Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0476089 (endometrial cancer)
 11,379 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Validated quantitative models are available that permit the accurate estimation of a woman's risk of developing invasive breast cancer during a specified period of time. Data from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Breast Cancer Prevention Trial indicate that tamoxifen can reduce the risk of developing breast cancer by at least 49% in women who are at increased risk. All premenopausal women whose 5-year risk of developing breast cancer is 1.67% or greater derive a net benefit from taking tamoxifen for risk reduction. Women who have either lobular carcinoma-in-situ or atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia derive an even greater net benefit. Women who carry mutations in either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene will also experience reduced incidence of breast cancer with tamoxifen. Although postmenopausal women derive a net benefit from tamoxifen through the reduction of both breast cancer and bone fracture event rates, the risks of both invasive endometrial cancer and thromboembolic events must be balanced in older women. Physicians should identify appropriate candidates with whom to discuss the possible benefits of tamoxifen for reducing the risk of breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Reducing the risk of breast cancer with tamoxifen in women at increased risk. 1156 Sep 80

About 5% of all ovarian-cancer cases are caused by a genetic predisposition, in particular as a component of the autosomal dominant hereditary breast-ovarian-cancer syndrome. This syndrome is usually due to germline mutations in the BRCA1- or BRCA2-gene. Ovarian and endometrial cancer also occur in families with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). This syndrome is caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes. Women at high risk of gynaecological cancer based upon familial clustering of disease or a demonstrated pathogenic germ-line mutation are candidates for surveillance: annual gynaecological examinations, including vaginal echoscopy and serum carcinoma antigen CA125 testing. Prophylactic surgery in the form of adnexectomy leads to a marked, but not complete, reduction of ovarian-cancer risk in high-risk cases. There is insufficient evidence to advise against the use of oral contraceptives or hormonal substitution after adnexectomy for healthy women with a genetic predisposition to breast cancer. Recommendations for surveillance and prevention should only be given after genetic-risk counselling, based on a detailed family study and DNA-based diagnosis.
 ...
PMID:[Recommendations for the management of women with an increased genetic risk of gynaecological cancer]. 1251 19

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the most fatal of all gastrointestinal cancers, wherein its mortality compares strikingly with its incidence. Unfortunately, 80-90% of PCs are diagnosed in the nonresectable stage. While the lifetime risk of PC in developed countries is approximately 1-3%, it is the fifth most common cause of cancer deaths among both males and females in Western countries. It occurs in excess in Jews. Approximately 5-10% of PC shows familial clustering. Examination of such familial clusters must take into consideration cancers of diverse anatomic sites, such as malignant melanoma in the familial atypical multiple melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome due to the CDKN2A (p16) germline mutation, and combinations of colorectal and endometrial carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, and several other cancers in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), which are due to mismatch repair germline mutations, the most common of which are MSH2 and MLH1 . Other hereditary disorders predisposing to PC include Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, due to the STK11 mutation, familial pancreatitis due to the cationic trypsinogen gene, site-specific familial pancreatic cancer which may be due to the 4q32-34 mutation, hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome that is due to BRCA2 and possibly some families with HBOC that is due to BRCA1 , familial adenomatous polyposis due to the ATP gene, and ataxia telangiectasia due to the ATM germline mutation. This extant heterogeneity mandates that the physician be knowledgeable about these PC-prone syndromes which play such an important role when considering the differential diagnosis of hereditary PC. Unfortunately, there are no PC screening programs with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. However, the gold standard for screening at this time is endoscopic ultrasound. Clearly, there is a great need for the development of novel screening approaches with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Further research is needed to elucidate those etiologic factors that contribute to the apparent excess of PC in Ashkenazi Jews. Attention should also be given to the search for mutations predisposing to PC in Jews so that opportunities to learn more about the disease's pathogenesis, as well as screening and control, may take place.
 ...
PMID:Familial pancreatic carcinoma in Jews. 1551 47

