Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0596263 (carcinogenesis)
 64,820 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Based on in vitro studies, several modes of action for arsenic have been suggested, although the mechanisms responsible for arsenic carcinogenesis have not been well established. In our previous study a dose-dependent increment in DNA migration was detected at low doses of sodium arsenite, but at higher dose levels a reduction in the migration was observed, suggesting the induction of DNA adducts. In order to confirm this hypothesis we performed the experiments considering other parameters and modifications of the standard alkaline comet assay. Additionally, the induction of sister chromatid exchanges was evaluated. The present study showed the induction by sodium arsenite of single strand breaks and DNA-protein adducts assessed by comet assay as well as of sister chromatid exchanges in the human lung fibroblast cell line MRC-5. The standard alkaline comet assay also revealed, at the highest arsenic concentration tested, a reduction in all the considered parameters in relation to untreated cells and the other doses. On the other hand, the incubation with proteinase K induced a dose-dependent increment in DNA migration as a consequence of the release of proteins joined to the DNA. Thus, sodium arsenite was able to induce both DNA-strand breaks and protein-DNA adducts in arsenic exposed MRC-5 cells, depending on the concentrations of arsenic salts tested.
 ...
PMID:Induction of DNA strand breaks, DNA-protein crosslinks and sister chromatid exchanges by arsenite in a human lung cell line. 1614 91

Translational protocols in cancer and carcinogenesis often require isolation of genomic DNA from paucicellular clinical samples. DNA extraction methods for PCR-based applications should optimize the recovery of amplifiable DNA. We compared five methods for DNA extraction in paucicellular epithelial and lymphocyte samples using proportion of extractions producing amplifiable DNA and mean real-time PCR Ct values for GAPDH as the endpoint measures. The methods included solid-phase DNA adsorption (QIAamp), sequential protein and DNA precipitation (Puregene), magnetic bead adsorption (Dynabeads), phenol-chloroform extraction, and single-step proteinase K digestion. In general, the performance of the three commercial kits was superior to either phenol-chloroform extraction or single-step proteinase K digestion. However, QIAamp and Puregene produced amplifiable DNA more frequently than Dynabeads for starting cell numbers <50,000. GAPDH Ct values for QIAamp extractions showed the greatest dynamic range and the best linearity across the range of starting cell numbers, but QIAamp was not statistically significantly superior to Puregene. Of the three commercial kits, Puregene is the least expensive. QIAamp and Puregene DNA extraction methods are well-suited for the preparation of paucicellular clinical samples for PCR-based assays.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of five methods for extracting DNA from paucicellular clinical samples. 1651 38


<< Previous 1 2