Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0600142 (hot flushes)
 1,242 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A double-blind comparison of moclobemide and toloxatone was performed in adult out-patients diagnosed as suffering from a major depressive disorder. Parallel groups of patients received moclobemide, 450 mg/day (n = 135) or toloxatone, 1000 mg/day (n = 133) for 28 days. Both groups showed a significant clinical improvement while on therapy; the response was most marked and rapid in those receiving moclobemide treatment. Improvement was greatest in those patients with the most severe depression at the time of trial onset. A significantly higher number of patients returned to normal sleep patterns following moclobemide treatment than following toloxatone. Overall, tolerance was rated as good or very good in more than 80% of patients. The most frequent complaints in the moclobemide-treated group were hot flushes, dry mouth, constipation and headache, while an increase in anxiety was associated with toloxatone usage. Moclobemide was found to be as effective as toloxatone in the treatment of major depressive episodes, but with the advantages of improved sleep patterns and reduced anxiety.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind comparison of moclobemide and toloxatone in out-patients presenting a major depressive disorder. 154 24

Twenty-four healthy women received 2.4 mg kg-1 dolasetron mesylate (1.8 mg kg-1 dolasetron base) by a 10 min intravenous administration and by oral administration. Pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and of its active reduced metabolite MDL 74156 were monitored for 48 h in plasma. Urine was collected from 0 to 48 h, blood pressure and heart rate were measured at 0, 0.08, 1, 2, 12, 24, and 36 h, and ECGs were measured at 0, 0.08 (intravenous only), 1, 2, and 36 h after dosing. Dolasetron was widely distributed and rapidly reduced (mean t1/2 = 0.23 h) to MDL 74156 (mean t1/2 = 8.05 and 9.12 h after intravenous and oral administration respectively). MDL 74156 was extensively distributed; between 27 (oral route) and 33% (intravenous route) was eliminated unchanged in urine. Safety assessment showed mild to moderate headache, dizziness, and hot flushes after the intravenous administration and headache, abdominal cramps or pain, and constipation after oral administration. Small and clinically non-significant changes in PR, QRS, and QTc intervals were observed. We conclude that there is no obvious difference in dolasetron pharmacokinetics between healthy women and men and that dolasetron can be used as safely in women as in men.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics and safety of single intravenous and oral doses of dolasetron mesylate in healthy women. 915 83

We investigated the clinical efficacy of milnacipran (Serotonin-Noradrenalin Reuptake Inhibitor: SNRI) in prostate cancer patients who suffer from hot flushes. Our study included 12 patients who had taken hormone therapy for at least 3 months prior to the trial entry. All patients had severe hot flushes at least 3 times daily. Among 12 patients, 7 subjects received milnacipran 25 mg orally once a day and 5 subjects received 50mg once a day. The questionnaire was used to measure the frequency and severity of hot flushes at baseline, and at 6 and 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, 9 patients were available for the evaluation. Four patients received 50 mg per day and 5 patients received 25 mg per day. The patients with > or =50% decrease in baseline hot flash score were observed in 3 out of 4 who received 50 mg and 2 out of 5 who received 25 mg per day. The frequency of hot flushes had significantly decreased at the 12 weeks period than the baseline in the milnacipran 50 mg per day treatment group (p < 0.05, paired t-test). Adverse events were observed in 3 patients: 2 cases of nausea and 1 case of constipation. However, all of them were mild to moderate. These results indicated that milnacipran 50 mg per day therapy is effective in the treatment of hot flushes, which is the side effect of hormone therapy for prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:[The clinical efficacy of SNRI milnacipran in the treatment of hot flushes with prostate cancer hormonally treated]. 1762 34

In the course of the international development of tianeptine (T), depressed patients were recruited by 18 centres from Belgium, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Spain and Switzerland in a double-blind parallel group study versus placebo (P) and imipramine (I). Efficacy and safety of tianeptine were evaluated in 187 depressed inpatients (56% female, 44% male), who fulfilled criteria for either major depression, single episode (24.6%) or recurrent (66.8%), or depressed bipolar disorder (8.6%). After a seven-day run-in placebo pre-inclusion period, patients were treated in double-blind conditions with tianeptine (37.5 mg/d) or imipramine (150 mg/d) or placebo for 14 days, including an increasing daily dose period of three days. After the fourteenth day and until the end of the sixth week of treatment, a flexible dosage was introduced in accordance with the therapeutic efficacy and/or the potential adverse events (T: 25-50 mg/d; I: 100-200 mg/d; P; 2-4 capsules). Discontinuation of treatment occurred in 57 patients (30.5%) with more inefficacy on placebo and tianeptine (P: 16/23; T: 11/17; I: 7/17), and more side-effects on imipramine (P: 1/23; T: 1/17; I: 7/17). Final MADRS scores in intention-to-treat analysis were 22.3 +/- 1.5, 17.3 +/- 1.6 and 18.4 +/- 1.5 for placebo, tianeptine and imipramine, respectively. Statistical analysis demonstrated the antidepressive efficacy of tianeptine and imipramine versus placebo (P = 0.012 and P = 0.034, respectively), and no difference between tianeptine and imipramine. In patients treated for 42 days (n = 129) the MADRS scores dropped from 62.3% on tianeptine, 54.2% on imipramine and 48.5% on placebo. These results confirmed the efficacy of tianeptine (37.5 mg/d) in the treatment of major depression and depressed bipolar disorder when compared to placebo. No difference was found between tianeptine and imipramine (150 mg/d) for the efficacy and between tianeptine and placebo for all safety criteria. The following adverse events were significantly more frequent with imipramine than with tianeptine or placebo: dry mouth (P < 0.001), constipation (P = 0.007), and hot flushes (P = 0.011). No difference in adverse events was found between tianeptine and placebo. While the usual cardiovascular signs of tricyclic antidepressants were observed in the imipramine group, no difference between tianeptine and placebo was shown in respect to heart rate or blood pressure (supine or standing). The assessment of haematological, renal, metabolic and hepatic parameters confirmed the safety of tianeptine.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind comparison of tianeptine, imipramine and placebo in the treatment of major depressive episodes. 1969 61