New insights into the genetic basis of carcinogenesis have been obtained by modern molecular biological techniques. Several susceptibility genes are known. The hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2) and endometrial cancer in the context of the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC), germline mutations in mismatch-repair genes, are the most frequent hereditary cancer syndromes in gynaecology. Mutations in TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome) and PTEN (Cowden's disease), associated with increased risk of breast cancer, are responsible for a smaller portion of familial breast cancer. The risk of inheritance and disease can be identified and defined by investigating family history, risk calculation programs, and genetic testing. Afterwards, options of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention can be formulated. Presently, prophylactic surgery is the only option proven by clinical trials that can reduce the mortality of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
 ...
PMID:[Prophylactic surgery of mammary and ovarian carcinoma]. 1623 64

The breast, ovary and endometrial cancers are hereditary in 5 to 10% of the cases. These genetic predisposition syndromes can be classified into two major classes: ovarian cancer and breast cancer predisposition family cases (genes BRCA1 and BRCA2) and family cases of colon cancer, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer (Lynch syndrome or HNPCC) (genes hMLH1, hMSH2, hMLH6). The estimate of the family and individual risk can contribute in a determining manner to the management of these patients, by the practice of screening or an adapted prevention. Indeed, the risk of cancer of an individual having a positive test for a gene of predisposition to breast cancer (BRCA1, BRCA2) or to the colon cancer (hMLH1, hMSH2, hMLH6) lies between 50 and 70% at the age of 70 years. The indication of a genetic test must be discussed within the framework of an oncogenetic consultation. An individual and family medical management ranging from simple monitoring to prophylactic surgery is proposed to these predisposed people.
 ...
PMID:[Hereditary predispositions to gynaecological cancers]. 1663 Jul 43

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been predominantly associated with the breast and ovarian cancers. Two mutations in BRCA1 (185delAG and 5382insC) and one mutation in BRCA2 (6174delT) are common in Ashkenazi Jewish population. To determine the proportion of these founder mutations, we analyzed DNA samples of 120 Slovak hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC) suspected families. Two particular exons of BRCA1 (2, 20) and 11N segment of BRCA2 were screened by single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) followed by DNA sequencing of fragments showing abnormal migration pattern. Mutational analysis revealed that 7 out of 20 (35%) families with detected BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic alteration harbored one of three Jewish mutations: five families with 5382insC, one family with 185delAG and one family with 6174delT. Interestingly, we have noted a very rare phenotype, when 5382insC in BRCA1 co-segregated also with endometrial carcinoma. Similarly to the studies from other countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the most frequent pathogenic alteration found was 5382insC that accounted for 1/4 of all gene defects detected. Following the high proportion of Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations in Slovak HBOC families, a pre-screening for at least 5382insC mutation in individuals at even moderate risk would be appropriate.
 ...
PMID:Ashkenazi founder BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in Slovak hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer families. 1657 64

It is unclear if BRCA mutation carriers diagnosed with advanced endometrial cancer have a better prognosis compared to sporadic cases. From a population database of BRCA1 and 2 mutation carriers in Southwestern Ontario, Canada, we identified three women with advanced-stage endometrial cancer. They were 57, 59, and 64 years of age, and of English/Scottish, Ashkenazi Jewish, and English heritage, respectively. They had different mutations in BRCA1 (Q1240X:C3837T; 68_69delAG; 1961delA). One had a sarcomatoid carcinoma and two had uterine papillary serous carcinoma. All had stage IVB disease, with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Follow-up has ranged from 3.3 to 14.6 years. They are still alive and well with no evidence of recurrent disease. This observation raises the question as to whether BRCA mutations may be associated with a better prognosis in patients with advanced endometrial cancer.
 ...
PMID:Prolonged survival among women with BRCA germline mutations and advanced endometrial cancer: a case series. 1798 37

