UMLS:C0730345 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0730345 (microalbuminuria)
4,018 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Angiotensin I Converting Enzyme (ACE), which is synthesized by vascular endothelial cells, can be elevated in some diabetic subjects. To study if serum ACE can be elevated in subjects with high risk for malignant microangiopathy, 34 normotensive type I, insulin-dependent diabetic subjects with persistent microalbuminuria (30-300 mg/24 h) were compared for serum ACE activity (Liebermann's method) with 30 normotensive, normoalbuminuric type I, insulin-dependent diabetic subjects of same age (33 +/- 15 (M +/- SD) vs 39 +/- 14 years), sex (13 F/21 M vs 15 F/15 M), stage of retinopathy (14 vs 16 nil/11 vs 7 background/6 vs 4 preproliferative/3 vs 3 proliferative), HbA1c (7.7 +/- .9 vs 8.2 +/- 1.0%). Serum ACE activity of diabetic subjects were also compared with 120 age and sex related healthy controls. Serum ACE activity was higher in type I, insulin-dependent diabetic subjects with microalbuminuria than in those with normoalbuminuria (406 +/- 114 vs 359 +/- 97 IU/l; p = 0.05), or in controls (307 +/- 95 IU/l; p = 0.0001). Normoalbuminuric subjects also had higher ACE activity than controls (p = 0.02). In diabetic subjects, serum ACE activity was not related to diabetes duration (r = 0.1; ns), stage of retinopathy (r = 0.06; ns), HbA1c (r = 0.02; ns), or to blood pressure (r = 0.03; ns), but was related to urinary albumin excretion (r = 0.28; p = 0.03) in diabetic subjects. However, stage of retinopathy was related to diabetes duration (r = 0.74; p = 0.0004) and to age (r = 0.42; p = 0.003) in these subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:[Increase of activity of angiotensin-converting enzyme in insulin-dependent diabetic patients with permanent microalbuminuria]. 133 56

The pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy remains elusive. A role for renal prostaglandins in antagonizing the hormonal effects of renin-angiotensin II has been postulated as a putative factor leading to hyperfiltration in patients with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Our aim was to elucidate the effects of angiotensin II on kidney haemodynamics and on blood pressure in eight normal subjects, in nine normotensive, in nine hypertensive with normal sodium-lithium countertransport activity in erythrocytes, in seven hypertensive without and in eight hypertensive Type 1 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria and with high sodium-lithium countertransport activity in erythrocytes. Angiotensin II infusion (4 ng.kg-1.min-1 for 60 min) decreased the glomerular filtration rate to a greater extent in normal subjects (-20%), than in normotensive patients (-5% p less than 0.01), in hypertensive patients with normal sodium-lithium countertransport activity in erythrocytes (-8% p less than 0.01) in hypertensive patients with high sodium-lithium countertransport (-6% p less than 0.01) and in hypertensive microalbuminuric patients (-5% p less than 0.01) with Type 1 diabetes. The urinary excretion rate of vasodilatory prostaglandins was two-three fold higher in all patients than in normal subjects. Acute indomethacin treatment restored a normal response to angiotensin II infusion in normotensive patients, but did not change the renal haemodynamic response in normal subjects. With regard to hypertensive patients with and without microalbuminuria indomethacin treatment restored a normal response to angiotensin II in some but not all patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Impaired response to angiotensin II in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Role of prostaglandins and sodium-lithium countertransport activity. 193 64

