Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0476089 (
endometrial cancer
)
11,379
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
In the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT), women considered to be at high risk for developing breast cancer who received tamoxifen experienced 49% and 50% reductions in the risk of developing invasive and noninvasive breast cancer, respectively, compared with women receiving placebo. Although the BCPT addressed the clinical benefits of tamoxifen, this study sought to assess its cost effectiveness in the prevention of breast cancer in women at increased risk for developing the disease. Women were considered to be at an increased risk if they were: 1) 60 years of age or older, 2) age 35 to 59 years with a history of
lobular carcinoma in situ
, or 3) age 35 to 59 years with additional risk factors that made their 5-year predicted breast cancer risk at least as great as that of women 60 years of age. A decision-analysis model was used to estimate the incremental cost effectiveness of using tamoxifen compared with no intervention as preventive therapy in age-group defined cohorts of women who were at high risk for developing breast cancer. The analysis used data on the benefits and risks of tamoxifen as observed in the BCPT. In a subgroup analysis, tamoxifen's cost effectiveness was also evaluated in women who had had a hysterectomy, because of evidence that suggested an increased risk of
endometrial cancer
in women receiving tamoxifen. Under conservative assumptions from a base-case analysis, the incremental cost effectiveness of tamoxifen is $41,372 per life-year gained for women age 35 to 49 years, whereas for women age 50 to 59 years and 60 to 69 years, these values are $68,349 and $74,981, respectively. For women with a previous hysterectomy, tamoxifen's cost effectiveness is $46,060 per life-year gained. A strategy of using tamoxifen in high-risk women to prevent breast cancer in high-risk women may be cost effective, particularly in the 35-to-49 year-old age group and in those of any age who have had a hysterectomy.
...
PMID:The cost effectiveness of tamoxifen in the prevention of breast cancer. 1053 51
The Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (P-1: BCPT) of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) randomized 13,388 women, > or = 35 years of age, at increased risk for breast cancer [> or = 1.66% by Gail model criteria or with a history of
lobular carcinoma in situ
(
LCIS
)] to 5 years of tamoxifen or placebo. A 49% reduction (P < 0.00001) in invasive breast cancers occurred, 175 with placebo versus 89 with tamoxifen, mainly among estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors (130 with placebo vs. 41 with tamoxifen). The major toxicities of tamoxifen were
endometrial cancer
(15 with placebo vs. 36 with tamoxifen) and thromboembolic disease, both predominantly in women who were > or = 50 years old. Ramifications emerging from the P-1 results regarding the efficacy and toxicities of preventive tamoxifen include the following: (1) Does tamoxifen induce more virulent breast cancers? (2) Does tamoxifen induce more virulent endometrial cancers? (3) Tamoxifen is especially efficacious in reducing breast cancer risk in
LCIS
(18 invasive breast cancers with placebo vs. 8 with tamoxifen group) and atypical ductal hyperplasia (AH) (23 invasive breast cancers with placebo vs. 3 with tamoxifen). (4) Does tamoxifen reduce breast cancer risk in women at increased risk due to genetic mutations? (5) How can we prevent tamoxifen-resistant breast cancers? (6) What do the BCPT results tell us about who should take preventive tamoxifen? In its ongoing effort to lower the incidence of breast cancer, the NSABP is now implementing its second breast cancer prevention trial, the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR), which is comparing the two agents with regard to efficacy and toxicity.
...
PMID:The role of tamoxifen in breast cancer prevention: issues sparked by the NSABP Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (P-1). 1179 86
Women who are at increased risk for developing breast cancer can be identified using quantitative risk assessment models that provide valid estimates of risk. The Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT, P-1) demonstrated that tamoxifen can reduce the incidence of both invasive and noninvasive breast cancer as well as of bone fractures in women at increased risk. These benefits accrue at the expense of increased risk of
endometrial cancer
, thromboses, cataracts, and possibly diminished quality of life in postmenopausal women. All premenopausal women with a 5-year risk of developing invasive breast cancer greater than 1.67% derive net benefit from using tamoxifen to reduce the risk. Subset analyses of older postmenopausal women taking raloxifene for the treatment of osteoporosis indicate reduction of breast cancer incidence by more than 70%. These findings led the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) to design and launch the STAR trial (P-2, the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene). Eligible women are at least 35 years of age and postmenopausal, and they must have either
lobular carcinoma in situ
(
LCIS
) or a 5-year risk of invasive breast cancer of at least 1.67% as determined by the Gail model [M. H. Gail et al., J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 81: 1879-1886, 1989]. Subjects are randomly assigned to receive either tamoxifen 20 mg or raloxifene 60 mg daily in a double-blind, double-dummy design. The trial is designed to recruit a total of 22,000 postmenopausal women and is powered to demonstrate superior efficacy of either agent or their equivalence in reducing the incidence of primary breast cancer. Additional end points will include the incidence of cardiovascular events and bone fractures. Thromboembolic events and
endometrial cancer
are the predicted toxicities. Ancillary studies of cognitive function will also be performed. Raloxifene should not be used for the reduction of breast cancer risk outside the context of the STAR trial.
...
PMID:Follow-up of the breast cancer prevention trial and the future of breast cancer prevention efforts. 1191 33
Raloxifene was approved for chemoprevention against breast cancer among high-risk women in addition to tamoxifen by the US Food and Drug Administration. This study aims to evaluate cost-effectiveness of these agents under Japan's health system. A cost-effectiveness analysis with Markov model consisting of eight health states such as healthy, invasive breast cancer, and
endometrial cancer
is carried out. The model incorporated the findings of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 and P-2 trial, and key costs obtained from health insurance claim reviews. Favourable results, that is cost saving or cost-effective, are found by both tamoxifen and raloxifene for the introduction of chemoprevention among extremely high-risk women such as having a history of atypical hyperplasia, a history of
lobular carcinoma in situ
or a 5-year predicted breast cancer risk of > or =5.01% starting at younger age, whereas unfavourable results, that is 'cost more and gain less' or cost-ineffective, are found for women with a 5-year predicted breast cancer risk of < or =5.00%. Therapeutic policy switch from tamoxifen to raloxifene among postmenopausal women are implied cost-effective. Findings suggest that introduction of chemoprevention targeting extremely high-risk women in Japan can be justifiable as an efficient use of finite health-care resources, possibly contributing to cost containment.
...
PMID:Economic evaluation of chemoprevention of breast cancer with tamoxifen and raloxifene among high-risk women in Japan. 1914 82