Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0917801 (insomnia)
10,606 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The pharmacological treatment of obesity should be considered when cannot be achieved a 10% weight loss with diet therapy and physical activity. The drugs effective in obesity treatment may act by different mechanisms such as reduction in food intake, inhibition of fat absorption, increase of thermogenesis and stimulation of adipocyte apoptosis. At present, we only have two marketed drugs for obesity treatment. Sibutramine is an inhibitor of norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonina reuptake which inhibits food intake and increases thermogenesis. Sibutramine administration for a year can induce a weight loss of 4-7%. Its main side effects are hypertension, headache, insomnia and constipation. Orlistat is an inhibitor of pancreatic lipase which is able to block the absorption of 30% of ingested fat. Its administration induces weight loss and reduction of ulterior weight regain. Also, this drug improves hypertension dyslipdaemia and helps to prevent diabetes in 52% of cases when administered over four years. The increase in frequency of stools and interference with vitamin absorption are its main side effects. Glucagon-like peptide 1, which increases insulin sensitivity and satiety, adiponectin and PPAR-gamma agonists which reduce insulin resistance and modulates adipocyte generation are the basis for future therapeutic approaches of obesity. Phosphatase inhibitors induce PPAR-gamma phosphorylation and UCP-1 expression leading to an increase in thermogenesis and reduction in appetite.
...
PMID:[Pharmacological treatment of obesity]. 1538 15

In Japan, palliative care team (PCT) services have been covered by National Health Insurance since 2002. The primary aims of this study were to compare the characteristics of patients who received PCT services with those admitted to palliative care units (PCU), and to clarify the medical treatments and symptom improvement during the first week after consultation with the PCT. This was a prospective audit study of 111 consecutive cancer patients referred to the PCT in Seirei Mikatabara Hospital and a comparison group of 100 consecutive patients admitted to PCU. As a part of daily practice, we prospectively recorded patient symptoms on a structured data collection sheet at the initial assessment and one week later. Symptom severity was measured by the Japanese version of the Schedule for Team Assessment Scale. After PCT consultation, 25% were discharged to home, 43% died in hospital, 40% died after admission to PCU, and 14% were alive at the end of the study period. Compared with PCU patients, PCT patients were significantly younger, had better performance status, were more likely to be referred with the described aim of symptom palliation, and suffered from more serious pain, appetite loss, somnolence, insomnia, anxiety, and delirium. There were significant improvements in symptom scores of pain, nausea, vomiting, constipation, abdominal swelling, dyspnea, sputum, insomnia, and anxiety during the first week in the PCT group. However, no significant improvements were observed in symptom scores of fatigue, dry mouth, somnolence, and delirium. A median of 3 interventions was performed for each patient, and the most common interventions were administration of NSAIDs, opioids, centrally-acting antiemetics, and steroids. These data indicate that a PCT was successfully implemented in Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, and may contribute to symptom improvement in cancer patients.
...
PMID:Palliative care team: the first year audit in Japan. 1590 48

This study compared the stabilized duloxetine dose through approximately 12 weeks of treatment in patients initiating duloxetine therapy with that in patients switching to duloxetine from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or venlafaxine. All patients met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for major depressive disorder. Patients (n = 112) exhibiting suboptimal response or poor tolerability to their current antidepressant medication (citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine) were switched to duloxetine 60 mg once daily (QD) without intermediate tapering or titration ("switching" group). A comparator group (n = 137), comprising patients not currently receiving antidepressant medication, was randomized to receive duloxetine 30 or 60 mg QD ("initiating" group). At the end of week 1, patients receiving 30 mg QD had their dose increased to 60 mg QD. During the remainder of the study, each patient's duloxetine dose could be titrated on the basis of degree of response within a range from 60 to 120 mg QD, with 90 mg QD as an intermediate dose. At the study end point, approximately one third of the patients in each treatment group were stabilized at each of the 3 studied duloxetine doses (60, 90, and 120 mg QD), and the distribution of stabilized doses among patients initiating duloxetine therapy did not differ significantly from that observed in patients switching to duloxetine. The efficacy of duloxetine in patients switching from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/venlafaxine did not differ significantly from that observed in untreated patients initiating duloxetine therapy (baseline-to-end point mean changes: 17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score, -13.1 vs. -13.5; Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, -10.6 vs. -10.3; and Clinical Global Impression of Severity, -2.22 vs. -2.38, respectively). The rate of discontinuation caused by adverse events among patients switched to duloxetine was significantly lower than that in patients initiating duloxetine therapy (6.3% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.018). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in more than 10% of patients in both treatment groups were nausea, headache, dry mouth, insomnia, diarrhea, and constipation. In the first week of therapy, patients switched to duloxetine reported significantly lower rates of headache and fatigue compared with patients initiating duloxetine. Thus, the efficacy of duloxetine in switched patients was comparable to that observed in patients initiating duloxetine therapy. Immediate switching from a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or venlafaxine to duloxetine (60 mg QD) was well tolerated.
...
PMID:An open-label study of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: comparison of switching versus initiating treatment approaches. 1628 37

