Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0519030 (Klebsiella)
21,988 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Transcription of the nitrogen-regulated nac promoter of Klebsiella aerogenes requires sigma54 RNA polymerase, is activated by the phosphorylated form of the transcription factor nitrogen regulator I (NRI) (NtrC), and is repressed by the product of the nac gene, Nac. Nac protects a large portion of the nac control region, extending from positions -130 to -70, from digestion by DNase I. This site(s) lies immediately upstream from the site at which sigma 54 RNA polymerase binds, is downstream of a high-affinity binding site for the transcriptional activator NRI approximately P, and partially overlaps a low-affinity NRI approximately P-binding site. Binding of Nac to the DNA resulted in bending of the DNA but did not interfere with the binding of sigma 54 RNA polymerase to the promoter or with the binding of NRI approximately P to either the high-affinity site or low-affinity site. Furthermore, transcription assays with various wild-type and mutant templates suggested that Nac did not exclude NRI approximately P from either the low- or high-affinity sites, nor did Nac interfere with the ability of the polymerase to form the open complex when the binding sites for NRI approximately P were moved to different locations upstream from the promoter. Rather, Nac seemed to repress by an antiactivation mechanism in which the interaction of the NRI approximately P, bound at its normal sites, with sigma 54 RNA polymerase, bound to the promoter, was prevented.
...
PMID:Repression of the Klebsiella aerogenes nac promoter. 755 39

A 32-kDa polypeptide corresponding to NAC, the product of the Klebsiella aerogenes nac gene, was overexpressed from a plasmid carrying a tac'-'nac operon fusion and purified to near homogeneity by taking advantage of its unusual solubility properties. NAC was able to shift the electrophoretic migration of DNA fragments carrying the NAC-sensitive promoters hutUp, putPp1, and ureDp. The interaction between NAC and hutUp was localized to a 26-bp region centered approximately 64 bp upstream of the hutUp transcription initiation site. Moreover, NAC protected this region from DNase I digestion. Mobility shift and DNase I protection studies utilizing the putP and ureD promoter regions identified NAC-binding regions of sizes and locations similar to those found in hutUp. Comparison of the DNA sequences which were protected from DNase I digestion by NAC suggests a minimal NAC-binding consensus sequence: 5'-ATA-N9-TAT-3'. In vitro transcription assays demonstrated that NAC was capable of activating the transcription of hutUp by sigma 70-RNA polymerase holoenzyme when this promoter was presented as either a linear or supercoiled DNA molecule. Thus, NAC displays the in vitro DNA-binding and transcription activation properties which have been predicted for the product of the nac gene.
...
PMID:The nitrogen assimilation control protein, NAC, is a DNA binding transcription activator in Klebsiella aerogenes. 776 65

The Klebsiella aerogenes hutUH operon is preceded by a promoter region, hut(P), that contains two divergent promoters (hutUp and Pc) which overlap and are alternately expressed. In the absence of the catabolite gene activator protein-cyclic AMP (CAP-cAMP) complex, Pc is predominantly expressed while hutUp is largely repressed. CAP-cAMP has the dual effect of repressing transcription from Pc while simultaneously activating transcription from hutUp. DNA deletion mutations in this region were used to identify DNA sequences required for transcription of these two promoters. We showed that inactivation of Pc by DNA deletion did not result in activation of hutUp in vitro or in vivo. In addition, Escherichia coli CAP mutants that are known to bind and bend DNA normally but are unable to activate various CAP-dependent promoters were also unable to activate hutUp in vivo. These results invalidate an indirect activation model by which CAP-mediated repression of Pc in itself would led to activation of hutUp. Gel retardation asays with various deletion mutations of hut(P) and DNase I protection analyses revealed a high-affinity CAP binding site (CAP site 1) centered at -81.5 relative to the hutUp start of transcription and a second low-affinity CAP site (CAP site 2) centered at about -41.5. CAP site 1 is essential for activation of hutUp. Although CAP site 2 by itself is unable to activate hutUp in vivo under catabolite-activating conditions, it appears to be required for maximal transcription from a site centered at -41.5, does not activate hutUp suggests that the role of CAP-cAMP at the weaker CAP site may be different from that of other promoters containing a similarly positioned site. We propose that CAP directly stimulates the activity of RNA polymerase at hutUp and that this reaction is completely dependent on a naturally occurring CAP site centered at -81.5 and also involves a second CAP site centered at about -41.5 for maximal activation.
...
PMID:Roles of catabolite activator protein sites centered at -81.5 and -41.5 in the activation of the Klebsiella aerogenes histidine utilization operon hutUH. 807 Dec 30

