Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0600097 (Sedation)
 1,337 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the safety, efficacy and feasibility of oral midazolam premedication in children were evaluated in an ambulatory surgery unit. Eighty unmedicated children (ASA PS I or II, ages 1-6 yr) were randomly assigned to one of four groups receiving midazolam 0.5, 0.75, or 1.0 mg.kg-1 or a placebo 30 min before separation from parents. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, sedation and anxiolysis scores were recorded before premedication, every five minutes for 30 min and then during induction of anaesthesia and recovery. We found that heart rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were unchanged during the study. Sedation and anxiolysis scores in the midazolam-treated groups were greater than those in the placebo group and that anxiolysis at the time of separation from the parents was judged excellent in 80-90% of the children who received midazolam. However, sedation and anxiolysis did not differ among the three midazolam groups. Mean times to discharge from hospital were similar for all four groups. The side effects, loss of balance and head control, blurred vision and dysphoric reactions were observed only in the 0.75 and 1.0 mg.kg-1 midazolam groups. We conclude that oral midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1 is a safe and effective premedication and that 0.75 and 1 mg.kg-1 while offering no additional benefit, may cause more side effects.
 ...
PMID:Premedication of children with oral midazolam. 164 74

Twenty-nine patients, ranked ASA 1 or 2, scheduled for diagnostic gastroduodenal fibroscopy were randomly allocated into three treatment groups: intranasal midazolam (IN) 0.15 mg.kg-1; intramuscular midazolam (IM) 0.15 mg.kg-1, and placebo (P). Sedation and the fibroscopy were all carried out by the same anaesthetist and fibroscopist. Efficiency and tolerance of the method were assessed by monitoring the heart rate, systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry), the degrees of sedation, anxiety, and anterograde as well as retrograde amnesia. The patient's and endoscopist's reactions were also considered. Patients in group P were older than those of the other two groups (p less than 0.01). Sedation was more important and patients less anxious in groups IN and IM than in group P. Three patients in group IM had retrograde amnesia. There were no significant differences between the degrees of anterograde amnesia in the three groups. At no time during the study were there any significant differences in SpO2 between and within groups. Four out of the 9 patients in group P had a bad opinion of their experience, as compared with two out of the 20 in the midazolam groups; the difference was not statistically significant. Three hours after the procedure, all patients were fully awake. Intranasal administration of midazolam therefore seemed to be an interesting alternative for gastroduodenal fibroscopy, because it was simple, non traumatic, well tolerated, and did not result in arterial desaturation.
 ...
PMID:[Sedation with intranasal midazolam for endoscopy of the upper digestive tract]. 175 55

We sought to compare epidural lidocaine to several short-acting epidural narcotics for their efficacy in controlling pain during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), hemodynamic changes, side effects and patient acceptance. To determine what contribution, if any, the local anesthetic test dose makes to the above factors, we also compared epidural sufentanil with and without a preceding test dose of local anesthetic with epinephrine. One hundred ASA I-III patients scheduled for elective ESWL were divided equally into five groups to receive one of the following epidural drugs through an epidural catheter: 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (Group L), 1000 micrograms alfentanil (Group A), 200 micrograms fentanyl (Group F) or 60 micrograms sufentanil (Groups S and S-). Group S- differed from all other groups in omission of the test dose and direct injection of the opioid through the epidural needle. Significant hypotension occurred in 20% of patients in Group L compared to 0% in the narcotic groups (p less than 0.01). Clinically significant respiratory depression was not observed in any group. Mild pruritus was observed in up to 60% of patients in the narcotic groups (p less than 0.01). Sedation was observed in all of the narcotic groups, particularly in Group S-, in which more than half of patients were drowsy (p less than 0.05). Requirements for adjuvant analgesics during ESWL were highest in Group A. Patient acceptance was high throughout the study. We conclude that epidural alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil are as effective as epidural lidocaine plus epinephrine in providing analgesia during ESWL.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A comparison of epidural narcotics, with and without a test dose, to epidural lidocaine for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. 214 29

The authors conducted a randomized double-blind controlled study comparing groups of patients receiving iv or epidural fentanyl infusions to determine whether, at comparable levels of analgesia, 1) the severity of side effects was different; and 2) plasma fentanyl concentrations differed between the two groups. Twenty-eight ASA physical status 2 women scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section were randomized into two groups to either receive fentanyl intravenously and saline epidurally or fentanyl epidurally and saline intravenously. After delivery of the infants under epidural anesthesia, each patient received a bolus of fentanyl 1.5 microgram/kg either intravenously or epidurally, and a fentanyl infusion was begun via the same route. Concurrently, a saline bolus and infusion were given via the alternate route. The rates of the fentanyl and saline infusions were adjusted until each patient was comfortable. Patients rated their pain, nausea, and pruritus on visual analogue scales. Sedation was evaluated by an observer. Respiratory depression was evaluated by end-tidal PCO2. Data were analyzed by unpaired two-tail t tests. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured at 12 and 24 h. Three patients in the iv group were dropped from the study because of inadequate pain relief. For the remaining 25 patients, similar infusion rates of fentanyl were required to produce similar levels of analgesia at 12 and 24 h. The severity of nausea, pruritus and sedation, and end-tidal PCO2 were similar for both groups. The plasma concentrations of fentanyl were significantly greater in those who received iv fentanyl at 12 h but not at 24 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural versus intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia after cesarean section. 200 64

