Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0917801 (insomnia)
 10,606 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An uncontrolled clinical study with WIN 27,147-2 was conducted with 10 hospitalized depressed psychiatric patients. There was statistically significant improvement in the total scores of the HAM-D, BPRS and Zung; in the scores of all the factors of the HAM-D and Zung; in the scores of the anxiety/depression and activation factors of the BPRS, and in the scores of 6 of the 18 items of the BPRS. Judged by clinical global impression, 9 of the 10 patients were very much improved and 1 patient much improved. The most frequently occurring adverse effects were dry mouth, sweating, drowsiness and insomnia.
 ...
PMID:WIN 27,147-2 in the treatment of depression. An uncontrolled clinical study. 1 70

Estazolam, a triazolobenzodiazepine with an intermediate elimination half-life, has been shown previously to be an effective and safe hypnotic in insomniacs without concomitant psychiatric illness. Our study of the efficacy of estazolam in patients with insomnia associated with generalized anxiety disorder began when 108 patients meeting criteria for generalized anxiety disorder (mean total score of Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety [HAM-A] = 22.0 +/- 3.1 [SD]) and insomnia were given single-blind placebo for 7 nights. Nine patients whose anxiety and/or insomnia improved were dropped as placebo responders. The remaining 99 patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to double-blind treatment with either estazolam 2.0 mg or matching placebo for 7 nights. Hypnotic efficacy, as determined by patient-completed sleep questionnaires, was statistically significant for estazolam 2.0 mg versus placebo for all sleep indices (p less than 0.01). Patients treated with estazolam 2.0 mg showed significantly greater improvement in anxiety than those receiving placebo on the mean total score of HAM-A ([placebo, -3.4; estazolam, -7.1; p less than 0.001] and without the insomnia item [placebo, -2.7; estazolam, -5.5; p less than 0.001]). Anxiety scores on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory showed greater improvement in the estazolam group, but without statistical significance (p = 0.237). Estazolam 2.0 mg is an effective hypnotic in patients with generalized anxiety disorder and appears to have a favorable anxiolytic action.
 ...
PMID:Estazolam treatment of insomnia in generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled study. 191 23

The effects of high-dose fluoxetine (median 80 mg/day), standard-dose imipramine (median 200 mg/day), and placebo were studied in 706 outpatients meeting DSM-III criteria for major depressive disorder. Baseline psychomotor activity of each patient was prospectively categorized as agitated, retarded, or neither. Rates of occurrence of total and significant (leading to discontinuation) activating adverse events (insomnia, agitation, anxiety, nervousness) and sedating events (somnolence, asthenia) were compared between treatments on an overall basis and within categories of baseline psychomotor activity. Additionally, these rates were compared across baseline psychomotor activity for each treatment. Efficacy was evaluated on an overall basis and with respect to baseline psychomotor activity. There was more total activation with fluoxetine than placebo (p = 0.008), but total activation with fluoxetine (28%) showed only a trend (p = 0.092) for being greater than with imipramine (21%). Discontinuations for activation with fluoxetine (5%) did not differ from imipramine (5%). Sedation and discontinuations for sedation with both fluoxetine and imipramine significantly exceeded placebo. The only drug-drug difference in discontinuations was for sedation where imipramine (11%) exceeded fluoxetine (5%; p = 0.008). Only for the occurrence of sedation with imipramine (47% among patients retarded at baseline) was there a significant association with baseline psychomotor activity (p = 0.021). Both fluoxetine and imipramine were superior to placebo and equal in efficacy in decreasing total Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the sleep disturbance HAM-D factor, and the anxiety/somatization HAM-D factor scores. These improvements were independent of baseline psychomotor activity.
 ...
PMID:High-dose fluoxetine: efficacy and activating-sedating effects in agitated and retarded depression. 162 94

Two hundred forty-one elderly depressed patients entered the 8-week, double-blind phase of this parallel-group, multicenter study; 161 patients were randomized to receive sertraline (50-200 mg/day) and 80 were randomized to receive amitriptyline (50-150 mg/day). Among evaluable patients, there were no statistically significant differences between treatments in any of the primary efficacy variables: change in total Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score (17 items), percentage change in HAM-D score, change in HAM-D Item 1, change in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Severity score, change in the Depression Factor of the 56-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist, and the CGI Improvement score at the last visit. Similar results were obtained using data from all patients (intention-to-treat analysis), except that amitriptyline was superior in HAM-D Total score (p = .044). The two drugs produced a similar degree of response: on the basis of the HAM-D criterion, 69.4% of sertraline patients and 62.5% of amitriptyline patients responded, and, on the basis of CGI criterion, 79.5% of sertraline and 73.4% of amitriptyline patients responded. Twenty-eight percent of the sertraline patients withdrew from the study because of a treatment-related side effect and 2.5% (4) because of a laboratory abnormality. In comparison, 35% of the amitriptyline patients withdrew because of treatment-related side effects. Sertraline was associated with a statistically lower frequency of somnolence, dry mouth, constipation, ataxia, and pain and a higher frequency of nausea, anorexia, diarrhea/loose stools, and insomnia; thus, anticholinergic effects were less common and gastrointestinal effects were more common with sertraline than with amitriptyline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Double-blind, multicenter comparison of sertraline and amitriptyline in elderly depressed patients. 225 79

