Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0684249 (lung carcinoma)
 23,830 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The addition of chest radiotherapy to combination chemotherapy has been shown to prolong survival of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer. Treatment of these patients with concurrent etoposide cisplatin and chest radiotherapy has resulted in a median survival of 18-27 months with a 2-year projected actuarial survival of 36-65%. The alternation of etoposide cisplatin (EP) with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) has been associated with prolonged survival in a single trial of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer treated with combined modality therapy. Timing of the alternation of the two regimens (EP and VAC) in the first, second, or fourth cycle has not been shown to be an important determinant of survival for patients in single arm studies. Three studies evaluating early (within 1 month of starting chemotherapy) versus late (3-4 months after starting chemotherapy) chest radiotherapy in concurrent regimens, have shown early chest radiotherapy is associated with longer survival in one study while the other two show no difference in survival. Further clinical research will continue to define the appropriate ways to combine chemotherapeutic agents and chest radiotherapy to maximize the survival of patients with small cell lung cancer.
Lung Cancer 1994 Mar
PMID:Concurrent approaches to combined chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy for the treatment of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer. 808 21

The treatment of small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) requires the careful combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. To understand the factors involved in the outcome of these patients, the authors undertook a study of patients treated for limited stage SCLC. The charts of 194 consecutive patients treated at our facilities between 1986 and 1994 were reviewed. All patients underwent thoracic radiation therapy (TRT), 50% received prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), and all but one received chemotherapy. The probability of survival at 5 years was 14%, and the disease-free survival (DFS) was 17%. Patients receiving a combination of platinum and etoposide (PE) and Cytoxan (Bristol-Myers, Evansville, IN, U.S.A.), Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Dublin, OH, U.S.A.), and Vincristine (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, U.S.A.) (CAV) experienced a DFS at 3 years of 31%, versus 14% for CAV only and 18% for PE only (p = 0.004). In a multivariate survival analysis, only PCI (p = 0.001), having received PE and CAV (p = 0.01), and response to treatment (p = 0.001) were significant. Radiation dose and field size did not influence outcome. The combination of PE and CAV chemotherapy produced the best results in our series. Unanswered questions regarding the optimal TRT dose, field size, and timing of TRT await the results of ongoing randomized trials.
 ...
PMID:Small-cell lung carcinoma: an analysis of 194 consecutive patients. 970 28

Despite recent advances in combined modality therapy, long-term survival remains elusive in most patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The present study was designed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy and weekly, alternating-regimen chemotherapy. Twelve patients with limited-stage SCLC and performance status 0-1 were treated with cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2, etoposide 100 mg/m2, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 every other week, and vincristine 1 mg/m2 on day 8, and ifosfamide 1.2 mg/m2 on days 8 and 9 every other week. Hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy, consisting of three daily doses of 1.1 Gy for 20 days to a total dose of 66 Gy, was started on day 1 of chemotherapy. Ten patients (83%) exhibited an objective response (9 CRs and 1 PR) with a median duration of response of 8.6 months. Two complete responders died at 50 and 53 months without evidence of progression and two remain alive and free of SCLC at 73 and 87 months. Median survival was 19.8 months with 2- and 5-year survival rates of 50 and 17%, respectively. Severe toxicity, including grade 3-4 esophagitis (67%) and granulocytopenia (83%), as well as debilitating fatigue and pneumonitis, prompted early termination of the trial. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy and concurrent weekly alternating-regimen chemotherapy resulted in promising response and survival rates, but induced excessive toxicity, in patients with limited-stage SCLC.
Lung Cancer 1998 Oct
PMID:Phase II study of hyperfractionated radiotherapy and concurrent weekly alternating chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer. 986 6

