Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0917801 (insomnia)
 10,606 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A double-blind, randomized study of parallel group design comparing remoxipride and thioridazine (dose range 150-600 mg/day of either drug) was undertaken at 11 Australian centres. A total of 144 patients (remoxipride = 73, thioridazine = 71) with DSM-III-R schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder commenced the study, and 89 patients (remoxipride = 45, thioridazine = 44) completed the 6 weeks of the trial. The mean daily doses at last rating were 404 mg (remoxipride) and 378 mg (thioridazine). Initial Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores decreased by a mean 8.7 points in both remoxipride and thioridazine groups. Equivalent treatment responses were also confirmed by Clinical Global Impression. During the study, sedatives or hypnotics were needed by 68% of the remoxipride patients and 51% of the thioridazine patients. Thioridazine was associated with more postural hypotension, drowsiness, increased sleep, headache, dizziness on rising, dry mouth, sexual dysfunction and weight gain, while remoxipride patients reported more insomnia. There were no differences between remoxipride and thioridazine on dystonia, hypokinesia, dyskinesia, rigidity and akathisia. The results indicate that remoxipride has similar antipsychotic efficacy to thioridazine but causes fewer side effects.
 ...
PMID:The Australian multicentre double-blind comparative study of remoxipride and thioridazine in schizophrenia. 787 41

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) offer a relatively new alternative to traditional tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in the treatment of depression in older adults. The two drug classes are equally effective, but SSRIs tend to cause fewer sedating, anticholinergic, or hypotensive effects and are unlikely to affect cardiac conduction. SSRIs also have a wider therapeutic window and are safer in cases of overdose. Potential side effects include GI distress, worsening of headaches, insomnia, and sexual dysfunction. Drawbacks of using SSRIs are their potential for drug interactions and relatively high cost.
 ...
PMID:Use of serotonergic drugs for treating depression in older patients. 830 83

The clinical trial development programme of mirtazapine (Org 3770), performed in Europe and the United States, demonstrated an outstanding safety profile of this compound. The evaluation of the safety was based on data from all patients who took at least one dose of study medication during studies comparing mirtazapine with placebo, amitriptyline or other active comparators. A general indication of mirtazapine's safety is the significantly lower percentage of patients (65%) who complained of any adverse clinical experiences compared with the placebo- (76%) or amitriptyline-treated group (87%). Moreover, drop-out rates due to adverse clinical experiences were significantly lower than in the amitriptyline-treatment group. Mirtazapine has virtually no anticholinergic, adrenergic or typical selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) side effects. The only significantly higher incidences versus placebo were seen in the adverse clinical effects of drowsiness (23% versus 14%), excessive sedation (19% versus 5%), dry mouth (25% versus 16%), increased appetite (11% versus 2%) and weight increase (10% versus 1%). These complaints were typically mild and transient in nature, and decreased over time despite increased doses of mirtazapine. In contrast, significantly higher incidences of headache (5% versus 10%) and weight decrease (2% versus 6%), symptoms commonly seen in depressed patients, were recorded in the placebo-treated patients. Also, typical SSRI adverse events, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and insomnia, and symptoms of sexual dysfunction were registered less frequently in mirtazapine-treated patients than in the placebo-treated patients. Approximately 10% of the mirtazapine-treated patients in the clinical trial programme were older than 65 years. The pattern of adverse clinical experiences seen in this group of patients is fully in line with that seen in the overall patient population. The analysis of vital sign indices, i.e. blood pressure and heart rate, showed that no changes occurred with mirtazapine treatment; this pattern was fully comparable to that seen with placebo. Furthermore, very low incidences of clinically relevant changes in laboratory indices, such as the liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase or neutropenia, were recorded in each treatment group. Mirtazapine has a very low seizure-inducing potential: only one case was recorded in a patient with a history of seizures during previous treatment with clomipramine. The low seizure-inducing potential combined with a lack of cardiotoxic properties allows safety in an overdose of mirtazapine, even in elderly patients. The only symptom seen in the patients taking an overdose of mirtazapine alone or in combination with other drugs was excessive but transient somnolence, which resolved spontaneously within a few hours. In conclusion, the new antidepressant mirtazapine offers clinicians a unique combination of strong efficacy and good safety.
 ...
PMID:Safety of mirtazapine: a review. 893 8