Data on 58 patients with major depressive episodes treated with tranylcypromine in the course of two controlled, 4-week trials were examined for clinical predictors of favorable response and patterns of symptom improvement and side effects. Predictors of positive outcome with tranylcypromine were associated with greater initial severity on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) ratings of depressed mood, psychomotor retardation, and weight loss, and with lower initial severity on ratings of middle and late insomnia. Distinct quality of depressed mood predicted poorer response; endogenicity, as defined by Research Diagnostic Criteria or the Nies-Robinson Diagnostic Index, failed to predict outcome. Analysis of improvement on individual symptom items of the HAM-D and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale indicated a generalized patholysis except in a few areas such as appetite/weight loss and insomnia, which may reflect specific side effects of tranylcypromine.
 ...
PMID:Tranylcypromine: patterns and predictors of response. 352 59

In a double-blind clinical trial with 20 patients suffering from endogenous depression statistically significant changes (improvement) were present in the scores of all assessment instruments. Although no statistically significant differences occurred between the groups, significant improvement on the HAM-D occurred earlier for amitriptyline and significant improvement occurred earlier on HAM-A for viloxazine. 2 patients were discontinued due to adverse reactions; one for nausea and vomiting while receiving viloxazine and one for paroxysmal atrial tachycardia while receiving amitriptyline. The same number of TES occurred for each group with seven unique to viloxazine (numbness, tingling, palpitation, ejaculation difficulty, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, epigastric pain and gustatory disturbances) and seven unique to amitriptyline (insomnia, irritability, syncope, tremor, nasal congestion, orthostatic hypertension and paroxysmal atrial tachycardia). Other than for 1 patient who developed syncope and orthostatic hypotension and the patient who developed paroxysmal atrial tachycardia, there were no clinically significant changes in pulse rate, blood pressure and weight. There were no clinical laboratory findings with either drug that were judged to be pathological.
 ...
PMID:Viloxazine in the treatment of endogenous depression. A standard (amitriptyline) controlled clinical study. 718 72

Fluoxetine is an efficacious, nonsedative antidepressant, but its selective efficacy on symptoms of insomnia has not been thoroughly explored. In this analysis, the effects of fluoxetine versus placebo on symptoms of insomnia were evaluated in three clinical subgroups: patients with baseline sleep disturbance, melancholia, or reduced rapid eye movement (REM) latency. Eighty-nine outpatients with major depression completed 2 nights of polysomnography (PSG) and were randomized to fluoxetine or placebo. Within each subgroup of patients, fluoxetine was statistically significantly more effective than placebo in improving non-sleep Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) items (HAM-D-17 total minus scores from Items 4, 5, and 6). Numerical improvement in HAM-D sleep total (sum of HAM-D Items 4, 5, and 6) was also seen for fluoxetine versus placebo. Fluoxetine did not exacerbate sleep disturbance either at Week 1 or at endpoint. These findings suggest that fluoxetine is an effective antidepressant in patients with baseline sleep disturbance, melancholia, and reduced REM latency.
 ...
PMID:The effects of fluoxetine on symptoms of insomnia in depressed patients. 749 73

