Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0854467 (myelosuppression)
 5,932 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The efficacy of a 5 day continuous infusion of cisplatin, 25 mg/m2/day, in combination with a bolus infusion of etoposide, 100 mg/m2/day over 2 h for 3 days (PiE therapy), was evaluated in a phase II study of previously untreated patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). There were 39 evaluable patients, of whom 17 had limited disease (LD) and 22 extensive disease (ED). The overall response rate was 92% (LD, 100%; ED, 86%). The complete response rate was 21% (LD, 41%; ED, 5%). The median survival time was 45.6 weeks (LD, 123.2 weeks; ED, 28.8 weeks). The major side-effects were grade 3 or 4 leucopenia (55%), neutropenia (88%) and thrombocytopenia (20%). There were no episodes of bleeding, severe infection or treatment-related deaths. PiE therapy was associated with significant myelosuppression, but was effective, with an especially encouraging response rate and survival for LD patients.
 ...
PMID:Phase II study of infusional cisplatin in combination with etoposide in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. 854 Nov

The aim of this Phase II study was to test the feasibility of intensifying standard chemotherapy in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) by reducing the interval between cycles from 3 to 2 weeks by adding recombinant human methionyl granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) to shorten the duration of neutropenia following each cycle. Thirty-two patients with SCLC were prescribed six cycles of 2-weekly doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1 g/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 120 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2 and 3 (ACE), plus filgrastim in a fixed dose of 300 micrograms s.c. on days 4-14 of each cycle. Three patients died during the treatment period and a further nine had chemotherapy terminated before the sixth cycle, all nine because of toxicity. All 32 patients have been followed up for at least 21 months; 14 (44%) were alive at 12 months and the median survival period was 356 days. Of the 127 intervals between cycles of chemotherapy, 74 (58%) were of the prescribed 14 days, 18 (14%) of 15-20 days, 25 (20%) of 21 days, and 10 (8%) were longer. The results were best during the first four cycles, during which 71% of the 83 intervals were of 14 days and a further 10% were less than 21 days. The main reason for delay was haematological toxicity in 37 of the 53 instances. Symptoms of myelosuppression occurred in 23 patients, but at 14 days after a cycle of chemotherapy, all 127 available neutrophil granulocyte counts were normal. Twenty-one patients received blood transfusion and five platelet transfusion. The only adverse effects attributed to filgastrim were episodes of rash, throat swelling, anorexia and shivering, affecting one patient. We conclude that the policy of adding filgrastim allows the dose intensity of ACE chemotherapy to be increased by reducing the intervals between cycles. The findings reinforce those of a parallel study involving lenograstim.
 ...
PMID:Increasing and planned dose intensity of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) by adding recombinant human methionyl granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. 858 54

Myelosuppression is the major dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The capacity of colony stimulating factors (CSFs) to stimulate granular neutrophil recovery may be of great value to prevent or cure febrile neutropenia and to increase dose-intensity. The aim of this review was to assess the current use of CSFs in SCLC on the basis of experimental and clinical data. Primary CSF administration has been shown to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia, hospital admission rate, and antibiotic use subsequent to cyclophosphamidedoxorubicin-high dose etoposide (CDE) chemotherapy, without improvement of survival or disease control. Primary CSF administration may be recommended when the expected incidence of febrile neutropenia is at least 40%. This benefit has not been established with less myelosuppressive regimens, such as cisplatin-etoposide (PE), which remains an alternative combination of SCLC when standard doses are used. A trial comparing high-dose CDE + CSF with PE would be of considerable interest. There is currently little clinical basis for the use of CSFs to increase chemotherapy dose-intensity, outside clinical trials. Peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized with CSFs offer interesting prospects. Further studies, with later initiation, shorter duration or lower doses of CSFs, are warranted to improve the cost-effectiveness of CSFs. CSF therapy in addition to antibiotics is normally not justified in febrile neutropenia, except perhaps in selected patients with sepsis syndromes, hypotension or pneumonia.
 ...
PMID:Colony-stimulating factors as an adjunct to chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer. 873 24

Patients with untreated extensive small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with CALGB performance scores 0-2 were treated with etoposide 200 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 and cisplatin doses of 20, 30, or 35 mg/m2/day days 1-3 in a Phase I/II format. Of the nine patients treated at the 35 mg/m2/day cisplatin dose in the Phase I portion of the study, Grade 4 leukopenia occurred in five patients and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia in four. There were two deaths due to myelosuppression and sepsis. This dose was thus considered the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and a Phase II trial was then conducted using this treatment program. In the Phase II trial of 39 patients, the objective response rate was 67% (95% confidence interval, 50-81%) with 21% complete responses (CI 9-36%). Median survival was 10.5 months. Grade 4-5 leukopenia was seen in 57% and Grade 4-5 thrombocytopenia in 56%. The MTD defined by this Phase I trial represents a 67-100% increase in etoposide and a 32-42% increase in cisplatin dosage compared to prior studies. The observed objective response rates with this regimen are comparable to studies using conventional doses, but hematological toxicity was higher.
 ...
PMID:A phase I/II trial of etoposide and cisplatin in extensive small cell lung cancer: a cancer and leukemia group B study. 888 88

