Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0730345 (microalbuminuria)
 4,018 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The purpose of the present study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of diuretic-free antihypertensive therapy with a calcium antagonist and/or an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor in patients with diabetes mellitus. 54 hypertensive [blood pressure (BP) above 140/90mm Hg] patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (n = 7) or 2 (n = 47) and normal serum creatinine levels (mean 82 +/- 6 mumol/L) received either verapamil or enalapril after a 2-week washout and a 4-week placebo phase. If BP remained elevated, both agents were combined. Verapamil or enalapril alone normalised diastolic BP (to less than 90mm Hg) in 36 patients; verapamil decreased BP from 159/98 to 147/87mm Hg (n = 19, p < 0.001) and enalapril decreased BP from 166/99 to 146/88mm Hg (n = 17, p < 0.001). In 18 patients who remained hypertensive after 10 weeks of monotherapy, a combination of both drugs decreased BP from 169/104 to 151/90mm Hg (p < 0.001). Overall, 87% of patients achieved a target BP response at 30 weeks. Urinary albumin as related to creatinine excretion (UAE; micrograms albumin:mg creatinine) was on average not significantly changed after verapamil or enalapril treatment, alone or combined. Nevertheless, in patients with initial microalbuminuria, UAE decreased (p < 0.05) during enalapril treatment. Serum potassium, total lipids, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycosylated haemoglobin, serum C peptide and fructosamine levels were not significantly modified by treatment. Subjective tolerability of the drugs was also generally good. Thus, in hypertensive patients with diabetes, a diuretic-free therapy based on the calcium antagonist verapamil or the ACE inhibitor enalapril, alone or combined, can effectively decrease BP without adversely affecting carbohydrate and lipid metabolism.
 ...
PMID:Swiss hypertension treatment programme with verapamil and/or enalapril in diabetic patients. 128 88

Abnormalities in sodium homeostasis and in atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) behavior could play a role in determining and accelerating the development of glomerular hypertension, hypertension, and microalbuminuria in insulin-dependent diabetes. The aim of the present study was to investigate in 32 hypertensive insulin-dependent diabetic patients (HD) with an altered albumin excretion rate the natriuretic response and ANP release to saline load (2 mmol/kg 90 min, and the effects angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy 2.5 to 5.0 mg cilazapril, once daily), and calcium antagonists (sustained release verapamil: 120 to 240 mg Isoptin Press, once daily, and long acting nifedipine: 20 to 40 mg Adalat AR, twice daily) on sodium homeostasis and albumin excretion rate. Eight normal subjects matched for sex, age, and weight served as controls. The 32 HD patients showed a blunted response in ANP release and sodium excretion during saline infusion in comparison with controls. The cilazapril and verapamil treatments were tested in 16 of the 32 HD patients and were both effective in ameliorating natriuretic and ANP response to saline load and in decreasing albumin excretion rate. The combined cilazapril and verapamil treatment further improved both these parameters in these patients, although blood pressure levels were comparable. The other 16 HD patients underwent sequential verapamil and nifedipine treatment. Verapamil was more effective than nifedipine in improving natriuresis and ANP release to saline load and in lowering the albumin excretion rate. The results of the present study demonstrate that sodium homeostasis and ANP release are altered in hypertensive nephropathic patients, and both cilazapril and verapamil are more effective than nifedipine in ameliorating natriuresis, ANP release, and albumin excretion rate.
 ...
PMID:Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists on atrial natriuretic peptide release and action and on albumin excretion rate in hypertensive insulin-dependent diabetic patients. 145 87

Verapamil SR (180 mg) plus trandolapril (2 mg) is a potent antihypertensive combination but the efficacy and safety of this treatment has not been studied fully in hypertensive patients with metabolic disorders. We enrolled 298 patients with mild to moderate hypertension who had at least one of the following disorders: diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia or mild renal failure. The sitting systolic pressure and diastolic blood pressures were significantly decreased after 12 weeks of treatment. Blood pressure was inadequately controlled in only 24 patients (8.8%). Progressive decreases in blood glucose, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein and triglyceride levels were observed during the study. There was no significant change in blood urea nitrogen, creatinine and transaminase levels (p > 0.05). There was a significant decrease in microalbuminuria levels. There was no significant change in glycosylated haemoglobin levels in diabetic patients. Verapamil SR plus trandolapril is an effective drug combination in the treatment of hypertension. It may be used safely in patients with diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia and mild renal failure.
 ...
PMID:Verapamil SR and trandolapril combination therapy is safe and effective in hypertensive patients with metabolic disorders. 1121 19

Trandolapril/verapamil sustained release (SR) [Tarka] is an oral, fixed-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor trandolapril and the SR formulation of the phenylalkylamine calcium channel antagonist verapamil. It is indicated for the treatment of hypertension in patients who require more than one agent to achieve blood pressure (BP) targets. In the large, randomised, multicentre INVEST (INternational VErapamil SR/trandolapril STudy), a verapamil SR-based treatment strategy that included trandolapril in most patients was as effective as an atenolol-based treatment strategy in reducing the risk of the primary outcome (first occurrence of death [all-cause], nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] or nonfatal stroke) in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease (CAD) and was as well tolerated. Trandolapril/verapamil SR is generally more effective at controlling hypertension than either component as monotherapy, and is as effective as a number of other fixed-dose combination therapies. The combination is as well tolerated as trandolapril monotherapy and is at least as well tolerated as verapamil SR monotherapy. In hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the BENEDICT (BErgamo NEphrologic DIabetes Complications Trial), trandolapril/verapamil SR prolonged the time to the onset of persistent microalbuminuria compared with placebo, as did trandolapril monotherapy. Thus, trandolapril/verapamil SR is an effective option for the treatment of essential hypertension in patients requiring more than one agent to achieve BP targets, including those with compelling indications, such as CAD or type 2 diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Trandolapril/verapamil sustained release: a review of its use in the treatment of essential hypertension. 1611 84

Objective: To review the use of nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (non-DHP CCBs) for the treatment of proteinuria in diabetic and nondiabetic kidney disease. Data Sources: A search using PubMed and MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed from 1964 through February 2019 using the following search terms alone or in combination: verapamil, diltiazem, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, proteinuria, albuminuria, microalbuminuria, kidney disease, renal disease. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All prospective English-language trials examining one or more non-DHP CCB for the treatment of proteinuria were evaluated. Data Synthesis: A total of 13 clinical trials examining the use of non-DHP CCBs to treat proteinuria alone or in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were included in the evaluation. Most studies evaluated patients with macroalbuminuria secondary to diabetes and hypertension. Verapamil was the most common agent studied. Non-DHP CCBs were effective in reducing proteinuria in diabetic kidney disease but did not reduce renal or cardiovascular outcomes in the one trial that evaluated clinical end points. They were generally well tolerated, with the most common adverse effect reported being constipation. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review evaluates and summarizes the available evidence on non-DHP CCBs for treatment of proteinuria in patients with existing kidney disease. Conclusion: Non-DHP CCBs may be a reasonable therapeutic option for patients with diabetic kidney disease and persistent proteinuria despite maximum doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs. Additionally, they may be reasonable alternatives to ACE inhibitors or ARBs if a contraindication or intolerance exists.
 ...
PMID:Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers for the Treatment of Proteinuria: A Review of the Literature. 3096 85