Since transdermal scopolamine (TS) seems effective against seasickness, we compared its antiemetic effect with intravenous droperidol (DHBP), our routine antidote for postoperative emesis. Ninety-six female patients (ASA I-II) scheduled for short-stay surgery were randomly allocated to three study groups after giving their informed consent. The three groups were as follows: TS adhesive, delivering 140 micrograms initially and 5 micrograms/h thereafter + placebo 0.5 ml i.v. 5 min before the end of surgery; transdermal placebo adhesive preoperatively + DHBP 0.5 ml (1.25 mg) i.v. 5 min before the end of surgery; transdermal placebo + 0.5 ml placebo i.v. as indicated above. Oxycodone i.m. and glycopyrrolate i.v. were given for premedication together with the test adhesive. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental and maintained with nitrous oxide and oxygen, enflurane, vecuronium and fentanyl. Neostigmine and glycopyrrolate were administered for reversal. In the recovery room no differences in nausea or vomiting were observed between the groups. Sedation was significantly more marked (P less than 0.15-0.0001) after DHBP than after either TS or the given DHBP and 6% of those given the placebo (P less than 0.05). During the following 24 h nausea was reported more by the placebo patients (25) than by those on TS (20) or DHBP (15) (P less than 0.05). However, actual vomiting on the ward did not differ between the groups. Visual disturbances were more frequent after TS (P less than 0.01). We conclude that prophylactic transdermal scopolamine does not diminish postoperative emetic sequelae.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind comparison of transdermal scopolamine, droperidol and placebo against postoperative nausea and vomiting. 305 39

The efficacy and tolerance of flumazenil were assessed in a double-blind randomized multicentre trial on 120 ASA I or II patients aged 40.3 +/- 13.9 years. They were anaesthetized with flunitrazepam (25.1 +/- 10.5 micrograms.kg-1.h-1), fentanyl (4.4 +/- 1.9 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) and either vecuronium or pancuronium; residual neuromuscular blockade was antagonized at the end of surgery. 61 patients received flumazenil and 59 a placebo. Sedation comprehension and temporo-spatial orientation were scored at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min after the administration of flumazenil or placebo. Local and general tolerances were evaluated 1 h and 24 h after administration. At the 24th h, the observer's assessment of consciousness, pain, respiration, coughing and vomiting were noted, as well as his identification, or not, of flumazenil or the placebo and their efficacy. Both groups were statistically homogeneous and comparable. Significant and marked efficacy was noted between the 5th and 30th min. There was no difference, at 24 h, between the flumazenil and placebo groups. In most cases, flumazenil was identified by the observer and its efficacy felt to be excellent. No major untoward effect of flumazenil was noted; however a mild and short lasting anxiety occurred in three patients. Tolerance was deemed to be excellent.
 ...
PMID:[Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerance of flumazenil in antagonism of the effects of flunitrazepam on the central nervous system]. 312 69

The aim of this study was to reassess the efficacy of flumazenil for reversal of sedation with midazolam. Twenty-four ASA I or II patients undergoing elective surgery under epidural anaesthesia participated. Following epidural block, midazolam was administered to keep the patient sleepy but still responsive to verbal commands. At the end of surgery the patients were randomly allocated to receive, in a double-blind manner, either flumazenil (0.1 mg.ml-1) or placebo. The study drug (maximum dose: 10 ml) was titrated until the patient became fully awake. Sedation was assessed with the Modified Steward Coma Scale (MSCS), the Trieger test (TT) and Critical Flicker Frequency (CFF). The assessments were done before anaesthesia (baseline), at the end of surgery immediately before administration of study drug, and serially afterwards, at 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min. Analyses of variance for repeated measures and pooled t tests were used. The duration of surgery was (mean +/- SD) 0.72 +/- 0.25 hr in the flumazenil group and 0.74 +/- 0.28 hr in the placebo group. The total dose of midazolam was 7.2 +/- 2.2 mg for the flumazenil group and 8.9 +/- 2.7 mg for the placebo group. The volume of study drug administered was 5.5 ml +/- 1.9, equivalent to 0.55 mg, for the flumazenil group and 6.7 +/- 2.2 ml for the placebo group. Critical Flicker Frequency is the only measure which revealed a difference (P < 0.005) between the flumazenil and placebo groups and this occurred only at the ten-minute assessment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Sedation with midazolam during regional anaesthesia: is there a role for flumazenil? 782 57

