Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0677930 (primary tumor)
 20,210 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Androgen binding (cytosol and nucleus) was measured in tissue obtained from 223 untreated patients with proven prostate cancer (199 primary tumor, 24 malignant lymph nodes), 19 patients with hormone refractory cancer, and 46 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The mean binding in both the cytosol and nucleus was significantly higher for patients with cancer than for those with BPH. Binding appeared to correlate with tumor stage. Androgen binding in malignant nodes can differ from that in the primary tissue and can vary from node to node in the same patient. Results obtained from an assay using a single saturating concentration of R1881 correlated well with those calculated from a full six-point Scatchard analysis when an adequate amount (500 mg) of tissue was available. However, binding results obtained from a single-point analysis performed on needle biopsy specimens (about 50 mg) obtained before complete surgical removal of the prostate correlated poorly with those derived from a full six-point analysis performed on tissue (500-1000 mg) removed from the center of the malignancy. Androgen binding in nuclear extracts of histologically benign tissue adjacent to the malignancy was significantly higher than in nuclear extracts of BPH tissue. Cytosolic androgen binding in tissue removed from patients who were refractory to hormonal therapy was higher than in tissue from untreated cancer patients. The binding of estradiol by extracts of benign and malignant prostate tissue was low or absent and, thus, did not appear to be a significant phenomenon.
 ...
PMID:Androgen receptor binding activity in human prostate cancer. 257 85

Patients with bulky prostate cancer have usually been treated by palliative measures because the likelihood of tumor control with definitive irradiation has been low and the development of distant metastases high. The addition of estrogen to irradiation has not been shown to be of value. However, we believe the method of estrogen administration may have been the cause for the apparent lack of benefit. Estrogen had been started either concurrent with irradiation or had been used for palliation and was given for long and unscheduled time periods prior to irradiation. We have used estrogen for two months prior to and concurrent with irradiation. We postulated that in those patients with estrogen responsive cancer, the reduced tumor burden prior to irradiation could enhance tumor control and survival. Between 1975 and 1980, 25 patients with bulky prostate cancer received sequential estrogen and irradiation, 12 patients irradiation alone and six patients irradiation after having become refractory to long-term estrogen use. One patient was lost to follow-up. Eighteen of 25 (72%) treated by sequential estrogen and irradiation, 14/17 (82%) with estrogen responsive cancer and 4/8 (50%) with estrogen resistant cancer had a complete tumor response. Six of 11 (55%) patients treated by irradiation alone and 2/6 (33%) treated by irradiation for estrogen refractory cancer had a complete tumor response. Disease-free survival was observed in 13/25 (52%) treated by sequential estrogen and irradiation, and 8/17 patients (47%) with irradiation. It is also possible the improved survival in the estrogen responsive group was a direct result of improved local control. Persistent local disease can act as a source for distant metastases. Distant metastases was observed in 15% of patients when the primary tumor was controlled and 30% when there was persistent or recurrent local disease. Also, progressive local disease can be an important cause of death. This was most evident in our patients with estrogen refractory cancer. Almost all patients in this group had progressive local disease that caused serious urinary bleeding and urinary infection that were considered the major cause of death. Our results suggest bulky prostate cancer should be aggressively treated when first diagnosed. The value of adjunct estrogen is unproven. Our results with the use of estrogen prior to and concurrent with irradiation is encouraging. Estrogen may shrink the cancer and allow for a more favorable geometry for external irradiation. Tumor control and survival may be thereby improved.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Improved control of bulky prostate carcinoma with sequential estrogen and radiation therapy. 674 58

The in vitro cytotoxic activity profile of nine novel phenylarsonic acid (CAS 98-05-5, PAA) compounds against 17 human cancer cell lines including (a) ovarian cancer cell lines ES-2, PA-1, CAOV-3, OVCAR-3, (b) testicular cancer cell lines Ntera-2, Tera-2, N2NICP, 833K, and 64CP, (c) multiple myeloma cell lines ARH77, HS-Sultan, RPMI-8226, and U266, and (d) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell lines NALM-6, MOLT-3, ALL-1, and RS4; 11, was determined by the MTT assay. The lead compounds, 2-methylthio-4-[(4'-aminophenylazo)-phenylarsonic acid] pyrimidine (PHI-370) and 2-methylthio-4-(4'-phenylarsonic acid)-aminopyrimidine (PHI-380) caused apoptotic death in all 17 cancer cell lines at low micromolar concentrations, as documented by TUNEL assays and confocal laser scanning microscopy. PHI-380 was also tested and found to be very active against primary tumor cells isolated from surgical biopsy specimens of 14 patients with therapy-refractory non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, lymphoma, hepatoblastoma, or Wilm's tumor as well. Because of their broad-spectrum and potent anticancer activity and ability to induce apoptosis in primary tumor cells from therapy-refractory cancer patients, PAA compounds such as PHI-370 and PHI-380 may provide the basis for effective salvage regimens for patients with recurrent cancer.
 ...
PMID:Phenylarsonic acid compounds with broad-spectrum and potent cytotoxic activity against human cancer cells. 1287 14

Personalized medicine is defined by the National Cancer Institute as "a form of medicine that uses information about a person's genes, proteins, and environment to prevent, diagnose, and treat disease." In oncology, the term "personalized medicine" arose with the emergence of molecularly targeted agents. The prescription of approved molecularly targeted agents to cancer patients currently relies on the primary tumor location and histological subtype. Predictive biomarkers of efficacy of these modern agents have been exclusively validated in specific tumor types. A major concern today is to determine whether the prescription of molecularly targeted therapies based on tumor molecular abnormalities, independently of primary tumor location and histology, would improve the outcome of cancer patients. This new paradigm requires prospective validation before being implemented in clinical practice. In this paper, we will first review different designs, including observational cohorts, as well as nonrandomized and randomized clinical trials, that have been recently proposed to evaluate the relevance of this approach, and further discuss their advantages and drawbacks. The design of the SHIVA trial, a randomized proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing therapy based on tumor molecular profiling versus conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer will be detailed. Finally, we will discuss the multiple challenges associated with the implementation of personalized medicine in oncology, as well as perspectives for the future.
 ...
PMID:Designs and challenges for personalized medicine studies in oncology: focus on the SHIVA trial. 2316 Oct 20