Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0699790 (
colon cancer
)
28,837
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
We identified genes related to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) sensitivity in colorectal cancer and utilized these genes for predicting the 5-FU sensitivity of liver metastases. Eighty-one candidate genes involved in 5-FU resistance in gastric and
colon cancer
cell lines were previously identified using a cDNA microarray. In this study, the mRNA expression levels of these 81 selected genes and the genes of 5-FU-related enzymes, including thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), were measured using real-time quantitative RT-PCR assays of surgically resected materials from primary colorectal tumors in 22 patients. Clinical responses were estimated by evaluating the effects of 5-FU-based hepatic artery injection (HAI) chemotherapy for synchronous liver metastases. Four genes (TNFRSF1B,
SLC35F5
, NAG-1 and OPRT) had significantly different expression profiles in 5-FU-nonresponding and responding tumors (p < 0.05). A "Response Index" system using three genes (TNFRSF1B,
SLC35F5
and OPRT) was then developed using a discriminate analysis; the results were well correlated with the individual chemosensitivities. Among the 11 cases with positive scores in our response index, 9 achieved a reduction in their liver metastases after 5-FU-based chemotherapy, whereas only 1 of the 11 cases with negative scores responded well to chemotherapy. Our "Response Index" system, consisting of TNFRSF1B,
SLC35F5
and OPRT, has great potential for predicting the efficacy of 5-FU-based chemotherapy against liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
...
PMID:Predicting 5-fluorouracil chemosensitivity of liver metastases from colorectal cancer using primary tumor specimens: three-gene expression model predicts clinical response. 1647 29