Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0854467 (myelosuppression)
 5,932 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typically receive platinum-based combination chemotherapy. In spite of improvements in symptoms and survival, response rates remain low and newer agents are being investigated. The newer agents may offer increased efficacy and reduced toxicity compared with established agents and regimens. The topoisomerase-I inhibitor, topotecan, achieves single-agent response rates of 4-25% in NSCLC. Topotecan has also been studied in combinations: a combination of topotecan, administered using the standard 5-day schedule, with cisplatin was effective but was associated with myelosuppression. The combination of topotecan plus carboplatin may be better tolerated and warrants further investigation. Topotecan was also combined with newer agents (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, docetaxel, paclitaxel) using a range of different administration schedules of topotecan. Response rates of up to 30% were achieved. A weekly schedule of topotecan was effective and well tolerated and was also convenient for healthcare professionals and patients.
 ...
PMID:Combination chemotherapy with topotecan for non-small cell lung cancer. 1456 11

Chemotherapy agents require a range of administration schedules, including 3-weekly, 4-weekly and daily administration. Some agents, for example gemcitabine and vinorelbine, have been developed for use in a weekly regimen. The possibility of administering other agents using a weekly schedule is being investigated. Weekly schedules offer practical benefits in terms of convenience to patients and allow drugs to be combined more easily. In addition, toxicity may be reduced. The standard 5-day schedule of topotecan has demonstrated effectiveness and patient benefits. Topotecan at this dose is generally well tolerated, with dose-limiting myelosuppression. Preclinical data supported intermittent dosing with topotecan and clinical studies with weekly dosing in ovarian cancer have indicated reduced myelosuppression compared with the 5-day regimen. Several studies in non-small cell lung cancer investigated topotecan combined with cisplatin or gemcitabine and confirmed these findings. However, further studies are needed to confirm that efficacy of topotecan (response and survival) is maintained with the altered regimen.
 ...
PMID:Weekly topotecan in the management of lung cancer. 1456 12

To determine the efficacy and toxicity of a novel chemotherapeutic approach with topotecan, a camptothecin analog, for progressive or recurring anaplastic oligodendroglioma or mixed oligoastrocytoma.Patients from seven centers with recurrent or progressive disease were treated with topotecan, 1.5 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.), 30 min dailyx5 days every 3 weeks. Efficacy and toxicity were assessed clinically and radiologically. The study was planned to accrue up to 30 evaluable patients if there was at least one response among the first 15 patients treated. Sixteen eligible patients entered the study. No response was documented in 14 evaluable patients. Eleven patients had stable disease of a median of 3.8 months and three had progressive disease. Sixteen patients were evaluable for toxicity. The most significant toxic effect was myelosuppression. Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was experienced by 15 of 16 patients and led to dose reduction in nearly half of the cycles delivered. Other adverse effects were fatigue, nausea, stomatitis, alopecia, and vomiting.Topotecan, delivered in the dailyx5 regimen, is relatively well tolerated. We could not demonstrate significant activity among the population studied to justify completing accrual to 30 patients. Topotecan did not demonstrate, with this small sample size, efficacy as a salvage chemotherapy monotherapy after exposure to procarbazine, CCNU and vincristine. Further trials with different agents in this indication are certainly warranted.
 ...
PMID:A phase II study of topotecan in patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma or anaplastic mixed oligoastrocytoma. 1458 16

Topotecan, a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, is an established treatment for patients with recurrent small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), with antitumor response rates of approximately 20% and median survival of approximately 32 weeks in patients with extensive-stage disease. Topotecan's comparable activity relative to other agents used in SCLC and its novel mechanism of action, noncumulative toxicity, and in vitro synergy with other active agents have provided the rationale for investigating topotecan in first-line therapy. Furthermore, topotecan penetrates the blood-brain barrier and is potentially useful for the relatively large subset of patients with SCLC and brain metastases. In early studies of topotecan in brain metastases, encouraging antitumor activity has been observed. In several feasibility and phase II studies of topotecan as single-agent therapy in patients with extensive- and limited-stage tumors and as part of novel first-line combination regimens, overall response rates have ranged from 42% to 100%. Complete responses of 3%-67% and partial responses of 33%-80% have been observed in first-line therapy. Furthermore, the median overall survival in patients receiving topotecan in first-line therapy has ranged from approximately 8 months (extensive-stage disease) to 20 months (limited-stage disease). The most frequent adverse events associated with topotecan-based regimens include grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia that often require the incorporation of growth factor support into the treatment regimen. Nonhematologic adverse events associated with topotecan-based combination regimens have been mild or primarily attributed to other agents in the combination. Alternative doses and schedules (3 consecutive days and weekly) are being explored because they appear to be associated with considerably less myelosuppression. Although several trials have established the feasibility and activity of topotecan in first-line therapy of patients with SCLC, randomized phase III studies with comparison to standard therapy will be required to confirm a potential role for this active agent and to determine the optimal dosing regimen.
 ...
PMID:Emerging role of topotecan in first-line therapy of small-cell lung cancer. 1460 45

