Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0476089 (endometrial cancer)
 11,379 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The metabolic effects of sex steroids pertinent to cardiovascular risk are described. These effects are discussed for estrogen inducible proteins, coagulation and fibrinolysis, blood pressure and hypertension, carbohydrate metabolism, lipids and lipoproteins, and vessel walls and local prostaglandins. Also described is the cardioprotection from estrogens and estrogen/progesterone treatment and cardiovascular risk. Oral contraceptive (OC) and cardiovascular risk are also discussed with the following effects identified: the influence on many of the multiple risk factors involved in the development of cardiovascular diseases (i.e., lipids, carbohydrate metabolism, and hemostasis), an association between OC use and thromboembolic accidents, a state of hypercoagulability counterbalanced by increased fibrinolytic activity, venous thrombosis, a relationship with the dosage of androgenic progestogens. no atherogenic origin, no age limit for prescribed, healthy, nonsmoking women, and an increased peripheral insulin resistance. It is concluded that it is rarely inadvisable to prescribe low dose natural estrogens in postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy. Factors contraindicating such use are undiagnosed genital bleeding, an active thrombolic or cardiovascular process, carcinoma of the breast or endometrium, and acute liver failure. Estrogen replacement therapy may exert some cardioprotective effect. When progestogens are added to prevent endometrial carcinoma development, the benefits might be reduced. Low estrogen and low progesterone OC use among healthy, nonsmoking women even in middle age poses no risk of death from cardiovascular disease. Premenopausal women may even be protected from coronary atherosclerosis with estrogen-containing OCs. However, it is advisable that OCs be used with the least possible impact on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, as well as on hemostasis. For those with some prior cardiovascular risk, there are theoretical advantages at present for use of the new, less, or nonandrogenic progestins in OCs; however, caution is urged and informed consent must be obtained until epidemiological studies support this position.
Acta Cardiol 1991
PMID:Sex hormones and cardiovascular risk. 192 64

This review briefly outlines the pharmacology of natural and synthetic estrogens, and synthetic progestins, and summarizes their beneficial and adverse effects for contraceptive and menopausal therapy. Currently, oral contraceptives contain 30-50 mc synthetic estrogen, and 1-5 mg nor-progestin; menopausal therapy may be either 0.625-1.25 mg natural estrogen or estrogen plus 10 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate daily if the woman has her uterus. The biologic effects of estrogens are : decrease in lipoproteins, increased blood coagulation factors, increased blood pressure, decreased glucose tolerance. Progestins increase blood lipids and increase insulin and glucose. Oral contraceptives increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, particularly in smokers and in women over 35, in proportion to dose. These studies should be recapitulated in more detail with the newer low-dose pills. Orals have far more beneficial effects, besides providing an inexpensive, effective method contraception. The death rate of users of oral contraceptives is 3.7/100,000 (1.8 in nonsmokers and 6.5 in smokers), but the risk is 5.5 times higher in nonusers exposed to pregnancy and childbirth. The risk for users of barrier methods backed up by abortion is lower, but pills are cheaper and more acceptable. If woman did not take oral contraceptives, they would not be protected from cancer of the breast, ovary, endometrium, and ovarian and breast cysts. Menopausal therapy puts woman at increased risk of endometrial cancer only if the estrogen is taken alone, not if progestin is combined with the estrogen. There are no other adverse effects except decreased glucose tolerance and possible comprise of lipoproteins if a norprogestin of menopausal estrogens effectively treat hot flashes, depression, vaginal atrophy and bones loss.
Cardiol Clin 1986 Feb
PMID:The adverse effects of hormonal therapy. 351 31

Women who self-select to take postmenopausal hormones have lower risks of coronary heart disease, their leading cause of mortality. Women and their primary health care providers must weigh this and other clear (osteoporosis), and possible (stroke, colon cancer, and Alzheimer's disease) benefits against clear (endometrial cancer) and possible (breast cancer) risks. Because all existing data derive only from observational studies, reliable information on the balance of risks and benefits must await the results of the Women's Health Initiative, a large-scale, randomized clinical trial.
Curr Opin Cardiol 1996 Jul
PMID:Postmenopausal hormones and coronary heart disease. 887 56

