Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0600142 (hot flushes)
 1,242 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Toremifene is an antiestrogen that binds strongly to estrogen receptors (ER). A total of 19 previously treated postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer whose performance status was good and whose ER status was positive or unknown were studied to determine the maximum tolerated dose of toremifene. Cohorts of patients received 200, 300, or 400 mg/m2 p.o. daily until relapse or unacceptable toxicity had occurred. Nausea, vomiting, and dizziness were dose-related. Three of five patients receiving 400 mg/m2 experienced moderate or severe vomiting and another developed reversible disorientation and hallucinations. Mild sweating, peripheral edema, vaginal discharge, and hot flushes were encountered at all doses. Reversible corneal pigmentation was identified in seven cases but was not of clinical importance. The pharmacokinetics of toremifene was studied weekly and in detail on day 42 using a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay that identified the parent compound and three active metabolites, N-desmethyltoremifene, (deaminohydroxy)toremifene, and didemethyltoremifene. Steady state was achieved at 1-3 weeks. The toremifene area under the curve and the maximal concentration were dose-dependent at high doses. The recommended phase II dose is 300 mg/m2 p.o. daily.
 ...
PMID:Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetics study of high-dose toremifene in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. 138 61

Eighty previously treated postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive fadrozole (CGS 16 949A), a new aromatase inhibitor, 1 or 4 mg orally per day. Seventy eight patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Only mild to moderate toxicity, namely hot flushes (28%), nausea and vomiting (13%), fatigue (8%) and loss of appetite (5%) occurred. Complete response was documented in 10% and partial response in 13% of patients with 45% having a no change status for at least 2 months. The median time to treatment failure is 4.1 months. The median survival is 23.7 months. The median survival is 23.7 months. The response and survival in patients with estrogen receptor positive and estrogen receptor unknown disease were not significantly different. Neither response nor survival was significantly different between the patients receiving 1 or 4 mg of fadrozole per day. Fadrozole is a well tolerated, effective second line treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Fadrozole hydrochloride, a new nontoxic aromatase inhibitor for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. 138 48

For almost a century surgical castration represented the initial standard therapy for metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women with hormone dependent tumors. Today the suppression of ovarian function can also be obtained by the administration of supraphysiologic doses of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists. From April 1987 to February 1989, 23 premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer (median age 39 years, range 28-52, ER positive 20, unknown 3; prior chemotherapy 17) were treated with the LHRH agonist goserelin depot (Zoladex) at the dose of 3.6 mg. every 4 weeks. Twenty-two patients were evaluable. Serum levels of 17 beta estradiol, progesterone, FSH and LH were suppressed by goserelin and fell to postmenopausal values within 8 weeks of therapy in 77% of cases. Complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) was documented in 7 of 22 (32%) and occurred in all major sites of disease. Five patients achieved CR (soft tissue 3, viscera 2). Response rate was higher in patients not previously treated with chemotherapy (4/6). In the present series, all responses were seen in women greater than 35 years old, regularly menstruating at the start of treatment. Time to progression for the entire case series was 22 weeks and for responders 64 weeks. Oophorectomy was performed after disease progression in four patients without success. Goserelin was well tolerated. Local cutaneous dyschromia occurred in 45% and hot flushes in 82%. Treatment efficacy of goserelin is comparable to that of oophorectomy, without the psychological trauma and the morbidity related to surgical castration.
 ...
PMID:Medical castration with zoladex: a conservative approach to premenopausal breast cancer. 182 40

This study was undertaken to determine whether intranasally administered buserelin, a gonadotrophin releasing hormone analog agonist, can be given with CAF to premenopausal women with advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer, and to assess toxicity and therapeutic effect. Of 24 women entered into the study 22 were evaluable; objective responses were documented in 18 patients (seven CR and 11 PR). The median time to treatment failure was 402 days. Buserelin, given with CAF, was well tolerated with the only additional side-effect being hot flushes. Amenorrhea occurred in 13/17 menstruating women and serum estradiol levels decreased to postmenopausal values in all patients.
 ...
PMID:CAF and nasal buserelin in the treatment of premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. 249 19