An early phase II study of topotecan produced favorable results in a small number of untreated and previously treated patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This multicenter study was conducted in patients with relapsed SCLC at 19 medical institutions in Japan. Topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/day was administered for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Fifty-three patients were enrolled in the study. One patient was withdrawn before the commencement of study treatment, and 2 patients were unable to continue study treatment due to an interruption in the supply of study medication. The response rate was 26.0% in 13 of the 50 evaluable patients who were eligible and completed protocol-specified treatment and procedures. The median time to progression and overall survival were 133 days and 262 days, respectively. The most frequently reported toxicity was reversible myelosuppression, such as leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia (decreased hemoglobin), and thrombocytopenia. Nonhematological toxicity was also reported but the incidence of grade 3/4 symptoms was low. The results of this study indicate that topotecan is effective against relapsed SCLC with good tolerability.
 ...
PMID:A phase II study of topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer. 1462 11

Topotecan has demonstrable activity in high-risk MDS and CMMoL. However, the significant toxicity of topotecan administered at a dose of 2mg/m2 i.v. daily for 5 days as a continuous infusion limits its use in older patients. Therefore, we studied topotecan 1.5mg/m2 per day i.v. over 2 h for three consecutive days in 20 patients with high-risk MDS (12 RAEB; 4 RAEB-T; 4 CMMoL). Cycles were given every 4-6 weeks. Fifteen patients were evaluable for response. Only one patient achieved a durable complete remission (CR). There were three deaths within the first cycle of therapy. Severe myelosuppression was the most common toxicity. Grades 3-4 infections were documented in four patients. We conclude that topotecan administered at this dose and schedule has no clinically significant activity.
 ...
PMID:Phase II study of low-dose topotecan in myelodysplastic syndromes: a Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) study. 1506 95

Topotecan dosing considerations and alternative dosing schedules to reduce and manage myelosuppression during the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer were reviewed. The myelosuppression patterns from phase I, II, and III clinical trials were analyzed to evaluate the degree of hematologic toxicity and to determine risk factors predictive of myelosuppression. Additionally, recent publications of alternative topotecan doses and schedules were examined. Extent of prior therapy, prior platinum therapy (particularly carboplatin), advanced age, impaired renal function, and prior radiation therapy were identified as potential risk factors for greater hematologic toxicity after topotecan therapy. Reducing the starting topotecan dose to 1.0 or 1.25 mg/m2/day is recommended to reduce the incidence of severe myelosuppression in high-risk individuals receiving topotecan for 5 consecutive days. Hematopoietic growth factors, transfusion therapy, and schedule adjustments may also help manage myelosuppression. Alternative schedules of 3-day or weekly dosing appear to have less myelotoxicity and are currently under evaluation. The clinical aspects of topotecan-related myelosuppression and results from clinical trials indicate that the dose, and possibly the dosing schedule, of topotecan can be modified to reduce hematologic toxicity and improve tolerance without compromising efficacy. Prospective individualization of topotecan dosing may prevent or minimize dose-limiting myelosuppression and allow patients to achieve the maximum topotecan benefit by improving their ability to complete therapy with fewer treatment delays. Ongoing clinical trials evaluating alternative dosing schedules with superior hematologic tolerability may facilitate the inclusion of topotecan in combination regimens for patients with ovarian cancer. Proposed topotecan dosing guidelines to reduce and manage myelosuppression are outlined.
 ...
PMID:Topotecan dosing guidelines in ovarian cancer: reduction and management of hematologic toxicity. 1475 13

