Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0677930 (
primary tumor
)
20,210
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
A total of 250 patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with irradiation of their brain metastases. The median overall survival was 3.1 (95% CI: 2.7-3.5) months. 32/250 patients presenting with solitary brain metastasis underwent surgical resection. Their 1-year survival rate of 58% was significantly better than 89/250 patients with a solitary lesion but without surgery (14%, P=0.001). Patients with an absent or controlled
primary tumor
(101/250, 40.5%) had a 1-year survival rate of 26% as opposed to 11% for patients presenting with an active
primary tumor
(P=0.051). Patients presenting with metastases to the brain only showed a significant survival advantage over patients with extracranial metastases (1-year survival of 21% vs 6%, P=0.001). Karnofsky performance score, neurofunction status and response to steroids were also identified as prognostic factors. The total dose whole brain irradiation (WBI) was prognostic of significance with a 1-year survival of 35% for 30 Gy and boost, 23.5% for 30 Gy and 4% for the patients irradiated to a dose of 20 Gy WBI (P=0.001). When patients were grouped into the RTOG
RPA
(Recursive partitioning analysis) classes, patients within class I (73/250) had a 1-year survival of 28.5%, patients in class II (145/250) a survival of 14% at 1 year and patients into class III only a 6% 1-year survival rate. In a multivariate analysis, surgical resection, neurofunction class, metastatic extent and WBI dose remained significant prognostic factors. Although survival remains poor, there needs to be a continued interest in these patients, probably by participating in clinical trials.
...
PMID:Brain metastases and non-small cell lung cancer. Prognostic factors and correlation with survival after irradiation. 1132 83
The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the survival of patients with high-grade gliomas treated with external beam radiotherapy with or without radiosurgical boost. From July 1993 to April 1998, 32 patients were selected, 15 of which received radiosurgery. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years, histological confirmation of high-grade glioma,
primary tumor
treatment with curative intent, unifocal tumor and supratentorial location. All patients were found to be in classes III-VI, according to the recursive partitioning analysis proposed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. The median interval between radiotherapy and radiosurgery was 5 weeks (range 1-13). Treatment volumes ranged from 2.9 to 70.3 cc (median 15.0 cc). Prescribed radiosurgery doses varied from 8.0 to 12.5 Gy (median 10.0 Gy). Radiosurgery and control groups were well balanced with respect to prognostic factor distributions. Median actuarial survival time in radiosurgery and control groups was 21.4 months and 11.6 months, respectively (p = 0.0254). Among patients with KPS > 80, median survival time was 11.0 months and 53.9 months in the control and radiosurgery groups, respectively (p = 0.0103). Radiosurgery was the single factor correlated with survival on Cox model analysis (p = 0.0362) and was associated with a 2.76 relative reduction in the risk of cancer death (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-7.13). Our results suggest that radiosurgery may confer a survival advantage for patients in
RPA
classes III-VI, especially for those with Karnofsky performance status >80. The definitive role of radiosurgical boost for patients with high-grade gliomas awaits the results of randomized trials.
...
PMID:Radiosurgical boost for primary high-grade gliomas. 1212 77
Brain metastases occur in 20-40% of patients with cancer and their frequency has increased over time. Lung, breast and skin (melanoma) are the commonest sources of brain metastases, and in up to 15% of patients the primary site remains unknown. After the introduction of MRI, multiple lesions have outnumbered single lesions. Contrast-enhanced MRI is the gold standard for the diagnosis. There are no pathognomonic features on CT or MRI that distinguish brain metastases from primary malignant brain tumors or nonneoplastic conditions: therefore a tissue diagnosis by biopsy should be always obtained in patients with unknown
primary tumor
before undergoing radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Some factors are prognostically important: a high Performance Status, a solitary brain metastasis, an absence of systemic metastases, a controlled
primary tumor
and a younger age. Based on these factors, subgroups of patients with different prognosis have been identified (
RPA
class I, II, III). Symptomatic therapy includes corticosteroids to reduce vasogenic cerebral edema and anticonvulsants to control seizures. In patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases prophylactic anticonvulsants should not be used routinely. The combination of surgery and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is superior to WBRT alone for the treatment of single brain metastasis in patients with limited or absent systemic disease and good neurological condition. Complete surgical resection allows a relief of intracranial hypertension, seizures and focal neurological deficits. Radiosurgery, alone or in conjunction with WBRT, yields results which are comparable to those reported after surgery followed by WBRT, provided that lesion's diameter does not exceed 3-3.5 cm. Radiosurgery offers the potential of treating patients with surgically inaccessible metastases. Still controversial is the need for WBRT after surgery or radiosurgery: local control seems better with the combined approach, but overall survival does not improve. Late neurotoxicity in long surviving patients after WBRT is not negligible; to avoid this complication patients with favorable prognostic factors must be treated with conventional schedules of RT, and monitoring of cognitive functions is important. WBRT alone is the treatment of choice in patients with single brain metastasis not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery, and with an active systemic disease, and in patients with multiple brain metastases. A small subgroup of these latter may benefit from surgery. The response rate of brain metastases to chemotherapy is similar to the response rate of the
primary tumor
and extracranial metastases, some tumor types being more chemosensitive (small cell lung carcinoma, breast carcinoma, germ cell tumors). New radiosensitizers and cytotoxic or cytostatic agents, and innovative technique of drug delivery are being investigated.
...
PMID:Management of brain metastases. 1238 50
To evaluate the prognostic factors and indexes of a series of 93 patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BM) in a single institution. Treatment outcomes were evaluated according to the major prognostic indexes (
RPA
, BSBM, GPA scores) and breast cancer subtypes. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were identified. The median OS values according to GPA 0-1, 1.5-2, 2.5-3 and 3.5-4, were 4.5, 9.5, 14.2 and 19.1 months, respectively (p < 0.0001) and according to genetic subtypes, they were 5, 14.2, 16.5 and 17.1 months for basal-like, luminal A and B and HER, respectively (p = 0.04). Using multivariate analysis, we established a new grading system using the six factors that were identified as indicators of longer survival: age under 60 (p = 0.001), high KPS (p = 0.007),
primary tumor
control (p = 0.05), low number of extracranial metastases and BM (p = 0.01 and 0.0002, respectively) and triple negative subtype (p = 0.002). Three groups with significantly different median survival times were identified: 4.1, 9.5 and 26.3 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Our new grading system shows that prognostic indexes could be improved by using more levels of classification and confirms the strength of biological prognostic factors.
...
PMID:An institutional retrospective analysis of 93 patients with brain metastases from breast cancer: treatment outcomes, diagnosis-specific prognostic factors. 2344 14