4-hydroxyandrostenedione, a potent inhibitor of the aromatase (oestrogen synthetase) system, was given to 11 patients with metastatic breast cancer. After a single 500 mg intramuscular injection a sustained reduction of serum oestradiol was observed for at least 1 week in all patients in whom the steroid was measured. 4 patients responded to treatment for periods of up to 4 months, and healing of bone metastases and reduction in size of soft-tissue metastases was evident. The only side-effects were pain at the injection site and hot flushes. 4-hydroxyandrostenedione is a new and specific aromatase inhibitor which shows promise in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:4-Hydroxyandrostenedione in treatment of postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. 615 Feb 77

In an open, prospective, multicentre phase III clinical trial 73 patients with newly diagnosed, metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. Most of them were hormone-receptor-positive. All patients were pre- or perimenopausal and treated with monthly sc. injections of 3.75 mg leuprorelinacetate-depot as monotherapy until disease progression. 50/73 patients (68.5%) had low-risk metastatic disease. A marked reduction of gonadotropin levels resulted in a profound and sustained suppression of the oestradiol levels to castration range (30 pg/ml) during the entire treatment period. The overall response rate based on the best response during treatment was as follows: CR + PR in 25/73 (34.2%) [25.1-44.4%] and CR + PR + SD in 42/73 patients (58%) [47.2-67.4%] respectively. The median time to progression (TTP) was 6 months and the median overall survival (OS) 24.3 months. Both parameters differed significantly when responder (CR/PR) and non-responder (NC/PD) were compared: 18.6 +/- 2.4 [13.9-23.4] vs. 5.8 +/- 0.6 [4.7-7.0] months (TTP, p < 0.0001) and 41.5 +/- 3.0 [35.5-47.5] vs. 15.6 +/- 2.4 [11.3-20.5] months (OS, p = 0.0019). The median duration of response was 12 (range: 3-48) months. Premenopausal low-risk patients without previous adjuvant treatment after primary surgery showed the best response during the GnRHa treatment. The main side effects (hot flushes, increased sweating, headache etc.) were related to oestradiol suppression. Treatment was well tolerated leading in only one case to a premature withdrawal due to side effects. Leuprorelinacetate-depot is a safe and effective palliative drug for pre- and perimenopausal metastatic breast cancer patients. Like other GnRH-agonists which have been evaluated for this indication, leuprorelinacetate-depot can be used as first-line endocrine treatment in these patients.
 ...
PMID:[Primary endocrine therapy as pre- and perimenopausal metastatic breast carcinoma with leuprorelin acetate depot. German Leuprorelin Study Group]. 965 99

This phase II, multicentre, open-label, clinical trial evaluated antitumoral efficacy, tolerability and endocrine effects following 25 mg of treatment with oral exemestane given daily to postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Eligibility criteria included oestrogen and/or progesterone positivity or a prior response to hormonal therapy if receptor status was unknown; prior failure to tamoxifen therapy; and progressive disease. Patients were divided into three strata: patients who did not respond to tamoxifen or progressed after disease stabilisation (SD) for less than 6 months (stratum 1); patients who, after an initial response or SD lasting at least 6 months, experienced disease progression whilst on tamoxifen (stratum 2); patients with recurrent metastatic disease during or within 12 months of discontinuing adjuvant tamoxifen (stratum 3). Of the 137 patients who received exemestane, 4 experienced a complete response (CR) and 28 a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 23%. Another 33 patients had SD for > or = 24 weeks, resulting in an overall success rate of 47%. The median time to objective response was 16.1 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.9-24.1). The median response duration was 69.4 weeks, the median duration of overall success 59.1 weeks, the median time to progression (TTP) 25.1 weeks and the median time to treatment failure (TTF) 24 weeks. Response to previous hormonal therapy had little effect on the results, except that there was a trend toward a higher overall success rate in patients who did not respond to previous hormonal therapy. After 8 weeks of therapy, serum levels of oestradiol (E2), oestrone (E1) and oestrone sulphate (E1S) were suppressed to 15.2%, 9.7% and 10.7% of baseline, respectively. The most common adverse events of drug-related or indeterminate cause were hot flushes (14%), dizziness (9%), nausea (8%) and increased sweating (5%). Exemestane had a favourable effect on performance status and tumour-related signs and symptoms, both of which improved or stabilised in approximately 67% and 68% of patients respectively. Exemestane is a unique therapy that is highly active and well tolerated as a new treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:High activity and tolerability demonstrated for exemestane in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer who had previously failed on tamoxifen treatment. 1088

