Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0677930 (primary tumor)
 20,210 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Unknown primary carcinoma presenting as cervical lymph node metastasis accounts for approximately 5% of all head and neck malignancies. The typical presentation involves a middle-aged man with a painless neck mass that has been present for several months. Over 90% of these malignancies represent squamous cell carcinoma originating within Waldeyer's ring (lymphoid tissue of the nasopharynx, tonsil, and base of tongue). The remainder are comprised of adenocarcinoma, melanoma, and other rare histologic variants. The ability to identify the occult primary tumor is imperative because identification allows site-specific therapy and avoidance of wide-field radiation side effects. Following confirmation of metastatic cervical disease with fine-needle aspiration, all patients presenting with an unknown primary carcinoma require a thorough head and neck history and physical examination, radiographic imaging, panendoscopy with directed biopsies of Waldeyer's ring, and bilateral tonsillectomy. Positron emission tomography has proved helpful in identifying occult primary tumors of the head and neck region.
 ...
PMID:Occult primary head and neck carcinoma. 1728 81

From 1989 to 2005, 28 patients--20 men and 8 women--with cervical lymph node metastasis from an unknown primary carcinoma were treated and studied retrospectively. In histological diagnosis, open biopsy was conducted in 11 patients and non-open biopsy (FNA or frozen section diagnosis during surgery) in 17. Blind biopsy under general anesthesia was conducted in 10 patients, showing one primary tumor in the nasopharynx. Tonsillectomy for diagnosis was not done. In region of maximum-size lymph node metastasis, the upper cervical region accounted for 22 cases (79%). The N stage of cervical lymph nodes was as follows: N2a in 4, N2b in 14, N2c in 3, and N3 in 7. The histopathological diagnosis of cervical lymph node was as follows: squamous cell carcinoma in 21, adenocarcinoma in 3, mucoepidermoid carcinoma in 2, and others in 2. Therapy was as follows: only neck dissection in 7, neck dissection with postoperative radiation therapy in 13, and irradiation and chemotherapy in 8. All patients treated with irradiation and chemotherapy had been judged to be inoperable. Seven patients were found to have a subsequent primary tumor. Primary tumor sites were as follows: tonsils in 3 and upper gingiva, base of tongue, lung, and nasopharynx in 1 each. FDG-PET was conducted in 7 patients but revealed no primary tumor. Overall 5-year survival in this study was 46%. We should pay particular attention to the tonsils for detecting primary tumors in patients with cervical metastasis from an unknown primary carcinoma.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical study of 28 cases of cervical lymph node metastasis from an unknown primary carcinoma]. 1769 98

Carcinoma of unknown primary is uncommon, estimated to represent only 3% to 5% of all head and neck cancers. Squamous cell carcinoma accounts for 70% to 90% of these lesions, most commonly from sites in the upper aerodigestive tract, including tonsils, base of tongue, nasopharynx, and piriform sinus. Magnetic resonance, computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography all play a role in the assessment of patients with an unknown primary. The location of a metastatic lymph node may give an indication of the primary tumor site, and knowledge of lymph node drainage patterns is important for anyone evaluating these patients. Magnetic resonance and CT are both used for evaluation for extracapsular nodal disease, perineural tumor spread, osseous skull base or perivertebral space involvement, and vascular invasion, findings that seriously impact treatment and prognosis. Positron emission tomography/CT also plays a significant role in detecting primary tumor sites and identifying distant metastatic disease.
 ...
PMID:Head and neck cancer: carcinoma of unknown primary. 1789 93

