Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0729233 (Thoracic)
 6,478 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Cardiac surgery elicits a cascade of stress responses mediated by the release of various cytokines and stress hormones [Roth-Isigkeit 1998]. Apart from the stress induced by the surgical process, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been documented to play a major role in the perioperative stress response seen following cardiac surgery [Butler 1993, McBride 1995, Hall 1997]. The imbalance in pro- and anti-inflammatory responses may affect outcome in cardiac surgery patients [Casey 1993, McBride 1995, Menasch 1995]. Contact of blood with the CPB circuit, along with hypoperfusion of various organs prior to and during CPB, may aggravate this stress response and contribute to adverse outcomes in the perioperative period [Casey 1993, Menasch 1995, Tonnesen 1996]. Splanchnic hypoperfusion that occurs in cardiac surgery patients [Landow 1991] can result in increased permeability of the gut mucosal barrier, resulting in endotoxemia and release of proinflammatory cytokines. Lungs and kidneys play a role in sequestrating the proinflammatory cytokines and, in the presence of hypoperfusion, may be damaged by these cytokines [Gilliland 1999, Liebold 1999, Gormley 2000]. Avoiding CPB may reduce this stress response. Anesthetic techniques such as thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) that improve splanchnic perfusion [Moore 1995, Kapral 1999, Ai 2001] may have a role in improving patient outcome. It is further known that ischemic myocardium can be a major source of proinflammatory cytokines [Wan 1999a]. The cardiac sympathetic block resulting from TEA has been shown to reduce ischemia reperfusion injury [Blomberg 1989, Blomberg 1990, Liem 1992a, Liem 1992b, Liem 1992c, Kirno 1994, Stenseth 1994]. Beating heart surgery done without the aid of CPB significantly attenuates cytokine and stress response [Brasil 1998, Fransen 1998, Gu 1998, Wan 1999b, Ganapathy 1999a, Ganapathy 2000a]. There is reduced renal dysfunction following beating heart surgery [Ascione 1999], which may be related to reduced proinflammatory cytokine surge. Thoracic epidural analgesia inhibits intraoperative cortisol as well as catecholamine surge but does not add further to the reduction in cytokine response [Ganapathy 1999b].
 ...
PMID:Stress and inflammatory response after beating heart surgery versus conventional bypass surgery: the role of thoracic epidural anesthesia. 1182 61

Irradiation of the heart begets different complications in which pericardial disease is the most common manifestation. Thoracic irradiation of lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, lung and breast cancer could be complicated by adverse effects to every structure of the heart. Potential injury of mediastinal irradiation can include acute and late pericarditis, cardiomyopathy, valvular disease and conduction abnormalities. The pathophysiology of these various syndromes is probably similar, starting by prior microvascular injury that leads to subsequent myocardium ischemia, all of which cause late fibrous scars. Acute pericarditis is often asymptomatic and clear spontaneously. Late pericarditis affects approximately 5% of the patients when the irradiation dose exceeds 40 Gy. At this dose, the mortality rate is below than 1%. Cardiomyopathy is rare and often asymptomatic. A long time unrecognized, coronary artery disease, diagnosed in 5 to 10% of the patients, begets multifarious sequelae like myocardial infarction, valvular abnormalities and cardiac rhythm changes. This coronary artery disease is more likely to occur if the patient was young at the time of the irradiation (< or = 21 years) and/or if other cardiovascular risk factors are associated. Incidence and mortality rates of valvular defects are about 20 and 0.5%, respectively. Conduction dysfunctions can also be seen in 5% of the patients. Radiation-induced heart complications seem to be related to total dose (> 30 Gy), irradiated tissue volume and fraction size. Since cardiac complications appear months to years following incidental irradiation of the heart, appropriate screening and long-term cardiac follow-up of these patients is essential.
 ...
PMID:[Radiation toxicity to the heart: physiopathology and clinical data]. 1589 21