Topotecan (Hycamtin) is a water soluble semisynthetic analogue of the alkaloid camptothecin which has antitumour activity in preclinical models in vitro and in vivo. A range of Phase I studies has been performed and a daily x 5 iv. schedule, which showed most promising evidence of activity, was selected for extensive clinical evaluation. To date, topotecan has been shown to be active in a number of malignancies, including metastatic ovarian cancer, recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, colorectal cancer and myelodysplastic syndrome. In ovarian cancer, response rates of around 15% were identified in patients who had failed standard chemotherapy, and in a randomised, comparative study with paclitaxel response rates of 20% (topotecan) and 13% (paclitaxel) were observed. In addition, overall time to progression was impressive at 23 weeks (topotecan) compared with 14 weeks (paclitaxel). In recurrent SCLC, topotecan has shown good activity in sensitive patients with a response rate of 39%, although the response rate in refractory patients was considerably lower (7%). Median survival of all patients was 5.4 months, acceptable for this difficult clinical scenario. Topotecan is well-tolerated in the majority of patients and subjective toxicities are uncommon. The principal side-effect is myelosuppression, mainly neutropenia. Serious clinical sequelae are relatively uncommon and non-cumulative. Nonhaematological toxicities are generally mild and not dose-limiting. In clinical use, topotecan has exhibited activity in multiple tumour types, with a side-effect profile that is predictable and manageable. The drug is under evaluation in other tumour types and in combination chemotherapy regimens.
 ...
PMID:Topotecan, an active new antineoplastic agent: review and current status. 1598 23

Topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 consecutive days of a 21-day cycle) is an established recurrent ovarian cancer treatment, but myelosuppression can be dose limiting. This study evaluates the activity and tolerability of low-dose topotecan in our clinical experience. Case records were reviewed for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in first through third relapse. Eligible patients had received > or =2 cycles of < or =1.25 mg/m(2) topotecan. Adverse events were evaluated using laboratory and clinical evaluation data. Twenty-seven eligible patients, most with advanced disease, received a total of 209 cycles (median, six cycles). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities during 184 cycles in 24 assessed patients were neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia in 35%, 28%, 36%, and 11% of cycles, and 21, 19, 16, and 10 patients, respectively. Only four grade 4 toxicities occurred: anemia (one) and thrombocytopenia (three). Myelosuppression was reversible, noncumulative, and manageable. Moreover, nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild to moderate, and the only two grade 3 events were constipation and deep vein thrombosis. Low-dose topotecan was active in this setting. Lower-dose topotecan is generally well tolerated and active in patients with pretreated ovarian cancer. Prospective clinical trials of low-dose topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer are warranted.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of lower-dose topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer: a retrospective case review. 1617 26

In this article, we review best standard practice for the management of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and indicate the likely areas of development over the next 5-10 years. A number of prognostic scores have been developed and these allow more rational decisions on treatment. Treatment with cisplatin plus etoposide with early, concurrent radiotherapy is the standard of care for patients with limited-stage disease (LD) suitable for this approach. A 5-year survival rate of 25% has been reported for concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy; however, the applicability of this in most busy hospitals is uncertain and this treatment is currently being compared with a high-dose, once-daily regimen. Patients unsuitable for concurrent chemo-radiotherapy are treated with a sequential approach. Patients with LD responding to treatment should be offered prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). A variety of strategies for improving survival have been investigated. Intensification of chemotherapy has not shown any clear survival advantage, but maintenance of dose intensity in patients with good prognosis is important. The evidence around maintenance therapy is conflicting and this is not routinely used. Patients with extensive-stage disease but few other adverse prognostic factors should be treated with a platinum compound plus etoposide, and carboplatin is a reasonable choice. Responding patients should be offered PCI as this is associated with a survival benefit. The initial positive results for irinotecan have not been repeated in a larger study. Age is not a prognostic factor, but caution needs to be exercised as prognostic scores do not reflect co-morbidity. Patients with relapsed disease have a poor prognosis, but there is evidence of a survival benefit for salvage chemotherapy in those fit for treatment. The choice of treatment will depend on a number of factors, including the disease-free interval. Topotecan is the only drug licensed in this indication, but myelosuppression is considerable. A number of new drugs are under evaluation and showing promise in SCLC. One of the most promising of these is amrubicin. A large randomised study has failed to show any benefit from the addition of thalidomide to chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide in extensive-stage disease patients responding to chemotherapy. Studies of a number of targeted treatments are also ongoing. The challenge for the future is to identify new targets, overcome drug-resistance mechanisms and redundancy in biological systems, and incorporate these new treatments into concurrent chemo-radiotherapy schedules.
 ...
PMID:Modern management of small-cell lung cancer. 1792 81


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>