Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0699790 (
colon cancer
)
28,837
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Lithocholic acid enhances the growth of 4 independent lines of liver cells, but is toxic to
colon cancer
cells and fibroblasts in culture.
Cholic acid
does not affect the growth of liver cells, deoxycholic and chenodexoycholic acids are highly toxic to them.
...
PMID:[Enhancement of growth of rat liver cell cultures by lithocholic acid]. 15 73
The mutagenicity of bile acids was detected by a fluctuation test using Salmonella typhimurium TA100 and TA98 as tester strains.
Cholic acid
, chenodeoxycholic acid, deoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid were mutagenic in this test while lithocholic acid was not. The mutagenicity of the bile acids on a molar basis was roughly one-fourth that of methyl methanesulfonate, a moderately potent mutagen. Epidemiological studies have shown a high correlation between levels of bile acids excreted and
colon cancer
. However, no evidence has previously been reported showing that bile acids are mutagenic. Our results suggest that bile acids may be important in the etiology of
colon cancer
.
...
PMID:The mutagenicity of bile acids using a fluctuation test. 299 1
Primary bile acids were studied as possible colon tumor promoters or inhibitors in a rat model of chemically induced
colon cancer
.
Cholic acid
feeding increased the number of animals with tumors, the number of tumors per animal, and the number of tumors per tumor-bearing animal. Tumor enhancement was attributed to deoxycholic acid, the bacterial metabolite of cholic acid. When chenodeoxycholic acid was fed to the rats in our model, tumor incidence was increased, but the number of tumors per animal and the number of tumors per tumor-bearing animal were similar to controls. The different fecal bile acid pattern obtained with chenodeoxycholic acid may be responsible for the differences in tumor incidence. The methodology to characterize and identify all steroidal components of the feces requires extraction, thin-layer chromatography, gas-liquid chromatography, and gas-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Newer techniques include LH-20 chromatography (for sulfated steroids) and high-pressure liquid chromatography.
...
PMID:Effects of bile acids on colon carcinogenesis in rats treated with carcinogens. 726 Sep 43
Epidemiological studies have suggested that increased intake of calcium (Ca) or aspirin (ASA) is associated with a reduced risk for
colon cancer
. To delineate a possible mechanism of action, the present study used male F344 rats in an azoxymethane (AOM)-induced colon tumor model to study the single and interactive effects of Ca and ASA on cholic acid-promoted experimental colon carcinogenesis. Following initiation with AOM, a promotion diet containing 0.5% cholic acid was fed for 34 weeks until the adenoma development stage.
Cholic acid
was used as a surrogate for high-fat diets and to promote carcinogenesis. Diets were supplemented with CaCO3 (2% Ca by weight), 250 p.p.m. ASA, or both. After 34 weeks, the diets were switched during the progression stage and rats were killed at week 51. Several intermediate endpoints were examined during the course of AOM carcinogenesis to determine their reliability as predictors of
colon cancer
risk. Intermediate endpoints included colon crypt height measurement, colon mucosal ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) and colon mucosal protein kinase C (PKC) activities. The biomarkers were examined at the beginning of the study at 2 weeks, and thereafter at 5, 15, 30 and 40 weeks of dietary treatment. Animals were necropsied at week 51 and tumor incidence and numbers were analyzed for correlation with biomarkers. Survival was highest in the group fed CaCO3 during the promotion stage and tumor burden was lowest in groups fed CaCO3 during this stage. Supplementation during the progression stage was ineffective. The cholic acid promotion model resulted in increased ODC which was inhibited by intervention during the promotion stage with Ca, but not ASA. PKC was also activated by cholic acid feeding, and this effect was modulated by intervention in the promotional stage with Ca or ASA. Colon tumor incidence and burden was increased by cholic acid promotion and decreased by Ca, but not affected by ASA. In summary, Ca is a more effective chemopreventive agent in cholic acid-promoted colon carcinogenesis than ASA, impacting both incidence and tumor number. Colonic ODC, but not PKC may be a suitable predictor of risk and response in chemoprevention trials for
colon cancer
.
...
PMID:Chemopreventive effects of calcium but not aspirin supplementation in cholic acid-promoted colon carcinogenesis: correlation with intermediate endpoints. 772 52
A factor in colon carcinogenesis might be the partial defeat in colon epithelial cells of the protective enzymic barrier against xenobiotics, via bile acid inhibition of enzymes that detoxify mutagens. The applicability of aspects of this concept to glucuronosyltransferase, a phenol detoxification enzyme, was tested in a
colon cancer
cell line. Inhibition of glucuronidation of the test substrate, 4-methylumbelliferone, occurred at bile acid concentrations found in faecal water, and depended on pH for some bile acids. Lithocholate was the most inhibitory: the concentration causing 50% inhibition of the initial rate of glucuronidation (IC50) was about 3 microM at pH 7.4 and at pH 6.2. The inhibitory potency of deoxycholate and chenodeoxycholate increased when pH decreased, but still remained less than that of lithocholate: the IC50 for deoxycholate was 88.5 microM at pH 7.4, and 14.8 microM at pH 6.2, and for chenodeoxycholate the IC50 was 67.4 microM at pH 7.4, and 21.7 microM at pH 6.2.
Cholate
did not cause appreciable inhibition. The inhibitory effects were additive when lithocholate was present together with either deoxycholate or chenodeoxycholate. The results provide a mechanism for the comutagenicity of bile acids, a feature of which is the inter-relation of bile acid comutagenicity specifically with mutagens that are inactivated by a bile acid-inhibitable enzyme. The results are also in accord with the view that high concentrations of bile acids in solution in faecal water, especially lithocholate, are a risk factor for
colon cancer
.
