Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0600142 (hot flushes)
 1,242 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

333 pre- and peri-menopausal patients with breast cancer entered a programme of open studies on the effect of goserelin. Of the 333 patients, 265 patients were entered into assessable efficacy studies. Efficacy data were analysed from 228 eligible patients receiving 3.6 mg of goserelin administered as a subcutaneous injection of a depot formulation once every 28 days. Mean serum luteinising hormone (LH) and oestradiol concentrations were suppressed by day 22 after the first injection. Subjective response occurred in 68.3% of patients assessed. Objective response (UICC criteria) occurred in 36.4% of patients and the lifetable median duration of response was 44 weeks. Responses were observed in all histological grades of tumour, and regardless of oestrogen receptor status. Treatment was well tolerated with no withdrawals due to possible adverse reactions of which hot flushes (75.9%) and loss of libido (47.4%) were commonly encountered. Goserelin provides an effective well tolerated medical alternative to ovarian ablation in the management of advanced breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Goserelin depot in the treatment of premenopausal advanced breast cancer. 138 37

Twelve premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer were randomised to receive 3.75 or 7.5 mg of a slow release formulation of the luteinising hormone releasing hormone agonist leuprorelin once every 4 weeks. All patients were oestrogen receptor positive or unknown. Serum levels of gonadotrophins and oestrogens were suppressed markedly by both doses. All oestrogen values during treatment were within the postmenopausal range except for a single oestradiol level (274 pmol l-1) in one patient on the lower dose. There was no other indication that this lower dose was less effective as an oestrogen suppressant. There were two objective responders to the 3.75 mg dose and three to the 7.5 mg dose. Toxicity was confined almost entirely to hot flushes which occurred in 11/12 patients. We conclude that the slow release formulation of leuprorelin is effective in breast cancer treatment and that there is no major detriment to the use of the 3.75 rather than 7.5 mg dose.
 ...
PMID:A dose-comparative endocrine-clinical study of leuprorelin in premenopausal breast cancer patients. 212 15

Tamoxifen, a non-steroidal antioestrogen, represents a significant advance in treatment of female breast cancer. In trials of tamoxifen as postsurgical adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer, disease-free survival is consistently prolonged, representing an enhanced quality of life in association with tamoxifen's favourable adverse effect profile. Moreover, overview analysis indicates a survival benefit of approximately 20% at 5 years for all women, most clearly evident in women over 50 years, while a survival benefit independent of menopausal, nodal or oestrogen receptor status has been demonstrated in some individual trials. Thus, for postmenopausal women, tamoxifen is clearly optimal adjuvant treatment, although the relative benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative patients requires clarification. A survival benefit for women under 50 has not been clearly demonstrated in overview analysis, but is not precluded by these rather limited data, and adjuvant treatment of premenopausal women with tamoxifen may also warrant serious consideration. Response rates to tamoxifen in advanced breast cancer are around 30 to 35%, increasing with patient selection for oestrogen receptor positivity. Tamoxifen must be regarded as first-line endocrine treatment in postmenopausal women, and may represent an alternative to first-line ovarian ablation in premenopausal women. An emergent role in primary therapy of elderly and frail patients with operable disease is apparent. Tamoxifen is also of benefit following surgery in male breast cancer, and may have a role as first-line endocrine treatment. Tamoxifen also has a potential role in other hormone-sensitive malignancies such as pancreatic carcinoma, and in treatment of benign breast disease. Finally, tamoxifen has a place in treatment of male and female infertility. because of adverse effects is rarely necessary. The most frequent adverse effects are related to the drug's anti-oestrogenic activity, and include hot flushes, nausea and/or vomiting, vaginal bleeding or discharge, and menstrual disturbances in premenopausal patients. Thus, tamoxifen continues to play a major role in management of female breast cancer in both early and advanced stages of disease, with a place also in treatment of male breast cancer and of infertility.
 ...
PMID:Tamoxifen. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use. 266 Nov 95