Results of a previous Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) study revealed a small survival advantage for VIP versus etoposide and cisplatin (EP) for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This phase II study evaluated VIP with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited stage SCLC. Eligible patients had a Karnofsky Performance Score > or = 50, no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and adequate end organ function. Fifty-three patients were entered. Radiotherapy was given as a daily fraction of 1.8 Gy, five fractions per week for 5 weeks for a total dose of 45 Gy, beginning on day 1 of VIP. The first 13 patients received etoposide 75 mg/m(2), cisplatin 20 mg/m(2), and ifosfamide 1.2 g/m(2) on days 1-4 with Mesna every 3 weeks for four cycles unless the patient demonstrated disease progression or undue toxicity. Excessive toxicity was seen in the first 13 patients; therefore, VIP was modified by deleting the 4th day for all subsequent patients. The major toxicity in this trial was myelosuppression. Grade 3/4 anemia, granulocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 38, 75, and 34% of patients, respectively. There were four treatment-related deaths [three patients (23%) on the 4-day regimen and one patient (2.5%) on the 3-day regimen]. Twenty-five patients (47.2%) achieved a CR and 11 patients (20.8%) had a PR for an overall response rate of 68%. Minimum follow up for all patients is 5 years. Overall, 46 of 53 patients have died. Median, 1, 2 and 5 year overall survival for the entire group is 15.1 months, 69.8, 35.9, and 13.2, respectively. The results of this phase II trial of VIP with concurrent early thoracic radiotherapy failed to demonstrate a superior response rate over other series utilizing EP. In addition, treatment-related morbidity and mortality appears to be unacceptably high with the VIP regimen.
Lung Cancer 2002 Mar
PMID:Etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin (VIP) plus concurrent radiation therapy for previously untreated limited small cell lung cancer (SCLC): a Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) phase II study. 1184 4

There have been few longitudinal studies of quality of life in patients with all stages of lung cancer, particularly those that have included measures of utility. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Assessment of Quality of Life instrument (AQoL) in patients with lung cancer. The AQoL is a health-related quality of life questionnaire and provides a descriptive system for a multi-attribute utility instrument (MAU), so that scores can be used in cost-utility evaluations. In the present study the reliability (internal consistency) of the AQoL was examined and the concurrent validity was assessed using the Medical Outcomes 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) as the comparator instrument. The sensitivity to different health states of the AQoL and the responsiveness to change over time was also examined. A prospective, non-experimental cohort study was undertaken. Ninety-two participants with all stages of lung cancer were recruited from a tertiary multi-disciplinary lung cancer clinic. Ninety participants had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and two had limited stage small cell lung cancer. The AQOL and SF-36 surveys were administered concurrently at baseline. In patients with NSCLC the surveys were then repeated 3 and 6 months later. Correlations between the baseline AQoL summary scales and SF-36 summary scales support the divergent and convergent validity of the AQoL. Reliability was also found to be sufficient (Cronbach's Alpha=0.76). In addition, in patients with inoperable NSCLC, baseline AQoL scores were found to be predictive of survival at 6 months in Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis. However, the physical components summary score of the SF-36 was more sensitive to differences in health states between patients with different stages of NSCLC at 6 months of follow-up and more responsive to change over time in both operable and inoperable patients with NSCLC than the AQoL. The findings support the construct validity and reliability of the AQoL in this population. However, there remains some uncertainty about whether the AQoL has sufficient sensitivity to different health states in this population. Further studies using other MAU instruments may determine whether alternative instruments are more sensitive to different health states in individuals with lung cancer.
Lung Cancer 2006 Aug
PMID:Validity of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) utility instrument in patients with operable and inoperable lung cancer. 1676 75

The survival of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is related to T, N, M components, and early diagnosis and treatment of limited stage SCLC may improve survival. The objective of this study was to review the initial and annual repeat screening computed tomography (CT) images of all five patients with SCLC, encountered in our 1996-1998 population-based screening for lung cancer, to clarify any subtle, characteristic CT findings of early-stage small cell lung cancer. The medical records of the patients were reviewed to examine demographic and clinical features. We identified characteristic CT features of SCLC in the lung periphery, which were related to gross pathologic findings with longitudinal spread along the bronchial wall: a small spindle-shaped or pyramidal lesion was found as a subtle CT finding of SCLC, and irregularly shaped nodular lesions (vermiform, pine-cone-like or tandem-like nodular lesions) appeared at a more advanced stage. Tumour volume doubling time of the cases ranged from 38 days to 217 days. All five patients were male smokers: four patients underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy; three of them remain alive, while the remaining patient, an interval case, died of lung cancer. One patient refused treatment and died of a cause other than lung cancer. Annual repeat CT screening was useful for detecting SCLC cases mostly at a curable stage, and information about CT features, presented here, should help physicians identify SCLC at an earlier-stage and lead to a more successful treatment of the disease.
Lung Cancer 2007 May
PMID:CT findings of early-stage small cell lung cancer in a low-dose CT screening programme. 1725 49

