Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0917801 (insomnia)
 10,606 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a double-blind, multicenter study, we compared the effects of SCH 434 (Claritin-D; Schering Corp., Kenilworth, N.J.), a new sustained-release, combination antihistamine/decongestant medication, with the effects of its individual components and placebo in 435 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. SCH 434 contains 5 mg of loratadine, a nonsedating antihistamine, and 120 mg of pseudoephedrine as the decongestant component. Administered twice daily in this study, SCH 434 effected a 50% decrease in total symptom scores at day 4 and was significantly (p less than or equal to 0.03) more effective than the components alone or the placebo. Loratadine or pseudoephedrine alone, with 43% and 33% decline in symptom scores, respectively, also was more effective than placebo (p less than 0.05). As expected, pseudoephedrine alone was more effective than loratadine (p less than 0.01) in relieving nasal stuffiness; SCH 434 was more effective (p less than or equal to 0.01) than placebo and loratadine in relieving nasal stuffiness. All treatments were safe and well tolerated, although insomnia and dry mouth were noted in a significant number of patients who received either SCH 434 or pseudoephedrine. No serious side effects were noted. The incidence of sedation did not differ significantly among the four treatment groups. We conclude that SCH 434 is a safe and effective treatment for symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The combination drug (SCH 434) was better than its components for some, but not all, symptoms.
 ...
PMID:SCH 434: a new antihistamine/decongestant for seasonal allergic rhinitis. 247 18

Two hundred sixty-four patients with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis were treated with loratadine 5 mg plus pseudoephedrine 120 mg twice a day or placebo in a 28-day multicenter study. Four nasal and four non-nasal symptoms were evaluated for efficacy. At the last evaluable visit, the active treatment group had significantly lower (P = .05) mean combined nasal and non-nasal symptom scores than the placebo group. Also, the physician's rating of overall therapeutic response was significantly better in the active-treatment group (P = .03). Dry mouth, insomnia, and nervousness were reported by a significantly greater proportion (P less than or equal to .04) in the active-treatment group. Sedation occurred in 7% of patients in each treatment group and 6% of patients in each group discontinued the study because of adverse experiences. Loratadine plus pseudoephedrine was safe and significantly more effective than placebo in relieving the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.
 ...
PMID:Loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination versus placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. 252 98

A multicentered trial compared the effects of the non-sedating antihistamine, loratadine, 5 mg plus pseudoephedrine 120 mg with a placebo on the signs and symptoms of the common cold. One hundred forty-two (142) subjects were treated with the loratadine/pseudoephedrine combination and 141 subjects were treated with placebo twice daily for five days. Evaluations by both subjects and physicians suggest that this antihistamine/decongestant combination is superior to placebo in relieving symptoms of the common cold. Specific differences were found in symptoms including nasal congestion, sneezing, postnasal drainage, and nasal discharge. Differences between groups for the following side effects were found: dry mouth (9% for the combination vs 2% for placebo), insomnia (6% vs 3%), and nervousness (4% vs 2%). There were no differences between groups for the frequency of drowsiness.
 ...
PMID:The effectiveness of the nonsedating antihistamine loratadine plus pseudoephedrine in the symptomatic management of the common cold. 252 99

Acceptability and plasma concentrations of rilmenidine, a new antihypertensive agent mainly eliminated via the kidney, were evaluated in 17 hypertensive patients (supine diastolic blood pressure, 104 +/- 3 mmHg) with renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance, 35 +/- 4 ml.minute-1/1.73 m2; range, 12 to 58). Patients were treated for six months with rilmenidine at the dose of 1 mg in the morning or 1 mg twice daily as single-drug therapy in untreated patients, or in combination or as substitution in patients already treated. Plasma concentrations of rilmenidine were measured by gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry at Days 0, 1, 5, 7, 9, and 11, and Months 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 before administration. Supine and erect blood pressure (sphygmomanometer) measurements and side effects were noted at the same times. Laboratory and electrocardiographic parameters were evaluated at Days 0 and 11, and Months 1.5 and 6. Blood pressure was effectively controlled during the trial in 12 patients (mean decrease in systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 12/8 mmHg). Five patients were removed from the trial after Month 1.5 because of a rise in blood pressure (three cases) or noncompliance (two cases). Side effects were moderate and transient (dry mouth, constipation, daytime drowsiness, mood disturbances, insomnia) never requiring treatment withdrawal. Surveillance of renal function revealed no significant mean variation. Rilmenidine plasma concentrations reached steady state the fifth day at the latest and were related to the degree of renal insufficiency. When renal function was stable (13 cases), plasma concentrations did not vary until the end of the trial. When renal function was progressive (four cases), plasma concentrations increased in parallel in two patients, without the onset of side effects, and remained stable in the other two patients. In conclusion, this study confirmed the good acceptability of rilmenidine in hypertensive patients with chronic renal insufficiency. It showed stable plasma concentrations of rilmenidine during a six-month treatment in hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency, reflecting the absence of accumulation of the drug.
 ...
PMID:Acceptability of rilmenidine and long-term surveillance of plasma concentrations in hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency. 278 26

Zotepine and thiothixene were compared for clinical efficacy and safety in a double-blind trial. Using overall improvement ratings and Gorham's BPRS, zotepine rated higher improvement in motor retardation, suspiciousness, mannerisms and posturing symptoms, suggesting that it has both activating and antipsychotic activities. Thiothixene produced higher improvement ratings in symptoms such as hallucinatory behavior, somatic concerns, anxiety, guilt feelings, tension, depressive mood and uncooperativeness. As for side effects, there was a significantly lower frequency of dry mouth and insomnia with zotepine when compared with thiothixene. The lower incidence of insomnia is interesting in view of zotepine's clinical activating effects. There were no abnormal laboratory findings.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of efficacy of zotepine and thiothixene in schizophrenia in a double-blind study. 288 80