The aim of the study was to compare efficacy and tolerability of the new aromatase inhibitor formestane (Lentaron) with megestrol acetate (Megestat) (MGA) in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. 179 patients were randomised to receive either 250 mg formestane intramuscularly biweekly or MGA 160 mg orally daily. 51% of the patients had received tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment; 73% of the patients had positive and 16% unknown oestrogen receptor values. The response rate was 17% in both treatment arms (95% confidence interval 10-26% for formestane and 10-27% for MGA). Disease stabilisation > or = 6 months was seen in 25% of the formestane and 22% of the MGA patients. Time to treatment failure was 120 days in the formestane arm and 111 days in the MGA arm. There was no significant difference between the treatments with regard to response rate and time to treatment failure. Overall toxicity was similar in both arms, but weight gain > 3 kg (P = 0.081) and severe cardiovascular toxicity (P = 0.044) were more frequently observed with MGA, e.g. deep vein thrombosis 0/90 formestane versus 5/81 MGA cases (P = 0.022). Formestane was associated with worsening of hot flushes/sleeping problems (P = 0.051) and mild leucopenia (P = 0.004). In our study, formestane and MGA showed similar antineoplastic activity as second-line hormonal treatment for advanced breast cancer. Both drugs have a specific toxicity profile. MGA was associated with significantly more severe cardiovascular toxicity and weight increase than formestane.
 ...
PMID:Formestane versus megestrol acetate in postmenopausal breast cancer patients after failure of tamoxifen: a phase III prospective randomised cross over trial of second-line hormonal treatment (SAKK 20/90). Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) 937 2

Raloxifene is a selective oestrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that has anti-oestrogenic effects on breast and endometrial tissue and oestrogenic actions on bone, lipid metabolism and blood clotting. In postmenopausal women raloxifene decreases bone turnover and increases bone mineral density, reducing the incidence of vertebral fractures. Unlike tamoxifen, raloxifene does not cause endometrial hyperplasia or cancer, as demonstrated by endometrial monitoring with ultrasonography and biopsy during treatment. Evidence suggests that raloxifene lowers total low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels behaving like oestrogens, but does not increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. In randomised clinical trials on postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, raloxifene reduced the risk of newly diagnosed ER-positive invasive breast cancer by 76% during a median of 40 months of treatment. However, raloxifene does not alleviate early menopausal symptoms, such as hot flushes and urogenital atrophy, and may even exacerbate some of them. In conclusion, raloxifene may be an alternative for the prevention of long-term effects of oestrogen deficiency (osteoporosis and heart diseases) in women with previous breast cancer not having hot flushes. For symptomatic patients, the association of raloxifene with different drugs which have demonstrated efficacy in the control of vasomotor symptoms is now under evaluation.
 ...
PMID:How to manage the menopause following therapy for breast cancer. is raloxifene a safe alternative? 1105 28

Selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are compounds that interact with the oestrogen receptor and have tissue-specific effects distinct from those of oestradiol, acting as an oestrogen agonist in some tissues and as an antagonist in others. The development of SERMs that selectively interact with specific receptors, coactivators and corepressors in different organ systems offers the possibility of improving the risk:benefit profile relative to hormone replacement therapy. Tamoxifen is a SERM that acts as an oestrogen antagonist in breast tissue and is currently being used for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Tamoxifen also exhibits oestrogen-agonistic properties in the endometrium and increases the risk of endometrial cancer. Oestrogen and another SERM, raloxifene, have been shown to prevent osteoporosis. The effects of oestrogens on cognitive functions are currently being investigated. Recent data reveal the lack of secondary prevention of coronary heart disease with oestrogen. Oestrogen has been used to treat menopausal symptoms, whereas the SERMs have been shown to induce hot flushes. Current research is focused on producing the ideal SERM, which would have benefits over existing SERMs in terms of preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and menopausal symptoms, improving cognitive functions, and have a significantly better toxicity profile in terms of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic events.
 ...
PMID:The search for the ideal SERM. 1203 7

We present an initial survival analysis and an update of the safety data of the North American and Tamoxifen or Arimidex Randomized Group Efficacy and Tolerability (TARGET) double-blind, randomised, multicentre studies which compared anastrozole with tamoxifen as first-line treatment in postmenopausal patients with oestrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor-positive (ER+/PR+) or receptor-unknown advanced breast cancer (ABC). At a median follow-up of 43.7 months, 56.0% of patients in the anastrozole group and 56.1% of patients in the tamoxifen group had died. The proportion of patients dead at 2 years was 31.1 and 32.0% in the anastrozole and tamoxifen groups, respectively. In the ER+/PR+ subgroup, 55.1 and 55.9% of patients had died and median time to deaths (TTD) were 40.8 and 41.3 months in the anastrozole and tamoxifen groups, respectively. Both agents remained well tolerated, with fewer reports of vaginal bleeding (anastrozole versus tamoxifen, 1.0% versus 2.5%) and thromboembolic events (anastrozole versus tamoxifen, 5.3% versus 9.0%) in the anastrozole group versus the tamoxifen group. Hot flushes and vaginal dryness were reported marginally less in the tamoxifen group compared with the Anastrozole group. Although no improvement in survival was observed, the favourable profile of anastrozole with respect to efficacy (TTP) and tolerability [Cancer 92 (2001) 2247] support the use of anastrozole in advance of tamoxifen as the first-line therapy choice in postmenopausal women with ABC.
 ...
PMID:Anastrozole (Arimidex) versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: survival analysis and updated safety results. 1509 87

