Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0600097 (Sedation)
 1,337 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

With improving standards of antenatal care, severe pre-eclampsia dn eclampsia are becoming less common and experience in the management of these conditions is lessening. Co-ordinated plans for the care of patients should be established by obstetricians and anaesthetists working as a team. A suitable regime for drug therapy in severe pre-eclampsia or eclampsia is the following: Initial management Diazepam 10 mg slowly i.v. Pethidine 100-150 mg i.m. or i.v. in incremental dosage, or extradural blocks, if analgesia is also required. Hydrallazine 20 mg i.v. initially, followed by 5 mg at intervals of 20 min until the diastolic pressure is less than 110 mm Hg. Then, preferably by syringe pump in a concentration of 2 mg/ml, at a rate of 2-20 mg/h. If vomiting occurs this can be controlled by administration of atropine. Subsequent management Sedation and anticonvulsant therapy. Continue diazepam and, in severe cases, institute chlormethiazole infusion. Continue analgesia with pethidine or extradural block. Control of hypertension by adjusting the dose of hydrallazine. If tachycardia exceeds 120 beat/min give propanolol 2-4 mg i.v. Plasma protein depletion with groww oedema is treated by administration of salt-free albumin or plasma protein fraction. Diuretic therapy is indicated if there is gross oedema or signs suggestive of acute renal failure. Oliguria associated with increased blood urea may be a result of renal failure or dehydration. The latter should be evident from the patient's condition and central venous pressure, but i.v. fluids and frusemide 20-40 mg can be used as a therapeutic test. Mannitol reduces cerebral oedema and may be given if diuresis has been first produced with frusemide. Potassium chloride is given if the plasma potassium decreases to less than 3 mmol/litre. Heparin therapy is considered if there is clinical evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation.
 ...
PMID:The management of severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. 83 44

Sedation is routinely used in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic procedures. Meperidine with promethazine and chlorpromazine; meperidine with pentobarbital; and meperidine, morphine, pentobarbital, thiopental, methohexital, chloral hydrate, and benzodiazepines as single agents have been used at different doses in patients for various procedures including computed tomography, endoscopy, electroencephalography, and bone marrow biopsies. Most available studies, however, have not compared these drugs in a controlled and blind manner, and the data have often been collected retrospectively. In addition, the degree and duration of sedation required may depend on the procedure. Thus, it is difficult to recommend the drug of choice for producing sedation. Serious cardiac and respiratory effects and excessive sedation have been associated with these drugs, even when normal doses were used. Controlled studies and specific guidelines are needed for optimal use and monitoring of these drugs in pediatric patients.
 ...
PMID:Sedation in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic procedures. 306 82

The main reason for premedication is the reduction of preoperative stress. Despite the proven fact that benzodiazepines best reduce preoperative stress, combinations of opioids and neuroleptic drugs are preferred for premedication by many on reviewing the journal Der Anaesthesist. This double-blind study was performed to investigate midazolam and meperidine/promethazine for intramuscular premedication. Method. 60 patients undergoing minor gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to receive either 5-7.5 mg midazolam or 50-75 mg meperidine and 25-50 mg promethazine intramuscularly 30-90 min before surgery. Anxiety, depression, and asthenia were assessed by the patient before and after premedication but before induction of anesthesia using visual analogue scales and a nominal scale. Sedation was assessed by an observer. Heart rate and blood pressure were the physiological stress parameters. Parameters of acceptance and side effects were registered perioperatively. Results. Midazolam had a significantly better anxiolytic and antidepressive effect. There were no differences in the other parameters except for adverse effects. Meperidine/promethazine produced significantly more side-effects than midazolam. The parameters of acceptance assessed the day after surgery were comparable. Conclusions. We conclude from these results that anesthesiologists still premedicate with meperidine/promethazine because the patients accept this premedication very well when asked the day after surgery. Nevertheless, premedication with midazolam provides significantly better anxiolytic and antidepressive effects with significantly less side-effects. Therefore, midazolam should be preferred to meperidine/promethazine for intramuscular premedication.
 ...
PMID:[Midazolam and pethidine/promethazine for intramuscular premedication]. 363 95

We compared analgesia and sedation provided by one of four different opioids in combination with midazolam during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients were given 1-3 mg midazolam and meperidine 50-100 mg, fentanyl 50-100 micrograms, sufentanil 5-10 micrograms, or alfentanil 150-300 micrograms, plus additional opioid and/or midazolam if needed. No untoward effects (i.e., O2 saturation < 85%, nausea, vomiting, severe bradycardia) occurred. Sedation and analgesia were comparable in the upper gastrointestinal groups. The number of patients with amnesia for the examination was highest in the meperidine group. Recovery time generally was shorter with alfentanil and sufentanil. Recovery time of the lower gastrointestinal patients was significantly longer in the meperidine group than in the other groups; analgesia scores for sufentanil were significantly lower than for meperidine. Sedation scores for these patients were highest in the meperidine group. The number of patients given meperidine who were amnesic was significantly greater than for the other opioids. Meperidine was better than the other opioids with regard to patient comfort and amnesia during colonoscopy.
 ...
PMID:Sedation and analgesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy. 809 40

The published paediatric experience with endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis and management of biliary complications following liver transplantation (LT) is limited. We describe our experience with ERCP in the management of children following LT who presented with biliary complications, over a 20-year period (1995-2014). The retrospectively reviewed data are summarized descriptively. Of 94 children (47 boys) who received 102 liver transplants at our centre, seven children (five boys, two girls) underwent ERCP after liver transplantation. In total, 25 ERCP procedures were carried out in these patients. The median age at liver transplantation was 10.7 (3.9-16.2) years. The median interval between LT and the first ERCP was 28 days (12 days-6.8 years). All patients were on standard calcineurin-inhibitor-based immunosuppression regimens. Six of the seven patients underwent ERCP on more than one occasion [median number of ERCP sessions per patient- 4, (1-6)]. Seventeen procedures were carried out under conscious sedation, remaining eight under general anaesthesia. Sedation was achieved employing a standard regimen (Midazolam 5 mg with Pethidine 50 mg) and occasionally Fentanyl. ERCP is an effective and safe intervention from both diagnostic and therapeutic point of view, in the management of post-LT biliary complications in children.
 ...
PMID:Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the management of biliary complications after paediatric liver transplantation - a retrospective study. 2913 May 83

Meperidine and fentanyl are opioids currently used in addition to midazolam for sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy in Italy. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of patients' psychological state before elective colonoscopy on the efficacy of the sedation regimens. Eighty outpatients who underwent an elective colonoscopy were included in our study. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire was self-administered to evaluate basal anxiety and depression state. The rate of baseline discomfort was evaluated by a standard 100-mm visual analog scale. Sedation was obtained alternatively with a midazolam-meperidine or midazolam-fentanyl combination. There were no statistically significant differences between the fentanyl and meperidine groups on body mass index, age, and gender composition. Patients in the meperidine group reported less pain during colonoscopy than patients in the fentanyl group. There were statistically significant positive correlations in the meperidine group with the distress, anxiety, and depression. Our study has pointed out greater effectiveness of the midazolam plus meperidine regimen, equal recovery times, and no significant differences in the duration of the endoscopic examinations. The evaluation of patients' psychological status seems to predict the efficacy of sedation when the nociceptive component of pain is well controlled.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of Sedation by Midazolam in Association With Meperidine or Fentanyl and Role of Patient Distress During Elective Colonoscopy. 3243 29