Metastatic cancer of unknown primary site (CUP syndrome) comprises 2-5% of all solid malignant tumors. One should distinguish between initial CUP (primary tumor later detected) and the true CUP syndrome (primary tumor remains unknown for a patient's lifetime despite thorough diagnostic work-up). For initial CUP, the most important auxiliary diagnostic method is immunohistochemistry, which should be applied in a two-step algorithmic fashion. Firstly, a small marker panel (including certain cytokeratins) yields a preliminary categorization of the tumor. Secondly, selective, organ-specific markers (including recently established markers such as TTF-1 and uroplakin) and further tumor group markers may further subclassify or even identify the primary tumor. Although they are a heterogeneous group, true CUP tumors share some unique biological features such as an early metastatic phenotype and unusual metastasis patterns, and they mostly have a very poor prognosis. Even autopsy reveals the primary site in only 55-80% of cases, most commonly in the lung and pancreas. True CUP tumors, predominantly adenocarcinomas and poorly differentiated carcinomas, may exhibit unusual immunohistochemical phenotypes. Nevertheless, careful histologic and immunohistochemical examination are essential not only for determining the actual tumor immunophenotype but in particular for identifying therapy-responsive subgroups such as neck lymph node CUP, axillary lymph node CUP of females, neuroendocrine CUP, and germ cell tumor CUP of males. For CUP syndrome, future interdisciplinary research efforts are needed, such as gene expression profiling using microarrays. It is thus to be hoped that pathology will contribute to the elucidation of the largely still enigmatic pathogenesis of the CUP syndrome, to improve its diagnosis and classification and, finally, to aid in the development of more specific therapeutic regimens.
 ...
PMID:[CUP syndrome: are there advances?]. 1803 82

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET and FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) in the detection of primary tumors in patients presenting with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) unidentified by conventional workup, and to compare the statistical difference between the FDG-PET and FDG-PET/CT. Twenty-eight studies (involving a total of 910 patients) published between 1990 and 2007 were reviewed. These studies evaluated the role of FDG-PET and FDG-PET/CT in the detection of unknown primary tumors after physical examination and conventional workup failed to detect a primary tumor. Systematic methods were used to identify, select, and evaluate the methodological quality of the studies as well as to summarize the overall findings of sensitivity, specificity, and detection capacity of the primary tumor. The overall sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET in detecting unknown primary tumors were 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-0.84)] and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.83), respectively. Furthermore, FDG-PET detected 28.54% of tumors that were not apparent after CUP failed to be detected by conventional workup. Data were collected on the locations of primary tumors detected by FDG-PET in 17 studies and detected by FDG-PET/CT in seven studies. Tumors from the base of the tongue accounted for 20.7% (six of 29) of all false-positive FDG-PET scans, corresponding to a false-positive rate of 28.6% (six of 29), much higher than tumors from the others. FDG-PET exhibited a lower sensitivity with respect to the tumors at the base of the tongue and tonsils, which was 68.2 and 76.7%, respectively. In the eight studies with 430 patients diagnosed with CUP by FDG-PET/CT, 31.4% (n=135) of primary tumors were detected. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74-0.87) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), respectively. FDG-PET and FDG-PET/CT can detect primary tumors that went undetected by physical examination and conventional workup. FDG-PET exhibited lower sensitivity with respect to the tumors at the base of the tongue and the tonsils.
 ...
PMID:Role of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET versus fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography in detection of unknown primary tumor: a meta-analysis of the literature. 1867 7

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is an intriguing clinical finding defined as biopsy-proven metastasis from a malignancy in the absence of an identifiable primary site after a complete clinical workup. CUP is a relatively common clinical entity, accounting for approximately 3-5% of all cancer diagnoses, and consists of a heterogeneous group of tumors that have acquired the capacity to metastasize before the development of a clinically evident primary lesion. The mechanisms responsible for early metastasis and lack of a detectable primary tumor are largely unknown. Although remarkable tools have been developed for immunohistological classification of CUP on the basis of the likely tissue of origin, data on molecular pathogenesis and biology of this disorder are rare. A wide variety of chromosomal aberrations are seen in CUP, with aberrations of chromosomes 1, 6, 7, and 11 having been most frequently described. 66-75% of CUP express epidermal growth factor receptor while overexpression of Her2/neu seems to be rare. In contrast to most other tumor entities p53 mutations have been found only in a minority of CUP tumors. Recently, several independent studies have demonstrated proof of principle for the use of gene expression microarrays in identifying a primary site for CUP. Therefore, gene expression and also genomic profiling tools represent promising analytical approaches to assist with the management of CUP patients.
 ...
PMID:[CUP syndrome: molecular pathogenesis and biology]. 1913 75

