Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0694563 (eds)
 1,062 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

First described as a separate entity by Gelineau in 1880 and later considered as a symptom, narcolepsy has eventually been recognized as a disease on clinical and polygraphic grounds. Its prevalence stays between 0.04 and 0.06 percent. Age at onset varies from 5 to 50 with a peak in the second decade. Clinical symptoms include excessive daytime somnolence, overwhelming daytime sleep episodes, attacks of cataplexy, hypnagogic hallucinations, sleep paralysis and disturbed nocturnal sleep; sleep onset REM episodes are the main polygraphic feature. Natural history varies with the different symptoms. Excessive daytime somnolence never subsides completely. Cataplexy may disappear spontaneously. Hypnagogic hallucinations and sleep paralysis are not present in all patients and tend to be more transitory. A positive diagnosis of narcolepsy requires a minimum of one major symptom, daytime sleep episodes or cataplexy, together with documented sleep onset REM episodes. Prolonged polygraphic recordings or multiple sleep latency test are of special interest in difficult cases. Clinical variants can be grouped under three headings, incomplete, symptomatic and associated narcolepsies. The etiology of narcolepsy is not well understood. However the discovery of natural animal models of narcolepsy, mainly dogs, has prompted genetic, pharmacological and biochemical studies. The breeding of narcoleptic canine colonies has led to the evidence of a possible autosomal recessive model of inheritance in some species. Pharmacological and neurochemical analysis has shown an imbalance between monoaminergic and cholinergic mechanism. In man, extensive family studies suggest either a two-threshold multifactorial model of inheritance or a dominant mode of inheritance and immunologic studies have recently shown a strong association between HLA-DR2 and narcolepsy. Assays of CSF biogenic amines suggest a decreased bioavailability of dopamine to explain sleepiness and an imbalance between monoamines and acetylcholine to explain cataplexy. A disturbance of circadian rhythms has not been evidenced in narcoleptics. Treatment is still purely symptomatic. Amphetamines and tricyclic antidepressants have been extensively used. However they are not free of side-effects hence the need for alternative treatments.
 ...
PMID:[Narcolepsy]. 286 18

Increasing experience indicates that anti-Ma2-associated encephalitis differs from classical paraneoplastic limbic or brainstem encephalitis, and therefore may be unrecognized. To facilitate its diagnosis we report a comprehensive clinical analysis of 38 patients with anti-Ma2 encephalitis. Thirty-four (89%) patients presented with isolated or combined limbic, diencephalic or brainstem dysfunction, and four with other syndromes. Considering the clinical and MRI follow-up, 95% of the patients developed limbic, diencephalic or brainstem encephalopathy. Only 26% had classical limbic encephalitis. Excessive daytime sleepiness affected 32% of the patients, sometimes with narcolepsy-cataplexy and low CSF hypocretin. Additional hormonal or MRI abnormalities indicated diencephalic-hypothalamic involvement in 34% of the patients. Eye movement abnormalities were prominent in 92% of the patients with brainstem dysfunction, but those with additional limbic or diencephalic deficits were most affected; 60% of these patients had vertical gaze paresis that sometimes evolved to total external ophthalmoplegia. Three patients developed atypical parkinsonism, and two a severe hypokinetic syndrome with a tendency to eye closure and dramatic reduction of verbal output. Neurological symptoms preceded the tumour diagnosis in 62% of the patients. Brain MRI abnormalities were present in 74% of all patients and 89% of those with limbic or diencephalic dysfunction. Among the 34 patients with cancer, 53% had testicular germ-cell tumours. Two patients without evidence of cancer had testicular microcalcification and one cryptorchidism, risk factors for testicular germ-cell tumours. After neurological syndrome development, 17 of 33 patients received oncological treatment (nine also immunotherapy), 10 immunotherapy alone, and six no treatment. Overall, 33% of the patients had neurological improvement, three with complete recovery; 21% had long-term stabilization, and 46% deteriorated. Features significantly associated with improvement or stabilization included, male gender, age <45 years, testicular tumour with complete response to treatment, absence of anti-Ma1 antibodies and limited CNS involvement. Immunosuppression was not found to be associated with improvement but was clearly effective in some patients. Fifteen patients (10 women, five men) had additional antibodies to Ma1. These patients were more likely to have tumours other than testicular cancer and to develop ataxia, and had a worse prognosis than patients with only anti-Ma2 antibodies (two women, 21 men); 67% of deceased patients had anti-Ma1 antibodies. Anti-Ma2 encephalitis (with or without anti-Ma1 antibodies) should be suspected in patients with limbic, diencephalic or brainstem dysfunction, MRI abnormalities in these regions, and inflammatory changes in the CSF. In young male patients, the primary tumour is usually in the testis, in other patients the leading neoplasm is lung cancer.
 ...
PMID:Clinical analysis of anti-Ma2-associated encephalitis. 1521 14

Recent studies provide valid criteria that help differentiate idiopathic narcolepsy from other disorders of excessive daytime somnolence [3]. Research to date suggests that idiopathic narcolepsy might properly be considered a disorder of excessive sleepiness with dysfunctional REM-sleep mechanisms, clinically evidenced as cataplexy and electrophysiologically recognized as SOREMPs. Given these criteria, a diagnosis can generally be made using a combination of history, PSG, and MSLT. Traditionally, the medical treatment of idiopathic narcolepsy has centered on a two-drug regimen (stimulants for sleepiness and TCAs for cataplexy and auxiliary symptoms). Some newer medications are proving efficacious for sleepiness with minimal adverse effects, whereas others may provide a single-drug regimen that simultaneously addresses sleepiness and cataplexy [18]. New research has allowed some experts to hypothesize that idiopathic narcolepsy may be the result of a genetic predisposition to autoimmune disease [176]. It is possible that aberrant genetic coding of elements in the hypocretin/orexin systems allows a sensitivity to inducible and possibly virally mediated changes, which leave cells in the lateral hypothalamus susceptible to autoimmune attack [96]. As such, genetic screening of high-risk individuals might eventually rationalize the prophylactic use of immunosuppressants in some instances. In the future, for atypical cases(poorly responsive to therapy), genetic, CSF, and brain imaging studies, and possibly even neuronal transplantation may prove beneficial in the assessment and treatment of idiopathic narcolepsy.
 ...
PMID:Narcolepsy and disorders of excessive somnolence. 1593 92

The narcoleptic syndrome in its most specific way is characterized by a set of clinical symptoms, including cataplexy, irresistable sleep episodes, hypnagogic hallucinations and sleepparalysis; the syndrome has been defined by the association of excessive day-time somnolence and REM-sleep abnormalities. In principle, anamnestic information is sufficient to establish the clinical diagnosis, although neuro-physiological and biochemical data(CSF monoamine metabolites and HLA-typology) are sometimes needed to support the diagnostic procedure. Treatment of excessive daytime somnolence is still primarily based upon CNS stimulants, while treatment of cataplexy and related symptoms rests on antidepressants with a primarily serotonergic mode of action.
...
PMID:Narcolepsy, a "sleeping disorder"? 2695 95