Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0476089 (endometrial cancer)
 11,379 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Why some women are at increased risk for the development of endometrial carcinoma while taking the antiestrogen tamoxifen (Tam) for breast cancer treatment or prevention is unknown. Various strains of rodents display differences in sensitivity to compounds with estrogenic activity, but whether differences in Tam sensitivity exist in rodent strains has not been investigated. In the present study, we investigated whether rat strain differences in reproductive tract sensitivity to Tam and estrogen exist between Fischer 344 (F344) and Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. Immature (21-23 day; 6/group), ovariectomized F344 and SD rats were treated with vehicle (control), 17beta-estradiol (E2) [1 x 10 (-6) to 1.0 micro g/kg body weight (BW)] or 4-OH tamoxifen (4-OHT) (1 x 10 (-4) to 10 mg/kg BW) for 2 days and then sacrificed on day 3. Reproductive tracts were collected, weighed, and examined for changes in histomorphology and expression of ER and nuclear receptor co-regulators (SRC1, p300, CARM1, GRIP1, SPA, REA and Uba3). Treatment with E (1 x 10(-5) micro g/kg BW) increased ( <0.05) uterine epithelial cell height in F344 but not SD rats, demonstrating increased sensitivity of the F344 strain to E. Conversely, treatment with 1 x 10(-3) mg/kg BW 4-OHT increased ( <0.05) uterine weight and epithelial cell height in SD but not F344 rats, demonstrating that the SD strain is more sensitive to the antiestrogen. Northern and Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis revealed that ER expression levels in the SD and F344 uterus were not different. Expression of receptor co-regulators was higher in the uterus compared to the vagina regardless of strain and higher CARM1 expression was seen in SD uterus compared to F344 rats. Understanding differences in Tam sensitivity may help us to better understand why some women develop endometrial cancer while taking Tam and be beneficial in treatment decisions for breast cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:Strain differences in tamoxifen sensitivity of Sprague-Dawley and Fischer 344 rats. 1239 57

Endometrial cancer cell lines have provided a valuable model to study endometrial epithelial cells in vitro. Since the first development of HEC1B over 35 yr ago, many different cell lines have been isolated and described. One valuable cell line that maintains hormone responsiveness and unique stability over time is the ECC-1 cell line, developed originally by the late P.G. Satyaswaroop. In this study, we investigated some of the properties of these cells and present their salient characteristics. Like Ishikawa cells, ECC-1 cells maintain both estrogen receptors (ESR1 [ER alpha] and ESR2 [ER beta]), progesterone receptors (PR A and B; PGRs), and androgen receptors (ARs), along with the p160 steroid receptor coactivators NCOA1 (formerly SRC1), NCOA2 (formerly TIF2), and NCOA3 (formerly AIB1). The karyotype of these cells is abnormal, with multiple structural rearrangements in all cells analyzed. Unlike Ishikawa cells that express glandular epithelial antigens, ECC-1 cells maintain a luminal phenotype, with expression of KRT13 (cytokeratin 13) and KRT18 (cytokeratin 18). Apparent differences in the regulation of ESR2 also were evident in ECC-1 cells compared to Ishikawa cells. Like other endometrial cell lines, ECC-1 cells express the steroid receptor coactivators and exhibit epidermal growth factor-stimulated expression of known luminal proteins thought to be involved in implantation, including the hyaluronate receptor CD44 and SPP1 (formerly osteopontin) and CD55 (decay-accelerating factor). These characteristics appear to be stable and persistent over multiple cell passages, making this well-differentiated cell line an excellent choice to study endocrine and paracrine regulation of endometrial epithelium in vitro.
 ...
PMID:ECC-1 cells: a well-differentiated steroid-responsive endometrial cell line with characteristics of luminal epithelium. 1670 68