Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0684249 (lung carcinoma)
 23,830 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Based on the results of our previous pilot study, we conducted a multi-institutional phase II study of combination chemotherapy consisting of oral UFT (Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Tokyo) plus cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). UFT capsule containing 100 mg tegafur and 224 mg uracil was orally administered in two divided doses on days 1 through 21 making the total tegafur dose 400 mg/m(2)/day (maximum 600 mg/body). CDDP was administered by drip infusion at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) on a 5-day schedule from day 8 to 12. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks as long as the criteria for initiation of therapy were still met. Between April 1995 and March 1997, 51 patients were entered into the study. The mean age of all 50 eligible patients was 64 years(range: 40-78). There were 21 patients with clinical stage IIIB disease and 29 patients with IV disease. Thirty-two patients had adenocarcinoma, 14 had epidermoid carcinoma, and four had large cell carcinoma. Of the 47 assessable patients, 18 achieved a partial response with an overall response rate of 38.3% (95% confidence interval: 24.4-52.2%). The median response duration was 113 days. The median survival time of the eligible patients was 12.8 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 54%. Among the 51 patients enrolled, grade 3 or 4 leukopenia developed in one patient (2%), neutropenia in six patients (11. 8%), thrombocytopenia in six patients (11. 8%), and anemia in three patients (5. 9%). Non-hematological grade 3 or 4 toxicities included anorexia in 10 patients (19.6%), nausea in ten (19.6%), vomiting in two (3.9%), and diarrhea in two (3. 9%). Grade 3 abnormal laboratory data included bilirubinemia in four (7. 8%), GPT elevation in one (2.0%), and hematuria in one (2.0%). In conclusion, combination of CDDP plus oral UFT is efficacious, with low toxicity, in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. In particular, the low hematological toxicity may warrant application of this regimen to the treatment of elderly patients and in trials of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.
Lung Cancer
PMID:A phase II trial of oral UFT plus cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 1116 9

BBR 2778 is a novel aza-anthracenedione with no cardiotoxicity in preclinical models. This Phase I dose escalation trial of BBR 2778 was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicity, and the pharmacokinetic profile of BBR 2778 in patients with advanced solid tumors. BBR 2778 was given in three consecutive weekly 30-min i.v. infusions over a 4-week cycle (cy). Thirty patients (pts) were treated with BBR 2778 at doses ranging from 5 to 150 mg/m2/week. The dose levels 5, 10, 16.5, 25, 37.5, 75, 112.5, and 150 mg/m2/week were investigated in 4 pts (9 cy), 3 pts (3 cy), 3 pts (5 cy), 6 pts (9 cy), 1 pt (1 cy), 4 pts (9 cy), 6 pts (18 cy), and 3 pts (4 cy), respectively. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, typically occurring at day 14. Other toxicities were mild to moderate and were principally thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, alopecia, nausea, and vomiting and blue coloration of the skin and urine. No significant cardiac toxicity was observed. The plasma dose concentration curve fitted a biexponential profile, with a rapid distribution phase followed by a prolonged elimination phase (mean t1/2,z, 12 h). BBR 2778 displayed a large volume of distribution (range, 9.7-29.7 l/kg) with a high plasma clearance rate (0.75-1.31 l/h/kg). Less than 10% of the dose was recovered in urine as unchanged drug. The maximum tolerated dose was 150 mg/m2/week for 3 weeks, every 4 weeks. On the basis of this study, the recommended dose for Phase II studies is 112.5 mg/m2/week days 1 and 8 with individual optional administration at day 15, every 4 weeks. Antitumor activity was observed in patients with breast, small cell lung carcinoma, and facial cylindroma. This trial showed that BBR 2778 has a manageable toxicity profile on a weekly schedule. This lead compound of the aza-anthracenedione family shows promising antitumor activity and deserves Phase II investigation in patients with high risk of cumulative cardiotoxicity, such as anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the novel aza-anthracenedione compound BBR 2778 in patients with advanced solid malignancies. 1120 16

