Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0917801 (insomnia)
 10,606 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Insomnia may be categorized as difficulty falling asleep, frequent awakening, early awakenings or a combination of each. The ideal hypnotic must promote rapid sleep onset and maintain sleep throughout the night while allowing the patient to awake refreshed the following day. Several benzodiazepines, with differing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles are presently available. All are clinically effective and not only elimination half-life but also dosage prescribed and pattern of distribution are important factors for determining treatment response. Hypnotics have been divided into those with long elimination half-lives (e.g. nitrazepam, flunitrazepam, flurazepam), those with intermediately long half-lives (brotizolam, loprazolam, lormetazepam, temazepam) and those with short half-lives (midazolam and triazolam). Carry-over effects into the morning such as excessive daytime sleepiness or drowsiness are related to drug half-life, dosage and pattern of distribution. In equipotent dosages most controlled clinical trials have found no significant differences between the various benzodiazepine hypnotics. Nevertheless, clinicians in general tend to use long half-life benzodiazepines in patients who have difficulties maintaining sleep and short half-life benzodiazepines for treating sleep onset insomnia. Intermediately long half-life, benzodiazepines are used for both indications and most clinicians feel that the choice of hypnotic should not only be influenced by elimination half-life or the dosage used, but by individual patient preference. Hypnotics should be used for only short periods of time and in those patients for whom a more chronic use is indicated, they should be used only on an intermittent basis.
 ...
PMID:The clinical use of hypnotics: indications for use and the need for a variety of hypnotics. 288 20

To assess the long-term acceptability and efficacy of rilmenidine (S 3341), patients with placebo-resistant hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [BP] greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg and less than 115 mm Hg) were included in an open 1-year treatment study. Eight examinations allowed treatment adaptation if diastolic BP remained greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg (monotherapy with rilmenidine, 1 or 2 mg/day, followed by the addition of a diuretic, then tritherapy). Three hundred seventeen patients, aged 58.0 +/- 0.7 years, were included. Two hundred sixty-nine were followed for 1 year and 48 withdrew from the trial without any symptom suggesting a withdrawal syndrome: 4 because of adverse effects; 6, lack of efficacy despite triple therapy; 9, intercurrent diseases; 10, noncompliance independent of adverse effects; 18, personal reasons not associated with treatment; and 1, lost to follow-up. On the 12th month, the decrease in supine systolic and diastolic BP reached 25 and 17 mm Hg with monotherapy (n = 150), 26 and 17 mm Hg with double therapy (n = 90) and 20 and 15 mm Hg with triple therapy (n = 29). BP was normalized (diastolic BP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) on months 6 and 12 in 80 and 84% of the patients, respectively. Monotherapy was maintained in 66 and 60% of these patients, respectively, two-thirds being treated with 1 mg once daily. Adverse effects with monotherapy were mainly observed at the beginning of treatment in 3 to 8%: dry mouth, asthenia, gastralgia, palpitations, drowsiness, insomnia; other adverse effects were rare (1 to 2%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of rilmenidine for arterial hypertension. 289 68

Of most antihistamines more or less pronounced sedative effects are known. In recently developed substances this effect is said to be less or absent. After some days of application the sedative effect may decrease, but it can be enhanced by simultaneous intake of psychotropic drugs, sedatives or alcohol. There are important interindividual differences. The Drug Commission of the German Medical Profession (AKdA) received reports concerning tiredness, somnolence (even with new antihistamines), CNS-stimulation, nervousness, insomnia and paroniria have also been observed. Furthermore cases of dyskinesia have been reported, which are already described in the literature after long term intake, as well as anticholinergic reactions. Despite of their use as antiallergic drugs, reports on hypersensitivity reactions due to antihistamines, up to anaphylactic reaction have been not infrequently received by the AKdA. In rare cases disturbances of blood cell formation have been reported besides observations of gastrointestinal disorders, increase of appetite and weight. Abuse of antihistamine containing drugs was reported mainly for combinations with psychotropic agents.
 ...
PMID:[Adverse effects of antihistaminics]. 290 91

