Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0847097 (
acidity
)
15,165
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The effect of ranitidine and cisapride on acid reflux and oesophageal motility was investigated in 18 patients with endoscopically verified erosive reflux
oesophagitis
. Each patient was treated with placebo, ranitidine (150 mg twice daily), and ranitidine (150 mg twice daily) plus cisapride (20 mg twice daily) in a double blind, double dummy, within subject, three way cross over design. Oesophageal
acidity
and motility were monitored under ambulatory conditions for 24 hours on the fourth day of treatment, after a wash out period of 10 days during which patients received only antacids for relief of symptoms. Acid reflux was monitored by a pH electrode located 5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter. Intraoesophageal pressure was simultaneously recorded from four transducers placed 20, 15, 10, and 5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter. Upright reflux was three times higher than supine reflux (median (range) 13.3 (3.7-35.0)% v 3.7 (0-37.6)% of the time with pH < 4.0, p < 0.01, n = 18). Compared with placebo, ranitidine decreased total reflux (from 10.0 (3.2-32.6)% to 6.4 (1.2-22.9)%, p < 0.01), upright reflux (p < 0.05), supine reflux (p < 0.001), and postprandial reflux (p < 0.01), but did not affect oesophageal motility. The combination of ranitidine with cisapride further diminished the acid reflux found with ranitidine--that is, cisapride led to an additional reduction of total reflux (from 6.4 (1.2-22.9)% to 3.7 (1.0-12.7)%, p < 0.01), supine reflux (p < 0.05), and postprandial reflux (p < 0.05). Cisapride also reduced both the number (p<0.01) and duration (p<0.05) of reflux episodes and significantly increased amplitude, duration, and propagation velocity of oesophageal contractions (p<0.05) but did not affect the number of contractions. The findings show that the 30% reduction of oesophageal acid exposure achieved by a conventional dose of ranitidine (150 mg twice daily) can be improved to more than 60% by combination with cisapride (20 mg twice daily). The cisapride induced increase in oesophageal contractile force and propagation velocity seems to enhance the clearance of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Combination of a histamine H2 receptor antagonist with a prokinetic agent may therefore provide an alternative treatment for reflux
oesophagitis
.
...
PMID:Effects of ranitidine and cisapride on acid reflux and oesophageal motility in patients with reflux oesophagitis: a 24 hour ambulatory combined pH and manometry study. 817 47
Thirty two consecutive patients (age range 6 months-13.4 years) with severe reflux
oesophagitis
were randomised to a therapeutic trial for eight weeks during which they received either standard doses of omeprazole (40 mg/day/1.73 m2 surface area) or high doses of ranitidine (20 mg/kg/day). Twenty five patients completed the trial (12 on omeprazole, 13 on ranitidine). At entry and at the end of the trial patients underwent symptomatic score assessment, endoscopic and histological evaluation of the oesophagus, and simultaneous oesophageal and gastric pH measurement; results are given as median (range). Both therapeutic regimens were effective in decreasing clinical score (omeprazole before 24.0 (15-33), after 9.0 (0-18); ranitidine before 19.5 (12-33), after 9.0 (6-12)), in improving the histological degree of
oesophagitis
(omeprazole before 8.0 (6-10), after 2.0 (0-60); ranitidine before 8.0 (8-10), after 2.0 (2-6), and in reducing oesophageal acid exposure, measured as minutes of reflux at 24 hour pH monitoring (omeprazole before 129.4 (84-217), after 44.6 (0.16-128); ranitidine before 207.3 (66-306), after 58.4 (32-128)) as well as intragastric
acidity
, measured as median intragastric pH (omeprazole before 2.1 (1.0-3.0), after 5.1 (2.2-7.4); ranitidine before 1.9 (1.6-4), after 3.4 (2.3-5.3)). Serum gastrin concentration was > 150 ng/l in four patients on omeprazole and in three patients on ranitidine. It is concluded that in children with refractory reflux
oesophagitis
high doses of ranitidine are comparable with omeprazole for the healing of
oesophagitis
and relief of symptoms; both drugs resulted in efficacious reduction of intragastric
acidity
and intra-oesophageal acid exposure.