This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of a weekly docetaxel (TXT) and cisplatin (CDDP) combination regimen in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who were previously untreated were eligible. Docetaxel, at a starting dose of 20 mg m(-2) per week on days 1, 8 and 15, was combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) on day 1. Docetaxel was increased in 5 mg m(-2) per week steps. Chemotherapy was given in a 4-weeks cycle. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as grade 3-4 leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, fever with grade 4 neutropenia and more than grade 2 non-hematologic toxicity, with the exception of nausea, vomiting, and alopecia. Omission of chemotherapy on day 8 and/or 15 was also considered DLT. Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. Leukopenia, anemia and fatigue were the DLTs. No grade 4 toxicities were seen in any patients. The overall response rate was 44.4% (95% confidence interval, 21.5-67.4%). The recommended dose of TXT to be combined with CDDP 80 mg m(-2) on day 1 is 35 mg m(-2) per week on days 1, 8 and 15. This is a promising regimen, therefore a multicenter phase II study is now under way.
Lung Cancer 2001 Jul
PMID:A phase I study of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 1142 97

The phase I study was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of weekly administered docetaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a dose escalation study, 22 patients, under 75 years old, with unresectable and metastatic untreated NSCLC with performance status (0-1) were enrolled. Patients were treated with cisplatin (day 1) and weekly docetaxel (days 1, 8, 15). Dose escalation levels in mg/m(2) were for cisplatin and docetaxel; 70 and 15 (level 1), 80 and 15 (level 2), 80 and 20 (level 3), 80 and 25 (level 4), 80 and 30 (level 5), respectively. Chemotherapy was repeated for at least two cycles every 28 days. All patients were assessable for toxicities. Although grade 3 neutropenia occurred in one case in level 4, there were no significant modifications of chemotherapy schedule until level 4. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in all cases receiving level 5. One patient developed an infection, and two had incomplete recovery of neutropenia by the 28th day after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Nonhematological toxicities, including nephrotoxicity, nausea/vomiting, alopecia and hypersensitivity reaction, were tolerable. However, one case developed severe hyponatremia. Among 21 patients evaluable for response, eight cases achieved partial response, thus the overall response was 39%. Weekly administration of docetaxel at 25 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, 15) combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) is recommended for phase II studies. The responses observed in the present study suggest an identical high degree of activity against NSCLC with less hematotoxicity compared with a standard schedule of cisplatin and docetaxel.
Lung Cancer 2001 Oct
PMID:Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. 1155 22

Vinorelbine is a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid that is effective as monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the large comparative Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study (ELVIS), patients receiving vinorelbine monotherapy achieved an objective response rate of 19.7%. The median survival time and the 1-year survival rate were significantly higher in recipients of vinorelbine plus best supportive care than in recipients of best supportive care alone. Vinorelbine recipients generally scored better than recipients of best supportive care on quality-of-life (QOL) functioning scales and experienced significantly fewer lung cancer-related symptoms; however, QOL scores were worse with vinorelbine for parameters relating to drug tolerability. Comparative phase III trials investigating the efficacy of combination therapy with vinorelbine and other agents specifically in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC have been conducted only for the combination of vinorelbine and gemcitabine [the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG) trial and the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES)]. Objective response rates for vinorelbine/gemcitabine combination therapy in these phase III trials were 22 and 20%, respectively. The SICOG trial was closed early when an interim analysis demonstrated a significant survival advantage for combination therapy with vinorelbine plus gemcitabine over vinorelbine monotherapy. However, a survival advantage for combination therapy versus vinorelbine monotherapy was not demonstrated in the larger MILES trial. The main adverse effect of vinorelbine monotherapy in the elderly is myelosuppression. Adverse events associated with most antineoplastic agents, such as mild alopecia, nausea, vomiting and mucositis, were reported in clinical trials; however, these events were rarely severe. Mild-to-moderate neurotoxicity, including constipation (presumably from autonomic neuropathy), was also reported. The addition of gemcitabine to vinorelbine increased the incidence of both haematological and nonhaematological adverse events. However, there was no significant increase in the incidence of life-threatening toxicity. Vinorelbine as a single agent is effective in elderly patients with NSCLC and is associated with improved survival and at least a trend towards improved QOL parameters compared with best supportive care alone. Vinorelbine was associated with a generally manageable tolerability profile. The benefit of adding gemcitabine to vinorelbine for the treatment of NSCLC in the elderly is equivocal; improved survival was reported in one comparative trial, but not in another larger one. Vinorelbine is an effective and well tolerated palliative treatment option for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.
 ...
PMID:Vinorelbine: a review of its use in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 1238 Dec 38