In this study, we define cis-acting elements involved in regulation of the Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin promoter. In place of a canonical promoter -35 sequence, the leukotoxin promoter contains four adenine-rich repeats of sequence CA6(C/T)A, phased at approximately 10-base intervals. DNA fragments containing these repeats exhibit retarded mobility in polyacrylamide gels and permitted identification of a static DNA bend in the promoter -70 region. Deletion of the static DNA bend caused a two-fold reduction of leukotoxin transcription in Escherichia coli, suggesting that it is involved in promoter regulation. Three putative upstream activator sites (UAS), similar to those that bind the NifA activator in Klebsiella pneumoniae, are found 130 bp upstream from the transcription start site and are protected from DNase I cleavage by a P. haemolytica-specific factor. The promoter region also binds the DNA bending protein, the integration host factor (IHF), although IHF mutations do not affect its expression in E. coli. The arrangement of these elements suggests that leukotoxin expression is activated by a factor that interacts with the UAS and regulates transcription initiation at a distance via DNA looping. Activation and DNA bending may also influence a second, divergent promoter that lies 340 bp upstream from the leukotoxin start site.
...
PMID:Static DNA bending and protein interactions within the Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin promoter region: development of an activation model for leukotoxin transcriptional control. 817 22

The genes specifically required for citrate fermentation in Klebsiella pneumoniae form a cluster on the chromosome consisting of two divergently transcribed groups, citCDEFG and citS-oadGAB-citAB. Northern blot analyses described here and elsewhere indicate that each group forms an operon. The transcriptional start sites of citC and citS, which were mapped in this work by primer extension, are separated by a stretch of 193 bp with an extraordinary high A + T content of 67%. Expression of the citrate fermentation genes was recently shown to be positively controlled by a two-component signal transduction system encoded by the promoter-distal genes of the citS operon, citA (sensor kinase) and citB (response regulator). As a first step towards the functional characterization of CitB, we analysed its DNA-binding properties. To this end, the entire CitB, its N-terminal receiver domain (CitBN), and its C-terminal output domain (CitBC), all modified by a (His)6-tag, were purified. CitB(His) and CitBN(His) could be phosphorylated either with acetylphosphate or with ATP plus MalE-CitAC. The latter protein contains the kinase domain of CitA fused to the C terminus of the maltose-binding protein. Upon phosphorylation, CitB(His) became more resistant towards limited proteolysis by trypsin, reflecting substantial changes in tertiary structure. In gel retardation assays, CitB(His) bound specifically to the citC-citS intergenic region. The retardation pattern changed significantly upon phosphorylation and the apparent binding affinity increased 10 to 100-fold. Depending on the protein concentration, four different phospho-CitB(His)-DNA complexes could be resolved, suggesting the presence of multiple binding sites between citC and citS. DNase I footprints revealed two protected regions extending maximally from -55 to -89 relative to the citS transcription start and from -50 to -96 relative to the citC transcription start. Gel retardation and DNase I footprint assays with CitBC(His) showed that the C-terminal domain is sufficient for specific DNA binding. Since its properties were similar to that of unphosphorylated CitB(His), an essential role of the N-terminal receiver domain in high-affinity DNA binding was indicated. The positions of the binding sites for CitB and of putative recognition sequences for the cAMP receptor protein suggested a model for the interaction of these activators with RNA polymerase.
...
PMID:In vitro binding of the response regulator CitB and of its carboxy-terminal domain to A + T-rich DNA target sequences in the control region of the divergent citC and citS operons of Klebsiella pneumoniae. 922 36

