Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0600097 (
Sedation
)
1,337
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Since transdermal scopolamine (TS) seems effective against seasickness, we compared its antiemetic effect with intravenous droperidol (
DHBP
), our routine antidote for postoperative emesis. Ninety-six female patients (ASA I-II) scheduled for short-stay surgery were randomly allocated to three study groups after giving their informed consent. The three groups were as follows: TS adhesive, delivering 140 micrograms initially and 5 micrograms/h thereafter + placebo 0.5 ml i.v. 5 min before the end of surgery; transdermal placebo adhesive preoperatively +
DHBP
0.5 ml (1.25 mg) i.v. 5 min before the end of surgery; transdermal placebo + 0.5 ml placebo i.v. as indicated above. Oxycodone i.m. and glycopyrrolate i.v. were given for premedication together with the test adhesive. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental and maintained with nitrous oxide and oxygen, enflurane, vecuronium and fentanyl. Neostigmine and glycopyrrolate were administered for reversal. In the recovery room no differences in nausea or vomiting were observed between the groups.
Sedation
was significantly more marked (P less than 0.15-0.0001) after
DHBP
than after either TS or the given
DHBP
and 6% of those given the placebo (P less than 0.05). During the following 24 h nausea was reported more by the placebo patients (25) than by those on TS (20) or
DHBP
(15) (P less than 0.05). However, actual vomiting on the ward did not differ between the groups. Visual disturbances were more frequent after TS (P less than 0.01). We conclude that prophylactic transdermal scopolamine does not diminish postoperative emetic sequelae.
...
PMID:Double-blind comparison of transdermal scopolamine, droperidol and placebo against postoperative nausea and vomiting. 305 39
The antiemetic activity of escalating doses of droperidol was evaluated in ten patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin regimens. Major antiemetic activity was achieved in five patients, two patients had less nausea and vomiting as compared with prior prochlorperazine therapy, and three patients were refractory to droperidol. No dose-response relationship was observed.
Sedation
occurred in nine patients, and two patients experienced dystonic reactions.
Droperidol
is a relatively safe and effective antiemetic for patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin.
...
PMID:The antiemetic activity of droperidol administered by intramuscular injection during cisplatin chemotherapy: a pilot study. 403 43