A phase II study was conducted to assess the activity and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) and carboplatin (CBDCA) combination chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligibility included chemo-naive advanced NSCLC patients with measurable disease and a good performance status. CPT-11 of 50 mg/m(2) was administered as a 90-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15. CBDCA dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 5 mgmin/ml, using Calvert's formula, was administered by 90-min infusion after the CPT-11 infusion on day 1. Treatment was repeated 28 days interval for at least two cycles. Haematopoietic growth factors were not routinely used. From December 1997 to January 1999, 36 patients were entered into the study. The overall response rate was 25.0% (95% confidence interval: 12.1-42.2%). The median survival time and the 1-year survival rate were 10.2 months and 42.2%, respectively. Major toxicity by Japan Clinical Oncology Group criteria was as follows: grade 3-4 neutropenia 76.5%; grade 3 anemia 26.5%; grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia 47.1%; grade 3 nausea/vomiting 36.1%; grade 3-4 diarrhoea 5.9%; grade 3 alopecia 5.9%; grade 3-4 skin rush 2.9%. Four patients developed febrile neutropenia and only one had serious diarrhea induced by CPT-11. Actual relative delivery dose of CPT-11 to the projected one on days 8 and 15 were 0.86 and 0.43, respectively. It seemed that CPT-11 and CBDCA was more toxic regimen than CPT-11 and CDDP in advanced NSCLC. The relatively disappointing response rate could be related with low dose intensity of CPT-11.
Lung Cancer 2002 Dec
PMID:Phase II study of irinotecan and carboplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 1244 53

Aberrations in cell cycle progression occur in the majority of human malignancies. The main pathway affected is the retinoblastoma (Rb) pathway. The tumor suppressor gene Rb is an important component in the G(1)/S transition and its function is abnormal in most human neoplasms. Loss in Rb function occurs by the hyperactivation of the cyclin-dependent kinases (cdk's). Therefore, modulation of cdk's may have an important use for the therapy and prevention of human neoplasms. Efforts to obtain small-molecule cdk modulators yielded two classes of modulators: direct and indirect modulators. Direct cdk modulators are small molecules that specifically target the ATP binding site of cdk's. Examples for this group include flavopiridol, roscovitine and BMS-387032. In contrast, indirect cdk modulators affect cdk function due to modulation of upstream pathways required for cdk activation. Some examples include perifosine, lovastatin, and UCN-01. The first example of a direct small-molecule cdk modulator tested in the clinic, flavopiridol, is a pan-cdk inhibitor that not only promotes cell cycle arrest but also halts transcriptional elongation, promotes apoptosis, induces differentiation, and has antiangiogenic properties. Clinical trials with this agent were performed with at least three different schedules of administration: 1-, 24- and 72-h infusions. The main toxicities for infusions >/=24-h are secretory diarrhea and proinflammatory syndrome. In addition, patients receiving shorter infusions have nausea/vomiting and neutropenia. A phase II trial of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma using the 72-h infusion every 2 weeks was recently completed. The median overall survival for the 20 patients who received treatment was 7.5 months, a survival similar to that obtained in a randomized trial of four chemotherapy regimens containing platinum analogues in combination with taxanes or gemcitabine, or with gefitinib, a recently approved EGFR inhibitor for the treatment of advanced lung cancer. Based on these encouraging results, a phase III trial comparing standard combination chemotherapy versus combination chemotherapy plus flavopiridol is currently under investigation. The second example of direct small-molecule cdk modulator tested in clinical trials is UCN-01 (7-hydroxystaurosporine). UCN-01 has interesting preclinical features: it inhibits Ca(2+)-dependent PKCs, promotes apoptosis, arrests cell cycle progression at G(1)/S, and abrogates checkpoints upon DNA damage. The first phase I trial of UCN-01 demonstrated a very prolonged half-life. Based on this novel feature, UCN-01 is administered as a 72-h continuous infusion every 4 weeks (in second and subsequent cycles UCN-01 is administered as a 36-h infusion). Other shorter schedules (i.e. 3 h) are being tested. Dose-limiting toxicities include nausea/vomiting, hypoxemia, and insulin-resistant hyperglycemia. Combination trials with cisplatin and other DNA-damaging agents are being tested. Recently, phase I trials with two novel small-molecule cdk modulators, BMS 387032 and R-Roscovitine (CYC202), have commenced with good tolerability. In summary, novel small-molecule cdk modulators are being tested in the clinic with interesting results. Although these small molecules are directed towards a very prevalent cause of carcinogenesis, we need to test them in advanced clinical trials to determine the future of this class of agents for the prevention and therapy of human malignancies.
 ...
PMID:Small-molecule cyclin-dependent kinase modulators. 1452 86