The previous assumption that progestin does not promote breast cancer development needs to be re-examined since a growing body of evidence indicates the opposite. Data from recent experimental trials and results from clinical and epidemiological studies on hormonal contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have been confronted with breast cancer cases known from the German database of adverse drug reactions (ADR), reported in association with the use of progestin only contraceptives (POC) and combined oral contraceptives (COC). Also cases reported in association with HRT have been analysed. The available data complement one another showing a tumour promoting potential of progestin, possibly higher than that of a combination of estrogen and progestin. These assumptions are based on the following facts: 1) in estrogen-supplemented animals, progesterone has been shown to reactivate the growth of regressed tumour xenograft obtained from breast cancer cell lines, expressing both estrogen and progesterone receptor; 2) antiprogestin has been revealed to suppress the reactivation of the growth of tumour xenograft and to fully suppress the development of breast cancer in an animal model for BRCA1 gene mutation; 3) metabolites of progesterone have been recognised as potent regulators of cell proliferation, cell detachment and apoptosis; 4) progesterone has been shown to inhibit, in a dose-dependent manner, apoptosis in breast cancer cell lines and apoptosis induced by doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracyl (drugs used in breast cancer treatment); 5) an association between breast cancer and HRT was suspected upon the addition of progestin on a regular basis for the prevention of endometrial cancer; 6) in a randomised placebo-controlled trial on HRT an increased risk of breast cancer was shown for the combination of estrogen and progestin, but not for estrogen alone; 7) in epidemiological studies on POC the recognition of an increased breast cancer risk was most probably impeded due to previously unrecognised systematic selection bias; 8) in a large epidemiological study on the risk of early-onset breast cancer in association with COC an increased risk was detected for COC use up to 1975, but no increased, even a slightly decreased, risk was shown for users of low-dose COC, applied since 1976; 9) a considerably higher number of breast cancer cases have been reported from Germany on POC than on the widespread used COC [corrected] (111 versus 12); 10) the big resemblance among the breast cancers reported for POC and their similarity with breast malignancies diagnosed in pregnancy suggest the existence of a pattern rather than pure coincidence [corrected]
 ...
PMID:Progestin and breast cancer. The missing pieces of a puzzle. 1859 37

Recent evidence indicates that the distal fallopian tube is the principal site of early serous cancer in women with a hereditary risk for ovarian cancer. Moreover, the fimbria is involved by early cancer in a significant minority of pelvic serous carcinomas, irrespective of whether the patient has a hereditary BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. In addition, the distal tube has been identified occasionally as a site of concurrent endometrioid tumors in women with endometrial carcinoma. Although the risk of sporadic fimbrial tumors in otherwise healthy women without genetic risk is unknown, routine histological examination of the fimbria provides the opportunity to determine the risk of such an event. To illustrate this point, a case of a woman who underwent surgery for an ovarian fibroma is presented. The distal tube was submitted, and found to harbor a focus of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) with a 2-mm invasive tumor. Incidentally discovered carcinomas underscore the potential risk, albeit low, of concurrent unsuspected malignancy in the distal fallopian tube and emphasize the importance of routine pathological examination of the fimbria in all salpingectomies. The rationale for this strategy, and its potential effect on early detection and in uncovering persons or families potentially at risk for ovarian cancer, is discussed.
 ...
PMID:Intercepting early pelvic serous carcinoma by routine pathological examination of the fimbria. 1940 56

Breast cancer risk factor analysis allows the identification of women at very high risk for the future development of breast cancer. Many of the known risk factors are either not modifiable or are not reasonably modifiable because of social implications or other potential health benefits (eg, those associated with hormone replacement therapy). Thus, effective strategies to decrease the risk of breast cancer are needed. The recent demonstration that the use of tamoxifen for 5 years decreases the future risk of breast cancer by approximately 49% provides the opportunity for a risk-reduction intervention. Women taking tamoxifen must be monitored for the occurrence of well-defined toxicities, including hot flashes and, more rarely, endometrial carcinoma, thromboembolic disease, and cataract formation. Strategies are available for the management of tamoxifen toxicity. In special circumstances, such as in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, the risk of future breast cancer is very high, and the performance of a bilateral prophylactic mastectomy may be considered. Women considering bilateral prophylactic mastectomy should undergo multidisciplinary consultation so that they may make a fully informed decision. The panel strongly encourages patients and health care providers to participate in clinical trials to test new strategies for decreasing the risk of breast cancer. Only through the accumulated experience gained from well-designed, prospective clinical trials will additional advances in the reduction of breast cancer risk be realized.
 ...
PMID:Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. 1976 86


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>