Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0948265 (metabolic syndrome)
 24,271 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The guidelines of the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program are similar to prior recommendations in focusing on elevations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol as the primary target of therapy and in gauging the intensity of therapy to the degree of coronary heart disease risk. New elements in the current guidelines include: quantification of risk, heightened attention to the risk imparted by low high-density lipoprotein levels, utilization of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in risk assessment for hypertriglyceridemic individuals, and emphasis on the metabolic syndrome. Nonetheless, the current guidelines are not perfect. The recommended algorithm for treatment is excessively complex; this complexity may keep the guidelines from being widely used. This complexity is generated by a hybrid scheme of risk assessment utilizing both counting of categorical coronary heart disease risk factors and calculation of coronary heart disease using the Framingham model. This hybrid method also results in undesirable inconsistencies in treatment. ATP III explicitly agrees that the therapeutic LDL goal should be determined by the burden of non-LDL risk factors. However, the current guidelines violate this principle by giving the baseline LDL cholesterol level a role in determining the therapeutic LDL goal. Additionally, the ATP III guidelines lead to under-treatment of women. Simplification should be a goal of the next iteration of the guidelines. Specific suggestions are given for simplification of the guidelines and for enhanced treatment of women. Furthermore, it is urged that the risk-assessing spreadsheet be provided in an "unlocked" form so that its details can be inspected.
 ...
PMID:Perspectives: some thoughts on the Adult Treatment Panel III report. 1198 54

Reducing high levels of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is still the primary focus of the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines developed by the National Cholesterol Education Program. The LDL-C goal of less than 100 mg/dL for those with coronary heart disease (CHD) is now extended to patients with diabetes and those with a Framingham risk score of greater than 20% in 10 years, both of which are now considered "CHD risk equivalents." Consequently, many more people will be considered candidates for aggressive lipid-lowering therapy under the new ATP III guidelines. Other prominent features in the new guidelines include determining an individual's absolute risk category by using a nine-step process, instituting therapeutic lifestyle changes to reduce LDL-C levels, and strategies for treating patients with other forms of dyslipidemia such as metabolic syndrome.
 ...
PMID:Adult Treatment Panel III: do we really need another set of cholesterol guidelines? 1204 81

Here we propose that glucose metabolism can be understood on the basis of three concept-derived axioms: (I) A hierarchy exists among the glucose-utilizing organs with the brain served first, followed by muscle and fat. (II) Tissue-specific glucose transporters allocate glucose among organs in order to maintain brain glucose concentrations. (III) Exogenous carbohydrate supply compensates for glucose alterations that can temporarily occur in muscle and fat. Derived from the control theory, the simplest solution of allocating supply to 2 organs, e.g. brain and muscle, is a "fishbone"-structured model. We reviewed the literature, searching for neuroendocrine and metabolic mechanisms that can fulfill control functions in such a model: The tissue-specific glucose transporters are differentially regulated. GLUT 1, carrying glucose across the blood-brain-barrier, is independent of insulin. Instead, this trans-endothelial glucose transporter is rather dependent on potent regulators of blood vessel function like vascular endothelial growth factor - a pituitary counterregulatory hormone. GLUT 4, carrying glucose across the membranes of muscle and fat cells, depends on insulin. Thereby, insulin allocates glucose to muscle and fat. The hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), and vascular endothelial growth factor allocate glucose to the brain. Multiple "sensors" (some of which have only recently been identified as ATP sensitive potassium channels) measure glucose or glucose equivalents at various sites of the body: the ventromedial hypothalamus, the lateral hypothalamus, portal vein, pancreatic beta cell, renal tubule, muscle and adipose tissue. Feedback pathways both from the brain and from muscle and fat are involved in regulating glucose allocation and exogenous glucose supply. The main feedback signal from the brain is found to be glucose, that from muscle and fat appears to be leptin. In fact, the literature search revealed two or more biological mechanisms for the function of each component in the model, finding glucose regulation highly redundant. This review focuses on "brain glucose" control. The concept of glucose allocation presented here challenges the common opinion of "blood glucose" being the main parameter controlled. According to the latter opinion, hyperglycemia in the metabolic syndrome is due to a putative defect located within the closed loop including the beta cell, muscle and fat cells. That traditional view leaves some peculiarities of e.g. the metabolic syndrome unexplained. The concept of glucose allocation, however, would predict that weight gain - with abundance of glucose in muscle and fat - increases feedback to the brain (via hyperleptinemia) which in turn results in HPA-axis and SNS overdrive, impaired insulin secretion, and insulin resistance. HPA-axis overdrive would account for metabolic abnormalities such as central adiposity, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, that are well known clinical aspects the metabolic syndrome. This novel viewpoint of "brain glucose" control may shed new light on the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.
 ...
PMID:The neuroendocrine control of glucose allocation. 1214 83

