Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0476089 (endometrial cancer)
 11,379 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Adverse and beneficial effects, especially with regard to mortality rates, of oral contraceptives (OC) are reviewed. In 1980 approximately 80 million women used OCs worldwide. OCs were first marketed in the United States in the 1960's, but by the 1980's low-dose combination pills with less estrogen and progesterone content became widespread along with the minipill, injectable preparations depo- medroxyprogesterone DMPA, and norethindrone containing capsules. Relative disease risk estimates are based on cohort studies and case- control studies. The Royal College of General Practitioners RCGP Oral Contraceptive Study of 1974 involved 46,000 women aged over 15 (50% were OC users, 50% were nonusers) the Oxford Family Planning Association Contraceptive Study of 1976 recruited 17,032 women aged 25-39, 56% of whom used OCs, and the Walnut Creek Contraceptive Drug Study of 1981 studied 16,638 women aged 18-54 of whom 28% were OC users and 33% were former users. A somewhat elevated mortality among ever-users of OCs in the order of 20% seems to be indicated by these studies mostly attributable to diseases of the circulatory system. Current OC use is also a risk factor in thrombotic stroke of the order of 4 or 5, but former use of OCs lowers the risk to 2. The effect of OC dose and formulation, duration of use, and predisposing factors on hemorrhagic and thrombotic stroke appears to be inconclusive with varying data from different studies. There is evidence for some increase in ischemic heart disease among current OC users, and also a 2-fold increase of myocardial infarction (MI) when smoking, serum cholesterol, and hypertension is taken into account, moreover higher estrogen dosage also contributes to a higher incidence of MI. There is also a 5-fold increase of venous thromboembolism among OC users induced by duration of use and estrogen potency, as OCs seem to promote atherogenesis, although the roles of progesterone and estrogen are conflicting. combination pills reduce the rate of endometrial cancer, provided protection against ovarian cancer, and do not seem to increase breast cancer incidence, although the relative risk of cervical cancer is elevated. Mortality risks with older OCs outweigh the benefits.
 ...
PMID:On the epidemiology of oral contraceptives and disease. 331 96

The use of estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women is under close scrutiny. The indications and side effects of replacement therapy are reviewed, and recommendations regarding its use are made. Hot flashes, atrophy of the vaginal epithelium, and prevention of osteoporosis have been established as indications for estrogen replacement therapy. Prevention of cardiovascular disease, aging changes of skin, and the occurrence of mental illness have also been suggested as indications, but beneficial effects of estrogen replacement therapy for these problems have not been clearly established. Studies have shown that side effects of estrogen replacement therapy include endometrial cancer, hypertension, gallbladder disease, and angina pectoris. Breast cancer may also be a risk factor, but a consensus of opinion has not been established. Pulmonary embolism, cerebral vascular accident, or myocardial infarction has not been associated with estrogen replacement therapy. The use of progesterone with estrogen replacement therapy has been shown to reduce the occurrence rate of endometrial carcinoma, but it does not prevent all the actions of estrogen. Oral administration of estrogen is the preferred route despite misgivings about portal absorption and liver metabolism. Further studies must examine this question. Various agents have been shown to be effective in treating some climacteric symptoms. These include progesterone for hot flashes and calcium for the prevention of osteoporosis. Other agents may also be effective but have not been tested critically.
 ...
PMID:Estrogen replacement therapy. 702 79

During the 20 years since the oral contraceptive was introduced, it has been used by some 150 million women around the world, and is perhaps the most carefully monitored medication in history. This vast body of research shows that for the overwhelming majority of healthy women under 30, the benefits of the pill continue to outweigh the risks. The most serious life threatening risks are those involving the cardiovascular system: heart attack, stroke, and throboembolism. However, deaths from these causes would be reduced by 1/2 if women using the pill did not smoke; further reductions would result if women with high blood pressure, high chloresterol levels and diabetes millitus did not use the pill. There is no evidence thus far to justify fears that the pill might be associated with an increased risk of cancer. Most studies show that not only is there no association between pill use and cancer of the ovaries, uterus and breast, but pill use may protect against ovarian and endometrial cancer. Women taking the pill are 1/4 as likely to develop benign breast lumps as nonusers, 1/14 as likely to develop ovarian cysts, 2/3 as likely to develop iron deficiency anemia, and 1/2 as likely to develop rheumatoid arthritis -- all relatively common conditions. In addition, pelvic inflammatory disease, a major cause of infertility, appears to occur only 1/2 as often among pill users as among nonusers. The risk to life among pill users younger than 30 who do not smoke is very small (virtually the same as that of users of the IUD, diaphragm, or condom) and is much lower than the risk of birth-related deaths among women who use no birth control.
 ...
PMID:The pill at 20: an assessment. 720 90

Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Studies also indicate a reduced risk of stroke and its consequent mortality among estrogen users, and ERT may also have a role in reducing the risk of Alzheimer's disease and increasing a woman's overall quality of life. On the negative side, some studies show a small duration-related risk of breast cancer with estrogen use and a significant increase in endometrial cancer; the latter is virtually eliminated with the addition of a progestin to the regimen. Although the definitive answer is not yet available, recent epidemiologic data suggest no reduction in protection against CVD and bone fracture with the addition of progestin, which is referred to as hormone replacement therapy, as opposed to using estrogen alone. A woman's potential risks associated with ERT or hormone replacement therapy must be weighed against her lifetime risks of developing CVD, stroke, and bone fracture. The reduction in mortality and morbidity rates with hormone use is generally viewed to be substantial and cost-effective. Health care professionals have an important role in shaping their patients' attitudes. Patients need more information from their physicians about the risks and benefits of estrogen therapy.
 ...
PMID:Benefits and risks of estrogen replacement therapy. 757 95

A women spends about one-third of her life in her postmenopausal years. Some women supplement this period of decreased estrogen production with estrogen replacement therapy (ERT). Many epidemiologic studies have examined the long-term effect of postmenopausal estrogen deprivation and of ERT. Since the 1970s, we have evaluated the risks and benefits of ERT in one population of older women in the California retirement community of Leisure World. ERT is the most effective method for preventing osteoporotic bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women. In Leisure World, ERT reduced the risk of hip fractures by about 50%. The effect is greatest in longterm users, but may be lost after discontinuation. Postmenopausal osteoporosis affects the bones of the jaws as well as other skeletal bones. Bone loss in the jaws may result in tooth loss. In Leisure World, estrogen users have retained more natural teeth than nonusers. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of hospitalization and death in women. In Leisure World, ERT reduced the risk of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, other heart disease, and stroke by 20-40%. The reduction is greatest in long-term and/or current users. ERT is effective in women with and without cardiovascular disease risk factors. One of the most feared aspects of aging is Alzheimer's disease. In Leisure World, women who had used ERT had a reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease. Risk decreased with increasing duration of use. Estrogen use, however, is not without risk. Unopposed estrogen increases risk of endometrial cancer. Risk increases with increasing years of use and remains high after discontinuation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:The risks and benefits of estrogen replacement therapy: Leisure World. 758 89

The menopause is defined as cessation of menstruation, ending the fertile period. The hormonal changes are a decrease in progesterone level, followed by a marked decrease in estrogen production. Symptoms associated with these hormonal changes may advocate for hormonal replacement therapy. This review is based on the English-language literature on the effect of estrogen therapy and estrogen plus progestin therapy on postmenopausal women. The advantages of hormone replacement therapy are regulation of dysfunctional uterine bleeding, relief of hot flushes, and prevention of atrophic changes in the urogenital tract. Women at risk of osteoporosis will benefit from hormone replacement therapy. The treatment should start as soon after menopause as possible and it is possible that it should be maintained for life. The treatment may be supplemented with extra calcium intake, vitamin D, and maybe calcitonin. Physical activity should be promoted, and cigarette smoking reduced if possible. Women at risk of cardiovascular disease will also benefit from hormone replacement therapy. There is overwhelming evidence that hormone therapy will protect against both coronary heart disease and stroke, and there is no increased risk of venous thrombosis or hypertension. A disadvantage of hormone replacement therapy is an increased risk of forming gall-bladder stones and undergoing cholecystectomy. Unopposed estrogen therapy gives a higher incidence of endometrial cancer in women with an intact uterus, but the contribution of progestins for about 10 days every month excludes this risk. Breast cancer in relation to estrogen-progestogen therapy has been given much concern, and the problem is still not fully solved. If there is a risk, it is small, and only after prolonged use of estrogen (15-20 years). The decision whether or not to use hormone replacement therapy should, of course, be taken by the individual woman in question, but her decision should be based on the available scientific information. It is the opinion of the authors that the advantages of hormone replacement therapy far exceed the disadvantages. We suggest that every woman showing any signs of hormone deprivation should be treated with hormone replacement therapy. This includes women with subjective or objective vaso-motor symptoms, genito-urinary symptoms, women at risk of osteoporosis (fast bone losers), and women at risk of cardiovascular diseases.
 ...
PMID:Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy--clinical implications. 819 55

