Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0476089 (endometrial cancer)
 11,379 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Several lines of evidence suggest that estrogen is an important determinant of cardiovascular risk in women. Epidemiologic data document low rates of coronary heart disease (CHD) in premenopausal women, a narrowing of the gender gap in CHD mortality after menopause, and elevated risk of CHD among young women with bilateral oophorectomy not treated with estrogen. Nearly all of the more than 30 observational studies of exogenous estrogen replacement therapy have indicated a reduced risk of CHD among women receiving estrogen therapy. In a meta-analysis comparing estrogen users and nonusers, the estimated reduction of CHD among users was 44%. In angiographic studies, women taking estrogen were less likely to have coronary artery stenosis. Estrogen is known to affect a wide range of physiologic processes that may have an impact on CHD risk. Use of oral estrogen has favorable effects on serum lipid profiles; it increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 10% to 15% and decreases low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by a similar magnitude. Other proposed mechanisms include inhibition of endothelial hyperplasia, reduced arterial impedance, enhanced production of prostacyclin, increased insulin sensitivity, and inhibition of oxidation of low-density lipoprotein. Nevertheless, the role of hormone replacement therapy in preventing clinical atherosclerotic events in women remains inconclusive because of the absence of randomized trial data. The benefit-to-risk ratio must be reliably assessed, because estrogen has complex actions, including postulated benefits (CHD, osteoporosis, and menopausal symptoms) and postulated risks (endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and gallstones.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Postmenopausal hormone therapy and atherosclerotic disease. 797 16

Hormone replacement therapy for postmenopausal patients following primary treatment of gynecologic malignancies has changed considerably during recent years. Estrogens have been found useful to prevent osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease as well as to ameliorate symptoms of estrogen deprivation. Thus, hormone replacement therapy can improve life quality of patients. Estrogen-gestagen replacement therapy after primary treatment of endometrial cancer is no longer contraindicated, at least in stage Ia to Ib disease. For breast cancer patients, the German Society of Senology has published recommendations based on the receptor status and lymph node status of an individual patient. Exogenous estrogens and gestagens are not contraindicated for breast cancer patients with negative receptors and negative lymph nodes. However, tamoxifen is indicated for patients with positive receptors and positive lymph nodes. If symptoms of hormonal deprivation occur, gestagens may be added to tamoxifen in these patients. There are no contraindications for hormone replacement therapy in patients with malignant tumors of the ovary, fallopian tube, cervix, vagina, and vulva.
 ...
PMID:[Hormone substitution in patients after primary treatment of gynecologic malignancies]. 814 98

The incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) rises after menopause. Hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Plasma lipoproteins are modified by oral estrogen treatment: LDL are lowered while HDL and VLDL are augmented. The cardioprotective effect of oral HRT may be partially due to the reduction in the LDL/HDL ratio. Optimal changes in lipid profile are achieved with doses that usually prevent bone mass loss. Progestogens tend to blunt the increment of HDL induced by estrogens, but this depends on the type of agent and its dose. Unlike oral estrogen, HRT by the transdermal route does not always modify the lipid profile. When it does, changes are similar to those observed under the oral route in that the LDL/HDL ratio is diminished, but VLDL do not rise. Possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed. At present there is no clear evidence that combined estrogen/progestogen treatment or transdermal estrogen alone could reduce CHD's incidence. Women with an intact uterus should receive a progestogen in addition to estrogen for prevention of endometrial carcinoma. Estrogen alone is preferable for hysterectomized women. When beneficial and adverse effects of HRT are considered simultaneously, the overall result is considered favorable, principally as a consequence of its cardioprotective properties.
 ...
PMID:[Postmenopause, plasma lipoproteins, and hormone replacement therapy]. 820 20