...
PMID:Omeprazole and high dose ranitidine in the treatment of refractory reflux oesophagitis. 828 77
Gastroesophageal reflux is a common disease. Its chronic course, even if mild, is sometimes complicated by erosive
oesophagitis
. Drug therapy acts against gastric
acidity
and motility disorders. Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease has three aims: improvement of symptoms and quality of life, healing erosive lesions and prevention of symptomatic and endoscopic relapses. Non-drug measures are always useful, even if their efficacy is not well established. Initial therapy of a symptomatic reflux or mild
oesophagitis
is most of the time effective (antacids, prokinetics, H2 receptor antagonists). Proton-pump inhibitors are also effective in healing and preventing severe
oesophagitis
. Questions about long-term treatment adverse events with powerful acid inhibitors, such as hypergastrinemia and the risk of gastric carcinoid tumours seem to be resolved. Studies are requested to define the optimal long-term maintenance treatment with cisapride, H2 receptor antagonists or proton-pump inhibitors at low doses in prevention of symptomatic and mild
oesophagitis
relapses.
...
PMID:[Therapeutic principles in gastroesophageal reflux]. 857 Sep 62
Gastroesophageal reflux disease accounts for approximately 75% of esophageal pathology. Accurate diagnosis can be complicated by the absence of endoscopic
esophagitis
in about 40% of patients with typical symptoms or atypical symptoms such as chest pain, chronic cough or wheezing. A number of tests have been developed to aid diagnosis, but 24-hour pH monitoring has emerged as the standard in reflux diagnostics. Although this method has been known for a long time, it has only become popular since small, portable digital recorders have been available. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze our first experience with this method. Included in the study were the first 50 consecutive patients in our hospital who had undergone endoscopy of the upper GI tract followed by 24-hour pH monitoring. As a recorder we used the "GastrograpH-Fresenius Mark II". In agreement with the literature we considered the following findings as abnormal: esophageal
acidity
below pH 4 > 5% of total time or > 8% of upright time or > 3% of supine time, more than 4 reflux episodes of > 5 minutes, duration of the longest reflux episode more than 20 minutes. With this definition there were 24 patients (48%) with reflux disease. The reflux episodes chiefly occurred in daytime (68%), as known from the literature. The indications for this examination were chiefly given by pneumologists (50%), followed by gastroenterologists (22%) and cardiologists (14%). Acid block therapy was performed in 83%, with success in 42% and failure in 8%. In 50% of the patients the necessary data were lacking. Based on these results we conclude that 24-hour pH monitoring has shown itself reliable for the diagnosis of reflux disease and should always be performed in patients with negative endoscopic examination but typical or atypical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.
...
PMID:[Indications for, results and consequences of 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring]. 870 Dec 62
The reasons why few patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease develop
oesophagitis
are not yet clear. One of the factors whose role is still debatable is the gastric acid secretory state. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether differences exist in nocturnal gastric
acidity
between patients with
oesophagitis
and refluxers without oesophageal lesions. We studied 65 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, 37 of whom presented erosive
oesophagitis
, while 28 had no oesophageal lesions. Thirty-one healthy volunteers were used as controls. In both patients and controls intragastric and intraoesophageal pH were measured continuously using 2 in-dwelling glass electrodes, placed in the gastric corpus and in the oesophagus. Mean intragastric pH was calculated over 3 nocturnal time periods: 11.00 p.m.-07.00 a.m.; 11.00 p.m.-03.00 a.m.; 03.00 a.m.-07.00 a.m. Patients with
oesophagitis
had a lower nocturnal gastric pH (1.6 +/- 0.2) than either refluxers without
oesophagitis
(2.2 +/- 0.3) (p = 0.05) or controls (2.6 +/- 0.4) (p = 0.02). The difference occurred entirely in the second part of the night. Furthermore, in the same time period,
oesophagitis
sufferers had a higher percentage of oesophageal acid exposure at pH < 2 (0.7 +/- 0.2) than refluxers without
oesophagitis
(0.2 +/- 0.1) (p = 0.05), suggesting that gastric findings are of pathogenetic relevance. Patients with reflux
oesophagitis
have a higher nocturnal intragastric
acidity
than refluxers without
oesophagitis
. This difference, confined to the second half of the night, may be due to an altered circadian pattern of gastric acid secretion and may partially explain why only some refluxers develop
oesophagitis
.