Mirtazapine is a unique antidepressant that refines the specificity of effects on noradrenergic and serotonergic systems. It is an antagonist of presynaptic alpha 2-adrenergic autoreceptors and heteroreceptors on both norepinephrine and serotonin (5-HT) presynaptic axons, plus is a potent antagonist of postsynaptic 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors. The net outcome of these effects is increased noradrenergic activity together with specific increased serotonergic activity, especially at 5-HT1A receptors. This mechanism of action maintains equivalent antidepressant efficacy but minimizes many of the adverse effects common to both tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Mirtazapine has an onset of clinical effect in 2-4 weeks similar to other antidepressants, although sleep disturbances and anxiety symptoms may improve in the first week of treatment. It has minimal cardiovascular and anticholinergic effects, and essentially lacks serotonergic effects such as gastrointestinal symptoms, insomnia, and sexual dysfunction. Sedation, increased appetite, and weight gain are more common with mirtazapine than with placebo. An elimination half-life of 20-40 hours enables once-daily bedtime dosing. The recommended initial dosage is 15 mg once/day at bedtime, with an effective daily dosage range of 15-45 mg. Cases of overdose of up to 975 mg caused significant sedation but no cardiovascular or respiratory effects or seizures.
 ...
PMID:Mirtazapine: an antidepressant with noradrenergic and specific serotonergic effects. 901 62

Medication management of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has consisted of monotherapy with either clomipramine (CMI) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluvoxamine, paroxetine, or sertraline. Frequently, OCD patients receiving monotherapy experience low treatment response rates and problematic side effects that may result in discontinuation or noncompliance. This open-label case series presents 7 patients (6 male, 1 female) ages 9 to 23 years with OCD who were effectively treated with combination of CMI plus an SSRI. Treatment effects persisted through 5 to 22 months of follow-up from onset of combination therapy. The drug combination was effective in the 2 patients with OCD and no mood/anxiety comorbidity. Side effects appeared in 5 of 7 patients; cardiovascular side effects were the most common adverse effects. Two patients had prolongation of QTc intervals and 2 developed tachycardia while taking CMI and SSRI combinations. Other risks might include serotonin syndrome, manic switch, insomnia, and possibly headaches, EPS, and sexual dysfunction. Recommendations are made to monitor electrocardiograms, CMI blood concentrations, and vital signs in all cases because SSRIs can increase the blood levels of CMI and/or its active metabolite, desmethylclomipramine (DCMI). CMI could also potentially increase SSRI absorption and/or protein binding. The use of CMI and SSRI combination therapy was found to be more effective compared with their monotherapy in all 7 cases.
 ...
PMID:Combination treatment with clomipramine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents. 963 80

This multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of citalopram and placebo in a population of moderately to severely depressed patients with melancholia. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared citalopram (flexible dose; 20-80 mg/day) with placebo in 180 psychiatric outpatients with a DSM-III diagnosis of major depression or bipolar disorder, depressed, who also met DSM-III criteria for melancholia. Following a 1-week placebo washout period, patients meeting study entry criteria were randomized to 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with either citalopram or placebo. Efficacy measures included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale, and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. Patients treated with citalopram showed significantly greater improvement at endpoint than placebo patients on the HAM-D, CGI, and Zung scales. On the HAM-D, citalopram patients exhibited significantly greater improvement than placebo patients after 1 week of double-blind treatment and at all subsequent study visits. Endpoint analyses of the HAM-D subscales demonstrated that citalopram produced significant improvement of the psychomotor retardation, cognitive disturbance, sleep disturbance, and melancholia symptom clusters. Nausea, dry mouth, somnolence, dizziness, and increased sweating were reported at higher rates by citalopram-treated patients than by placebo-treated patients, but there were no significant citalopram-placebo differences in the incidence of activation (e.g., anxiety, nervousness, insomnia) or sexual dysfunction. Analysis of electrocardiograms, vital signs, and laboratory tests did not reveal any clinically significant effects of citalopram treatment. The results of this study indicate that citalopram is safe and effective in the treatment of depressed patients with melancholia, and is associated with a favorable side effect profile and a potentially rapid onset of action.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind comparison of citalopram and placebo in depressed outpatients with melancholia. 1020 59

