Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0476089 (endometrial cancer)
 11,379 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Ever since a gradual but significant reduction in the estrogenic and progestogenic components of oral contraceptives (OCs) was made, there has been a corresponding decrease in adverse effects associated with the pill. The beneficial effects include prevention of pregnancy, reduction in pelvic inflammatory disease, protection against ovarian/endometrial cancer and benign breast tumors and ovarian cysts, reduction in the occurrence of rheumatoid arthritis among OC users, and regulation of the menstrual cycle. The adverse effects include diseases of the circulatory system (myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypertension), possible carcinogenicity (breast, cervix, melanoma), pituitary adenomas, liver disorders, glucose metabolix effects (diabetes), vitamin status alteration, delay in return of menstruation and fertility, and a number of minor side effects (nausea, vomiting). Contraindications to OC use include history of malignancy of the breast or genital tract, venous thromboembolism, cerebrovascular accident, undiagnosed abnormal vaginal bleeding, focal migraine, or familial hyperlipidemia. The following situations require medical assessment before OCs are prescribed, and medical supervision if OCs are prescribed: age 40+, smoking and age over 35, mild hypertension or a history of hypertensive disease of pregnancy (toxemia), epilepsy, diabetes mellitus, history of bouts of depression, history of oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea in nulliparous women, and gallbladder disease. Problems could occur with OC use in the following situations: 1) lactation (ideally, OCs should be withheld until the child is weaned but if not possible, OCs should not be given until lactation is established); 2) drug interaction (other contraceptive form should be used when the patient is taking antibiotics or anticonvulsants); 3) tropical diseases (studies are still underway); 4) adolescence (very young girls should use other contraceptive method until regular menstruation is established); 5) postcoital contraception (limited use of steroids in emergency situation); and 6) hormonal pregnancy tests (use of oral steroids for pregnancy testing is not recommended). The 3 main types of OCs currently used are the combined estrogen and progestagen, the progestagen-only OC, and the triphasic OC. The lowest effective dose of a compound should be used, and healthy women may continue to use OCs for many years.
 ...
PMID:Statement on steroidal oral contraceptives. 1226 73

Reports regarding the question of whether oral contraceptive (OC) use enhances the risk of cancer or one of several serious cardiovascular disorders, i.e., thromboembolic disease, stroke, and myocardial infarction are reviewed. In 1974 the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) issued an interim report of a large prospective study involving 46,000 women. The study found a 5-fold increase in the risk of deep venous thrombosis among women taking OCs. Laboratory studies have tried to establish a direct causal relationship between OC use and altered hemostatis. In review of these studies, Bingel and Benoit reported an increased incidence of thromboembolism in OC users with blood group A. Other hemostatic alterations in OC users were also noted. Other investigators have examined the effect of OCs on antithrombin 3. In 1 study, the inhibitory activity of antithrombin 3 on factor X was significantly reduced among 57 women using the combined OCs, but there was no substantial difference in the quantity of antithrombin 3 in these women as compared with 48 women in the control group. In 1 retrospective case control study of 60 surgical patients with complications of pulmonary embolism or venous thrombosis, the risk of postoperative thromboembolism was 6.7 times greater in OC users than in 97 well matched surgical controls. The RCGP study showed that the risk of cerebrovascular disease in women using OCs was 4 times greater than in nonusers. This finding was substantiated by the Boston-based Collaborative Group for the Study of Stroke in Young Women, which observed a 2-fold increase in risk for all types of stroke among OC users. Several studies have demonstrated that serum lipids are higher in women who use OCs than in those who do not, with estrogen being implicated as the cause of the elevation. Other studies have attempted to link serum lipid elevations to myocardial infarction, but the association is unclear. Both epidemiological and laboratory studies have implicated OCs in the genesis of essential hypertension. Several studies have examined mortality trends associated with OC use. In 1 analysis of data from 21 countries, women between 15 and 44 years of age were found to have a 3-fold to 5-fold increase in cardiovascular mortality that was associated with OC use. The principle evidence that suggested a possible link between OCs and breast carcinoma derived from experiments in laboratory animals. There is no conclusive evidence that OCs cause breast cancer in humans. The association between OC use and endometrial cancer is also inconclusive at this time. A marked increase in the incidence of hepatic adenomas among OC users has also been noted recently. The following other effects associated with OC use are reviewed briefly: glucose tolerance tests; birth defects; gallbladder disease; postpill amenorrhea; laboratory tests; and drug activity. Absolute and relative contraindications for OC use are listed.
 ...
PMID:Oral contraceptive risks: a realistic appraisal. 1227 76

