Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0699790 (colon cancer)
 28,837 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

High intake of red meat has been associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer in Western countries. There has been much interest in the role of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in colorectal cancer prevention, but epidemiological findings are limited and inconsistent. The objective of our study was to examine associations of meat, fish and fat intake with risk of colorectal cancer, paying particular attention to the subsite within the colorectum. Data were from the Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study, a population-based case-control study, covering 782 cases and 793 controls. Diet was assessed by interview, using newly developed personal-computer software for registering semiquantitative food frequencies. The intake of beef/pork, processed meat, total fat, saturated fat or n-6 PUFA showed no clear association with the overall or subsite-specific risk of colorectal cancer. There was an almost significant inverse association between n-3 PUFA and the risk of colorectal cancer; the covariate-adjusted odds ratio for the highest (median 3.94 g/day) versus lowest (median 1.99 g/day) quintile of energy-adjusted intake was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.52-1.06, trend P=0.050). The consumption of fish and fish products was similarly inversely related to the risk although the association was not statistically significant. These associations were more evident for distal colon cancer; adjusted odds ratio for the highest versus lowest quintile of n-3 PUFA intake was 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.34-0.92, trend P=0.02). Our findings do not support the hypothesis that consumption of red meat increases colorectal cancer risk but do suggest that high intake of fish may decrease the risk, particularly of distal colon cancer.
 ...
PMID:Meat, fish and fat intake in relation to subsite-specific risk of colorectal cancer: The Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study. 1742 96

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the Western world, with > 500,000 new cases diagnosed each year. One of the strongest risk factors for colon cancer is age. The incidence rates rise from 10 in 100,000 at age 40-45 years to 300 in 100,000 at age 75-80 years, with the median age at diagnosis of CRC being 71 years. With the general demographic shift toward an aging population, the number of people aged > 65 years is expected to increase. This article reviews the development of treatment for elderly patients with metastatic CRC, from single-agent fluoropyrimidines to combination therapies.
Clin Colorectal Cancer 2007 May
PMID:Current treatment strategies in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. 1755 99

In patients with colon cancer who undergo resection for potential cure, 40% to 60% have advanced locoregional disease and are classified as either stage II or stage III. The role of adjuvant therapy in stage III colon cancer is well defined. The results from the MOSAIC trial (Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer) and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-07 trial confirm a definite disease-free survival (DFS) benefit with the addition of oxaliplatin to either infusional or bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV). The Xeloda in Adjuvant Colon Cancer Therapy (X-ACT) trial showed capecitabine to be of equivalent clinical benefit to bolus 5-FU/LV. However, adjuvant trials with irinotecan, including Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 89803), the Pan-European Trial in Adjuvant Colorectal Cancer 3 (PETACC-3), and the French ACCORD trial, have not shown a significant DFS advantage. In contrast, in patients with stage II disease, a small survival benefit of 1% to 5% exists with chemotherapy. Perhaps the analysis of molecular markers in combination with high-risk histopathologic features will help increase patient specificity and identify subsets of patients with stage II colon cancer who will derive a survival benefit with adjuvant therapy. The current Intergroup study stratifying stage II patients based on presence of microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity 18q allele will help us better understand the risk versus benefit observed.
 ...
PMID:Adjuvant therapy for colon cancer. 1799 44

Early experiences with laparoscopic colectomy were unfavorable, with higher than expected rates of wound tumor implants and concerns about short and long-term compromised oncologic outcomes. Several international randomized controlled trials were initiated to address concerns regarding compromised oncologic outcomes. Each of the trials was designed to test the hypothesis that level 1 evidence supports the general feasibility and recovery advantage as well as cancer equivalence of laparoscopic colectomy in curable colon cancer. The following four phase III randomized controlled trials have completed accrual and reported early data on recovery benefits for laparoscopic colectomy: Barcelona, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (COSTSG), Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR), and Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer (CLASICC). These trials have uniformly and consistently shown a significant reduction in the use of narcotics and oral analgesics and length of hospital stay, as well as a faster return of diet and bowel function, with laparoscopic colectomy. Two of the trials, Barcelona and COSTSG, have sufficient maturation and follow-up to report recurrence and survival data, and neither has found a survival disadvantage in patients treated with laparoscopic colectomy. Results of the Barcelona trial suggest a cancer-related survival advantage in patients treated with laparoscopic colectomy, based solely on differences in patients with stage III disease; this is not confirmed by the COSTSG trial. Results of the CLASICC and COLOR trials, as well as 5-year data from the COSTSG trial, should definitively address survival results. The investigational experience with laparoscopic rectal cancer is not as mature; the subset of rectal cancer patients (n = 253) in the CLASICC trial provides the only available randomized controlled trial data. Laparoscopic colectomy in patients with curable cancer is accepted as an alternative to open colectomy, whereas the viability of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection requires further investigation.
 ...
PMID:Colon and rectal cancer: laparoscopic or open? 1800 96

For patients who undergo successful surgery for colon cancer, additional chemotherapy is recommended in high-risk stage II and stage III disease. Colorectal cancer prognosis is stage and grade dependent, and many tumors with similar histopathologic features show significantly different clinical outcomes. Therefore, tumor recurrence after curative resection continues to be a significant problem in the management of colon cancer, and approximately 50% of patients will develop recurrent disease. There are a few clinical and potential molecular markers that can predict clinical outcome in locally advanced colon cancer. Accordingly, the development of molecular markers of prognosis is critical in making a tailored adjuvant treatment with molecular stratification possible. Many new biomarkers have been investigated; however, none of them have yet been validated in large prospective clinical trials. To date, the two most promising and most studied mechanisms of genomic instability are chromosomal instability with deletion of chromosome 18q and 17p and microsatellite instability (MSI). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 5202 is a prospective clinical trial which is randomizing patients with stage II disease based on their MSI and 18q status to observation versus adjuvant chemotherapy with the intention of prospectively determining their prognostic value as molecular markers. This review will discuss the most promising molecular prognostic markers and provide an update on the most recent developments.
Clin Colorectal Cancer 2007 Nov
PMID:Molecular prognostic markers in locally advanced colon cancer. 1803 21

