Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0854467 (myelosuppression)
 5,932 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Between August 1985 and June 1986, 49 previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with the combination of cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, vindesine 3 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8, and mitomycin-C 8 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 (MVP), repeating after an interval of 4 weeks, and thereafter every 6 weeks. The median age for all patients was 62 years, with a range of 21 to 77 years. All patients had a performance status of 0, 1, or 2 (ECOG scale) and measurable disease. Histologic types included squamous cell carcinoma (22 patients), adenocarcinoma (22 patients), and large-cell carcinoma (6 patients). Forty-eight patients were evaluable for response. Out of 48 patients, one (2%) achieved a complete response and 24 patients (50%) achieved a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 52% (95% confidence interval, 38-68%). The response rates were 52% for squamous cell carcinoma, 45% for adenocarcinoma, and 80% for large-cell carcinoma, respectively. The median duration of response was 4.2 months and the median duration of survival for all patients was 10.6 months. The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 85% and 33%, respectively. One patient died of sepsis associated with leukopenia. Other toxicities were manageable and reversible. In conclusion, the MVP regimen was active and tolerable in patients with advanced NSCLC. Prospective randomized study comparing the MVP regimen with the two-drug combination of vindesine and cisplatin is warranted.
 ...
PMID:Mitomycin C, vindesine, and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase II study. 131 68

Cisplatin has many toxic effects; emesis, impairment of renal function, myelosuppression, peripheral neuropathy, ototoxicity and renal tubular wasting. We used MVP regimen (Mitomycin C, Vp-16, and Cisplatin) in advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Using hydration and prophylactic supplementation of sodium and potassium before and during chemotherapy, we have observed the development of hyponatremia in 48 courses (43%), hypokalemia in 23 courses and hypomagnesemia in 11 courses. Some patients showed abnormalities of renal function in 16 courses. All the electrolyte depletion and renal problem was corrected before next courses by hydration and replacement of the wasting. Frequent measurement of serum cation and appropriate replacement are recommended when high dose Cisplatin containing regimen is used in chemotherapy of neoplasms.
 ...
PMID:Renal salt wasting in patients treated with high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 133 77

The combination treatment of mitomycin C (M), vincristine (V), and cisplatin (P) (MVP) in 63 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated for their potential synergistic cytotoxicity. The overall response rate was 43% (27/63); in the 54 eligible and evaluable patients, the response rate was 50% (27/54). Responses were observed in all cell types and disease sites. Cell type; performance status of 0, 1, or 2; sex; and age younger or older than 60 years did not significantly influence the response rate. However, patients with prior radiation had significantly more treatment failure than those without. The dose-limiting side effects in these 54 patients were myelosuppression (40%), pulmonary fibrosis (9%), peripheral neuropathy (6%), and intractable nausea and vomiting (4%). The degree of leukopenia (P less than 0.01) but not of thrombocytopenia increased significantly in patients who had received prior radiotherapy. One patient died of marked thrombocytopenia and one of fulminant hepatitis. Patients who responded lived significantly longer than those who did not (P less than 0.004). A majority of the responders (82%) also achieved symptomatic palliation. With appropriate dose modification and supportive care, MVP was tolerable. Further trials with this regimen or a modified version are worth consideration.
 ...
PMID:Phase II evaluation of a combination of mitomycin C, vincristine, and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 394 Jun 22

To evaluate the efficacy of a three-drug regimen vs. a two-drug CDDP based combination in the treatment of NSCLC, we conducted a three-arm randomized parallel trial comparing (a) CDDP (120 mg/m2 day 1) + etoposide (100 mg/m2 days 1-3) every 3 weeks (PE--arm A); (b) CDDP (120 mg/m2 every 4 weeks) + mitomycin (8 mg/m2 days 1, 29, 71) + vindesine (3 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, 22 every 2 weeks) (MVP--arm B); and (c) CDDP (120 mg/m2 day 1) + mitomycin (6 mg/m2 day 1) + ifosfamide (3 g/m2 day 2) every 3 weeks (MIC--arm C). From May 1989 to April 1992, 393 consecutive previously untreated patients with NSCLC Stage IIIB and IV entered the trial; 373 were evaluable for survival and 360 for response. The response rate was significantly better for both the three-drug regimens compared with PE (Table 3). Logistic regression model showed a significantly better response in patients with a good P.S. and in Stage IIIB. Main toxicity consisted of myelosuppression: neutropenia Grade III-IV was recorded in 14% (arm A), 15% (arm B) and 21% (arm C). Thrombocytopenia Grade III-IV was worst in arm C: 10% vs. 5% (arm A) and 3% (arm B). Nephrotoxicity Grade III-IV was more common in arm C: 3.5%. Toxic deaths were 11 (3%: three in arm A, five in arm B, three in arm C). From our data, the three-drug containing regimens, MVP and MIC, appear more active than the two-drug combination PE in treatment of advanced NSCLC.
 ...
PMID:Superiority of three-drug combination chemotherapy versus cisplatin-etoposide in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial by the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. 755 20