A dose-escalation study of daily etoposide and carboplatin was carried out on 23 patients with advanced lung cancer using a starting dose of 40 mg/m2/day etoposide given orally for 21 days and 250 mg/m2 carboplatin given intravenously (IV) on day 1. A total of 41 courses were given. Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose was reached at the fourth level with 40 mg/m2/day etoposide for 21 days and 400 mg/m2 carboplatin on day 1, once every 4 weeks. Non-hematological toxicities were generally mild or reversible. The recommended doses of this combination chemotherapy are 40 mg/m2/day etoposide for 21 days and 350 mg/m2 carboplatin on day 1. The response rate for non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer was 16.7% and 60% (95% confidence intervals of 3.6% to 41.4%, and 14.7% to 94.7%), respectively. A phase II study is necessary to define the efficacy and safety of this combination chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Dose-escalation study of oral etoposide and carboplatin in patients with advanced lung cancer. 889 71

Over the past few years we have conducted several clinical studies with etoposide phosphate (Etopophos; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ). A phase I trial initially was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics. A brief intravenous infusion for 5 consecutive days was given every 3 weeks. Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity and other toxicities were quite similar to those associated with etoposide. The maximum tolerated dose was 100 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days. No cytokine support was used in this phase I trial. Pharmacokinetic studies showed very rapid conversion of etoposide phosphate to etoposide. The kinetics of etoposide phosphate were similar to those expected after a comparable etoposide dose. We subsequently began three additional studies, including a phase II randomized comparison of etoposide phosphate plus cisplatin versus etoposide plus cisplatin in patients with small cell lung cancer, a study of low-dose continuous infusion daily etoposide phosphate, and a high-dose etoposide phosphate trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose given in concert with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The latter two studies are complete; these data are currently being evaluated. The phase II comparative trial was important and showed unequivocally that the response rate and toxicity with etoposide phosphate plus cisplatin is equivalent to those with etoposide plus cisplatin in patients with small cell lung cancer. In addition, it appears that there was no survival difference between these two treatment arms in this phase II trial of 120 patients. Etoposide phosphate is easier to administer than etoposide and, considering all other factors, including total cost of administration, it is preferable to etoposide for routine clinical use.
 ...
PMID:Clinical studies with etoposide phosphate. 899 75

A phase III clinical trial of vindesine-containing regimens organized by Chinese Medical Association was conducted from November 1993 to October 1994. In 799 evaluable cases, the overall response rate was 64.5% and the individual response rate was 74.1% for SCLC, 52.6% for NSCLC, 88.0% for malignant lymphomas, 62.6% for breast cancer, 57.5% for esophageal carcinoma, 59.0% for overian carcinoma and 94.0% for ALL. There were 1532 patients evaluable for toxicity. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Gastro-intestinal reactions, peripheral neuritis, alopecia and phlebtitis were also common. It is concluded that vindesine is similar to that reported as to response rate and toxicity.
 ...
PMID:[Results of phase II clinical trial of vindesine in the treatment of malignant tumors]. 938 23

Topotecan (Hycamtin; SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA), a camptothecin analog, is a novel and specific inhibitor of the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. In preclinical studies, topotecan demonstrated significant in vitro activity in a variety of solid tumor explants derived from colorectal, breast, ovarian, renal cell, non-small cell lung cancer, and gastrointestinal sources. Notable activity was also demonstrated in vivo in a wide range of animal tumor models. A large number of phase I studies with topotecan have been conducted since 1992 in both adults and children with a broad range of refractory malignancies and as many as 14 different dosing schedules. Complete, partial, or minor responses were demonstrated in patients with recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, esophageal cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. The antitumor activity of topotecan in these phase I evaluations was associated more often with frequent or continuous dosing schedules compared with less frequent or short exposure schedules. Maximum tolerated doses were predominantly dependent on the dosing schedule used. Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity across all schedules, and nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Data from phase I studies have provided valuable information about antitumor responses, maximum tolerated doses, and dose-limiting toxicities associated with different dosing schedules. Based on this information, there was substantial enthusiasm for further evaluating topotecan in a wide range of cancer patients in phase II studies.
 ...
PMID:Review of phase I clinical studies with topotecan. 942 56