To assess the long-term acceptability and efficacy of rilmenidine (S 3341), patients with placebo-resistant hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [BP] greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg and less than 115 mm Hg) were included in an open 1-year treatment study. Eight examinations allowed treatment adaptation if diastolic BP remained greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg (monotherapy with rilmenidine, 1 or 2 mg/day, followed by the addition of a diuretic, then tritherapy). Three hundred seventeen patients, aged 58.0 +/- 0.7 years, were included. Two hundred sixty-nine were followed for 1 year and 48 withdrew from the trial without any symptom suggesting a withdrawal syndrome: 4 because of adverse effects; 6, lack of efficacy despite triple therapy; 9, intercurrent diseases; 10, noncompliance independent of adverse effects; 18, personal reasons not associated with treatment; and 1, lost to follow-up. On the 12th month, the decrease in supine systolic and diastolic BP reached 25 and 17 mm Hg with monotherapy (n = 150), 26 and 17 mm Hg with double therapy (n = 90) and 20 and 15 mm Hg with triple therapy (n = 29). BP was normalized (diastolic BP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) on months 6 and 12 in 80 and 84% of the patients, respectively. Monotherapy was maintained in 66 and 60% of these patients, respectively, two-thirds being treated with 1 mg once daily. Adverse effects with monotherapy were mainly observed at the beginning of treatment in 3 to 8%: dry mouth, asthenia, gastralgia, palpitations, drowsiness, insomnia; other adverse effects were rare (1 to 2%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of rilmenidine for arterial hypertension. 289 68

Fifty-two adult depressed outpatients fulfilling Research Diagnostic Criteria for Definite Major Depressive Disorder were enrolled in a double-blind study comparing the antidepressant effects of alprazolam versus desipramine. Twenty-nine patients completed the seven week (one week placebo followed by six weeks of active drug) study. The mean daily dose of alprazolam and desipramine at study termination was 3.34 mg and 192 mg respectively. Based on psychometric ratings of depression (Hamilton Scale) and severity of illness (Clinical Global Impressions) there was no significant difference between alprazolam and desipramine at the end of six weeks of active drug treatment. Both medications were well tolerated with drowsiness being the most common side effect of alprazolam, and insomnia, dry mouth, and constipation, the complaints most associated with desipramine.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of the efficacy and safety of alprazolam and desipramine in depressed outpatients. 305 90

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study the authors found that fluoxetine, a potent and selective inhibitor of serotonin reuptake, was an effective antidepressant in moderately depressed, ambulatory outpatients. Typical adverse effects reported by patients treated with fluoxetine included agitation, nausea, fatigue, and insomnia. Compared to imipramine, fluoxetine was associated with fewer complaints of dry mouth, constipation, and dizziness.
 ...
PMID:Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin uptake inhibitor, for the treatment of outpatients with major depression. 328 84

One hundred consecutive patients, 74 women and 26 men, aged between 18 and 83 years (mean = 54.8 years), referred with complaints related to oral galvanism were investigated and treated and the treatment results were evaluated after 2-3 years. Forty of the patients reported facial pain, pain from the teeth, temporomandibular joints (TMJ) and masticatory muscles and TMJ clicking and locking and 26 reported headache. Smarting in the oral mucosa, smarting of the tongue and xerostomia were reported by 26, 21 and 24 patients, respectively, and 30 patients reported an unpleasant taste, a metallic taste or a battery taste. The same patient often reported several symptoms. The patients also reported various general symptoms, above all joint symptoms, pain in the back, neck and shoulders and general muscular pain but also tiredness, weakness, difficulty in concentrating, depression and insomnia. After clinical and radiological examination, salivary tests, determination of the maximum galvanic current at metallic contacts and screening for contact allergy to dental materials, various oral diagnoses could be established. Most of the patients exhibited functional disturbances of the masticatory system, periodontitis, smarting of the oral mucosa, xerostomia, pulpitis and pulpal necrosis and mucosal lesions. The medical illnesses the patients reported themselves to be suffering from or had been treated for included cardiovascular disorders, high and low blood pressure, asthma, rheumatic disorders, diabetes, pernicious anaemia, gastritis and peptic ulcer. Seventy-six patients took drugs regularly. In most cases there were several oral, dental and medical explanations for the symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Results obtained from patients referred for the investigation of complaints related to oral galvanism. 345 16

The therapeutic effects of 1 g/day cimetidine in short-term courses of 21 days have been tested by a double blind study in 20 patients, of which 17 with duodenal ulcer and 3 with both gastric and duodenal ulcerations, in comparison with a similar group of patients who received placebo. The symptomatology was characteristic in all the cases, X-ray presence of ulcer in 17 patients and indirect signs in 3, endoscopic examination positive. The total volume of ClH nocturnal secretion, as well as the basal and maximal hydrochloric secretions decreased, but the differences with respect to the initial values were not statistically significant; the inhibition of gastric acid secretion by cimetidine amounted to 40%; ulcer healing was noted in 3 out of 17 cases. The adverse effects were rare: sleeplessness in 6 cases, asthenia in 4, dry mouth in 3. The differences between the results of cimetidine administration and those in the placebo group had no statistical significance. It is concluded that a short-term course of 21 days is not sufficient to obtain healing of the gastric or duodenal ulcerations.
 ...
PMID:The value of cimetidine in the treatment of gastroduodenal ulcer. 388 43


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>