Mirtazapine is a presynaptic alpha-2 antagonist that has dual action by increasing noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission. The enhancement of serotonergic neurotransmission is specifically mediated via 5-HT1 receptors because mirtazapine is a postsynaptic serotonergic 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 antagonist. In addition, mirtazapine has only a weak affinity for 5-HT1 receptors and has very weak muscarinic anticholinergic and histamine (H1) antagonist properties. As a consequence of its unique pharmacodynamic properties, mirtazapine is an effective, safe and well-tolerated addition to the antidepressant armamentarium. Mirtazapine is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract following oral administration, and it is extensively metabolized in the liver to four metabolites via demethylation and hydroxylation, followed by glucuronide conjugation. The unconjugated desmethyl metabolite is pharmacologically less active than the parent compound. Mirtazapine lacks auto-induction of hepatic isoenzymes. Although mirtazapine is a substrate of P450 isoenzymes 1A2, 2D6 and 3A4, in vitro studies show that it is not a potent inhibitor or inducer of any of these enzymes. Mirtazapine has been evaluated in a worldwide clinical development program involving approximately 4500 patients. Controlled clinical trials involving almost 2800 mirtazapine-treated patients have demonstrated the compound to be effective for the treatment of moderate-to-serve major depression. Mirtazapine was consistently superior to placebo, and equivalent in efficacy to the tricyclic antidepressants amitriptyline, doxepin and clomipramine, but with an improved tolerability profile. Mirtazapine has shown a rapid onset of action in patients with predominantly severe depressive illness in a comparative study against fluoxetine. Mirtazapine has a unique tolerability profile, since the specific postsynaptic 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptor blockade of mirtazapine provides early antidepressant effects without causing unwanted serotonin-related side-effects. Transient somnolence, hyperphagia and weight gain are the most commonly reported adverse events, which may be attributed to the antihistaminic (H1) activity of mirtazapine at low doses. Somnolence, the most commonly reported side-effect, appears to be less frequent at higher dosages. Mirtazapine also demonstrates important anxiolytic and sleep-improving effects, which may be related to its pharmacodynamic properties. In addition, mirtazapine does not appear to be associated with sexual dysfunction. Mirtazapine has shown no significant cardiovascular adverse effects at multiples of 7 to 22 times the maximum recommended dose. Mirtazapine is a unique addition to the antidepressant armamentarium as first-line therapy in patients with major depression and symptoms of anxiety/agitation or anxiety/somatization or complaints of insomnia and as a useful alternative in depressed patients who do not adequately respond to or are intolerant of tricyclic antidepressants or serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Review of the results from clinical studies on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirtazapine for the treatment of patients with major depression. 1033 82