Preclinical schedule dependency suggests that prolonged maintenance of low plasma levels of topotecan, a specific inhibitor of the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I, results in optimal antitumor activity. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan, administered as single agent in second-line therapy as a continuous low-dose infusion for 21 days, were evaluated in nine patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Topotecan was administered i.v. as a 21 day continuous infusion every 28 days via an ambulatory pump. Dosages ranged from 0.4 to 0.6 mg/m2/day. Plasma levels of topotecan, the sum of topotecan, and its hydroxy acid congener and the N-desmethyl metabolite were determined at 1, 7, 14 and 21 days during infusion, using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with fluorescence detection. Myelosuppression was the most important toxicity. All patients experienced anemia, being severe (grade 3/4) in 55% of all courses. Other adverse effects were relatively mild and reversible, and included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and fatigue. Three patients achieved a partial response. Mean steady-state concentrations of topotecan (C(ss)) in the first course were 0.46+/-0.17 and 0.47+/-0.19 ng/ml after doses of 0.4 and 0.5 mg/m2/day, respectively. Steady-state levels of the total of topotecan and hydroxy acid (C(ss,tot)) were 1.28+/-0.25 (range 0.93-1.58) and 1.57+/-0.19 (range 1.43-1.70) ng/ml at doses of 0.4 and 0.5 mg/m2/day, respectively. The percentage of the administered topotecan dose excreted in the urine within 24 h was 40+/-14 and 1.2+/-1.0% for total topotecan and N-desmethyltopotecan, respectively. During the second course, C(ss,tot) was significantly higher (p=0.032, paired t-test), which suggests altered topotecan disposition. A sigmoidal relationship was found between C(ss,tot) and the percent decrease in platelets (r=0.76, p=0.018). We conclude that topotecan administered as a 21 day continuous low-dose infusion has activity as single-agent, second-line therapy in patients with SCLC. There was considerable interpatient and intrapatient variability in systemic exposure to topotecan. Differences in organ function might contribute to this variation. Serum aspartate aminotransferase and albumin levels were predictive of topotecan pharmacokinetics.
 ...
PMID:Continuous infusion of low-dose topotecan: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during a phase II study in patients with small cell lung cancer. 966 May 38

This trial was conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group to improve the responses and survival in small cell lung cancer with a good prognosis, using a weekly intensive chemotherapy with alternated non-cross-resistant myelosuppressive agents. Patients were classified into two groups; group A consisted of those who received the initial designed regimen (29 patients), and group B consisted of those who received the more intensified regimen that increased by 25% the doses of carboplatin, epirubicin, and ifosfamide, and by 33% the doses of etoposide given on days 1, 2, and 3 with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Chemotherapy in group A consisted of carboplatin 150 mg/m2 in 250 ml of 5% dextrose in water as an 1-hour infusion on day 1, etoposide 75 mg/m2 in 250 ml normal saline as an 1-hour infusion on days 1 and 2 alternating with epirubicin 30 mg/m2 intravenous push on day 8, and ifosfamide 2 g/m2 in 500 ml 5% dextrose in water as a 2-hour infusion with mesna protection on day 8. Responding patients with limited disease were also treated with thoracic irradiation. Those who achieved complete response received prophylactic cranial radiotherapy. In group A, the overall response rate was 79.3%, with a 27.6% complete response rate, a median time to progression of 5.71 months, and a median survival of 8.3 months. For patients with limited disease, the response rate was 75%, with a 40% complete response rate, a median time to progression of 5.87 months, and a median survival of 10.98 months. The respective numbers for extensive disease were 89% (only partial responses), 4.82 months, and 5.67 months. The toxicity was mild and manageable. There were no dose reductions or treatment delays. In view of the excellent tolerability and the rather low efficacy of the initial regimen, we decided to administer the more intensified one with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. In Group B, the overall response rate was 91.8%, with a 45.9% complete response rate, a median time to progression of 7.05 months, and a median survival of 10.16 months. For limited disease, the response rate was 93%, with a 52% complete response rate, a median time to progression of 7.05 months, and a median survival of 10.49 months. The respective numbers for extensive disease were 88% (25% complete response), 6.82 months, and 9.02 months. The toxicity of this more intensified regimen was more severe but acceptable. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity. However, grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization occurred only in 6% of patients. The relative dose intensity was 91%, probably the result of the prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The differences in response rate, time to progression, and survival were not statistically significant between the two groups. There were statistically significant differences in the response rate (p = 0.019) and survival rate (p = 0.001) between limited disease and extensive disease only in group A. In conclusion, this weekly, alternated regimen, specifically the intensified regimen, appears to be very active and well tolerated in patient who have small cell lung cancer with a good prognosis. However, despite the high efficacy, this study failed to show any survival advantage as compared with that obtained with the standard treatment for small cell lung cancer.
 ...
PMID:Weekly alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer with a good prognosis: a study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. 1002 90


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10