Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0598853 (forgetting)
 3,232 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An intraindividual double-blind cross-over comparison for the anterograde effect on memory of unilateral non-dominant frontofrontal (FF) and temporo-parietal (TP) ECT was performed in connection with the second and third treatment of an ECT-series, the electrode placement being alternated at random. Treatment technique was standardized and seizure duration was measured by means of EEG. Memory functions were tested after treatments by means of four memory tests: the 30 Word-Pair Test, the 30 Figure Test, the 30 Geometrical Figure Test and the 30 Face Test. Three operationally defined memory variables, immediate memory (IMS, 3 hours after ECT), delayed memory (DMS, 3 hours after IMS), and their difference, forgetting, were scored. No differences were found in the mean time of electrical stimulation, in the amount of methohexital and suxamethonium chloride, and in seizure duration between the two treatment groups. No statistically significant differences in any of the memory tests were found. The FF electrode position did not show any advantage compared with the routine TP electrode placement.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of fronto-frontal and temporo-parietal unilateral ECT. 33 77

In the course of a series into the effects of unilateral electroconvulsive therapy on memory functions,double-blind cross-over intraindividual comparison were performed after the second and third treatment in patients suffering from depressive syndrome. The main aim of the project, which is still in course, was to explore the possibility of a further reduction of the side-effects of this antidepressant method. Three separate comparisons were performed between unilateral nondominant temporo-parietal ECT and (a) unilateral dominant temporo-parietal ECT, (b) unilateral non-dominant fronto-parietal ECT, (c) unilateral non-dominant fronto-fronto ECT (Figure 1). The treatments were given under total anaesthesia and with subtotal muscle relaxation. Four memory tests were administered three hours after the second and the third ECT, the treatment methods being allocated at random. The 30 Word-Pair Test is mixed audio-visual recall verbal test. The 30 Figure Test is mainly visual recognition test with items which can be easily verbally patterned. Further, two visual recognition tests, the 30 Face Test and the 30 Geometrical Figure Test, composed of not easily verbalized items were administered. For each test, three memory scores were obtained, immediate memory score (IMS, immediately after the presentation of the items, three hours after ECT), delayed memory score (DMS, three hours after IMS) and their differenc, forgetting score (FS). IMS is considered to be a function of the hypothetical memory variable, learning, and FS a function of the variable retention. DMS is related to both learning and retention. When non-dominant and dominant temporo-parietal ECT are compared, there are, after non-dominant ECT, significantly lower IMS and DMS in the 30 Face Test but only lower IMS in the 30 Geometrical Figure Test. The difference in DMS for the 30 Word-Pair Test is in the opposite direction (Figure 2). In the comparison between non-dominant temporo-parietal vs non-dominant fronto-frontal ECT, a slightly, non-significant, lower IMS in the 30 Face Test is apparent (Figure 4). Other important trends are not found in any of the studies (Figures 2-4). The results show that differential effects are obtained with different memory material when dominant and non-dominant electrode positions are used in unilateral ECT. The results are discussed in relation to the question whether high level perceptive function or memory is involved in the encoding-storage of complex non-verbal material in the non-dominant hemisphere.
 ...
PMID:Memory changes after unilateral electroconvulsive therapy with different electrode positions. 100 Sep 96

Forced-choice tests of recognition have become the favoured behavioural method for the assessment of models of amnesia in nonhuman primates, yet the profile of deficits shown by human amnesic subjects remains uncertain. The present study explored the performance of 12 amnesic subjects on two delayed matching-to-sample tasks. Experiment 1, which used retention delays of between 2 and 60 sec, confirmed that amnesia impairs such tasks, even when there is only one item to be remembered. The results also highlighted the need to match levels of performance before the effects of delay can be interpreted. In Experiment 2 care was taken to eliminate ceiling effects and to match the subjects at the shortest delay (3 sec). This was achieved by giving the control subjects harder versions of the same task. The amnesic subjects still showed a faster rate of forgetting for abstract patterns, indicating that this is a genuine feature of amnesia. In contrast, the amnesic subjects' performance on a spatial matching-to-sample task was not differentially affected by delays of up to 40 sec. There was no evidence that the amnesic subjects were disproportionately impaired on this spatial task, nor could the different aetiological groups be distinguished by their patterns of DMS performance.
 ...
PMID:The performance of amnesic subjects on tests of delayed matching-to-sample and delayed matching-to-position. 874 16