. While continuing to concentrate on treating patients with coronary heart disease, the new report advocates more intensive treatment in order to reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in specific groups of individuals, pays special attention to primary prevention among patients with multiple risk factors, and recognizes as a secondary prevention concern a cluster of heart disease risk factors known as "the metabolic syndrome." Other issues that the ATP III report covers include therapeutic lifestyle changes to reduce LDL, LDL-lowering drug therapy, and the management of specific dyslipidemias.
 ...
PMID:[Detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults]. 1147 23

For the care of an expanding segment of the US population with multiple coronary risk factors, combination lipid-altering therapy is emerging as a treatment imperative. The most recent National Cholesterol Education Program's consensus guidelines emphasize long-term global coronary heart disease (CHD) risk status, designate patients with CHD risk equivalents (eg, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, 20% or more 10-year absolute CHD risk) for aggressive lipid-altering therapy, and deem the metabolic syndrome (eg, obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension, elevated triglycerides, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, small dense low-density lipoprotein particles) as a secondary target for intervention. With the advancing age of the US population and the high prevalence of diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and CHD, increasing numbers of patients will require a more balanced metabolic attack attainable only through combination lipid-altering regimens. Many of these patients, as well as persons at heightened risk for cardiovascular disease because of a range of heritable conditions (eg, familial hypercholesterolemia, familial combined hyperlipidemia), will undoubtedly require binary or ternary regimens involving statins in concert with niacin, fibric-acid derivatives, or bile acid resins. Such approaches enable the clinician to exploit the complementary effects of these agents, allowing them to be administered at low, optimally tolerable doses that are consistent with superior efficacy and a lower risk of adverse events as compared with escalating doses of monotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Combination lipid-altering therapy: an emerging treatment paradigm for the 21st century. 1148 48

Type 2 diabetes is increasingly recognized as a major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). The recent Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program makes special mention of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome and proposes a secondary goal of therapy following achievement of the LDL goal, namely non-HDL cholesterol (the sum of VLDL and LDL cholesterol, i.e. total cholesterol-HDL cholesterol). In addition diabetes is recognized as a CHD risk equivalent. Much information is available from subgroup analysis of the major CHD secondary prevention trials of lipid-lowering with regard to the benefits for diabetic patients. However little information is available from clinical trials in primary prevention. Ongoing trials will help fill this gap. Recently the first report of a large lipid-lowering trial addressing coronary atherosclerosis in a specific diabetic population has been published-the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study (DAIS). In this study fenofibrate therapy was associated with reduced progression of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by quantitative coronary angiography.
 ...
PMID:Lipid-lowering trials in diabetes. 1180 61

The third set of guidelines recently issued by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) differs from the second set issued in 1993 in several ways. The third set introduced a quantitative risk scoring system and identified and/or reclassified certain groups of patients at high or moderate risk for a coronary event. Among these groups are patients with type 2 diabetes, and patients with multiple risk factors other than coronary heart disease or diabetes that cumulatively confer high risk for a coronary event. However, the new guidelines also present physicians with the major challenges of identifying these patients, determining their true risk, and implementing the recommended approaches to treatment in clinical practice settings. Although reducing elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol remains the primary focus of therapy, the new NCEP guidelines also include strategies to identify and treat patients with low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and/or elevated triglyceride levels. Just as there is "good" cholesterol (HDL) and "bad" cholesterol (LDL), there are also "good" triglycerides, which contain high concentrations of triglyceride remnants and are associated with low risk, and "bad" triglycerides, which contain high concentrations of cholesterol remnants and are associated with increased risk. The mechanisms by which "bad" triglycerides develop explain why elevated triglycerides and low HDL--and patients with the metabolic syndrome--warrant special attention. These mechanisms and others also suggest new targets for therapeutic intervention and the development of new drugs that will correct lipid and lipoprotein abnormalities through a number of different metabolic pathways.
 ...
PMID:Rising to the challenge of the new NCEP ATP III guidelines: exceeding current therapeutic limitations. 1185 98