Naturally occurring or surgically related hormonal deprivation at menopause is associated with cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular complications. Hormonal replacement therapy helps to prevent and treat these complications, not only symptoms associated with menopause (which continue to be their major indication) but also bone and cardiovascular related problems. It is well known that oral contraceptive use is one of the most common reversible causes of secondary hypertension. This is, in part, why the use of hormonal replacement therapy has provoked such suspicion among clinicians who have mainly believed that a similar effect on blood pressure would probably occur with the use of hormonal replacement therapy. However, the results of a variety of clinical studies and surveys do not confirm these suspicions. These beneficial effects have to be weighed against the risk of endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial cancer and breast cancer (among other unwanted effects) that could occur when long-term therapy is implemented. If one considers that the overall risk associated with cardiovascular mortality is more than four times higher than the risk associated with gynecological malignancies, even a modest decrease in the cardiovascular risk could easily outweigh other risks and result in an overall improved risk profile in postmenopausal women.
Rev Esp Cardiol 1998
PMID:[Hormone replacement therapy in hypertension in the postmenopausal woman]. 988 70

A large body of evidence suggests hormone replacement therapy (HRT) reduces cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women. It is, however, associated with serious side effects, such as increased risk of breast and endometrial cancer. This has likely caused uneasiness among both women and health care providers. A new class of compounds, called selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), have emerged. Through their interactions at the estrogen receptor level they have become a class of compounds distinct from estrogen. While they share similar effects with estrogen on such factors as lipid profile and bone density, they affect other tissues differently. Specifically, they do not induce endometrial hyperplasia and are therefore not associated with endometrial cancer. In vitro studies have also shown that they inhibit lipoprotein oxidation and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. The cumulative effects of these compounds may prove quite beneficial in reducing cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women while avoiding serious side effects. This may, in turn, ease much of the anxiety surrounding the issue of HRT. Clinical trials are presently being conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of raloxifene, a SERM, on cardiovascular risk reduction in postmenopausal women.
Clin Cardiol 2000 Jan
PMID:Selective estrogen receptor modulators--a new age of estrogens in cardiovascular disease? 1068 24

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the number 1 cause of death and disability in the Western world. The incidence of CAD increases with age, although, on average, women present with symptomatic CAD about 10 years later than men. The belief that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may reduce the incidence of CAD is based on its favorable effects on (1) vasoreactivity, (2) progression of atherosclerosis, (3) lipids and lipoproteins, (4) hemostasis, and (5) impaired glucose tolerance. However, unopposed estrogen may be related to an increased risk of endometrial cancer. The belief that HRT has an overall beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease comes from the results of prospective cohort studies. The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS), however, showed no beneficial effect of HRT on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Uncertainty exists about the duration and optimal type of HRT regimen to use, because different estrogens and progestins have yielded different results. Results of ongoing trials addressing similar questions will be published in future years. The Women's Hormone Intervention Secondary Prevention (WHISP) pilot study, using a different HRT regimen from that used in HERS, will assess the effect of HRT on lipid and hemostatic risk markers of heart disease, and it may provide the rationale for a large trial evaluating the effect of HRT on morbidity and mortality.
Am J Cardiol 2002 Jul 03
PMID:Clinical cardiovascular studies of hormone replacement therapy. 1210 38

Biological studies have demonstrated estrogen's beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk factors, including plasma lipoproteins, atherogenesis, vascular reactivity, inflammation and antioxidative activity. Additionally, observational studies have supported a cardioprotective effect of hormone therapy (HT), although an underlying healthy-user effect may account for these observations. Progestagens are added to protect against an increased risk of endometrial cancer observed with unopposed estrogen treatment. The inclusion of progestagen in HT has been associated with possible adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Recent, large-scale, randomized clinical studies did not confirm a beneficial cardiovascular effect of HT. On the contrary, an increased risk was found with continuous combined estrogen-progestagen regimens. The progestagen used in these trials was medroxyprogesterone acetate and other progestagen components have only been sparsely elucidated. The purpose of the present review is to outline some of the modifying effects of different progestagens on the actions of estrogen on cardiovascular risk markers and clinical end points observed in biological, observational and clinical studies.
Future Cardiol 2006 Nov
PMID:Hormone therapy and cardiovascular risk markers and disease: focus on progestagens. 1980 60