Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0851184 (thinning)
 11,252 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

It is difficult to distinguish between restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis on the basis of clinical findings and simple investigation. Cardiac catheterisation has been the reference standard for diagnosis but even this does not always permit an accurate distinction. A Summagraphics digitiser and Prime 750 computer system were used to digitise the echocardiograms of 15 patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy, 10 with constrictive pericarditis and a group of 20 age and sex matched normal subjects of similar age and sex distribution. Compared with controls, patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy showed a significant reduction in the following variables (a) decreased fractional shortening, (b) decreased peak left ventricular filling and emptying rates, (c) decreased percentage posterior wall thickening, and (d) decreased peak left ventricular posterior wall thickening and thinning rates. Whereas patients with constrictive pericarditis only had significantly reduced peak left ventricular filling and posterior wall thinning rates and significantly increased posterior wall thinning rate. When patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy were compared with those with constrictive pericarditis the significant differences were: (a) decreased peak left ventricular emptying rate, (b) decreased percentage posterior wall thickening, and (c) decreased peak left ventricular posterior wall thickening and thinning rates. Digitisation of M mode echocardiograms, with particular attention to posterior wall function, may be a useful adjunct to cardiac catheterisation in distinguishing restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis.
 ...
PMID:Restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis: non-invasive distinction by digitised M mode echocardiography. 291 96

A diastole is a non specific haemodynamic syndrome which may result from constrictive pericarditis or from a restrictive cardiomyopathy. The aim of this study was to differentiate these two types of condition by analysis of computerised M mode recordings of the left ventricle. Three groups of patients were studied: 5 cases of confirmed cardiac amyloidosis (Am); 5 cases of constrictive pericarditis confirmed surgically (CP) and 10 normal subjects (NL). The study was based on analysis of parameters of ventricular filling and of diastolic thinning of the LV free wall. A significant difference was observed between AM and CP but not between PC and NL. Amyloidosis was characterised by a reduction in the maximum velocity of endocavitary diameter lengthening (AM 0,84 +/- 0,56 cir/sec; PC 3,95 +/- 0,77, p less than 0,01), prolongation of the rapid filling phase (AM 0,42 +/- 0,17 sec; PC 0,16 +/- 0,06 sec, p less than 0,02) and a decrease in maximum velocity of free wall thinning (AM 0,45 +/- 0,23 th/syst/sec; PC 4,79 +/- 2,1, p less than 0,01). The diastolic thickness of the free wall was greater in the amyloidosis group (AM 1,73 +/- 0,61 cm; PC 1,05 +/- 0,21, p less than 0,05) and correlated with the reduction of maximum velocity of free wall thinning. Parameters of global diastolic filling did not distinguish the two conditions. The M mode recordings were therefore digitalised to provide graphs of chamber filling and wall thinning and their derivatives.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Differential diagnosis between constrictive pericarditis and cardiac amyloidosis by computerized M-mode echocardiography]. 643 26

Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy are difficult to distinguish at the bedside and occasionally at routine cardiac catheterization. Left ventricular diastolic function was studied by computer analysis of digitized M-mode echocardiograms in four patients with constrictive disease and three with restrictive disease, and the data were compared with those of normal subjects. The respective distinguishing echographic features of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy were as follows: the major filling period of the left ventricle was 78 +/- 9% of normal versus 128 +/- 4% (p less than 0.01), minimal left ventricular dimension to peak filling interval was 50 +/- 10 versus 110 ms (p less than 0.05) and the maximal rate of left ventricular posterior wall thinning was -4.9 versus -2.3 seconds-1 (p less than 0.05). This preliminary study suggests that it may be possible to accurately diagnose the two disease entities using this technique at the bedside and to avoid cardiac catheterization.
 ...
PMID:Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy using digitized echocardiography. 682 63