Sitaxsentan is an orally active, selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist that may benefit patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by blocking the vasoconstrictive effects of endothelin-A receptors, while maintaining the vasodilator and endothelin-1 clearance functions of the endothelin-B receptors. In its first randomized, placebo-controlled study, sitaxsentan improved exercise capacity assessed by the 6-min walk test, New York Heart Association functional class, cardiac index and pulmonary vascular resistance in New York Heart Association Class II, III and IV patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary arterial hypertension related to connective tissue disease or congenital heart disease. Although doses of 100 and 300 mg once daily demonstrated equivalent efficacy, the lower dose had a better safety profile. Additional studies are ongoing to assess the relative safety and efficacy of 50 and 100 mg once-daily dosing. The most common side effects include rhinitis, headache, peripheral edema, chest pain, nausea, constipation, increased prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (in patients on warfarin), flushing and insomnia. As with other endothelin receptor antagonists, increases in hepatic transaminases have been observed with sitaxsentan. Initial studies using the selective oral endothelin-A receptor antagonist sitaxsentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients have revealed a favorable risk-benefit therapeutic profile with the 100 mg once-daily dose.
...
PMID:Sitaxsentan: a novel endothelin-A receptor antagonist for pulmonary arterial hypertension. 1629 89

LIN Xue-Jian adopts Chinese traditional acupuncture and moxibustion manipulation methods to stimulate the special area of scalp to treat a part of brain-derived diseases, such as infantile cerebral palsy, nerve deafness, cerebellar ataxia, lacunar cerebral infarction, senile dementia, Parkinson's disease, anxiety, insomnia and central constipation, and so on. Scalp acupuncture can improve ability of blood and oxygen supply for general blood vessels; stimulation of corresponding acupoint area according to symptoms and signs can control condition of disease; and can repair, activate and regenerate the injured, dormancy and aging neurons, so as to dredge nerve network in the brain, hence better therapeutic effect.
...
PMID:[Lin Xue-Jian's experience on treatment of a part of cerebral diseases with scalp acupuncture]. 1631 37

This randomized controlled trial investigated the effect of reporting physical symptoms by using a systematic symptom monitoring instrument, the Symptom Monitor, on symptom prevalence and severity among patients with cancer in the palliative phase. The overall objective was to achieve symptom relief through systematic and regular symptom reporting by patients themselves. One hundred forty-six patients with cancer in the palliative phase were randomized to either the intervention group (n = 69 with Symptom Monitor) or the control group (n = 77 without Symptom Monitor). Ten physical symptoms with regard to prevalence and severity were monitored. After 2 months, the prevalence of symptoms was lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (prevalent differences 2.1-24.3%) for 9 out of 10 symptoms (except coughing). The intervention group scored a statistically significantly lower prevalence in constipation and vomiting (prevalence differences 24.3% and 18.0%, respectively). In four symptoms (fatigue, lack of appetite, shortness of breath, and nausea), the intervention group had a lower, although not statistically significant, severity score (median differences 0.5-1). In four symptoms (pain, coughing, sleeplessness, and diarrhea), the severity score was the same in both groups (medians 2-4). In two symptoms (constipation and vomiting), the severity score was lower in the control group (median differences -1 and -2). A comparison between the study groups on improved, deteriorated, or steady-state cases showed that the severity score had deteriorated less for 8 out of 10 symptoms in a larger proportion of patients in the intervention group. Although statistical significance was not reached, the prevalence as well as severity of symptoms in the palliative phase of cancer can be influenced by using the Symptom Monitor.
...
PMID:Using the symptom monitor in a randomized controlled trial: the effect on symptom prevalence and severity. 1644 79

This study involved longitudinal evaluations of symptom severity and describes the symptom patterns of 77 terminal cancer patients (median age: 62 years; 61% female), selected from 537 consecutive patients admitted to the Palliative Care Unit of the National Taiwan University Hospital. The most common primary cancer sites in these patients were lung (23.4%), liver (15.6%), and stomach (13%). Nineteen physical and psychological symptoms were assessed using different scales. The median number of symptoms was 11 (range: 1-18) on admission, among which weakness, fatigue, anorexia, pain, and depression were the most common. A comparison of the initial symptom severity scores with those at one week after admission and two days before death suggested six symptom change patterns: A: continuous static (restless/heat, abdominal fullness, constipation, dizziness, and insomnia); B: static-increase (fatigue, weakness, nausea/vomiting, taste alteration, dysphagia, diarrhea, dry mouth, and night sweats); C: decrease-static (pain and depression); D: decrease-increase (anorexia and dyspnea); E: static-decrease (aggression); and F: gradually decrease (anxiety). These six symptom patterns can be divided into two categories on the basis of the relative severity of symptoms between one week after admission and two days before death. The first category included patterns A, C, E and F, and the symptoms improved with palliative care. However, the symptoms in the second category (patterns B and D), which were associated with the anorexia-cachexia syndrome and dyspnea, did not show improvement. As symptom management is an essential component of palliative care, holistic care, which encompasses physical, psychosocial and spiritual aspects, represents a rational approach for the relief of these incurable symptoms at the end stage of life for these patients.
...
PMID:Symptom patterns of advanced cancer patients in a palliative care unit. 1706 Feb 55