To determine whether treatment regimens for unopposed estrogens can be tailored so as to minimize the excess risk of endometrial cancer, results from 19 published studies of the association between unopposed estrogen use and endometrial cancer were compiled. We sought to examine the influence of duration of use, recency, dose, type of estrogen preparation, and periodic interruption of use on cancer incidence. Estrogen use for 5 years or longer was examined in 18 studies and was associated with a large increase in the risk of endometrial cancer in each one (range in relative risk, 1.8 to 36). Use for shorter durations also was observed to increase risk; however, among women who used estrogens for less than 6 months, any increased risk that may exist appears to be very small in size (six studies; range, 0.6 to 1.4). Risk consistently was seen to decrease with increasing time since cessation of use, although there is evidence from seven of eight studies that some residual excess risk remains long after estrogens have been discontinued. In each of 12 studies that examined the influence of dose, all dose levels of conjugated estrogens increased risk of endometrial cancer substantially. Four of five studies found no differences between oral synthetic estrogens and conjugated estrogens with respect to cancer risk, and all of eight studies found no difference between cyclic and continuous regimens. Based on our review, we conclude that apart from minimizing the duration of use, there is no way of taking unopposed postmenopausal estrogens that reduces their potential to cause endometrial cancer.
 ...
PMID:Postmenopausal unopposed estrogens. Characteristics of use in relation to the risk of endometrial carcinoma. 827 5

Estrogen and progesterone receptor concentrations were measured in the primary tumors of 137 surgically staged women with clinical stages I and II endometrial carcinoma. For each steroid, increasing receptor concentrations were associated with a decrease in hazard (increase in survival) and the effect was linear for each receptor. When expressed dichotomously, steroid receptor status was also significantly associated with a number of known risk factors, and the significance of the association was influenced by the receptor concentration used as the criterion for receptor positivity. In a multivariate analysis, only progesterone receptor concentration affected survival independently, but the effect disappeared when the analysis was restricted to women with disease confined to the uterus. We conclude that the estrogen and progesterone receptor status of the primary tumor is of limited prognostic significance in endometrial carcinoma unless extrauterine disease is present.
 ...
PMID:Steroid receptor concentrations in endometrial carcinoma: effect on survival in surgically staged patients. 840 87

Clinical and histopathological features of postmenopausal endometrial cancer were studied in 63 patients who had received exogenous estrogens previously and in 76 patients who had never been exposed to estrogens. All treatments were primarily surgical. Estrogen users were younger than nonusers (P < 0.001). Body mass index, age at menarche and menopause, parity, and blood pressure were comparable in the two groups. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus was higher in nonusers (P < 0.01). Tumor stage was earlier (P < 0.001) and the histologic grade was lower (P < 0.001) in estrogen users compared to nonusers, and the frequency of clear cell and adenosquamous carcinoma was lower in estrogen users. Myometrial invasion was less pronounced in estrogen users, independently of grade and stage (P < 0.01). Number of mitoses correlated significantly with grade and with estrogen use. Features such as squamous metaplasia and "foam" cells were not related to tumor grade or use of estrogens. The receptor content correlated inversely with grade but was not related to estrogen use. Duration of estrogen treatment was not associated with tumor stage and grade. Our findings support the theory that endometrial cancer of estrogen users may be less aggressive than cancer of nonusers.
 ...
PMID:Endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women with and without previous estrogen replacement treatment: comparison of clinical and histopathological characteristics. 850 92

A woman spends about one-third of her life in her postmenopausal years. Some women supplement this period of decreased estrogen production with estrogen replacement therapy (ERT). Since the 1970s, we have evaluated the long-term risks and benefits of ERT in one population of women, the Leisure World retirement community. ERT is the most effective method for preventing osteoporotic bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women. In Leisure World, ERT reduced the risk of hip fractures about 50 %. The effect is greatest in long-term users but may be lost after discontinuation. Postmenopausal osteoporosis affects the bones of the jaws as well as other skeletal bones. Bone loss in the jaws may result in tooth loss. In Leisure World, estrogen users retain more natural teeth than nonusers. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of hospitalization and death in women. In Leisure World, ERT reduced the risk of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, other heart disease, and stroke by 20-40 %. The reduction is greatest in long-term and/or current users. ERT is effective in women with and without cardiovascular disease risk factors. A most feared aspect of aging is Alzheimer's disease. In Leisure World, women who had used ERT had a reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease. Risk both increaseng dose and decreased with increasing duration of use. Estrogen use, however, is not without risk. Unopposed estrogen increases risk of endometrial cancer. Risk increases with increasing years of use and remains high after discontinuation. The most important potential risk of ERT is breast cancer. In Leisure World, women who had used a total accumulated estrogen dose of 1500 mg or more had nearly twice the risk of breast cancer compared with nonusers. Short-term low-dose users showed no substantial increased risk. The Leisure World Study shows risks and benefits of ERT similar to other reports in the literature. For postmenopausal women generally, the benefits of ERT--preventing osteoporotic fractures, reducing heart disease, decreasing mortality, and possibly reducing risk of Alzheimer's disease-out-weigh the risks of endometrial and breast cancers. A woman must be fully informed of the risks and benefits of hormone therapy and play an important role in deciding whether to take hormones and which regimen to use.
 ...
PMID:Estrogen replacement therapy in the elderly. 870 21

