Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0699790 (colon cancer)
 28,837 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of irinotecan and capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Thirty-four patients received 122 courses of irinotecan 200 to 300 mg/m(2) as an intravenous infusion during 30 minutes on day 1 and capecitabine 1,500 to 3,000 mg/d orally 12 hours apart starting on day 2 for 14 days, repeated every 21 days (one course). Three to seven patients were treated in six dose-escalation cohorts. Three of 7 (43%) patients treated with irinotecan 300 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 2,300 mg/d had course 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defining maximum tolerated dosage (MTD). Fatigue and diarrhea were the major DLTs, and other events included neutropenia, anorexia, and hand-foot syndrome. At one dose level below the MTD, none of 7 patients treated with irinotecan 275 mg/m(2), and capecitabine 2,300 mg/d (36 courses) had course 1 DLT. Grade III to IV toxicities beyond course 1 included neutropenia (11% of all courses), fatigue (3.4%) and hand-foot syndrome (3.4%). There were only two episodes of febrile grade II neutropenia. There were no toxic deaths. Transient antitumor response was noted in one patient with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil-refractory colon cancer. The combination of irinotecan 275 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 2,300 mg/d represents a safe, favorable, and convenient outpatient regimen warranting further phase II evaluation.
 ...
PMID:Phase I clinical trial of irinotecan with oral capecitabine in patients with gastrointestinal and other solid malignancies. 1239 99

Lack of energy balance, or greater energy intake than expenditure as indicated by a large body mass index (BMI), has been associated with colon cancer, although less is known about its association with rectal cancer. In this study, we examined the association between BMI, energy intake, and energy expenditure and their combined effect on rectal cancer risk. A population-based case-control study was conducted in Utah and Northern California. Incident cases (n = 952) of rectal cancer and population-based controls (n = 1205) were interviewed between 1997 and 2002 to obtain detailed information on body size, dietary intake, and physical activity patterns. BMI (kg/m(2)) was not associated with rectal cancer in either men or women. Participation in vigorous leisure-time physical activity over the past 20 yr was associated with a significant 40% reduction in rectal cancer risk. Energy intake was associated significantly with increased risk of rectal cancer, especially among people whose diagnosis was prior to age 60 yr (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7-9.1 for men; OR = 2.8; 95% CI = 1.1-7.2 for women). There was a significant interaction between energy intake and energy expenditure, although not between BMI and either energy intake or energy expenditure. These data suggest that large BMI, an indicator of lack of energy balance, is not an important component of the etiology of rectal cancer. However, both physical activity and energy intake were significantly associated with rectal cancer risk. These data suggest that energy expenditure and energy intake alter rectal cancer risk through mechanisms other than energy balance.
 ...
PMID:Energy balance and rectal cancer: an evaluation of energy intake, energy expenditure, and body mass index. 1469 Jul 92

The purpose of this report is to summarize information on oxaliplatin, a drug recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information provided includes regulatory history, study design, efficacy and safety results, and pertinent literature references. A single, multicenter, randomized trial, enrolling 463 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma whose disease had recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of therapy with the combination of bolus 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, was submitted. Study arms included infusional 5-FU/LV alone (arm A), oxaliplatin alone (arm B), and the combination of oxaliplatin and infusional 5-FU/LV(arm C). Oxaliplatin, at a dose of 85 mg/m2, was administered to patients in arms B and C intravenously over 2 hours in 250-500 ml of dextrose 5% in water (D5W) on day 1 only. A 200-mg/m2 dose of LV was administered simultaneously to arm C patients, in a separate bag using a Y-line, or alone to arm A patients, by i.v. infusion, over 2 hours. 5-FU was then administered to arms A and C patients, first as a bolus injection over 2-4 minutes at a dose of 400 mg/m2, then as a continuous infusion in 500 ml of D5W over 22 hours at a dose of 600 mg/m2. LV was repeated on day 2 of the cycle (arms A and C) followed by a 400-mg/m2 5-FU bolus and a 600-mg/m2 22-hour infusion. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. Response rate was the prespecified end point for accelerated approval. Time to progression (TTP) was a secondary end point. The prespecified primary comparison was between the 5-FU/LV regimen and the 5-FU/LV/ oxaliplatin combination regimen. The three arms were well balanced for patient prognostic factors. There were no complete responders. The partial response rates were 0%, 1%, and 9% for the 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV treatments, respectively (p = 0.0002, arm C versus arm A). The median times to radiographic tumor progression, based on available radiographs, were 2.7 months, 1.6 months, and 4.6 months, respectively (p < 0.0001, arm C versus arm A). Common adverse events associated with the combination treatment included peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and abdominal pain. Neutropenia was the major hematologic toxicity. Adverse events were similar in men and women and in patients <65 and > or =65 years of age, but older patients may have been more susceptible to dehydration, diarrhea, hypokalemia, and fatigue. Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-FU/LV was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum whose disease has recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of first-line therapy with the combination of bolus 5-FU/LV and irinotecan. Approval was based on response rate and on an interim analysis of TTP. No results are available, at this time, that demonstrate a clinical benefit, such as improvement in disease-related symptoms or survival.
 ...
PMID:FDA drug approval summaries: oxaliplatin. 1475 10