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three daily dosages of the triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor NS 2330 (tesofensine) compared to placebo as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease (PD). In MPTP (1-methyl 4-phenyl-tetrahydropyridine 1,2,3,6)-lesioned marmosets, dopamine reuptake inhibitors have been demonstrated to reverse parkinsonian signs without evoking established dyskinesia. NS 2330 inhibits reuptake of dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. We performed a proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind trial of NS 2330. Two hundred sixty-one subjects with PD < 5 years and not receiving dopaminergic treatment were randomly assigned to daily treatment with NS 2330 at 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, or placebo. Adjusted mean difference in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores from baseline to week 14 was -0.7 (P = 0.64) in the 0.25-mg group, -1.3 (P = 0.41) in the 0.5-mg group, and -1.7 (P = 0.27) in the 1.0-mg group. The adjusted mean difference in total UPDRS score for the highest dose group (1.0 mg/day) was superior to placebo at week 6 (-3.1; P = 0.02), but this effect was not sustained. NS 2330 was generally well tolerated and the most commonly reported adverse events were constipation, insomnia, and dry mouth. Decreased body weight and elevated heart rate were common in the 1.0-mg dosage group. At the dosages tested, NS 2330 did not provide significantly greater benefit than placebo. It is possible that inhibition of dopamine reuptake alone does not provide clinical benefit in early PD, adequate inhibition of dopamine reuptake was not achieved in this study, or countervailing physiologic mechanisms offset the potential benefit.
...
PMID:Randomized trial of the triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor NS 2330 (tesofensine) in early Parkinson's disease. 1714 25

(1) Drugs play a limited role in smoking cessation. Nicotine is the drug with the best risk-benefit balance and is available in several formulations and dose strengths. However, only about 16% of patients remain abstinent after one year, compared to about 10% of patients on placebo. Bupropion, an amphetamine derivative, is best avoided. (2) Varenicline, a partial acetylcholine receptor agonist, has been approved as an aid in smoking cessation. There are no published trials of varenicline versus nicotine. (3) Four placebo-controlled trials show that after 12 weeks of treatment with varenicline about 22% of patients remain abstinent at one year, compared to 8% on placebo. In the two trials also including a group treated with bupropion, the one-year abstinence rate was significantly higher with varenicline than bupropion in one trial and also in a combined analysis of the two trials. (4) The known adverse effects of varenicline seem to be limited in scope. In the short term they mainly consist of gastrointestinal problems (especially nausea and constipation) and neuropsychological disorders (insomnia, dream disturbances, and headache). Long-term cardiac toxicity cannot currently be ruled out. Simultaneous use of nicotine and varenicline aggravates the adverse effects of nicotine. (5) In practice, varenicline does not appear to have a better risk-benefit balance than nicotine. Nicotine therefore remains the first-choice drug when a patient needs pharmacological support to stop smoking.
...
PMID:Varenicline: new drug. Smoking cessation: no better than nicotine. 1716 37

Asian irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) studies not only confirm the truth of this functional disorder but also describe the current disease situation of this continent, with its variable socioeconomic backgrounds. Most Asian community IBS prevalence is within 5-10%, regardless of gender or ethnic character. As well as meeting the main Rome II criteria, Asian IBS subjects also have many minor symptoms. Thus this recommendation remains useful to diagnose Asian IBS. Also, female patients commonly express constipation-predominant (C-) symptoms. Extra-colonic symptoms are common in Asia, for example dyspepsia, insomnia and irritable urinary bladder. Asian IBS subjects do experience psychological disturbances including anxiety, depression, agoraphobia and neuroticism. Accordingly, their quality of life is poor and there is absenteeism leading to excessive physician visits. Abnormal gut motor and sensory functions have been indicated among the Asian IBS subjects. Now, there is evidence of altered colonic neuroimmune function leading to gut hypersensitivity and dysmotility. An Asia-Pacific trial also confirmed tegaserod efficacy on female C-IBS subjects. More than 90% of nurses have very limited IBS knowledge, and are unable even to explain it clearly. In conclusion, Western recommended criteria clearly diagnose Asian IBS and many factors are mutual leading to IBS. Current IBS treatments remain useful but additional reeducation for medical professionals appears to be needed.
...
PMID:Irritable bowel syndrome in the 21st century: perspectives from Asia or South-east Asia. 1720 73


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>