Fifty-two adult depressed outpatients fulfilling Research Diagnostic Criteria for Definite Major Depressive Disorder were enrolled in a double-blind study comparing the antidepressant effects of alprazolam versus desipramine. Twenty-nine patients completed the seven week (one week placebo followed by six weeks of active drug) study. The mean daily dose of alprazolam and desipramine at study termination was 3.34 mg and 192 mg respectively. Based on psychometric ratings of depression (Hamilton Scale) and severity of illness (Clinical Global Impressions) there was no significant difference between alprazolam and desipramine at the end of six weeks of active drug treatment. Both medications were well tolerated with drowsiness being the most common side effect of alprazolam, and insomnia, dry mouth, and constipation, the complaints most associated with desipramine.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of the efficacy and safety of alprazolam and desipramine in depressed outpatients. 305 90

Trazodone's unique chemical structure reflects its distinct pharmacologic profile. Its antidepressant efficacy is postulated to occur through serotonin reuptake inhibition. It has little effect on other neurotransmitter systems. In the United States it has been studied in several double-blind trials which compared it to standard antidepressants and placebo. Both in- and outpatients spanning a spectrum of age and diagnoses have been studied. Trazodone has been shown to be at least as effective as standard antidepressants. There are few anticholinergic or cardiovascular side effects. Adverse reactions include drowsiness, dizziness, headache, nausea and rarely, priapism. It is relatively safe in overdose. Trazodone deserves special consideration in the treatment of patients with depression accompanied by marked agitation, anxiety, and insomnia, as well as those unable to tolerate anticholinergic side effects.
 ...
PMID:Overview of USA controlled trials of trazodone in clinical depression. 313 15

American trypanosomiasis (Chagas' disease) is an endemic parasitic disease afflicting more than 20 million persons in Latin America. Two drugs are currently being used for treatment of the acute phase of Chagas' disease: 4-[(5-nitrofurfurylidene)amino-3-methylthiomorpholine-1,1-di oxide] (Nifurtimox; Nfx) and (N-benzl-2-nitro-1-imidazole acetamide) (Benznidazole; Bz). Nfx and Bz have serious undesirable effects, which have been reported during their clinical use, including anorexia and weight loss, nausea and vomiting, nervous excitation, insomnia, psyche depressions, convulsions, vertigo, headache, sleepiness, myalgias, arthralgias, loss of balance, disorientation, forgetfulness, paresthesias, adynamia, acoustic phenomena, peripheral neuropathies, gastralgia, mucosal edema, hepatic intolerance, skin manifestations, and intolerance to drinking alcohol. Effects in the central and peripheral nervous system of Nfx were also reproduced in animals. Signs of testicular and ovarian injury were reported for both Nfx and Bz, the effects of Bz being in general less intense than those of Nfx. Both drugs evidenced mutagenicity. In light of the present knowledge about the toxicity of Nfx and Bz, further studies on the mutagenic, teratogenic, carcinogenic, and reproductive effects of both drugs are recommended. Lack of information is particularly serious for Bz. Studies on Nfx and Bz biotransformation, activation to reactive metabolites, and potential mechanisms for their toxic effects were analyzed. Risk-benefit considerations of the use of Nfx and Bz were made and an analysis of the need for research on Chagas' disease chemotherapy was also performed.
 ...
PMID:Toxic effects of nifurtimox and benznidazole, two drugs used against American trypanosomiasis (Chagas' disease). 315 55

Brotizolam is a new thienotriazolodiazepine derivative with a pharmacological profile similar to that of benzodiazepines. It is indicated for use as an hypnotic in the management of insomnia, although it also has anticonvulsant, antianxiety and muscle relaxant properties in animals. In clinical trials brotizolam 0.125 to 0.5mg improved sleep in insomniacs similarly to nitrazepam 2.5 and 5mg, flunitrazepam 2mg and triazolam 0.25mg, whilst brotizolam 0.5mg was shown to be superior to flurazepam 30mg in some studies. Brotizolam is an effective hypnotic for hospital patients awaiting surgery, in whom it also reduces anxiety. Brotizolam has an elimination half-life of about 5 hours, which is 'intermediate' compared with the shorter-acting hypnotic, triazolam, and longer-acting benzodiazepines. Consequently, it is able to induce sleep without producing early morning rebound insomnia, and can also maintain sleep throughout the night. Brotizolam at dosages below 0.5mg at night usually produced minimal morning drowsiness; no residual impairment of psychomotor performance occurs following dosages within the recommended range of 0.125 to 0.25 mg/kg. No serious side effects have been reported to date and the most frequently observed adverse experiences are drowsiness, headache and dizziness. Mild rebound insomnia may occur in some patients when treatment is stopped. Thus, brotizolam is a useful hypnotic which can be used in patients who have difficulty in falling asleep and also in patients who are troubled by night-time awakenings. Used in the recommended dosage it may be particularly useful for patients in whom daytime impairment of performance is unacceptable.
 ...
PMID:Brotizolam. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy as an hypnotic. 328 19