We examined ten patients with type I diabetes mellitus and ten age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Median duration of diabetes was 7 years (range 0.5-24). None of the diabetic patients had hypertension, microalbuminuria, or proliferative retinopathy. Maximal specific binding capacity for angiotensin II to thrombocytes was significantly increased in diabetics (Bmax 11.9 +/- 1.6 sites per cell vs 7.0 +/- 0.9 in controls; P less than 0.01). In contrast, maximal binding for atrial natriuretic factor tended to be lower in type I diabetics (8.84 +/- 1.25 sites per cell vs 16.8 +/- 2.97; P less than 0.07). There was no difference of apparent dissociation constant (KD) for either receptor. Angiotensin II values (RIA) were greater in diabetics (16.2 +/- 1.5 pg/ml vs 8.5 +/- 1.4 in controls; P less than 0.02) and concentrations of atrial natriuretic factor (RIA) were not significantly different. The data suggest increased angiotensin II binding despite high angiotensin II concentrations in non-nephropathic type I diabetic patients. These findings may be relevant when considering the evolution of hypertension and microangiopathy lesions.
...
PMID:Specific binding of angiotensin II and atrial natriuretic factor in non-nephropathic type I diabetes mellitus. 252 55

Several methods used in the prediction of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) were evaluated with statistical techniques. Only cohort studies were considered. The data reviewed show that platelet count, hematocrit, serum uric acid, and microalbuminuria are poor predictors of HDP. Mean arterial pressure predicts transient hypertension rather than preeclampsia. Fibronectin, urinary calcium excretion, roll-over test, and Doppler ultrasound showed contradictory and nonconclusive findings among the different authors. Isometric exercise test showed high predictive values but only two studies have been performed. Angiotensin II sensitivity was the test that showed the best predictive values but it is useless in clinical practice. In conclusion, currently, there is no test that fulfills all criteria established to be a good predictor of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. The search for an adequate method for the screening of HDP with a high sensitivity, inexpensive, and easy to perform should still be a priority in future investigations.
...
PMID:Evaluation of methods used in the prediction of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. 816 16

As angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is accompanied by a marked decrease in glomerular protein loss, the hypothesis was tested that an increase of the glomerular transcapillary hydraulic pressure difference by exogenous angiotensin II would increase microalbuminuria in patients with insulin (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Acute effects of increasing doses of angiotensin II (1, 3 and 6 ng/kg/min) were studied on mean arterial pressure (MAP), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), filtration fraction (FF), total renal vascular resistance (TRVR), and urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) in 11 IDDM and 11 NIDDM microalbuminuric patients. Angiotensin II infusion changed MAP from 100 +/- 3 mmHg at baseline to 105 +/- 3, 111 +/- 3, and 116 +/- 3 mmHg (P < 0.001), ERPF from 542 +/- 29 to 478 +/- 24, 429 +/- 23, and 382 +/- 19 ml/min (P < 0.001), FF from 20.2 +/- 0.06 to 23.1 +/- 0.7, 27.1 +/- 1.1, and 29.8 +/- 1.2% (P < 0.001), and TRVR from 9454 +/- 809 to 11,158 +/- 930, 13,310 +/- 1206, and 15,538 +/- 1362 dyne s cm-5 (P < 0.001). GFR and UAER, however, did not change significantly. Therefore, during angiotensin II infusion ERPF decreased, while FF and TRVR increased. As UAER and GFR remained unchanged, the presumed rise in intraglomerular capillary pressure by exogenous angiotensin II did not increase UAER. We suggest that during manipulation of the renin-angiotensin system, as in other renal diseases with proteinuria, factors other than glomerular transcapillary hydraulic pressure determine the degree of urinary albumin loss in microalbuminuric IDDM and NIDDM patients.
...
PMID:Urinary albumin excretion rate during angiotensin II infusion in microalbuminuric patients with insulin and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. 913 45

A considerable amount of data have implicated angiotensin receptors (AT receptors) in the development and maintenance of essential hypertension and renovascular hypertension as well as in progressive renal pathologies. Inhibition of angiotensin II (Ang II) action by blocking Ang II formation through angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, or by blocking AT1 receptors directly using subtype-selective nonpeptide antagonists, has been found to attenuate the proteinuria, microalbuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, and nephrosclerosis in a variety of experimental models and in clinical trials. This review will first broadly discuss AT receptor subtypes in terms of their structure, function, tissue distribution and signaling. Secondly, the mechanistic differences between ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade will be examined because these pharmaceutical agents are widely used tools to investigate the role of AT receptors in renal disease. Lastly, experimental models of essential hypertension, renovascular hypertension and progressive renal disease will be presented, which include the Fawn-hooded rat, the stroke prone spontaneously hypertensive rat, renal mass ablation and the 2K1C and 1K1C animal models. The overall goal of this review is to critically evaluate the data regarding the role of AT receptors in the pathophysiology of renal disease.
...
PMID:Kidney angiotensin receptors and their role in renal pathophysiology. 1102 92