Safety aspects [adverse events, blood pressure and heart rate, weight, and laboratory tests (liver parameters, hemoglobin, leukocytes)] of long-term treatment in 1,120 patients are discussed. Adverse events during this long-term treatment were also compared with those of a subgroup of these patients who, before long-term treatment, were treated on a short-term basis (n = 706). Efficacy [Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Clinical Global Impression of Efficacy (CGI), and occurrence of relapses and recurrences] in a homogeneous sample of 485 patients is also discussed. The adverse events most frequently observed during long-term treatment were insomnia, headache, and dizziness. Insomnia and headache were also most often occurring in the compared sample of patients with short-term treatment, whereas dizziness during this treatment period ranked at the fifth position. Supine and standing mean blood pressure did not consistently change during long-term treatment, the most prominent increases in comparison with baseline were seen in the period > 1 year of treatment (6.3 mm Hg supine/7.2 mm Hg standing). Comparison of blood pressure values in the hypertensive range at baseline and during long-term treatment revealed no statistical difference (McNemar test p = 0.07829). Mean heart rate slightly decreased during long-term treatment (by a maximum of 6.3 beats/min supine, 8.2 beats/min standing). Mean weight did not change between baseline and treatment end point. There were 23 patients with a weight loss of 10 kg or more and 16 patients with a weight gain of 10 kg or more. For none of the laboratory parameters tested was there a statistical significance regarding shifts from normal to pathological values. HAM-D mean total scores in the above-mentioned subgroup of patients decreased from 25.05 points at baseline (n = 485) to 7.88 points after 1 year of treatment (n = 139). Seventy-five patients who had favorably responded to treatment (total responders n = 300) relapsed during the first 6 months of treatment. During the second half-year of treatment the recurrence rate was 14.8%, and during the third 6 months the recurrence rate was 12.2%. CGI in the same subsample of patients in whom HAMD was evaluated (n = 485) compared with those patients who did not drop out during the short-term period up to 44 days and entered long-term treatment (n = 401) showed that the percentage of the ratings "no change/worse" was higher in the sample that also included patients who withdrew from treatment during the short-term period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Safety and efficacy during long-term treatment with moclobemide. 795 86

Fluoxetine, a serotonin uptake inhibitor, and amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, were compared in a 5-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial in 136 out-patient men and women, aged 21-70 years, with major depressive disorder. Overall efficacy was comparable with fluoxetine and amitriptyline [Hamilton 21-Item Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D21), Raskin, Covi, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity and -Improvement, Patient's Global Impressions]. Mean +/- standard deviation decreases in HAM-D21 total score were 12.9 +/- 9.9 and 11.6 +/- 10.3 (p = 0.423), respectively. Response rates (> or = 50% decrease in HAM-D21 total score) for patients treated > or = 4 weeks were 46.7% and 66.0% (p = 0.039) and remission rates (HAM-D21 total score < or = 7) were 18.3% and 28.3% (p = 0.209), respectively. Response and remission rates for all patients were comparable with fluoxetine and amitriptyline. Study completions were higher with fluoxetine than amitriptyline (87.7% vs 66.2%; p = 0.003). Discontinuations for adverse events were higher with amitriptyline than fluoxetine (22.5% vs 6.2%; p = 0.007). More treatment-emergent nausea and insomnia were reported with fluoxetine (p < or = 0.05); more anticholinergic and orthostatic events and weight gain were reported with amitriptyline (p < or = 0.05). Statistically, but not clinically, significant changes were observed in vital signs. Both fluoxetine and amitriptyline were effective treatments for out-patients with major depressive disorder. Fluoxetine had a more favorable safety profile than amitriptyline.
 ...
PMID:Fluoxetine versus amitriptyline in the treatment of major depression: a multicenter trial. 826 11

Brofaromine is a new, reversible, and selective type-A monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) that also has serotonin reuptake inhibitory properties. Its dual pharmacologic effects offer promise in the treatment of a wide spectrum of depressed patients while producing less severe anticholinergic side effects in comparison with standard drugs. A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study including 220 patients was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brofaromine in major depression. This study of a fixed-dose design and 6 weeks' duration found that brofaromine was significantly better than placebo on the Overall Evaluation of Efficacy, Beck self-rating scale, HAM-D Bech subscale, HAM-D total 14 items (minus the three sleep items), HAM-D depressed mood item and retardation factor, and worse than placebo on the insomnia items of HAM-D. Significantly more patients on placebo than on brofaromine did not complete the trial due to lack of efficacy. In comparative controlled studies (n = 899), brofaromine was found to be at least as efficacious as tricyclic antidepressants (imipramine) and standard MAOIs (tranylcypromine and phenelzine). Reductions of at least 50% in the HAM-D total score were seen in 58-66% of patients treated with either brofaromine or imipramine (n = 609). Brofaromine also was found to be of comparable efficacy to tranylcypromine in two clinical trials (n = 132), one of which included patients considered to have a treatment-resistant depression (n = 39). In another double-blind study that compared brofaromine (150 mg/day) to phenelzine (45 mg/day) (n = 158), there was no difference between brofaromine and phenelzine.
 ...
PMID:Brofaromine in depression: a Canadian multicenter placebo trial and a review of standard drug comparative studies. 831 97


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>