The nitrogen fixation protein NifA is a member of the protein family activating transcription by the alternative eubacterial sigmaN (sigma54) RNA polymerase holoenzyme. Binding sites for NifA, upstream activator sequences (UASs), are remotely located. Interaction between holoenzyme bound in a closed promoter complex and NiFA is facilitated by bending of the intervening DNA by integration host factor (IHF). We have examined NifA contact with the Klebsiella pneumoniae nifH promoter UAS in the presence and absence of holoenzyme and IHF. Footprints with UV light were made on 5-BrdU-substituted DNA and DNase I and laser UV footprints on conventional DNA templates. Results establish that the consensus thymidine residues of the UAS motif 5'-TGT are in close proximity to NifA. Reactivity suggests that each UAS thymidine is not structurally equivalent. Titration of NifA binding to the UAS in the presence or absence of the closed promoter complex indicates that the interaction of NifA with the UAS is not strongly co-operative with holoenzyme or IHF, a result supportive of an activation mechanism not reliant upon simple recruitment of factors to the promoter. Laser footprints demonstrated that holoenzyme suppressed reactivity of promoter consensus -14, -15 and -16 T residues, indicating close contact. Binding of holoenzyme resulted in a specific increase in 5-BrdU reactivity at -9 within the holoenzyme binding site, likely reflecting DNA distortion. Enhanced -9 reactivity required sigmaNN-terminal sequences that are necessary for activation. Since T-9 is melted in open complexes the closed complex appears poised for melting. Open promoter complex formation was accompanied by a distinct change in laser footprint signal at -11, consistent with the view that nucleation of strand separation occurs within or close to the -12 promoter element.
...
PMID:Nucleoprotein complex formation by the enhancer binding protein nifA. 925 7

The nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) binds to a site within the promoter region of the histidine utilization operon (hutUH) of Klebsiella aerogenes, and NAC bound at this site activates transcription of hutUH. This NAC-binding site was characterized by a combination of random and directed DNA mutagenesis. Mutations that abolished or diminished in vivo transcriptional activation by NAC were found to lie within a 15-bp region contained within the 26-bp region protected by NAC from DNase I digestion. This 15-bp core has the palindromic ends ATA and TAT, and it matches the consensus for LysR family transcriptional regulators. Protein-binding experiments showed that transcriptional activation in vivo decreased with decreasing binding in vitro. In contrast to the NAC-binding site from hutUH, the NAC-binding site from the gdhA promoter failed to activate transcription from a semisynthetic promoter, and this failure was not due to weak binding or greatly distorted protein-DNA structure. Mutations in the promoter-proximal half-site of the NAC-binding site from gdhA allowed this site to activate transcription. Similar studies using the NAC-binding site from hut showed that two mutations in the promoter proximal half-site increased binding but abolished transcriptional activation. Interestingly, for symmetric mutations in the promoter-distal half-site, loss of transcriptional activation was always correlated with a decrease in binding. We conclude from these observations that if the binding in vitro reflects the binding in vivo, then binding of NAC to DNA is not sufficient for transcriptional activation and that the NAC-binding site can be functionally divided in two half-sites, with related but different functions.
...
PMID:Two roles for the DNA recognition site of the Klebsiella aerogenes nitrogen assimilation control protein. 945 60

The NifA protein of Klebsiella pneumoniae is required for transcriptional activation of all nitrogen fixation (nif) operons except the regulatory nifLA genes. At these operons, NifA binds to an upstream activator sequence (UAS), with the consensus TGT-N(10)-ACA, via a C-terminal DNA-binding domain (CTD). Binding of the activator to this upstream enhancer-like sequence allows NifA to interact with RNA polymerase containing the alternative sigma factor, sigma(54). The isolated NifA CTD is monomeric and binds specifically to DNA in vitro as shown by DNase I footprinting. Heteronuclear 3D NMR experiments have been used to assign the signals from the protein backbone. Three alpha-helices have been identified, based on secondary chemical shifts and medium range Halpha(i)-NH(i)( + 1), and NH(i)-NH(i)( + 1) NOEs. On addition of DNA containing a half-site UAS, several changes are observed in the NMR spectra, allowing the identification of residues that are most likely to interact with DNA. These occur in the final two helices of the protein, directly confirming that DNA binding is mediated by a helix-turn-helix motif.
...
PMID:Secondary structure and DNA binding by the C-terminal domain of the transcriptional activator NifA from Klebsiella pneumoniae. 1223 81