Outlined is a protocol for the administration of emergency contraceptive pills. The indication for such treatment is unprotected intercourse within the past 72 hours. Absolute contraindications include the possibility of an existing pregnancy and a family history of stroke, heart attack, thrombophlebitis, breast or endometrial cancer, or liver tumor. Possibly excluded, depending on evaluation by a physician, are women with abnormal vaginal bleeding, active hepatitis, active gallbladder disease, high blood pressure, acute focal migraine, breastfeeding women, and those unable to understand instructions. The recommended regimen consists of six tablets of Ovral (two taken immediately, two more in 12 hours) or 12 tablets of Lo/Ovral, Nordette, or Levlen (four taken immediately, repeat dosage in 12 hours). The extra pills are to be used in cases of vomiting within three hours of pill ingestion. Women with a history of oral contraceptive-related nausea and vomiting should be provided with Compazine. Women should be informed that this method is effective in only about 92% of cases. All women who receive emergency contraception should be counseled that this is strictly a back-up method and helped to formulate a long-term birth control strategy.
 ...
PMID:Emergency contraceptive pills (ECP) protocol. 1228 80

New types of contraception approved for use in the US include two long-lasting, hormone-based contraceptives, Depo-Provera and Norplant, and the female condom. The female condom is made of polyurethane, which is thinner, stronger, and a better conductor of heat than latex. Its inner ring fits over the cervix and the outer ring protects the labia and the base of the penis. Its typical-use and perfect-use failure rates are 21-26% and around 5%, respectively. One injection of Depo-Provera blocks ovulation for 3 months. Irregular periods are common with Depo-Provera use. Fertility may not return for 6-12 months after discontinuation. Depo-Provera may protect against endometrial cancer. The 6-capsule system Norplant is inserted subdermally in the arm and releases levonorgestrel for up to 5 years. Since its arrival on the US market, more than 900,000 women have used Norplant. Contraindications to Norplant are liver disease, blood clots, inflammation of the veins, history of breast cancer, or breast feeding in the first 6 weeks postpartum. More than 600,000 US women undergo sterilization annually. 25% of all heterosexually active, fertile women of reproductive age and 60% of these women ages 35-44 have had a tubal ligation. Vasectomy is less risky than tubal ligation. Both vasectomy and tubal sterilization are more than 99% effective. Oral contraceptives (OCs) suppress ovulation. 28% of US women of reproductive age use OCs. OCs are more than 99% effective. OCs appear to increase the risk of blood clots, heart attack, and stroke for smokers over 35. Health benefits of OCs include protection against ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, pelvic inflammatory disease, ovarian cysts, and benign breast tumors. Barrier methods keep sperm from joining the egg. Latex condoms protect against sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). IUDs interfere with sperm transport and egg fertilization. In the US, there is a perception that IUD use is unsafe. Women with new or multiple partners should use condoms to protect against STDs.
 ...
PMID:Choosing a contraceptive. What's best for you? 1229 May 58