Hypercholesterolemia is one of the major contributors to atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease in our society. The National Cholesterol Education Program of the National Institutes of Health has created a set of guidelines that standardize the clinical assessment and management of hypercholesterolemia for practicing physicians and other professionals in the medical community. In May 2001, the National Cholesterol Education Program released its third set of guidelines, reflecting changes in cholesterol management since their previous report in 1993. In addition to modifying current strategies of risk assessment, the new guidelines stress the importance of an aggressive therapeutic approach in the management of hypercholesterolemia. The major risk factors that modify low-density lipoprotein goals include age, smoking status, hypertension, high-density lipoprotein levels, and family history. The concept of "CHD equivalent" is introduced-conditions requiring the same vigilance used in patients with coronary heart disease. Patients with diabetes and those with a 10-year cardiac event risk of 20 percent or greater are considered CHD equivalents. Once low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is at an accepted level, physicians are advised to address the metabolic syndrome and hypertriglyceridemia.
 ...
PMID:Cholesterol treatment guidelines update. 1189 52

The guidelines of the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program are similar to prior recommendations in focusing on elevations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol as the primary target of therapy and in gauging the intensity of therapy to the degree of coronary heart disease risk. New elements in the current guidelines include: quantification of risk, heightened attention to the risk imparted by low high-density lipoprotein levels, utilization of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in risk assessment for hypertriglyceridemic individuals, and emphasis on the metabolic syndrome. Nonetheless, the current guidelines are not perfect. The recommended algorithm for treatment is excessively complex; this complexity may keep the guidelines from being widely used. This complexity is generated by a hybrid scheme of risk assessment utilizing both counting of categorical coronary heart disease risk factors and calculation of coronary heart disease using the Framingham model. This hybrid method also results in undesirable inconsistencies in treatment. ATP III explicitly agrees that the therapeutic LDL goal should be determined by the burden of non-LDL risk factors. However, the current guidelines violate this principle by giving the baseline LDL cholesterol level a role in determining the therapeutic LDL goal. Additionally, the ATP III guidelines lead to under-treatment of women. Simplification should be a goal of the next iteration of the guidelines. Specific suggestions are given for simplification of the guidelines and for enhanced treatment of women. Furthermore, it is urged that the risk-assessing spreadsheet be provided in an "unlocked" form so that its details can be inspected.
 ...
PMID:Perspectives: some thoughts on the Adult Treatment Panel III report. 1198 54

Reducing high levels of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is still the primary focus of the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines developed by the National Cholesterol Education Program. The LDL-C goal of less than 100 mg/dL for those with coronary heart disease (CHD) is now extended to patients with diabetes and those with a Framingham risk score of greater than 20% in 10 years, both of which are now considered "CHD risk equivalents." Consequently, many more people will be considered candidates for aggressive lipid-lowering therapy under the new ATP III guidelines. Other prominent features in the new guidelines include determining an individual's absolute risk category by using a nine-step process, instituting therapeutic lifestyle changes to reduce LDL-C levels, and strategies for treating patients with other forms of dyslipidemia such as metabolic syndrome.
 ...
PMID:Adult Treatment Panel III: do we really need another set of cholesterol guidelines? 1204 81

The third Adult Treatment Panel of the National Cholesterol Education Program has recently issued revised guidelines for the treatment of cholesterol in adults. Increased attention to the metabolic syndrome and diabetes, including the inaccuracy of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) measurement in these patients because of elevated triglycerides is highlighted. To overcome the inaccuracy of the Friedewald equation in calculating LDL-C when the triglycerides are elevated, measuring non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL-C) may provide a better means to follow these patients toward their treatment goals. Recently, non-HDL-C was shown to be a better predictor of cardiovascular death than LDL-C, even in patients with triglyceride levels below 200 mg/dL. The authors review the basis for using non-HDL-C as a treatment target for cholesterol, in comparison with other lipoproteins.
 ...
PMID:Perspectives: The significance of measuring non-HDL-cholesterol. 1209 59


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>