...
PMID:Nocturnal gastric acidity pattern in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with or without oesophagitis. 877 66
CFTR, or cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, the gene product that is defective in cystic fibrosis, is present in the apical membrane of the epithelial cells from the stomach to the colon. In the foregut, the clinical manifestations are not directly related to the primary defect of the CFTR chloride channel. The most troublesome complaints and symptoms originate from the oesophagus as peptic
oesophagitis
or oesophageal varices. In the small intestinal wall, the clinical expression of CF depends largely on the decreased secretion of fluid and chloride ions, the increased permeability of the paracellular space between adjacent enterocytes and the sticky mucous cover over the enterocytes. As a rule, the brush border enzyme activities are normal and there is some enhanced active transport as shown for glucose and alanine. The results of continuous enteral feeding of CF patients clearly show that the small intestinal mucosa, in the daily situation, is not functioning at maximal capacity. Although CFTR expression in the colon is lower, the large intestine may be the site of several serious complications such as rectal prolapse, meconium ileus equivalent, intussusception, volvulus and silent appendicitis. In recent years colonic strictures, after the use of high-dose pancreatic enzymes, are being increasingly reported; the condition has recently been called CF fibrosing colonopathy. The CF gastrointestinal content itself differs mainly from the normal condition by the lower
acidity
in the foregut and the accretion of mucins and proteins, eventually resulting in intestinal obstruction, in the ileum and colon. Better understanding of the CF gastrointestinal phenotype may contribute to improvement of the overall wellbeing of these patients.
...
PMID:Gastrointestinal manifestations in cystic fibrosis. 886 67
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a very common disorder of upper gastro-intestinal motility, differing widely in severity and prognosis. Medical therapy of GORD has involved antacids, alginates, prokinetic agents and antisecretory compounds, primarily H2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of these compounds is important, to optimise the therapeutic benefit in each patient. GORD patients are often elderly and pharmacokinetics are move variable in this group. Furthermore, they often suffer from other diseases needing medical therapy and may need a combination of drugs to heal reflux
oesophagitis
and relieve reflux symptoms. The ideal therapy for GORD will have linear pharmacokinetics, a relatively long plasma half-life (t1/2), a duration of action allowing once daily administration, and a stable effect independent of interactions with food, antacids and other drugs. Over-the-counter antacids and alginates are widely used, buy may affect absorption of H2 receptor antagonists like cimetidine and ranitidine. Aluminium-containing antacids may, over time, cause toxicity in patients with renal insufficiency. In the treatment of GORD, cisapride presents important advantages over earlier prokinetic compounds, with a longer plasma t1/2, low penetration of the blood-brain barrier and fewer adverse effects. The group of H2 receptor antagonists is still the most frequently use therapy for GORD. Linear pharmacokinetics make dose adjustments easy and safe. In individual patients, suppression of gastric secretion is related to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), but there is wide interindividual variation in the effect of the same oral dose. Only with frequent administration and high doses will acid suppression approximate that of proton pump inhibitors. Tolerance, with loss of effect over time, however, is most pronounced in this situation. H2 receptor antagonists seem well suited for on-demand treatment of reflux symptoms, due to the rapid onset of effect and a decrease likelihood of the development of tolerance. Effervescent formulations provide more rapid absorption and almost immediate clinical effect. Cimetidine, however, causes interference with the metabolism of several other drugs in common use. In elderly patients elimination is delayed and in patients with renal insufficiency, dose reductions of all H2 receptor antagonists are recommended. The most effective medical therapy for any severity of GORD, particularly in severe
oesophagitis
, are the proton pump inhibitors. The substituted benzimidazoles (omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole), are prodrugs which once trapped and activated in the acid milieu of the gastric glands potently suppress gastric secretion of acid and pepsin. Their long duration of action, more related to the slow turnover of parietal cell H(+)-K+ ATPase molecules, allows once daily administration in most patients. Interindividual variation in bioavailability sometimes calls for higher doses or twice daily administration. Acid suppression is closely related to the AUC. Omeprazole is prone to interaction with the metabolism of other drugs, some of which may e be clinically important. Lansoprazole seems to have an earlier onset of action than omeprazole, ascribed to higher bioavailability during the first days of treatment. Proton pump inhibitors have a slow onset of action, which makes them unsuited for on-demand therapy. Clinical practice in GORD calls for the use of not one but several substances, according to the severity and symptom pattern of the patient. Pharmacokinetic optimisation in the treatment of GORD is a question of selecting the most suitable substances and administration schemes within each group. Cisapride is superior to other prokinetics in terms of longer plasma t1/2 and less toxicity. Amongst H2 receptor antagonists, the more long-acting compounds, ranitidine and famotidine, will improve
acidity
control througho
...