The use of oral contraceptives (OC) by an estimated 150 million women worldwide has prompted concern about their potential risks. But, there are also health conditions--medical and surgical disorders, reproductive tract cancers, and menstruation disorders--that oral contraceptives affect beneficially. OC users have a lower risk of iron deficiency anemia, an important consideration for nutritionally deficient women. The risk of developing pelvic inflammatory disease is also decreased in OC users, as is the risk of ectopic pregnancy. This is important for women in developing countries, where access to medical services for a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy might be limited. Using OCs lowers the incidence of surgery for benign breast disease, the incidence of retention cysts of the ovary, the risk of endometrial cancer, the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer, and relieves symptoms of dysmenorrhea and premenstrual syndrome. The risks associated with OC use, including stroke and heart attack, vary among age groups, smoking status, and other cardiovascular risk factors. For example, elevated serum cholesterol is lower among women in developing countries, so the associated risk of heart attack is lower for these women. Other complications associated with OC use are deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, gallbladder disease, and hepatic adenoma. There is controversy about whether OC use increases the risk of cervical neoplasia. Studies that have attempted to define this risk are subject to methodological problems, in that increased surveillance of OC users results in a higher rate of detection. Some controversy exists about OC use and an increased risk of breast cancer, but no definitive results are available. Although the risks associated with OC use can be serious, these risks are only slightly higher among OC users compared with non-users. The benefits, such as reduced risk of serious diseases and gynecological disorders, seem to outweigh the risks, pointing to the need for accurate communication between health professionals and the women they advise about contraceptive choices.
 ...
PMID:Beyond contraception: the health benefits and risks of the pill. 1231 33

A consensus development conference held at the National Institutes of Health on September 13-14, 1979 addressed the issue of estrogen treatment for postmenopausal women. Conference participants included research scientists, physicians, and consumers. Conclusions reached by the conference participants were: 1) estrogens are more effective than placebos in reducing vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause; 2) therapy should be undertaken only if the patient considers the symptoms to be severe enough to warrant treatment, and the smallest dose possible should be administered; 3) estrogens are effective in treating atrophy of the vaginal epithelium, but the use of estrogen creams to treat localized vaginal areas needs further study; 4) estrogens should not be used to treat primary psychological problems; 5) insufficient data is available for determining whether estrogen therapy decreases the risk of fracture associated with osteoporosis; 6) recent investigations indicate estrogen therapy reduces bone loss, but it is not known if the effect is permanant; 7) estrogen therapy appears to neither increase nor decrease the risk of thromboembolism, stroke, or heart disease; 8) estrogen therapy is associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer but primarily with low grade endometrial cancers; 9) cystic hyperplasia is associated with unopposed estrogen therapy; 10) yearly endometrial samples should be obtained and checked for endometrial changes for all patients receiving estrogen therapy; 11) evidence supporting an association between estrogen therapy and breast cancer is indecisive; and 12) estrogen therapy is associated with an increased risk of gallbladder disease. In general, many areas need further study and patients themselves will have to assess whether symptom relief is of sufficent importance to them to warrant the acceptance of the possible risks involved in the therapy.
 ...
PMID:Estrogen use and postmenopausal women. 1233 54

Smoking is dangerous for all women, regardless of the method of contraception used. Women who smoke and take the oral contraceptive pill should stop smoking, since the combined effect of smoking and oral contraception may increase a woman's risk of heart attack compared to smoking only. Since women under age 35 who smoke and use the pill are at greater risk of death from pregnancy and childbirth than from using the pill, smoking and not oral pill use should be eliminated from their lives in the interest of practicing a safe and highly effective mode of birth control. Pill use is definitely not recommended for women aged 35 and older who smoke. Many programs exist to help one stop smoking. Stopping smoking is very important to reduce one's risk of stroke whether or not the pill is being used. Exactly how much the pill may or may not increase a woman's risk of getting a blood clot is controversial, although blood clots among otherwise healthy pill users who do not smoke are rare. In addition to being a very safe method of birth control which is highly effective when taken correctly and consistently, birth control pill use protects women against ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, painful or irregular periods, breast cysts, iron deficiency anemia, ectopic or tubal pregnancy, and infections of the fallopian tube requiring hospitalization. Healthy, nonsmoking women can safely take the pill right up until menopause.
 ...
PMID:The truth about oral contraceptives, heart attack, stroke and blood clots. 1234 1