In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed among men and women and the second leading cause of death from cancer. CRC largely can be prevented by the detection and removal of adenomatous polyps, and survival is significantly better when CRC is diagnosed while still localized. In 2006 to 2007, the American Cancer Society, the US Multi Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology came together to develop consensus guidelines for the detection of adenomatous polyps and CRC in asymptomatic average-risk adults. In this update of each organization's guidelines, screening tests are grouped into those that primarily detect cancer early and those that can detect cancer early and also can detect adenomatous polyps, thus providing a greater potential for prevention through polypectomy. When possible, clinicians should make patients aware of the full range of screening options, but at a minimum they should be prepared to offer patients a choice between a screening test that is effective at both early cancer detection and cancer prevention through the detection and removal of polyps and a screening test that primarily is effective at early cancer detection. It is the strong opinion of these 3 organizations that colon cancer prevention should be the primary goal of screening.
 ...
PMID:Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. 1832 43

As a result of the development of novel chemotherapeutic drugs and targeted biologic agents, the treatment of colon cancer has changed significantly over the past 10 years. Today, we have more active agents to use in colon cancer than ever before. The better understanding underlying the pathogenesis of this disease at the molecular level has allowed us to take advantage of 2 key pathways, the angiogenic and epidermal growth factor (EGF) signaling pathways. The combination of traditional chemotherapy drugs with agents that inhibit these pathways has led to a significant improvement in survival. At present, patients with metastatic colon cancer routinely achieve a median survival time > 2 years. The numerous agents available have made the choice of initial treatment more difficult for a newly diagnosed patient. Herein, we review the 2 main molecular targets of biologic therapy in colon cancer and examine the clinical evidence for regimens that inhibit angiogenesis and EGF receptor alone or in combination for newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer.
Clin Colorectal Cancer 2007 Dec
PMID:Update on clinical data with regimens inhibiting angiogenesis and epidermal growth factor receptor for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer. 1836 3

In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed among men and women and the second leading cause of death from cancer. CRC largely can be prevented by the detection and removal of adenomatous polyps, and survival is significantly better when CRC is diagnosed while still localized. In 2006 to 2007, the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology came together to develop consensus guidelines for the detection of adenomatous polyps and CRC in asymptomatic average-risk adults. In this update of each organization's guidelines, screening tests are grouped into those that primarily detect cancer early and those that can detect cancer early and also can detect adenomatous polyps, thus providing a greater potential for prevention through polypectomy. When possible, clinicians should make patients aware of the full range of screening options, but at a minimum they should be prepared to offer patients a choice between a screening test that primarily is effective at early cancer detection and a screening test that is effective at both early cancer detection and cancer prevention through the detection and removal of polyps. It is the strong opinion of these 3 organizations that colon cancer prevention should be the primary goal of screening.
 ...
PMID:Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. 1861 44

The concept that cancer might arise from a rare population of cells with stem cell-like properties was proposed 150 years ago. Increasing evidence during the past 2 decades suggests the existence of a small subgroup of cells in cancer that are responsible for tumor growth and proliferation. Stem cells have self-renewing properties; thus, they are appealing candidates for generating the malignant phenotype. Although the concept of stem cells in leukemia has received significant attention for more than the past decade, over the past several years, expression of several surface markers on cancer cells has led to identification of tumor-initiating cells in several solid tumors, including melanoma, brain, breast, prostate, liver, pancreatic, ovarian, and recently, colon cancer. This review will provide an update of the biologic basis of the stem cell model and possible targets for the treatment of colon cancer.
Clin Colorectal Cancer 2008 Mar
PMID:Stem cells in colon cancer. 1850 Oct 67

Bevacizumab is the fi rst vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agent shown to increase survival in patients receiving first- and second-line intravenous 5-FU-based chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Bevacizumab is typically well tolerated and its major side effects include hypertension, proteinuria, bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation and arterial thrombotic events. Although exfoliative dermatitis has been described as a side effect in 19% of patients, skin rash (type unspecified) has rarely been described in patients following infusion of bevacizumab. We recently reported the fi rst patient with colon cancer manifesting a correlation between rash and a positive drug response with bevacizumab. A 49-year old male with T3 N1 M1 rectal carcinoma received modified FOLFOX-6/bevacizumab, which he tolerated very well except for grade 2 skin rash related to bevacizumab. The rash continued to progress as the serum carcinoembryonic antigen decreased significantly. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography scan confirmed response to FOLFOX/bevacizumab. We therefore believe that this rash was linked to bevacizumab administration and correlated with response to therapy. Grade 1/2 rash has been described in patients after infusion of bevacizumab in initial phase I and II studies. Skin rash was observed in 34% and 46% of patients in the Kabbinavar's study receiving 5 mg/kg dose and 10 mg/kg respectively but no patient developed > grade 3 rash. This toxicity was not well described in pivotal phase III studies. On the other hand, acneiform rash occurs in > 90% patients who receive cetuximab and panitumumab, severity of which appears to be predictive of response. To our knowledge, this case report is the second report of possible correlation between rash and a positive drug response associated with bevacizumab and warrants further investigation of similar observation.
Clin Colorectal Cancer 2008 Mar
PMID:Correlation between rash and a positive drug response associated with bevacizumab in a patient with advanced colorectal cancer. 1850 Oct 75


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>