We report a case of a 61-year-old man who presented with fatigue, abdominal pain and hepatomegaly. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen showed hepatomegaly and multiple hepatic lesions highly suggestive of metastatic diseases. Due to the endoscopic finding of colon ulcer, colon cancer with liver metastases was suspected. Biochemically a slight increase of transaminases, alkaline phosphatase and gammaglutamyl transpeptidase were present; alpha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryogenic antigen and carbohydrate 19-9 antigen serum levels were normal. Laboratory and instrumental investigations, including colon and liver biopsies revealed no signs of malignancy. In the light of spontaneous improvement of symptoms and CT findings, his personal history was reevaluated revealing direct contact with pigs and their tissues. Diagnosis of leptospirosis was considered and confirmed by detection of an elevated titer of antibodies to leptospira. After two mo, biochemical data, CT and colonoscopy were totally normal.
 ...
PMID:A case of leptospirosis simulating colon cancer with liver metastases. 1528 43

The patient was a 66-year-old male who had descending colon cancer with multiple liver metastases and paraaortic lymph node metastases. He underwent a left colectomy with lymph node dissection, but the operation resulted in curability C. The serum CEA level before the operation was 205.5 ng/ml. After 2 courses of 5-FU/LV as first-line chemotherapy, this treatment could not be continued due to grade 3 anorexia. As second-line chemotherapy, the patient was treated with daily oral administration of TS-1 (100 mg/day) for 3 weeks. Due to grade 3 anorexia, this treatment could not be continued. Tailored TS-1/CPT-11 (TS-1 80 mg/day from day 1 to day 21, CPT-11 65 mg/m(2) day 1, 15) combination therapy was then chosen as third-line chemotherapy. After 6 courses of combination therapy, the tumor marker (CEA) was decreased and para-aortic lymph nodes could not be detected by computed tomography (CT). Only grade 1 fatigue was noted as an adverse reaction to the treatment. The patient's good QOL was achieved during follow-up over 24 months with the cancer controlled. This case suggests that patients with non-curative resected colon cancer could benefit from TS-1/CPT-11 combination therapy as a second-line or third-line treatment.
 ...
PMID:[A case of non-curatively resected colon cancer with liver and lymph node metastases treated by TS-1/CPT-11 combination therapy]. 1696 37

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of modified FOLFIRI for patients with refractory advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Modified FOLFIRI was given 29 patients (21 men and 8 women, with a median age of 61.0 years) from 2 to 16 times (median 10.0). 19 out of 29 patients were colon cancer, and the other 10 were rectal cancer. 18 patients were administered as first-line chemotherapy, and 11 were more than second line. CPT-11 was administered at a dose of under 150 mg/m(2), to remain within the limits in Japan. The response to treatment was CR in 3 patients, PR in 8, and SD in 12. The response rate was 37.9%. Grade 4 hematologic toxicities included leukocytopenia in 2 patients, neutropenia in 7 and anemia in 1. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia in 4 patients, anorexia in 3, fatigue in 3, and nausea, diarrhea and interstitial pneumonia in 1. Except in 2 patients, all reactions could be controlled with the use of G-CSF or by setting drug holiday. In summary, modified FOLFIRI is a safe and effective regimen even at a dose of under 150 mg/m(2), of CPT-11. It can be given with good tolerance for patients with refractory advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer on an outpatient basis with due care especially for neutropenia.
 ...
PMID:[Feasibility of modified FOLFIRI regimen for patients with refractory advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer]. 1730 28