This statement summarizes the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations for use of hormone replacement therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal women and updates the 1996 USPSTF recommendations on this topic. The complete information on which this statement is based, including evidence tables and references, is available through the USPSTF Web site (http://www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov) and through the National Guideline Clearinghouse (http://www.guideline.gov) The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the use of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and the following outcomes: cardiovascular disease, including CHD and stroke; osteoporosis and fractures; thromboembolism; dementia and cognitive function; breast, colon, ovarian, and endometrial cancer; and cholecystitis. The USPSTF also reviewed evidence of the effects of hormone replacement therapy on phytoestrogens and osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. The use of hormone replacement therapy for relieving active symptoms of menopause, such as hot flashes, urogenital symptoms, and mood and sleep disturbances, among others, is outside the scope of these USPSTF recommendations, and literature on this topic was not reviewed. Sources for estimates of benefits and harms cited in this Recommendation statement are described in the summary of the evidence available from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
 ...
PMID:Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy for primary prevention of chronic conditions: recommendations and rationale. 1243 33

Over the last 20 years tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, has been shown to be of clinical benefit to patients with advanced and resected hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen has also been evaluated as a risk-reducing agent among patients at a high risk for the development of breast cancer and found to be effective, although it is associated with untoward adverse events (ie, stroke, venous thrombosis, and endometrial cancer). Recent analysis of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project tamoxifen trials confirms that an increased risk for developing various endometrial malignancies exists across these protocols. Raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator available to treat osteoporosis, may also reduce the risk for developing breast cancer. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project is now comparing the risk-reducing activities of tamoxifen and raloxifene in women considered to be at a high risk for developing breast cancer. As newer potential risk-reducing agents are identified and placed into clinical prevention trials, patient selection, trial implementation methods, and accrual strategies must be developed to insure both that appropriate accrual targets are achieved and that women at clinically significant risk levels are accrued.
 ...
PMID:A review of selective estrogen receptor modulators and national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project clinical trials. 1461 21

The goal of endocrine therapy in breast cancer is to block the action of estrogen on the tumor cells either by inhibiting estrogen from binding to the specific estrogen receptor or by inhibiting its synthesis. Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is the standard endocrine treatment for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, both in the adjuvant and metastatic settings. Tamoxifen inhibits the binding of estrogen to the receptor, resulting in inhibition of hormone action. However, as tamoxifen is also weakly estrogenic, it may not be optimally effective and increases the risk of endometrial cancer and stroke. Furthermore, patients may be refractory or may become resistant to tamoxifen treatment. Since aromatase inhibitors (AI) block the synthesis of estrogen and have no intrinsic estrogenic activity, they have the potential to be more effective than tamoxifen. Their different mechanism of action and chemical structures may also circumvent tamoxifen resistance. Consequently, AIs are currently being evaluated as an alternative to tamoxifen treatment. A preclinical model has recently been developed to compare the efficacy of AIs and antiestrogens in different treatment schemes and to assist in the design of clinical trials. Current studies with the MCF-7Ca xenograft model are exploring the effects of combination and sequential therapy on tumor growth. The efficacy of AIs in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer was first demonstrated in five multicenter second-line trials enrolling several hundreds of postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer who had failed tamoxifen treatment. More recently, anastrozole demonstrated efficacy at least equivalent to that of tamoxifen in first-line randomized, phase III clinical trials in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive or unknown metastatic breast cancer, whereas letrozole demonstrated superiority. The steroidal AI exemestane is currently under evaluation. Letrozole is the only AI to have been studied in a randomized, phase III trial in the neoadjuvant setting. In this trial, more patients underwent breast-conserving surgery with letrozole than with tamoxifen. Smaller phase II studies also suggest that both anastrozole and exemestane are active in the neoadjuvant setting. Because neoadjuvant trials permit temporal sampling of breast tissue, substudies in the phase III trial with letrozole have examined the impact of such biomarkers as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor family members, HER-1 and HER-2, on patient response. AIs are currently under evaluation in the adjuvant setting, and preliminary results of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial have been reported. AIs have proven as safe as tamoxifen in trials in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ongoing clinical trials in the adjuvant setting include companion studies of end-organ effects, particularly bone metabolism and lipid metabolism evaluations. Quality-of-life assessments are also parts of major clinical trials. A head-to-head quality-of-life assessment of anastrozole compared with letrozole demonstrated patient preference for letrozole. These assessments also clearly indicated the eagerness of patients to participate actively in treatment decisions
 ...
PMID:Challenges in the endocrine management of breast cancer. 1465 38


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>