In a double-blind trial, comprising 96 depressed patients, citalopram was compared with maprotiline. The trial period was 6 weeks with ratings (MADRS, CGI) and side effects recordings taking place at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6. Both drugs were administered as a single evening dose, 40 or 60 mg for citalopram, and 75 or 150 mg for maprotiline. MADRS total scores and CGI scores showed a highly significant reduction in both groups with no significant difference between them, whether the groups were considered as a whole or whether they were subdivided into endogenously/non-endogenously depressed or melancholic/non-melancholic patients. Side effects were not significantly different, but the maprotiline group showed more anticholinergic side effects, whereas the citalopram group showed more nausea, increased sweating and headache. Two patients on maprotiline were withdrawn because of side effects (hypotension and somnolence in the one case; tremor and insomnia in the other). One patient in each group was withdrawn because of increased transaminases, the citalopram-treated patient having increased values, however, already at baseline. Apart from this, no cardiovascular side effects and no pathological laboratory values related to treatment were observed. The authors conclude that citalopram is a safe antidepressant drug and as effective as maprotiline.
 ...
PMID:Citalopram versus maprotiline: a controlled, clinical multicentre trial in depressed patients. 332 48

The efficacy and tolerance of zopiclone were compared with nitrazepam and placebo in a multicenter double-blind parallel-group study in insomniac patients. Following a 7-day placebo washout period, 99 patients (age range 20 to 69 years) received oral capsules of 7.5 mg zopiclone or 5 mg nitrazepam or placebo for 2 weeks. During the fourth week all patients received placebo treatment. Sleep assessments by the patients showed that, compared with placebo, zopiclone and nitrazepam improved all sleep measures of efficacy from the first night and that effectiveness was maintained throughout treatment. The physicians global assessment of efficacy also favored zopiclone and nitrazepam over placebo treatment. Subjective morning drowsiness during treatment was significantly less for zopiclone than for either nitrazepam or placebo and represents a clear advantage for ambulatory patients. No rebound insomnia was evident during a 7 day post-treatment withdrawal period for either zopiclone or nitrazepam. Tolerance was good for all treatments.
 ...
PMID:Zopiclone and nitrazepam: a multicenter placebo controlled comparative study of efficacy and tolerance in insomniac patients in general practice. 332 16

Although the initial sleep disorders classifications provided a framework for categorizing diagnoses, these early instruments had a number of limitations. Among their shortcomings were a lack of specific diagnostic criteria, limited clinical validation, and an overreliance on sleep laboratory findings. As a result, many of the diagnoses were not only poorly substantiated, but they lacked clinical relevance. Also, because of a fusing of diagnoses, a causal relationship was implied that may have been nonexistent and could misdirect the treatment focus. The ICD-10 represents a clinically based diagnostic classification. Furthermore, this classification system includes diagnostic criteria and encourages multiple diagnoses for a more complete description of the patient's clinical presentation. In addition, the ICD-10 allows for differentiation of psychogenic, developmental, and organic factors. Finally, it can be fully applied in the office setting, which allows physicians to maximize their interviewing and assessment skills to complete the diagnoses and subsequent treatment plans. Thus, this classification system strongly reinforces the doctor-patient relationship. It also facilitates consideration of the entire scope of the patient's problems in a truly biopsychosocial perspective. The prevalence of insomnia ranges across studies from 20 to 30% of the adult population. Before adulthood, its prevalence is below 2%. About 5% of adults complain of excessive daytime sleepiness. Among the conditions of excessive daytime sleepiness, narcolepsy has a prevalence of 0.1% and sleep apnea not more than 1% in the general adult population. Nightmares have a prevalence of about 5% in adulthood and 20% in childhood. Sleepwalking and night terrors have a prevalence of less than 1% in adulthood and 15 and 5%, respectively, in childhood.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Nosology and prevalence of sleep disorders. 333 58


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>