Sedation, anxiolysis, intubation responses and fentanyl anaesthetic requirements were investigated in a double-blind, randomized study in twenty ASA I-II elective hysterectomy patients. Ten patients received dexmedetomidine 2.5 micrograms kg-1 i.m. 60 min before induction and saline placebo i.v. 2 min prior to induction (= DP group). Ten patients received midazolam 0.08 mg kg-1 i.m. 60 min and fentanyl 1.5 micrograms kg-1 i.v. (= MF group) 2 min before induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone 4 mg kg-1. Anaesthesia was maintained with 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen and with fentanyl 2 micrograms kg-1 i.v. increments according to predetermined criteria. Both premedications induced sedation (P < 0.01 in both groups) and anxiolysis (P < 0.01 in DP vs P < 0.05 in MF group) without any differences between the groups. Haemodynamic changes following tracheal intubation did not significantly differ between the groups. Intraoperatively systolic and diastolic arterial pressure were 15% and 13% lower in DP group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 for drug effect), the mean heart rate was approximately 9 beats min-1 lower in DP group (n.s.). Fentanyl was required more often in MF group: median 3.5 (QD 1.5) vs. 2.5 (QD 0.5) times in DP group (P < 0.05), the total amount being 57% smaller in DP group: 0.03 (QD 0.01) vs. 0.07 (QD 0.02) micrograms kg-1 min-1 (P < 0.05). Postoperative course and analgesic requirements were similar in both groups. Dexmedetomidine premedication may offer an alternative to current anaesthesia practice in elective hysterectomy.
 ...
PMID:Intramuscular dexmedetomidine premedication--an alternative to midazolam-fentanyl-combination in elective hysterectomy? 791 77

Sedation using combined intravenous midazolam and fentanyl is a popular technique for minor gynaecological procedures. However, it is fraught with inconsistency in efficacy and has a greater tendency to perioperative oxygen desaturation. Fifty female ASA I patients scheduled for minor gynaecological procedures were given intravenous midazolam and fentanyl before surgery started. Intraoperative excessive movement that interfered with surgery and failure to maintain a patient airway were noted. Perioperative oxygen saturation was monitored with the pulse oximeter. In another group of 50 female ASA I patients, intravenous thiopentone was given and anaesthesia maintained with 67% nitrous oxide in 33% oxygen and 0.5% of isoflurane via a face mask. Results showed that 10% of the sedated patients had excessive movements that interfered with surgery, of which 6% needed a general anaesthetic. Twenty-two percent of the sedated patients needed maintenance of airway perioperatively. Perioperative oxygen desaturation was profound in incidence and degree in the sedated patients whereas no patient who received general anaesthesia desaturated. The perioperative incidence of desaturation in the sedated patients was 46%. Intraoperatively, 28% (p < 0.001) of the sedated patients had oxygen saturation in the range of 85 to 90% and 18% of them (p < 0.01) had oxygen saturation of less than 85%. Postoperatively 8% of the sedated patients had oxygen saturation of 85 to 90%. We conclude that general anaesthesia is more efficacious and safer than sedation in patients scheduled for minor gynaecological procedures. The same minimum standard of monitoring applied to general anaesthesia should be used for sedated patients.
 ...
PMID:General anaesthesia vs sedation for minor gynaecological procedures--a comparative study. 815 83

Intra-operative patient controlled sedation with propofol (bolus dose 18 mg over 5.4 s; lockout period 1 min) has been compared to continuous propofol infusion (3.6 mg.kg-1.h-1) in a randomised crossover study of 38 ASA 1 or 2 day surgery patients undergoing two-stage bilateral extraction of third molar teeth under local anaesthesia (76 procedures). Mean (SD) propofol used (mg.kg-1) was less with patient-controlled sedation (2.39 (1.28) than with the infusion (2.58 (0.84)) but the difference was not statistically significant. There were only minor differences between the methods in postoperative recovery of cognitive function and no differences for patient cooperation and surgeon's satisfaction with sedation. Patient-controlled sedation was preferred by 19 patients, continuous infusion by 10, with nine indifferent. Preferences, expressed as mild, moderate or strong, were significantly stronger for patient-controlled sedation (p < 0.05). Sedation was no deeper than eyelid closure with response to command in all 76 procedures. This level was reached in all 38 infusion cases but in only 26 cases with patient-controlled sedation, where 12 patients remained less sedated (p < 0.01). Patient-controlled sedation with propofol provided safe sedation and was strongly preferred over the infusion by a large proportion of patients.
 ...
PMID:Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation and patient attitude to control. A crossover comparison of patient preference for patient-controlled propofol and propofol by continuous infusion. 817 32


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>