...
PMID:Bile acid inhibition of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes is a factor in the mechanism of colon carcinogenesis: tests of aspects of the concept with glucuronosyltransferase. 840 Nov 74
Promotion would suppose the selection of initiated cells. We tested the selection of aberrant crypt cells by cholic acid, a
colon cancer
promoter, and the effect of protectors, phytate and food restriction. After an azoxymethane injection, rats were allocated to a control diet, or to supplements of cholic acid, sodium phytate, or to a 50% food restriction. The proliferation and apoptosis of 1200 crypts were assessed, after immuno-staining for BrdU.
Cholic acid
increased the proliferation of aberrant crypts but not of normal crypts. Phytate and food restriction decreased the proliferation of normal crypts, but not of aberrant crypts. Apoptosis was not affected by diets. Results support the hypothesis that cholic acid can select initiated cells in the colon.
...
PMID:Colon tumor promotion: is it a selective process? Effects of cholate, phytate, and food restriction in rats on proliferation and apoptosis in normal and aberrant crypts. 910 72
Epidemiological studies have suggested that the concentration and composition of fecal bile acids are important determining factors in the etiology of
colon cancer
. However, the mechanism by which these compounds influence tumor development is not understood. To begin to elucidate their mechanism of action, four bile acids, cholic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid, deoxycholic acid (DCA), and ursodeoxycholic acid, were examined for their effects on the growth of several different tumor cell lines. We found that incubating cells with chenodeoxycholic acid or DCA caused morphological changes, seen by electron and light microscopy, that were characteristic of apoptosis, whereas incubating cells with ursodeoxycholic acid inhibited cell proliferation but did not induce apoptosis.
Cholic acid
had no discernible effect on cells. Notably, the apoptosis induced by DCA could be suppressed by inhibiting protein kinase C activity with calphostin C. These results indicate that different bile acids exhibit distinct biological activities and suggest that the cytotoxicity reported for DCA may be due to its capacity to induce apoptosis via a protein kinase C-dependent signaling pathway.
...
PMID:Different bile acids exhibit distinct biological effects: the tumor promoter deoxycholic acid induces apoptosis and the chemopreventive agent ursodeoxycholic acid inhibits cell proliferation. 977 Jul 22
In the azoxymethane (AOM) model of experimental rodent
colon cancer
, cholic acid and its colonic metabolite deoxycholic acid (DCA) strongly promote tumorigenesis. In contrast, we showed that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a low abundance bile acid, inhibited AOM tumorigenesis. Dietary UDCA also blocked the development of tumors with activated Ras and suppressed cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) upregulation in AOM tumors. In this study, we compared the effect of dietary supplementation with tumor-promoting cholic acid to chemopreventive UDCA on Cox-2 expression in AOM tumors.
Cholic acid
enhanced Cox-2 upregulation in AOM tumors, whereas UDCA inhibited this increase and concomitantly decreased CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBPbeta), a transcriptional regulator of Cox-2. In HCA-7
colon cancer
cells, DCA activated Ras and increased C/EBPbeta and Cox-2 by a mechanism requiring the mitogen-activated protein kinase p38. UDCA inhibited DCA-induced p38 activation and decreased C/EBPbeta and Cox-2 upregulation. Using transient transfections, UDCA inhibited Cox-2 promoter and C/EBP reporter activation by DCA. Transfection with dominant-negative (17)N-Ras abolished DCA-induced p38 activation and C/EBPbeta and Cox-2 upregulation. Taken together, these studies have identified a transcriptional pathway regulating Cox-2 expression involving Ras, p38, and C/EBPbeta that is inhibited by UDCA. These signal transducers are novel targets of UDCA's chemopreventive actions.
...
PMID:Ursodeoxycholic acid suppresses Cox-2 expression in colon cancer: roles of Ras, p38, and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein. 1844 74
We synthesized four cationic bile acid based facial amphiphiles featuring trimethyl ammonium head groups. We evaluated the role of these amphiphiles for cytotoxic activities against
colon cancer
cells and their membrane interactions by varying charge, hydration and hydrophobicity. The singly charged cationic Lithocholic acid based amphiphile (LCA-TMA1) is most cytotoxic, whereas the triply charged cationic
Cholic acid
based amphiphile (CA-TMA3) is least cytotoxic. Light microscopy and Annexin-FITC assay revealed that these facial amphiphiles caused late apoptosis. In addition, we studied the interactions of these amphiphiles with model membrane systems by Prodan-based hydration, DPH-based anisotropy, and differential scanning calorimetry. LCA-TMA1 is most hydrophobic with a hard charge causing efficient dehydration and maximum perturbations of membranes thereby facilitating translocation and high cytotoxicity against
colon cancer
cells. In contrast, the highly hydrated and multiple charged CA-TMA3 caused least membrane perturbations leading to low translocation and less cytotoxicity. As expected, Chenodeoxycholic acid and Deoxycholic acid based amphiphiles (CDCA-TMA2, DCA-TMA2) featuring two charged head groups showed intermediate behavior. Thus, we deciphered that charge, hydration, and hydrophobicity of these amphiphiles govern membrane interactions, translocation, and resulting cytoxicity against
colon cancer
cells.
...
PMID:Deciphering the role of charge, hydration, and hydrophobicity for cytotoxic activities and membrane interactions of bile acid based facial amphiphiles. 2359 Sep 96