A pilot study of Formestane or 4-Hydroxyandrostenedione (Lentaron), a new endocrine agent, was conducted on 18 postmenopausal patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer. 16 patients were evaluable for response and objective responses were seen in 4 patients (25%). Stabilisation of disease was seen in 5 patients (32%). Out of 17 patients evaluable for toxicity, 3 (18%) reported adverse effects including hot flushes, lethargy and myalgia. Adverse effects were mild, transient and no patient required discontinuation of drug. Our study confirms that Formestane is a well tolerated endocrine agent with low toxicity and reasonable efficacy in postmenopausal patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Pilot study of formestane in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. 1096 35

Idoxifene is a novel selective oestrogen receptor modulator (SERM) which had greater binding affinity for the oestrogen receptor (ER) and reduced agonist activity compared with tamoxifen in preclinical studies. In a randomized phase II trial in 56 postmenopausal patients with progressive locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer we assessed whether idoxifene showed evidence of activity compared with an increased 40 mg/day dose of tamoxifen in patients who had previously demonstrated resistance to the standard 20 mg/day dose of tamoxifen. Of 47 patients eligible for response (25 idoxifene, 22 tamoxifen), two partial responses and two disease stabilizations (SD) for >6 months were seen with idoxifene (overall clinical benefit rate 16%, 95% CI 4.5-36.1%). The median duration of clinical benefit was 9.8 months. In contrast, no objective responses were seen with the increased 40 mg/day dose of tamoxifen, although two patients had SD for 7 and 14 months (clinical benefit rate 9%, 95% CI 1.1-29.2%). Idoxifene was well tolerated and the reported possible drug-related toxicities were similar in frequency to those with tamoxifen (hot flushes 13% vs 15%, mild nausea 20% vs 15%). Endocrine and lipid analysis in both groups showed a similar significant fall in serum follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone after 4 weeks, together with a significant rise in sex hormone binding globulin levels and 11% reduction in serum cholesterol levels. In conclusion, while idoxifene was associated with only modest evidence of clinical activity in patients with tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer, its toxicity profile and effects on endocrine/lipid parameters were similar to those of tamoxifen.
 ...
PMID:A cancer research (UK) randomized phase II study of idoxifene in patients with locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer resistant to tamoxifen. 1472 33

To summarise the advances in the hormonal treatment of post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer, this paper reviews the published literature regarding the randomised trials comparing aromatase inhibitors (AIs) versus tamoxifen as a first-line therapeutic choice, or AIs versus megestrole acetate (MEG) as a second-line option. The pooled analysis of these authors on AI versus MEG as a second-line option for post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer suggested that AIs do not add any significant benefit over MEG in terms of overall response rate (ORR) and time to progression. According to the Cochrane Database, use of an AI as a second-line therapy versus any other endocrine therapy (mostly MEG) has shown a significant benefit in terms of overall survival, but not for progression-free survival, clinical benefit (CB) or ORR. Concerning the authors' comparisons between AIs versus tamoxifen as a first-line endocrine option in post-menopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma, AIs seem to be superior to tamoxifen, with a significant benefit in terms of ORR, CB and time to progression being observed in favour of AIs over tamoxifen with fixed effects estimates. According to the Cochrane Database, there was an advantage to the use of AIs over tamoxifen in terms of progression-free survival and CB, but not for overall survival or ORR. With regards to toxicity, AIs show similar levels of hot flushes and arthralgia, increased risks of nausea, diarrhoea and vomiting, but a decreased risk of vaginal bleeding and thromboembolic events compared with other endocrine therapies. Weight gain, dyspnoea and peripheral oedema seem to be more frequent with MEG. At present, there is no proved overall survival difference in patients who are treated first with an AI and then with tamoxifen compared with the opposite sequence. In the metastatic setting, results are limited and are based on retrospective analyses.
 ...
PMID:Aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal metastatic breast carcinoma. 1759 87


1 2 Next >>