PMID:Pharmacokinetic optimisation in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. 911 86
Saliva contains several factors that protect the alimentary canal mucosa against
acidity
. We measured the secretory carbonic anhydrase (CA VI) levels in the saliva of patients with gastrointestinal disorders using a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay. The mean enzyme concentrations were found to be lower in patients with verified
esophagitis
, gastric ulcer, or duodenal ulcer than in control patients with nonacid peptic diseases. The biochemical data from the enzyme activity assays and western blots of the human gastric mucosa and gastric juice samples indicated that the swallowed CA VI probably retains its activity in the harsh environment of the gastric lumen. In the upper alimentary canal, CA VI may neutralize the acid by catalyzing the formation of carbon dioxide and water. The present findings suggest that drugs supplemented with CA VI may prove beneficial in treating acid-peptic diseases.
...
PMID:Salivary carbonic anhydrase protects gastroesophageal mucosa from acid injury. 914 56
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is primarily due to incompetence of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) and crural diaphragm, with transient LOS relaxation frequently accounting for daytime reflux. In the absence of drugs that adequately correct the motility defects of GERD, treatment is directed towards decreasing gastric
acidity
. Oesophageal healing is related to control of 24-h intragastric
acidity
, the degree of acid suppression and duration of treatment. H2-receptor antagonists are generally less effective in GERD than in peptic ulcer disease. While providing symptomatic relief in non-erosive GERD, they are often ineffective in healing erosive
oesophagitis
. Proton pump inhibitors provide more rapid and complete healing and symptom resolution. They are superior to H2-receptor antagonists in the long-term management of erosive
oesophagitis
and in reducing recurrence of oesophageal stricture following mechanical dilatation. In Barrett's oesophagus, high-dose proton pump inhibitors in combination with laser/photodynamic ablation therapy can produce metaplastic regression, although this does not preclude future emergence of adenocarcinoma. Surgical morbidity and mortality rates in GERD generally remain higher than those associated with long-term pharmacotherapy. However, direct comparisons between laparascopic anti-reflux surgery and proton pump inhibitor maintenance therapy remain to be performed. Although there is no evidence that H. pylori infection worsens the severity of
oesophagitis
or that H. pylori is carcinogenic in the metaplastic oesophageal mucosa. It has been suggested that H. pylori-positive patients requiring long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy receive bacterial eradication therapy to reduce the risk of developing atrophic gastritis.
...
PMID:Review article: current practice and future perspectives in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. 930 72
Twelve neurologically normal infants (age 2.9+/-0.9 months) with peptic esophagitis (grade 2) who did not respond to cimetidine (in addition to positioning, cisapride, and Gaviscon) were treated with omeprazole, 0.5 mg/kg once a day, for 6 weeks. The effectiveness of omeprazole was evaluated in all infants by clinical assessment and endoscopy before and after treatment and by 24-hour gastric pH monitoring during treatment in seven infants. Omeprazole therapy led to a marked decrease in symptoms, endoscopic and histologic signs of
esophagitis
, and intragastric
acidity
.
...
PMID:Omeprazole in infants with cimetidine-resistant peptic esophagitis. 950 56
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>