Chronic inhibition of the renin angiotensin system prevents increased BP and renal injury in N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) hypertension. However, a relationship between plasma renin activity and the protective effect of chronic angiotensin II (Ang II) blockade has not been established. With this background, this study was undertaken to evaluate how the chronic administration of deoxycortisone acetate (DOCA) modifies the effects of losartan on BP, renal injury, and other variables in L-NAME hypertensive rats. The following groups were used: Control, DOCA, L-NAME, L-NAME + losartan, L-NAME + DOCA, and L-NAME + DOCA + losartan. Tail systolic BP was measured twice a week. After 4-wk evolution, mean arterial pressure and metabolic, morphologic, and renal variables were measured. The final mean arterial pressure values were 116 +/- 6 mmHg for control, 107 +/- 2 mmHg for DOCA, 151 +/- 5 mmHg for L-NAME, 123 +/- 2 mmHg for L-NAME + losartan, 170 +/- 3 mmHg for L-NAME + DOCA, and 171 +/- 5.5 mmHg for L-NAME + DOCA + losartan. Losartan prevented microalbuminuria, hyaline arteriopathy, and glomerulosclerosis of L-NAME hypertension but was ineffective in L-NAME + DOCA-treated rats. Plasma protein was significantly reduced in the L-NAME + DOCA group when compared with control and L-NAME groups, whereas no significant differences were observed in the other groups. Plasma renin activity was suppressed in the DOCA (0.55 +/- 0.2) and L-NAME + DOCA (0.60 +/- 10.2) groups but unsuppressed in the L-NAME + DOCA + losartan group (5.8 +/- 1). The conclusion is that DOCA blocks the preventive effect of losartan on the increased BP and renal injury of L-NAME hypertension, which suggests that DOCA transforms L-NAME hypertension into an Ang II-independent model of hypertension. These data also suggest that losartan prevents L-NAME hypertension by blocking the activity of systemic Ang II.
...
PMID:Deoxycorticosterone suppresses the effects of losartan in nitric oxide-deficient hypertensive rats. 1105 74

The Reduction in End Points in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study and the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) are two recently reported trials with hard end points, conducted in patients in advanced stages of diabetic nephropathy. Two other studies--the Irbesartan Microalbuminuria Study (IRMA)-2 and the Microalbuminuria Reduction with Valsartan study (MARVAL)--were trials conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria, a cardiovascular risk factor associated with early-stage diabetic nephropathy. These trials all had a common theme--that is, does an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) interfere with the natural history of diabetic nephropathy in a blood pressure-independent fashion? Without question, the results of these trials legitimatize the use of the ARB class in forestalling the deterioration in renal function, which is almost inevitable in the patient with untreated diabetic nephropathy. These data can now be added to the vast array of evidence supporting angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor use in patients with nephropathy associated with type 1 diabetes. It now appears a safe conclusion that the patient with diabetic nephropathy should receive therapy with an agent that interrupts the renin-angiotensin system. These studies have not resolved the question as to whether an ACE inhibitor or an ARB is the preferred agent in people with nephropathy from type 1 diabetes, though the optimal doses of these drugs remain to be determined. Head-to-head studies comparing ACE inhibitors to ARBs in diabetic nephropathy are not likely to occur, so it is unlikely that comparable information will be forthcoming with ACE inhibitors. An evidence-based therapeutic approach derived from these trials would argue for ARBs to be the foundation of therapy in the patient with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.
...
PMID:Type 2 diabetes: RENAAL and IDNT--the emergence of new treatment options. 1182 41