Thoracic aortic dissection is a life-threatening disease with a high mortality rate and an elevated incidence of early and long-term complications. Advances in surgical treatment of ascending (Stanford type A) aortic dissection have helped improve patient survival, but follow-up imaging is critically important for the identification of postsurgical complications. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, along with multisection computed tomography, is the technique of choice for this purpose. For accurate assessment of 3D MR angiograms, it is important to know what surgical procedure was performed and to be familiar with the appearance of the normal postsurgical anatomy. A thorough understanding of potential postsurgical complications also is essential. Some complications (eg, formation of a periprosthetic hematoma or pseudoaneurysm, stenosis in a graft anastomosis) may derive from the prosthesis. Complications also may occur in the remnant of the native aorta, where persistent dissection distal to the prosthesis is common and may result in false channel thrombosis or aneurysmatic dilatation with collapse of the true lumen. Residual dissection that involves the supra-aortic trunks or the visceral aortic branches may produce neurologic effects or renal and mesenteric ischemia, respectively.
 ...
PMID:MR angiographic evaluation of complications in surgically treated type A aortic dissection. 1684 27

Thoracic aortic endografting is proving to be extremely useful for correcting a variety of lesions with few complications. Endovascular intervention avoids sternotomy or thoracotomy, the use of chest tubes, respirators, and general anesthesia, and limits blood loss. Compared with traditional open surgery, complications such as paraplegia, renal failure, and cardiac and pulmonary difficulties are minimized; hospital and rehabilitation times are also reduced. Selection of patients on the basis of favorable anatomy and pathology for a specific device is critical to procedural success. In some cases, a retroperitoneal conduit may be useful. In addition, left carotid-subclavian bypass or a transposition of the left subclavian artery to the left common carotid artery may be necessary before endografting, and spinal cord fluid drainage may be important when there is potential for cord ischemia.
 ...
PMID:Technical tips for thoracic aortic endografting. 1834 29

Thoracic endografting is emerging as an alternative option in the surgical management of patients who have thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) or aortic dissection. Due to the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with open TAAA repair, vascular surgeons are searching for innovative methods to repair such aneurysms. A combined endovascular and open approach, otherwise known as the hybrid repair, involves aortic "debranching" (renal and mesenteric revascularization) to create a landing zone for the endograft. Although operative mortality with hybrid is equivalent to mortality found with open repair, reported paralysis rates are reduced. Limited data regarding hybrid graft patency and durability are available. Vascular nurses play a vital role in patient education pre and postoperatively; therefore, they should know the risks and benefits associated with both open and hybrid TAAA repair as well as the risk associated with TAAA rupture. Nurses caring for patients after hybrid repair should possess astute assessment skills in monitoring for postoperative complications. Close observation for stroke, paralysis, renal insufficiency/failure, bowel ischemia/dysfunction, lower extremity ischemia and basic hemodynamics is essential for favorable outcomes. Vascular nurses should provide surgery-specific instruction regarding lengths of stay, expected outcomes, activity restrictions, CT-scan follow-up and possible complications after surgery, including warning signs. In the evolving field of endovascular surgery, vascular nurses must remain current on new innovative techniques being used, such as thoracic endografting.
 ...
PMID:Hybrid repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms: a combined endovascular and open approach. 1902 68

We evaluated the early outcome of surgical treatment of thoracic aortic disease combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Between January 2001 and December 2007, a total of 22 patients underwent thoracic aortic surgery with CABG. Four patients had an emergency operation performed for acute type A aortic dissection (group D). Three patients with a dissection of the right coronary artery (RCA) and 1 patient with cardiac ischemia during operation underwent CABG. One of the 18 patients with non-dissecting aneurysm (group N) underwent CABG due to injury of RCA. A comparative study was made between the study groups and a control group of 68 patients (group S) who underwent thoracic aortic replacement without CABG. Hospital mortality was 4.5% (1/22 patients) due to low output syndrome. There were significant differences in operation time, total cardiopulmonary bypass time and cardiac arrest time between groups D and N, and between groups N and S. There was also a significant difference in ventilation time and the duration of stay in the intensive care unit between groups D and N. However, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications among all the groups. This operation provides satisfactory early clinical outcomes. Thoracic aortic surgery combined with CABG can be carried out safely in elderly patients.
 ...
PMID:[Surgical treatment of thoracic aortic disease combined with coronary artery bypass grafting operation]. 1904 95