A 50-year-old man was admitted because of right lateral abdominal pain, easy fatigue and anemia. An endoscopic examination revealed advanced ascending colon cancer, and abdominal CT scan demonstrated enlarged metastatic lymph nodes of superior mesenteric arterial circumference. The Serum CEA rose considerably. The preoperative diagnosis was cStage IV (SS, N(4), P(0), H(0), M(-)), and right colectomy was performed on March 2, 2005. The metastatic lymph nodes around the superior mesenteric arterial root macroscopically remained. From the 20th postoperative day, we started combination chemotherapy using S-1 plus CPT-11 as one course for three weeks. S-1 (120 mg/body/day) was orally administered for 2 weeks continuously, and CPT-11 (80 mg/m(2)) was done intravenously on day 1 and 8. Serum CEA was normalized in the middle of 3 courses. Moreover, after 13 courses, a complete response (CR) was noted on the follow-up abdominal CT scan. No severe side effect more than grade 2 was observed, there was no interruption of the dosage, and PS was sufficiently maintained kept enough through this combination chemotherapy. The course has been without metastasis, recurrence and a rise of serum CEA now in the 16th postoperative month. S-1/CPT-11 combination chemotherapy is a promising and effective cure for unresectable progressive recurrent colorectal cancer in future.
 ...
PMID:[A case of ascending colon cancer with enlarged metastatic lymph nodes around superior mesenteric arterial root that responded dramatically to S-1 and CPT-11 combination chemotherapy]. 1749 57

On September 27, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval to panitumumab (Vectibix, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) for the treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing, metastatic colorectal carcinoma with disease progression on or following fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy regimens. Panitumumab approval is based on the results of a single, open-label, randomized, multinational study that enrolled 463 patients with EGFR-expressing (at least 1+ membrane staining in > or =1% of tumor cells) metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients were randomized to either best supportive care (BSC) alone or BSC plus panitumumab, 6 mg/kg i.v., every other week. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), determined by an independent review committee that was blinded as to treatment assignment. BSC patients who progressed were eligible to receive panitumumab. The study patients' median age was 62 years, with 40% aged > or =65; 63% were male, 99% were white, 86% had a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, and 67% had colon cancer. The median time from diagnosis of metastases was approximately 19 months and the median number of prior therapies was 2.4. The PFS duration was significantly longer among patients randomized to receive panitumumab in addition to BSC (n = 231) compared with BSC alone (n = 232). The median and mean PFS times were 56 and 96.4 days, respectively, for patients receiving panitumumab and 51 and 59.7 days, respectively, for patients receiving BSC alone. Nineteen partial responses (8%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3%-12.5%) were observed in panitumumab treated patients. The median duration of response was 17 weeks (95% CI, 16-25 weeks). Approximately 75% of patients in the BSC alone arm crossed over to receive panitumumab after disease progression. There was no difference in overall survival between the two study arms. The most common adverse events were skin rash, hypomagnesemia, paronychia, fatigue, abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea. The most serious adverse events were pulmonary fibrosis, severe dermatologic toxicity complicated by infectious sequelae and septic death, infusion reactions, abdominal pain, hypomagnesemia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation.
 ...
PMID:FDA drug approval summary: panitumumab (Vectibix). 1752 46

Patients with colorectal cancer present a number of supportive care challenges including those related to the underlying disease, such as gastrointestinal obstruction, nausea, anorexia, and fatigue, and those caused by the treatments, such as oral mucositis, neuropathy, and chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Unique toxicities can accompany specific routes of administration of colon cancer drugs such as hand-foot syndrome with oral capecitabine and continuous infusion fluorouracil and biliary sclerosis with intrahepatic arterial floxuridine. The newer targeted therapies also present new toxicities, such as cardiovascular events and wound-healing complications with bevacizumab and rash and hypomagnesemia with cetuximab. Recent additions to the therapeutic armamentarium have presented new challenges, such as oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome, cetuximab-induced rash, and bevacizumab-associated arterial thrombotic events, bowel perforation, hypertension, and wound-healing complications. This article focuses on the prevention and management of several of these more common symptoms and toxicities.
 ...
PMID:Supportive care in the management of colon cancer. 1863 90

With a median age at diagnosis of 71 years old and the aging of the US population, colon cancer commonly occurs in the elderly. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been standard of care for stage III disease following complete surgical resection since 1990, but insufficient numbers of patients over 75 years old are participating in clinical trials, and a disparity persists in the administration of standard adjuvant therapy between younger and older Americans despite a meaningful survival advantage for most patients. A large pooled analysis of seven clinical trials supports the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy to otherwise-fit elderly patients, and registry studies have confirmed similar benefits in Medicare beneficiaries. Otherwise-fit elderly patients enrolled in clinical trials do not appear to have more side effects aside from myelosuppression and fatigue. In this review, I discuss the potential benefits and harm of adjuvant therapy in older patients, with a focus on the role of comorbid illness in individualizing decision-making, current standard drug options in the adjuvant setting, and barriers to treatment. Although chronologic age alone should not be an exclusion criterion, more work is needed to establish an optimal and efficient strategy for choosing who would benefit most from adjuvant treatment following surgical resection.
 ...
PMID:Adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer in the elderly: moving from evidence to practice. 1932 99


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>