Carcinoma of unknown primary origin (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of cancers defined by the presence of metastatic disease with no identified primary tumor at presentation. Identifying patients with prognostically favorable disease is important, since they may derive substantial benefit, including prolonged survival, from directed treatment. In CUP cases, a focused search for the primary tumor is recommended. Whether CUP is a distinct molecular genotype-phenotype relative to metastases of known cancers is unknown. However, use of a robust immunohistochemical panel and emerging molecular data may permit development of a tailored treatment algorithm for CUP patients that will include appropriate use of targeted agents.
 ...
PMID:Carcinoma of unknown primary origin. 1926 1

Patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) present with metastatic disease for which the primary site cannot be found, despite extensive standard investigation. Here, we describe the development and implementation of the first clinically available microarray-based test for this cancer type (CUPPrint), based on 633 individual tumors representing 30 carcinoma and 17 noncarcinoma classes. Tissue of origin prediction for either fresh frozen or paraffin-embedded tumor samples is achieved with the use of a custom 8-pack 1.9k microarray and robust classification algorithm. An expression profile of 495 genes was used to predict tumor origin by applying a k-nearest neighbor algorithm. Internal cross-validation and analysis of an independent, previously published, 229-sample dataset revealed that clinically informative predictions were made for up to 94% of samples analyzed. Analysis of 13 previously published CUP specimens yielded predicted tumor origins that supported the clinical suspicion in 12 cases (92%). Microarray profiling presents a promising tool to assist in the identification of the primary tumor and might direct a more tailored treatment for CUP patients.
 ...
PMID:Implementation of a novel microarray-based diagnostic test for cancer of unknown primary. 1953 16

Clinical investigations with imaging- and endoscopic techniques in order to identify the primary tumor sites in patients with CUP syndrome generally entail a significant diagnostic effort. If costs exceed <euro> 800.00, a financial loss ensues for German hospitals, as public health insurance companies do not reimburse above this amount. Combined cytological/immunocytochemical investigation of metastatic cancer cells represents a cost-effective, minimally invasive procedure to identify the probable primary cancer site that can be applied on an outpatient basis. We report on 85 fine needle aspiration biopsies of metastases to the liver, 30 to the lymph nodes and over 180 serous effusions and/or ascites with metastatic cancer cells in CUP. After conventional microscopic inspection, a routine panel of six monoclonal antibodies was applied (CK 5/6, CK 7, CK 20, Cdx 2, TTF 1 and CA 125). We were thus able to correctly identify the primary tumor sites in 90.3%, 92.0% and 85.1%, respectively, within three days. In total, 23 primary hepatocellular carcinomas could all be classified correctly, applying the antibodies HepPar 1, BerEp 4, AFP, CD 31, CD 68 and Ki 67. In addition, 141 malignant epithelial mesotheliomas were typed correctly in 97.1%, using the antibodies BerEp 4, Calretinin, Mesothelin, EMA and WT. Therefore, immunocytochemical investigation of metastatic cancer cells from fine needle aspiration biopsies or in serous effusions offers an efficient, cost-effective diagnostic alternative to imaging and endoscopic techniques in the workup of patients with CUP syndrome.
 ...
PMID:[Immunocytochemical identification of carcinomas of unknown primaries on fine-needle-aspiration-biopsies]. 1975 20

"Cancer of unknown primary (site)" (CUP) represents a frequent and often difficult task for diagnostic histopathology. In the initial CUP situation, immunohistochemistry, which is relatively cost-efficient and non-burdensome for the patient, contributes substantially to the targeted search for and identification of the primary tumor. It may be performed in a two-step algorithm (keratins as the first step, group and selective markers as the second step). However, in true CUP syndrome--a heterogeneous disease whose etiology and pathogenesis is still poorly understood--the primary tumor is rarely identified, and the immunohistochemical marker profile is often anomalous. Nevertheless, immunohistochemistry remains the most important special method, aiming at the phenotypical classification and particularly the identification of certain favorable therapy-responsive subsets. Novel methods for subtyping of CUP based on the analysis of gene expression profiles need to be further evaluated before their possible diagnostic application. Future basic and clinical research is required to unravel the still enigmatic tumor biology of the CUP syndrome and to improve the hitherto very unfavorable prognosis by developing new efficient therapy regimens.
 ...
PMID:[The initial CUP situation and CUP syndrome: pathological diagnostics]. 1981 86


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>