Small cell lung carcinoma comprises approximately 10-20% of all lung cancers. At the time of diagnosis, 20-30% of patients have what is considered limited stage disease. Historically, chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for small cell lung cancer, but more recent evidence from large meta-analyses have established the local control and overall survival advantages conferred by the addition of external beam thoracic radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy for limited stage disease along with prophylactic cranial irradiation for complete responders. At present, radiotherapy is recommended to commence in concurrentoe with an earlier cycle of chemotherapy. Despite the established role of thoracic radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for patients with limited stage disease, the optimal radiotherapy dose-fractionation schedule is still undefined. Recent investigational radiotherapy approaches applied to limited stage small cell lung cancer patients include hyperfractionated radiotherapy, dose-escalated daily radiotherapy, and hypofractionation. While several chemotherapy regimens and targeted systemic agents have been investigated in small numbers of small cell lung cancer patients, cisplatin with etoposide remains the current standard chemotherapy regimen for this cancer.
 ...
PMID:Combined modality treatment of limited stage small cell carcinoma of the lung. 1847 26

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to examine the outcomes of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) over time and to determine if any trends were present with respect to the publication of significant clinical trials. We assembled a cohort of 6271 patients aged 21 years and older with LS-SCLC diagnosed from 1983 to 1998 and followed through 2005. Potential covariates included patient age at diagnosis, sex, race, year of diagnosis, laterality, tumor size, and location (upper lobe, middle lobe, lower lobe, or main bronchus). In multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, African American race, and main bronchus location were all associated with a statistically significant increase in the mortality hazard. When compared to patients diagnosed in 1983-1987 who did not receive radiotherapy, the hazard for mortality was significantly reduced for patients diagnosed in 1988-1992 regardless of whether they received radiotherapy (HR=0.59; CI 0.52-0.65; p<0.0001) or not (HR=0.67; CI 0.60-0.75; p<0.0001). Patients who were diagnosed in 1993-1998 and received radiotherapy had similarly improved survival (HR=0.53; CI 0.47-0.58; p<0.0001), which was better than patients from the same time era who did not receive radiotherapy (HR=0.77; CI 0.69-0.85; p<0.0001). In conclusion, the survival for patients with LS-SCLC has improved over time. Many factors are likely involved, however we believe that part of this improvement was the result of clinical trials which investigated and subsequently defined chemoradiotherapy as the standard of care. In order to continue to improve clinical outcomes, clinical trials investigating new treatment paradigms are needed.
Lung Cancer 2009 May
PMID:Trends in the outcomes for patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer: An analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. 1883 59

There is paucity of data in the literature regarding the safety of combining granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) during chemo-radiotherapy (CTRT) in lung cancer patients. The ASCO 2006 recommendations advise against use of CSFs during concomitant mediastinal CTRT. The only randomised study evaluating CSFs in this context showed significant increase in grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and an excess of pulmonary toxic deaths. In the context of a phase II trial, 38 patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer were randomised to receive once-daily (66 Gy in 33 fractions) or twice-daily (45 Gy in 30 fractions) radiotherapy. Radiotherapy (RT) was given concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. G-CSF was given as primary or secondary prophylaxis or as a therapeutic measure during an episode of febrile neutropenia according to local protocols. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v3.0 was used to record toxicity. Thirteen (34%) of 38 patients received G-CSF concurrently with RT. With a median follow-up of 16.9 months, there were no treatment related deaths reported. Seven (54%) patients experienced grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and 5 (38%) experienced grade 3/4 anaemia. Thirty-one percent required platelet transfusions. No episodes of bleeding were observed. There were no cases of grade 3/4 acute pneumonitis. These data suggests that with modern three-dimensional (3D) conformal RT, G-CSF administration concurrently with CTRT does not result in the increase risk of pulmonary toxicity, but does increase the risk of thrombocytopenia. Whether the risks of thrombocytopenia are outweighed by the outcome of timely early concurrent CTRT is being evaluated prospectively in the ongoing phase III CONVERT trial (NCT00433563) in which G-CSF is permitted during thoracic irradiation.
Lung Cancer 2011 Oct
PMID:Use of G-CSF during concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer safety data from a phase II trial. 2135 20

Although prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been the standard of practice for patients successfully treated for limited stage small cell lung cancer for decades, subsequent changes in patient selection, updated brain imaging guidelines, an increased understanding of the mechanisms underlying the deleterious effects of whole brain irradiation as well as ongoing investigations into improving radiation treatment delivery have begun to question the current role of PCI. Who should be treated and how? This review attempts to gather together evidence for improving patient selection and describe potential improvements in treatment delivery.
Lung Cancer 2015 Jul
PMID:Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). Still a no-brainer? 2599 22


1 2 Next >>