Recent trials have helped to clarify indications for the initial pharmacological therapy of hypertension. Both the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) and World Health Organization-international Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) recommendations should be revised. The more recent trials indicate that: (1) diuretics and beta-blockers appear to be as effective in reducing overall morbidity/ mortality as other agents (Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension [STOP-2], United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study [UKPDS], Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment [INSIGHT], Nordic diltiazem [NORDIL]); (2) the use of an a-blocker results in more cardiovascular events, especially congestive heart failure, when compared with a diuretic (Antihypertensive Therapy and Lipid Lowering Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]); (3)the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor results in fewer myocardial infarctions and episodes of heart failure than calcium channel blockers in the elderly and in diabetic patients (Fosinopril vs. Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial [FACET], Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes [ABCD], STOP-2) - other data (Captopril Prevention Project [CAPPP]) suggest that the use of an ACE inhibitor is preferred in diabetic patients; (4) overall cardiovascular events are similar with calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic - however, there are fewer strokes with non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NORDIL) and a trend towards an increase in heart failure and myocardial infarctions with either a dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic (INSIGHT, NORDIL); (5) angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) will decrease proteinuria and slow progression of renal disease in type 2 diabetic patients when compared with regimens that do not include an ARB or an ACE inhibitor (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan [RENAAL], Irbesartan Type II Diabetic Nephropathy Trial [IDNT], Irbesartan Type II Diabetes with Microalbuminuria [IRMA Il]). The debate over initial therapy may be moot. High-risk hypertensive patients should probably be treated initially with combination therapy, one of which should be a diuretic. The use of diuretics and beta-blockers as well as ACE-inhibitors alone or with a diuretic should be considered as initial therapy (a change from JNCVI). Alpha-blockers should be reserved for special situations, i.e. prostatic hypertrophy (in contrast to WHO-ISH recommendations). An ACE-inhibitor or ARB, usually along with a diuretic, can be considered as preferred therapy in hypertensive diabetic patients. Some data suggest equal or greater reduction in strokes with a calcium channel blocker than other medications.
...
PMID:Current recommendations for the treatment of hypertension: are they still valid? 1199 97

In this article, 2 leading physicians debate the strength of outcome data on the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for reducing the incidence of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renovascular events. Dr. Stephen G. Ball notes that the efficacy of ACE inhibitors for reducing the risk for myocardial infarction independent of their effects on blood pressure is controversial. In the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study, ramipril treatment in high-risk patients was associated with a 20% reduction in the risk for myocardial infarction; mean reduction in blood pressure was 3 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and 1 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. The HOPE investigators propose that the 20% reduction was much greater than would be expected based on the observed blood pressure reduction. However, a meta-regression analysis of blood pressure reduction in >20 antihypertensive therapy outcome trials found that the reduction in myocardial infarction risk with ramipril observed in HOPE was consistent with the modest blood pressure reduction seen with that agent. Nevertheless, there are convincing data for prevention of myocardial infarction with ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure, including those with heart failure after myocardial infarction, as well as supportive evidence from studies in patients with diabetes mellitus and concomitant hypertension. On the other hand, Dr. William B. White takes the position that ARBs are well-tolerated antihypertensive agents that specifically antagonize the angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor and provide a more complete block of the pathologic effects of angiotensin II-which are mediated via the AT(1) receptor-than ACE inhibitors. The Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE) II study and the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (ValHeFT) suggest that ARBs reduce the risk for mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint (LIFE) Reduction in Hypertension trial also demonstrated beneficial effects of ARBs in the prevention of stroke events. The Irbesartan in Patients with Diabetes and Microalbuminuria (IRMA) study, the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT), and the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study demonstrated significant reductions in the rate of progression of renal disease in patients receiving ARBs, independent of effects on blood pressure. These data support the use of ARBs, in addition to the standard of care, in hypertensive patients with heart failure who are intolerant of ACE inhibitors, and also provide compelling evidence for their use in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.
...
PMID:Debate: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin II receptor blockers--a gap in evidence-based medicine. 1451 6

1 2 3 4 Next >>