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriateness review of common clinical scenarios in which coronary revascularization is frequently considered. The clinical scenarios were developed to mimic common situations encountered in everyday practice and included information on symptom status, extent of medical therapy, risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing, and coronary anatomy. Approximately 180 clinical scenarios were developed by a writing committee and scored by a separate technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization was considered appropriate and likely to improve health outcomes or survival. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate revascularization was considered inappropriate and unlikely to improve health outcomes or survival. The mid range (4 to 6) indicates a clinical scenario for which the likelihood that coronary revascularization would improve health outcomes or survival was considered uncertain. For the majority of the clinical scenarios, the panel only considered the appropriateness of revascularization irrespective of whether this was accomplished by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). In a select subgroup of clinical scenarios in which revascularization is generally considered appropriate, the appropriateness of PCI and CABG individually as the primary mode of revascularization was considered. In general, the use of coronary revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndromes and combinations of significant symptoms and/or ischemia was viewed favorably. In contrast, revascularization of asymptomatic patients or patients with low-risk findings on noninvasive testing and minimal medical therapy were viewed less favorably. It is anticipated that these results will have an impact on physician decision making and patient education regarding expected benefits from revascularization and will help guide future research.
 ...
PMID:ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization : a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 1921 82

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriateness review of common clinical scenarios in which coronary revascularization is frequently considered. The clinical scenarios were developed to mimic common situations encountered in everyday practice and included information on symptom status, extent of medical therapy, risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing, and coronary anatomy. Approximately 180 clinical scenarios were developed by a writing committee and scored by a separate technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization was considered appropriate and likely to improve health outcomes or survival. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate revascularization was considered inappropriate and unlikely to improve health outcomes or survival. The mid range (4 to 6) indicates a clinical scenario for which the likelihood that coronary revascularization would improve health outcomes or survival was considered uncertain. For the majority of the clinical scenarios, the panel only considered the appropriateness of revascularization irrespective of whether this was accomplished by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). In a select subgroup of clinical scenarios in which revascularization is generally considered appropriate, the appropriateness of PCI and CABG individually as the primary mode of revascularization was considered. In general, the use of coronary revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndromes and combinations of significant symptoms and/or ischemia was viewed favorably. In contrast, revascularization of asymptomatic patients or patients with low-risk findings on noninvasive testing and minimal medical therapy were viewed less favorably. It is anticipated that these results will have an impact on physician decision making and patient education regarding expected benefits from revascularization and will help guide future research.
 ...
PMID:ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology: Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 1927 29

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a recognized treatment for various diseases involving the thoracic aorta. Patients treated with TEVAR require lifelong surveillance for potential complications, with CT being highly utilized in most centres. Endoleak is the most common complication and can be detected using CT. However, other complications such as stent strut perforations and end organ ischemia can also be detected on CT. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to illustrate the CT appearance of post-TEVAR complications encountered in our institution and to highlight their significance.
 ...
PMID:CT appearance of complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR): a pictorial essay. 1914 42

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriateness review of common clinical scenarios in which coronary revascularization is frequently considered. The clinical scenarios were developed to mimic common situations encountered in everyday practice and included information on symptom status, extent of medical therapy, risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing, and coronary anatomy. Approximately 180 clinical scenarios were developed by a writing committee and scored by a separate technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization was considered appropriate and likely to improve health outcomes or survival. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate revascularization was considered inappropriate and unlikely to improve health outcomes or survival. The mid range (4 to 6) indicates a clinical scenario for which the likelihood that coronary revascularization would improve health outcomes or survival was considered uncertain. For the majority of the clinical scenarios, the panel only considered the appropriateness of revascularization irrespective of whether this was accomplished by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). In a select subgroup of clinical scenarios in which revascularization is generally considered appropriate, the appropriateness of PCI and CABG individually as the primary mode of revascularization was considered. In general, the use of coronary revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndromes and combinations of significant symptoms and/or ischemia was viewed favorably. In contrast, revascularization of asymptomatic patients or patients with low-risk findings on noninvasive testing and minimal medical therapy were viewed less favorably. It is anticipated that these results will have an impact on physician decision making and patient education regarding expected benefits from revascularization and will help guide future research.
 ...
PMID:ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2011 26


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>