Endometrial fibroblasts derived from uterine endometrium as controls and endometrial cancer cell lines (Ishikawa and HHUA cells) were analyzed for the induction manner of c-fos and c-jun transcripts in endometrial cancers, some of which are estrogen-dependent in growth. Estrogen increased c-fos expression and protein kinase C (PKC) activity in fibroblasts and Ishikawa cells, but not in HHUA cells. Progesterone diminished c-fos and c-jun expression and PKC activity induced by estradiol in the fibroblasts, but not in Ishikawa cells, which persistently overexpressed c-fos and c-jun. In these cells, 12-0-tetra-decanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) increased c-fos and c-jun expression as did estradiol. Pretreatment with 1-(5-isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-methylpiperazine dihydrochloride (H-7) abolished estrogen-inducible over-expression of c-fos and c-jun. The combination of both estradiol and TPA at maximum effective concentration exerted no additive and synergistic effect on induction of c-fos and c-jun expression. In conclusion, persistent activation of PKC might lead to overexpression of c-fos and c-jun in some endometrial cancers with an estrogen predominant milieu, which might be, at least in part, associated with the transformation or growth potential.
 ...
PMID:Estrogen induces expression of c-fos and c-jun via activation of protein kinase C in an endometrial cancer cell line and fibroblasts derived from human uterine endometrium. 870 84

A new human endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line, Watanabe cells, was established from the ascitic fluid of a relapsed endometrial adenocarcinoma obtained from a 58-year-old woman; this cell line has been maintained in vitro for more than 3 years and 8 months. The cells formed a monolayer in a mosaic fashion and tended to pile up and formed a hemicyst. The population boubling time was 60.0 hours at the 10th generation. The modal chromosomal number of the cells was in the diploid range. The histology of tumors induced by this cell line in athymic nude mice showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, while the initial tumor was a well differentiated adenocarcinoma. Estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PR) were demonstrated in the original tumor, whereas ER but not PR were present in the tumors induced in nude mice. CA125, CA19-9 and other tumor markers were positive in culture media of this cell line. The cells showed intrinsic cisplatin-resistance (50% inhibition concentration: > 10 micrograms/ml) at 120 hours of exposure by MTT assay. We believe this cell line will be useful for investigating the mechanisms of progesterone therapy, the biological behaviors of the tumor markers and mechanisms of chemotherapeutic resistance in endometrial carcinoma.
 ...
PMID:[Establishment of a new human endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line, Watanabe cells, containing estrogen receptor]. 872 Oct 91

It has been suggested that there are two types of endometrial carcinoma: the first arises in younger women who have hyperestrogenism and has a favorable prognosis and the second occurs in older women, is not associated to estrogen stimulation, and has a poorer prognosis. This study examined the hypothesis that more aggressive carcinomas are found in older patients with no evidence of estrogen stimulation. A retrospective review of all patients (N = 82) with endometrial carcinoma diagnosed and treated at our institution between 1978 and 1990 was undertaken. The following data were analyzed: age at diagnosis, stage, race, histologic type, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, absence or presence of associated hyperplasia, and survival. The mean age of the patients was 64.8 years. Sixty (73%) of the 82 patients were considered estrogen-positive either because of obesity (body mass index > or = 27.3) or the use of unopposed exogenous estrogen. There were no statistically significant differences between estrogen-positive and estrogen-negative patients. Patients > or = 65 years had a 5-year survival of 60% compared with 74% for younger patients. There was a trend toward higher histologic grade among the older patients. Otherwise no statistically significant differences were found between these two groups. Estrogen-negative women > or = 65 years had the worst prognosis with a 5-year survival of 29%. As identified by other investigators, age at diagnosis is a significant indicator of prognosis in patients with endometrial carcinoma. In this series, thin, older (> or = 65 years) women who developed endometrial carcinoma had the worst prognosis.
 ...
PMID:Poorer prognosis in older patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma. 877 67


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>