AE-941 (Neovastat), an antiangiogenic component extracted from cartilage, selectively competes for the binding of vascular endothelial growth factor to its receptor, inhibits matrix metalloproteinases, stimulates tissue plasminogen activator enzymatic activities, and induces apoptotic activities in endothelial cells. A phase I/II study was conducted to obtain information on its safety and efficacy in patients with advanced cancer refractory to treatment or for which no standard treatments were available. Eighty patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study of AE-941 (30, 60, 120, or 240 mL/day) administered orally b.i.d. as monotherapy. No dose-limiting toxicity was reported. The most frequent adverse events were nausea (9%), pruritus (5%), anorexia (4%), and vomiting (4%). All adverse events were grade 1/2 except grade 3 constipation (n = 1). A survival analysis was conducted in the 48 patients with unresectable stage IIIA, IIIB, or IV non-small-cell lung cancer. A significant survival advantage was observed for patients receiving doses > 2.6 mL/kg/day (which correspond to approximately 180 mL/day in a 70-kg patient) compared to patients receiving lower doses (median, 6.1 months vs. 4.6 months; P = 0.026). No tumor responses were observed. On the other hand, 26% of the patients in the high-dose group had stable disease compared to 14% in the low-dose group. AE-941 is well tolerated in patients with advanced lung cancer. The higher dose of AE-941 explored in this phase I/II trial may confer a survival benefit.
Clin Lung Cancer 2003 Jan
PMID:Phase I/II trial of the safety and efficacy of AE-941 (Neovastat) in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. 1462 12

Irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, has been shown in preclinical studies to be a potent radiosensitizer. Carboplatin, a known radiosensitizer with single-agent activity in non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is felt to be a rational choice in combination with irinotecan. We have completed the initial portion of a phase I study, in patients with locally unresectable lung cancer, combining irinotecan with thoracic radiation. Thirteen patients have been entered onto this study through three dose levels (30 to 50 mg/m2/week) of irinotecan. There were seven partial responses in 12 evaluable patients, for an over-all response rate of 58%. Nausea, vomiting, and esophagitis were the principal toxicities of weekly irinotecan and concurrent thoracic radiation. As the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan with radiation has been established at 40 mg/m2/week, we are currently accruing patients to the second phase of this study with the addition of carboplatin (AUC = 2). Thus far toxicity has primarily been esophagitis.
Clin Lung Cancer 2000 May
PMID:A phase I trial of outpatient weekly irinotecan/carboplatin and concurrent radiation for stage III unresectable non small-cell lung cancer: a Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Affiliate Network Trial. 1473 37

In a previous phase II randomized study, a cisplatin/gemcitabine/vinorelbine (PGV) regimen produced a 50-week median survival time (MST) in advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The present trial was planned to randomly compare the outcome of patients treated with this new triplet regimen with those of patients receiving either cisplatin plus vinorelbine (PV) or cisplatin plus gemcitabine (PG) doublet combinations. One hundred eighty patients with stage IIIB (76) or IV (104) disease, aged <or= 70 years, and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) <or= 1, were randomly allocated to receive: cisplatin, 50 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 plus vinorelbine, 25 mg/m2 (PGV) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 on day 1 plus gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 (PG) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks; cisplatin, 120 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29 plus vinorelbine, 30 mg/m2/week (PV). At the planned interim analysis, the MST of patients in the PGV, PG, and PV arms was 51, 42, and 35 weeks, respectively. The hazard of death (Cox analysis) for patients receiving PGV compared with those receiving PV was 0.35 (95% confidence index [CI], 0.16-0.77, P = 0.0058). The response rate was 47% in the PGV arm, 30% in the PG arm, and 25% in the PV arm. Severe neutropenia (75% vs. 45%), and vomiting (50% vs. 15%) significantly affected more patients in the PV than in the PGV arm. Since the difference in survival met early stopping rules, accrual to the PV arm was suspended. Enrollment still continues in the PGV and PG arms to ascertain whether the triplet regimen has a more significant effect on survival than that produced with the PG regimen.
Clin Lung Cancer 2000 Feb
PMID:Interim analysis of a phase III trial comparing cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine vs. either cisplatin and gemcitabine or cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced non small-cell lung cancer. A Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group Study. 1473 45


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>