Idoxifene is a novel selective oestrogen receptor modulator (SERM) which had greater binding affinity for the oestrogen receptor (ER) and reduced agonist activity compared with tamoxifen in preclinical studies. In a randomized phase II trial in 56 postmenopausal patients with progressive locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer we assessed whether idoxifene showed evidence of activity compared with an increased 40 mg/day dose of tamoxifen in patients who had previously demonstrated resistance to the standard 20 mg/day dose of tamoxifen. Of 47 patients eligible for response (25 idoxifene, 22 tamoxifen), two partial responses and two disease stabilizations (SD) for >6 months were seen with idoxifene (overall clinical benefit rate 16%, 95% CI 4.5-36.1%). The median duration of clinical benefit was 9.8 months. In contrast, no objective responses were seen with the increased 40 mg/day dose of tamoxifen, although two patients had SD for 7 and 14 months (clinical benefit rate 9%, 95% CI 1.1-29.2%). Idoxifene was well tolerated and the reported possible drug-related toxicities were similar in frequency to those with tamoxifen (hot flushes 13% vs 15%, mild nausea 20% vs 15%). Endocrine and lipid analysis in both groups showed a similar significant fall in serum follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone after 4 weeks, together with a significant rise in sex hormone binding globulin levels and 11% reduction in serum cholesterol levels. In conclusion, while idoxifene was associated with only modest evidence of clinical activity in patients with tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer, its toxicity profile and effects on endocrine/lipid parameters were similar to those of tamoxifen.
 ...
PMID:A cancer research (UK) randomized phase II study of idoxifene in patients with locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer resistant to tamoxifen. 1472 33

Approximately 75% of breast tumours in postmenopausal women are positive for the oestrogen receptor (ER) and/or the progesterone receptor (PgR) and are, therefore, potential candidates for endocrine treatment. Fulvestrant is a new type of ER antagonist with no agonist effects and a novel mode of action; it binds, blocks and degrades the ER, leading to a reduction in cellular ER and, consequently, in PgR levels. This novel mode of action results in a lack of cross-resistance with other commonly used endocrine treatments. In Phase III trials in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior anti-oestrogen therapy, fulvestrant was at least as effective as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, in terms of time to progression and objective response, and was associated with similar overall survival. In the first-line setting, fulvestrant showed similar efficacy to tamoxifen in patients with ER-positive and/or PgR-positive disease. Efficacy in more heavily pretreated patients has also been demonstrated in the fulvestrant compassionate use programme. Fulvestrant is well tolerated, being associated with a significantly lower incidence of joint disorders compared with anastrozole, and a lower incidence of hot flushes compared with tamoxifen. Fulvestrant, therefore, provides clinicians with a useful additional treatment for hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Ongoing trials will help to clarify the optimal position of fulvestrant in the endocrine treatment sequence for these patients.
 ...
PMID:Fulvestrant - a new treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer. 1557 71

Owing to its favourable tolerability profile versus cytotoxic chemotherapy, endocrine therapy is the treatment of choice for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, tolerability concerns associated with some endocrine treatments and the potential for cross-resistance has helped to drive the need for new, effective and better-tolerated agents. Fulvestrant is a new type of oestrogen receptor antagonist with no agonist effects. In phase III trials, fulvestrant has been shown to be at least as effective as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor (AI) anastrozole in the treatment of postmenopausal women with ABC progressing on prior tamoxifen therapy. Fulvestrant is administered as a once-monthly 250 mg intramuscular injection into the gluteus muscle. Here we review the tolerability of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive ABC and compare it with that of the four most frequently prescribed endocrine treatments for advanced disease (tamoxifen, anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane). Compared with these agents, fulvestrant is well tolerated and is associated with a lower incidence of joint disorders compared with the non-steroidal AIs and none of the potential androgenic side-effects that are sometimes seen with steroidal AIs. It is also associated with hot flushes compared with tamoxifen. Fulvestrant therefore provides clinicians and patients with a useful, well-tolerated option for the treatment of hormone-sensitive ABC. Integration of such agents into the endocrine treatment sequence may extend the opportunity for using well-tolerated therapies before chemotherapy needs to be considered and thus may improve quality of life for patients with ABC. The overall safety profiles of newer agents such as fulvestrant will become increasingly clear with their ongoing use.
 ...
PMID:Fulvestrant, a new treatment option for advanced breast cancer: tolerability versus existing agents. 1625 Dec


1 2 Next >>