Transcription of the cytosine deaminase (codBA) operon of Escherichia coli is regulated by nitrogen, with about three times more codBA expression in cells grown in nitrogen-limiting medium than in nitrogen-excess medium. Beta-galactosidase expression from codBp-lacZ operon fusions showed that the nitrogen assimilation control protein NAC was necessary for this regulation. In vitro transcription from the codBA promoter with purified RNA polymerase was stimulated by the addition of purified NAC, confirming that no other factors are required. Gel mobility shifts and DNase I footprints showed that NAC binds to a site centered at position -59 relative to the start site of transcription and that mutants that cannot bind NAC there cannot activate transcription. When a longer promoter region (positions -120 to +67) was used, a double footprint was seen with a second 26-bp footprint separated from the first by a hypersensitive site. When a shorter fragment was used (positions -83 to +67), only the primary footprint was seen. Nevertheless, both the shorter and longer fragments showed NAC-mediated regulation in vivo. Cytosine deaminase expression in Klebsiella pneumoniae was also regulated by nitrogen in a NAC-dependent manner. K. pneumoniae differs from E. coli in having two cytosine deaminase genes, an intervening open reading frame between the codB and codA orthologs, and a different response to hypoxanthine which increased cod expression in K. pneumoniae but decreased it in E. coli.
...
PMID:Nitrogen regulation of the codBA (cytosine deaminase) operon from Escherichia coli by the nitrogen assimilation control protein, NAC. 1270 Feb 71

The nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) from Klebsiella pneumoniae is a very versatile regulatory protein. NAC activates transcription of operons such as hut (histidine utilization) and ure (urea utilization), whose products generate ammonia. NAC also represses the transcription of genes such as gdhA, whose products use ammonia. NAC exerts a weak repression at gdhA by competing with the binding of a lysine-sensitive activator. NAC also strongly represses transcription of gdhA (about 20-fold) by binding to two separated sites, suggesting a model involving DNA looping. We have identified negative control mutants that are unable to exert this strong repression of gdhA expression but still activate hut and ure expression normally. Some of these negative control mutants (e.g., NAC(86ter) and NAC(132ter)) delete the C-terminal domain, thought to be required for tetramerization. Other negative control mutants (e.g., NAC(L111K) and NAC(L125R)) alter single amino acids involved in tetramerization. In this work we used gel filtration to show that NAC(86ter) and NAC(L111K) are dimers in solution, even at high concentration (NAC(WT) is a tetramer). Moreover, using a combination of DNase I footprints and gel mobility shifts assays, we showed that when NAC(WT) binds to two adjacent sites on a DNA fragment, NAC(WT) binds as a tetramer that bends the DNA fragment significantly. NAC(L111K) binds to such a fragment as two independent dimers without inducing the strong bend. Thus, NAC(L111K) is a dimer in solution or when bound to DNA. NAC(L111K) (typical of the negative control mutants) is wild type for every other property tested: (i) it activates transcription at hut and ure; (ii) it competes with the lysine-sensitive activator for binding at gdhA; (iii) it binds to the same sites at the hut, ure, nac, and gdhA promoters as NAC(WT); (iv) the relative affinity of NAC(L111K) for these sites follows the same order as NAC(WT) (ure > gdhA > nac > hut); (v) it induces the same slight bend as dimers of NAC(WT); and (vi) its DNase I footprints at these sites are indistinguishable from those of NAC(WT) (except for features ascribed to tetramer formation). The only two phenotypes we know for negative control mutants of NAC are their inability to tetramerize and their inability to cause the strong repression of gdhA. Thus, we propose that in order for NAC(WT) to exert the strong repression, it must form a tetramer that bridges the two sites at gdhA (similar to other DNA looping models) and that the negative control mutants of NAC, which fail to tetramerize, cannot form this loop and thus fail to exert the strong repression at gdhA.
...
PMID:Importance of tetramer formation by the nitrogen assimilation control protein for strong repression of glutamate dehydrogenase formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae. 1632 33


1 2 Next >>