Fourteen patients with recurrent breast cancer were treated with a combination of mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2 iv, day 1), vincristine (1 mg/m2 iv, day 1) and prednisolone (30 mg/day day 1-7). Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks and all patients received more than 3 cycles. The objective response rate was 70.0% (7 of 10). In two patients, the treatment has been continued now for more than one year. In these 2 patients, the duration of response is more than 40 weeks. The toxicity was primarily myelosuppression. Five of 14 patients (35.7%) had leukopenia of Grade 3 and 4. These patients received G-CSF therapy and recovered well from leukopenia. Nausea and vomiting were well tolerated, probably by prednisolone. This regimen was especially superior in the maintenance of quality of life because hair loss was much less compared to CAF (cyclophosphamide, ADM, 5-fluorouracil) treatment. In conclusion, MVP treatment is highly effective and safe for the treatment of recurrent breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:[Efficacy of combination chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, vincristine, prednisolone (MVP) for recurrence of breast cancer]. 782 82

In the present multicentre randomized phase II trial, the activity and toxicity of three platinum-based combination regimens for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated. The three regimens were: MVP (mitomycin-C 6 mg m(-2) on day 1, vindesine 3 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) on day 1 every 28 days), PIN (cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) day 1, ifosfamide 3 g m(-2) day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg m(-2) day 1 and 8 every 21 days) and CaN (carboplatin 350 mg m(-2) day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg m(-2) days 1 and 8 every 28 days). A total of 140 chemotherapy-naive patients entered the study; 49 patients were treated with MVP, 48 with PIN and 43 with CaN. Sixty-seven per cent of the patients had stage IV disease. Response rates, calculated on an 'intention to treat' basis, were as follows: MVP, 14.3% (95% CI 5.94-27.2%); PIN, 16.7% (95% CI 7.4-30.2%); and CaN, 14% (95% CI 5.3-27.9%). The overall median survivals were 256, 269 and 243 days for patients treated with MVP, PIN and CaN respectively. Myelosuppression was the most frequent toxicity: grade 3-4 leucopenia was observed in 14.3%, 25% and 18.6% of patients treated with MVP, PIN and CaN respectively. This multicentre phase II randomized trial shows that MVP, PIN and CaN can be administered on an outpatient basis with acceptable toxicities. Unfortunately, the three regimens showed an activity significantly lower than that reported in previous single-institution phase II trials.
 ...
PMID:Cisplatin-vindesine-mitomycin (MVP) vs cisplatin-ifosfamide-vinorelbine (PIN) vs carboplatin-vinorelbine (CaN) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a FONICAP randomized phase II study. Italian Lung Cancer Task Force (FONICAP). 964 60

The aim of this randomised trial was to compare the efficacy of bolus versus continuous infusion cisplatin combined with mitomycin C and vindesine (MVP) for chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 97 patients (49 given bolus cisplatin-arm A and 48 given continuous infusion cisplatin--arm B) were evaluable for response. In arm A, 2 patients achieved a complete response (CR), 21 achieved a partial response (PR), whilst in arm B, 14 patients achieved a PR (29%) (P = 0.07). Median survival was 8 months in both arms. Myelosuppression was the most frequent and severe toxicity, with a higher incidence of grade 3-4 leucopenia in arm A when compared with arm B (44% versus 25%). In conclusion, there is no advantage for a cisplatin 5 day infusion in the MVP regimen.
 ...
PMID:Bolus versus 5-day continuous infusion of cisplatin with mitomycin and vindesine in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase III prospective randomised trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC). 1002 25

Treatment strategies for locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer have failed to significantly alter the survival of most patients. Treatment strategies utilizing, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy/radiation therapy have shown promise in some reports. Twenty-six consecutive patients with stage III, non-small cell lung cancer were treated over a 3 year period according to a strategy involving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (mitomycin, vinblastine, cisplatin [MVP]) followed by reassessment for surgical resection, followed by treatment with concomitant radiation therapy and chemotherapy (hydroxyurea [HU], 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]). Staging revealed stage IIIa disease in 15 patients and stage IIIb disease in 11 patients. Nine of 18 evaluable patients responded to MVP (50%) with 1 CR and 8 PRs. Only one of nine responders underwent surgical resection. Eleven of 19 patients receiving concomitant 5-FU, HU, and radiation therapy were evaluable for response. Two of 11 patients were converted to clinical CRs, and the remaining 9 patients had stable disease. Myelosuppression, mucositis and hand-foot syndrome were observed with 5-FU/HU/RT. Median survival for all patients is 10.5 months. One and 2-year survival is estimated at 36% and 27%, respectively. This clinical trial combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy/radiation therapy is feasible. Select patients appeared to have a survival benefit however most patients failed to derive an improvement in clinical endpoints.
 ...
PMID:A phase-ii trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced nonsmall cell lung-cancer. 2160 75