Sexual dysfunction, a frequently reported side effect of many antidepressants, may result in patient dissatisfaction and noncompliance with treatment regimens. This paper describes the results of the first placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy, safety, and effects on sexual functioning of sustained-release bupropion (bupropion SR) and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline. This randomized, double-masked, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter trial enrolled 360 patients with moderate-to-severe recurrent major depression. Patients were treated with bupropion SR 150 to 400 mg/d, sertraline 50 to 200 mg/d, or placebo for up to 8 weeks. Patients' depression and sexual functioning were assessed at weekly or biweekly clinic visits; safety was assessed by regular monitoring of adverse events, vital signs, and body weight. Treatment groups were similar at baseline in terms of age, sex, and race, and most patients had a diagnosis of moderate uncomplicated depression. Patients treated with bupropion SR or sertraline showed similar improvements on all efficacy measures; both active treatments were superior to placebo in improving scores on all rating scales for depression at various time points. Significantly more patients treated with sertraline experienced orgasmic dysfunction throughout the study than did patients treated with bupropion SR or placebo (P < 0.001). Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event in all 3 treatment groups and occurred with similar frequency in each group (30% to 40%). Nausea (31%), diarrhea (26%), insomnia (18%), and somnolence (17%) occurred in significantly more patients in the sertraline group than in the bupropion SR group (18%, 7%, 13%, and 3%, respectively) and the placebo group (10%, 11%, 4%, and 6%, respectively). Dry mouth occurred more frequently with bupropion SR (19%) than with sertraline (14%) or placebo (12%), although the differences were not significant. Changes in vital signs were similar in all groups. Similar (small, but not statistically significant) decreases in mean body weight were seen in both the bupropion SR (-1.06 kg) and sertraline (-0.79 kg) groups, whereas the placebo group experienced a minor increase (0.21 kg). Although bupropion SR and sertraline were similarly well tolerated and effective in the treatment of depression, sertraline treatment was more often associated with sexual dysfunction and certain other adverse events compared with bupropion SR and placebo. Therefore, bupropion SR may be an appropriate choice as an antidepressant for the treatment of sexually active patients.
 ...
PMID:A placebo-controlled comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and effects on sexual functioning of sustained-release bupropion and sertraline. 1036 31

Currently available antidepressants interact with several types of receptors, which may explain both wanted and unwanted effects of these drugs. These effects are different and distinctive, and knowledge about them may help clinicians understand differences between compounds in terms of their tolerability profiles. Given roughly comparable efficacy, tolerability profile is the critical determinant in selecting an antidepressant medication for a particular patient. In addition, tolerability is inseparably linked to patient compliance, both in acute and long-term treatment, and ultimately to overall success of treatment. Refinement in pharmacologic profiles of all newly introduced antidepressants resulted in overall advantages in tolerability in comparison with older tricyclic compounds. However, differences in receptor interactions between antidepressants are directly reflected in tolerability (adverse event) profiles. Among new antidepressants, mirtazapine and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors share favorable overall tolerability and safety, especially with respect to low premature termination rates because of adverse events, cardiac safety, and safety in overdose. However, the different pharmacologic profile of mirtazapine is reflected in its different tolerability profile. Because of interactions with the histamine (H1) receptor, mirtazapine may be related to transient initial somnolence and weight gain in some patients. Its serotonin-2 (5-HT2)-blocking properties may account for lack of sexual dysfunction, insomnia, nervousness, and agitation. Mirtazapine's 5-HT3-blocking properties are unique among all currently available antidepressants and may account for lack of gastrointestinal adverse events.
 ...
PMID:Tolerability and patient compliance. 1044 36

Andropause, a syndrome in aging men, consists of physical, sexual, and psychologic symptoms that include weakness, fatigue, reduced muscle and bone mass, impaired hematopoiesis, oligospermia, sexual dysfunction, depression, anxiety, irritability, insomnia, memory impairment, and reduced cognitive function. Free testosterone levels begin to decline at a rate of 1% per year after age 40 years. It is estimated that 20% of men aged 60-80 years have levels below the lower limit of normal. Although the causal relationship between declining testosterone levels and development of andropause symptoms is not firmly established, administration of testosterone to this population resulted in improvements in many areas. Most studies to date focused on physical benefits of testosterone replacement and failed to assess psychologic symptoms rigorously. Preliminary data suggest that therapy may benefit elderly men with new-onset depression. Testosterone administration is not without problems, the most worrisome being the potential for increased prostate cancer risk. Despite this concern, a limited number of studies administered the hormone weekly for up to 2 years, with only mild increases in prostate-specific antigen over control values. Currently, insufficient evidence, primarily regarding psychologic safety and efficacy, exists to warrant general administration of testosterone to elderly hypogonadal men. Further clinical investigations of this therapy in men with low testosterone levels and andropause symptoms are justified and necessary.
 ...
PMID:Testosterone and andropause: the feasibility of testosterone replacement therapy in elderly men. 1045 66


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>