Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0684249 (lung carcinoma)
 23,830 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The emergence of the targeted therapies for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has generated a need for accurate histologic subtyping of NSCLC. In this study, we assessed the utility of immunohistochemical markers that could be helpful in distinction between adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We performed a battery of immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray for napsin-A, Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), p63, cytokeratin (CK) 5/6, thrombomodulin (CD141), Epithelial-related antigen (MOC-31), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), high-molecular-weight CK (HMWCK), p27kip1 (p27), and Rb protein in 129 resected primary NSCLC with 81 ADCs and 48 SCCs and 10 metastatic ADC to the lung (primary in colon, 7 cases; stomach, 2 cases; vagina, 1 case). Cases of ADC and SCC were morphologically unequivocal and solid tumors with no definite squamous or glandular differentiation were excluded for this analysis. Napsin-A and TTF-1 were positive in 81% and 70% of ADC and in 0% and 2% of SCC, respectively, whereas P63 and CK5/6 were positive in 91% and 90% of SCC and in 9% and 4% of ADC, respectively (P < .001). CD141 stained significantly higher in SCC over ADC (positive in 2% of ADC and 46% of SCC. MOC-31, CEA, COX-2, HMWCK, p27, and Rb appeared to be not useful markers in distinction between ADC and SCC because of their low specificity. None of metastatic ADC to the lung showed positive for napsin-A and TTF-1. It was evident that combination of napsin-A, TTF-1, CK5/6, and p63 was the best immunohistochemical panel in differentiating ADC from SCC of the lung in this study. CD141 appeared to be a potential new marker for SCC with high specificity. Cyclooxygenase 2, MOC-31, CEA, HMWCK, p27, and Rb showed less specificity for differentiation ADC from SCC.
 ...
PMID:Best immunohistochemical panel in distinguishing adenocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma of lung: tissue microarray assay in resected lung cancer specimens. 2304 Jul 37

Intestinal type of lung adenocarcinoma (ILADC) was initially described by Tsao and Fraser in 1991. Morphology and immunophenotype of ILADC are the same as in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Rectocolonoscopy must be performed to exclude colorectal origin of adenocarcinoma. Colorectal adenocarcinoma claimed to be genetically similar to an ILADC. Patients. We describe 24- and 26-year-old patients of both genders who went under surgery because of a lung tumor mass detected on CT scan. ILADC was diagnosed on resected lung specimens. According to positivity of Cytokeratin20, CDX-2, and Villin, respectively, and negativity of Cytokeratin7, TTF-1, Napsin-A, SurfactantB, MUC-1, and MUC-2, respectively, ILADC was diagnosed. KRAS mutation was detected in tumor tissue of the male patient. Conclusion. Rectocolonoscopy is the only relevant method for distinguishing the intestinal type of lung adenocarcinoma from metastatic colorectal carcinoma because immunohistochemistry and detection of mutation status are frequently the same in both types of adenocarcinoma. More investigations are needed for further understanding of ILADC in purpose of personalized lung carcinoma therapy particularly introducing detection of mutation status, especially in younger patients.
...
PMID:Intestinal type of lung adenocarcinoma in younger adults. 2478 38

The differential diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma from lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma requires the positive and negative immunohistochemical markers of mesothelioma. The IMIG guideline has suggested the use of Calretinin, D2-40, WT1, and CK5/6 as mesothelial markers, TTF-1, Napsin-A, Claudin 4, CEA as lung adenocarcinoma markers p40, p63, CK5/6, MOC-31 as squamous cell markers. However, use of other immunohistochemical markers is still necessary. We evaluated 65 epithelioid mesotheliomas, 60 adenocarcinomas, and 57 squamous cell carcinomas of the lung for MUC4 expression by immunohistochemistry and compared with the previously known immunohistochemical markers. MUC4 expression was not found in any of 65 cases of epithelioid mesothelioma. In contrast, MUC4 expression was observed in 50/60(83.3%) cases of lung adenocarcinoma and 50/56(89.3%) cases of lung squamous cell carcinoma. The negative MUC4 expression showed 100% sensitivity, 86.2% specificity and accuracy rate of 91.2% to differentiate epithelioid mesothelioma from lung carcinoma. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MUC4 are comparable to that of previously known markers of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, namely CEA, Claudin 4 and better than that of MOC-31. In conclusion, MUC4 immunohistochemistry is useful for differentiation of epithelioid mesothelioma from lung carcinoma, either adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma.
 ...
PMID:MUC4 immunohistochemistry is useful in distinguishing epithelioid mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. 2931 12