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common, costly, and undertreated disorder in the United States, and dyslipidemia is one of its most important modifiable risk factors. Recently, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) published updated guidelines for the treatment of lipid disorders, greatly expanding the number of patients eligible for therapy. In the new recommendations, several significant changes have been made in the identification and management of patients at risk for CHD. Although ATP III maintains that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol should be the primary target of lipid-lowering therapy, it identifies non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (total cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol) as a secondary target in patients with elevated triglycerides. Patients with > or = 2 CHD risk factors should now be assessed for 10-year absolute CHD risk based on the Framingham Point Scale to identify those who require more aggressive treatment. The guidelines also designate a new category, CHD risk equivalent, which recognizes that certain patients have the same high risk as those with established CHD. Diabetes is now identified as a CHD risk equivalent, as are other forms of atherosclerotic disease and multiple risk factors comprising a CHD 10-year risk of > 20%. New lipoprotein classifications are given, and increased emphasis is placed on the metabolic syndrome, a constellation of metabolic risk factors, as a marker for CHD risk. Since adherence poses a major challenge in the management of patients with or at risk for CHD, the new guidelines provide physicians with several strategies for increasing patient compliance. The new guidelines should help physicians better identify and manage patients at risk for CHD, help more patients reach their lipid goals, and thereby decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
 ...
PMID:New therapeutic options in the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. 1224 Jul 1

The Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III) has an extensive section on nonpharmacologic therapy for those with abnormal blood lipids. ATP III focused on the high-saturated fat atherogenic diet, obesity, and sedentary lifestyle and recommended a program of therapeutic lifestyle change (TLC). This review discusses several issues, including 1) why ATP III changed from the Step I and Step II diets to TLC; 2) the benefits of keeping trans fatty acid intake low and the addition of viscous fiber and plant stanol/sterol esters to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol beyond that seen with the Step II diet; 3) the de-emphasis on total fat and a sharper focus on the kinds of fat ingested in the new guidelines; 4) the endorsement of regular physical activity and weight loss as important first steps in reversing the unwanted metabolic effects of the metabolic syndrome; and 5) the emphasis of health-promoting aspects of the diet that include, among other things, fish and omega-3 fatty acids. At all stages of TLC, ATP III encourages the referral to registered dietitians or other qualified nutritionists for medical nutrition therapy. TLC and the ATP III guidelines should provide guidance to practitioners who wish to get low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to goal (whether or not drugs are used), prevent or treat the metabolic syndrome, and improve the overall health of the patient.
 ...
PMID:Therapeutic lifestyle change and Adult Treatment Panel III: evidence then and now. 1236 90

Patients with combined dyslipidemia are at high risk for coronary artery disease and often require combination drug therapy to achieve lipid levels recommended by the US National Cholesterol Education Program's third Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III). In addition to recommendations for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels, ATP III established non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol goals for individuals with triglycerides >or=2.26 mmol/L (>or=200 mg/dL). It also introduced certain criteria for the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome, a clustering of risk factors (abdominal obesity, elevated triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, elevated blood pressure, impaired fasting glucose) that increases cardiovascular risk and is common in patients with combined dyslipidemia. Statin monotherapy has been shown to benefit these patients, and additional benefit may be obtained by combination therapy that provides greater reductions in both LDL cholesterol and triglycerides as well as greater increases in HDL cholesterol. However, combining a statin with either niacin or a fibrate may increase the risk for myopathy and therefore requires careful monitoring and evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio for each patient. Moreover, combination therapy may be associated with increased drug costs and decreased patient compliance. Recently developed agents that may improve the effectiveness of combination therapy include ezetimibe-a cholesterol absorption inhibitor-and a formulation that combines extended-release niacin and lovastatin in a single pill. Clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal treatment in patients with combined dyslipidemia.
 ...
PMID:Combination therapy for combined dyslipidemia. 1246 37

Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of death in the United States with more than 40% of all deaths each year directly attributed to the disease. Current evidence suggests that early identification and aggressive modification of risk factors offer the most promising approach to reducing the burden of CHD. Dyslipidemia has been identified as the primary risk factor leading to the development of CHD. It is estimated that nearly 65 million Americans require some form of lipid-modification therapy. The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) set of guidelines released in May 2001 provides physicians with evidence-based recommendations on the classification, diagnosis, and treatment of lipid disorders. New features of the guidelines include a scoring system for calculating CHD risk, as well as the identification of CHD risk equivalents, lower treatment target goals, and an emphasis on conditions conferring a higher risk for CHD, such as the metabolic syndrome. The ATP III emphasis on risk assessment substantially increases the number of patients considered at risk for CHD and will expand the number eligible for lifestyle and drug interventions. This article highlights the new recommendations and reviews the impact of ATP III on osteopathic physicians.
 ...
PMID:The national cholesterol education program adult treatment panel ill guidelines. 1257 22

The constellation of risk factors known as the metabolic syndrome increases the risk of coronary artery disease at any low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level. We performed an exploratory analysis of data from 5 trials to study the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg on lipid levels and ratios in hypercholesterolemic patients (LDL cholesterol > or =160 mg/dL and <250 mg/dL) who met a modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) definition of the metabolic syndrome. Of 580 patients completing 12 weeks of treatment with rosuvastatin 10 mg, 194 (33%) met the definition of the metabolic syndrome by exhibiting > or =3 of the following: body mass index >30; triglycerides > or =150 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol <40 mg/dL in men and <50 mg/dL in women; blood pressure > or =130/> or =85 mm Hg or receiving current medication for hypertension; and fasting blood glucose > or =110 mg/dL. Patients with the metabolic syndrome had higher triglyceride, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and lipid ratios, and lower HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I levels, at baseline compared with patients without the metabolic syndrome. In patients with the metabolic syndrome, rosuvastatin 10 mg improved LDL cholesterol (-47%), non-HDL cholesterol (-43%), non-HDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio (-47%), apolipoprotein B (-37%), apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I ratio (-40%), triglycerides (-23%), apolipoprotein A-I (+7%), and HDL cholesterol (+10%)-in a manner similar to that in hypercholesterolemic patients who did not meet these criteria. Among patients who met the metabolic syndrome criteria and who had triglycerides > or =200 mg/dL, 64% met their ATP III non-HDL goals.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of rosuvastatin 10 mg in patients with the metabolic syndrome. 1264 42

The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines for lipid-lowering therapy to reduce coronary heart disease (CHD) risk contain a number of features that distinguish them from the previous ATP guidelines. These new features include modifications in lipid/lipoprotein levels considered optimal, abnormal, or reflective of risk; increased focus on primary prevention through use of Framingham risk scoring to define risk in persons with multiple lipid/nonlipid risk factors; and increased focus on the association of the metabolic syndrome with CHD risk. The introduction of the category of CHD risk equivalents-including persons with atherosclerotic disease, diabetes, or 10-year CHD risk > 20% based on Framingham scoring-results in an increase over previous guidelines in the proportion of patients categorized as being at high risk and therefore eligible for more intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapy. Use of the new secondary therapeutic target of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol should improve management of lipid risk factors in patients who have elevated triglyceride levels after LDL-C goals have been met. These new features of the NCEP ATP III guidelines should improve identification and treatment of patients with dyslipidemias associated with CHD risk.
 ...
PMID:New features of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III lipid-lowering guidelines. 1270 35

The metabolic syndrome is a highly prevalent clinical entity. The recent Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III) guidelines have called specific attention to the importance of targeting the cardiovascular risk factors of the metabolic syndrome as a method of risk reduction therapy. The main factors characteristic of this syndrome are abdominal obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia, elevated blood pressure, insulin resistance (with or without glucose intolerance), prothrombotic and proinflammatory states. An insulin resistance following nuclear peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPAR) deactivation (mainly obesity-related) is the key phase of metabolic syndrome initiation. Afterwards, there are 2 principal pathways of metabolic syndrome development: 1) with preserved pancreatic beta cells function and insulin hypersecretion which can compensate for insulin resistance. This pathway leads mainly to the macrovascular complications of metabolic syndrome; 2) with massive damage of pancreatic beta cells leading to progressively decrease of insulin secretion and to hyperglycemia (e.g. overt type 2 diabetes). This pathway leads to both microvascular and macrovascular complications. We suggest that a PPAR-based appraisal of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes may improve our understanding of these diseases and set a basis for a comprehensive approach in their treatment.
 ...
PMID:Metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus: focus on peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPAR). 1283 41


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>