The evidence of the effects of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) on mortality and morbidity is reviewed. All the 11 case-control studies published since 1980 reported and approximate halving of endometrial cancer risk among COC users. The CASH study showed that the protective effect was apparent after 12 months' use, and users had 40% of the risk of non-users after 2 years' use. A study showed that 5 patterns of self-perceived prolonged, heavy, frequent, irregular, or painful bleeding during menstruation were reported less frequently in COC users than in users of other methods. Benign breast disease is rarer, and functional ovarian cysts are less frequent in COC users. Lower-dose preparations may carry a lower risk of myocardial infarction. Smoking possibly potentiates the risk associated with oral contraceptive (OC) use, and it is a major risk factor for myocardial infarction. The Oxford/FPA study found a 2-3-fold increase in incidence of non-haemorrhagic stroke among current OC users. The epidemiologic data on the current risk of venous thromboembolism in relation to OC use are equivocal. New lower dose COCs have a smaller adverse effect on the lipid profile: they cause a smaller increase in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) and a variable but smaller decrease in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL). The large CASH study, based on 2088 cases, found a significantly elevated relative risk (2.7) of breast cancer, but only in women who had used the OC for at least 11 years. Of 6 case-control studies of hepatocellular carcinoma and OC use published since 1983, all but one showed a large elevated relative risk of around 4-fold. Delayed return of fertility has been observed in nulliparous women 30 who had 2 years; continuous exposure to COCs, although this may not be associated with low-dose, modern OCs. Malignant melanoma, pituitary adenoma, gallbladder disease, and chronic inflammatory bowel disease have been possibly associated with adverse side effects, but results are so far inconclusive.
 ...
PMID:Combined oral contraceptives: risks and benefits. 832 3

The use of combined oral contraceptives carries a number of well-established major non-contraceptive benefits. Of these, the most important protective effects are suppression of the risk of epithelial cancer of the ovary and cancer of the endometrium. Also of great importance is a reduction in the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. Needless to say, there are also some established risks of combined oral contraceptives. The most important of these are the vascular ones, comprising effects on acute myocardial infarction, thrombotic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, and venous thrombosis and embolism. Possible risks which are still under evaluation include an adverse effect on breast cancer and, likewise, on carcinoma of the cervix. More information is needed about both these conditions. A number of authors have provided analyses of varying degrees of complexity in which they have attempted to weigh the benefits and risks of combined oral contraceptives. Results from some of these studies are presented in the paper. On the whole, the findings are reasonably reassuring.
 ...
PMID:Benefits and risks of combined oral contraceptives. 834 Nov 54

22 patients with endometrial cancer were studied. Twelve (54.5%) between 45 and 66 years were treated for six days before surgery with 160 mg per os of Megestrol acetate administered twice daily plus Beta interferon 3,000,000 IU- on alternate days for a week, plus Tamoxifen--two cp of 10 mg daily for six days. Before and after surgery and associated medical therapies the steroid receptor values (ER and PgR) were checked. After treatment an average increase was observed of the ER (19 fmol/mg) and PgR (17 fmol/mg). Of the twelve patients one died of a stroke during the study (8.33%); five (41.67%) showed complete remission (CR); four (33.34%) a partial remission (PR) and two (16.67%) were not responders (NR).
 ...
PMID:Tamoxifen, megestrol acetate, and beta interferon in endometrial cancer. 853 66

A woman spends about one-third of her life in her postmenopausal years. Some women supplement this period of decreased estrogen production with estrogen replacement therapy (ERT). Since the 1970s, we have evaluated the long-term risks and benefits of ERT in one population of women, the Leisure World retirement community. ERT is the most effective method for preventing osteoporotic bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women. In Leisure World, ERT reduced the risk of hip fractures about 50 %. The effect is greatest in long-term users but may be lost after discontinuation. Postmenopausal osteoporosis affects the bones of the jaws as well as other skeletal bones. Bone loss in the jaws may result in tooth loss. In Leisure World, estrogen users retain more natural teeth than nonusers. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of hospitalization and death in women. In Leisure World, ERT reduced the risk of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, other heart disease, and stroke by 20-40 %. The reduction is greatest in long-term and/or current users. ERT is effective in women with and without cardiovascular disease risk factors. A most feared aspect of aging is Alzheimer's disease. In Leisure World, women who had used ERT had a reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease. Risk both increaseng dose and decreased with increasing duration of use. Estrogen use, however, is not without risk. Unopposed estrogen increases risk of endometrial cancer. Risk increases with increasing years of use and remains high after discontinuation. The most important potential risk of ERT is breast cancer. In Leisure World, women who had used a total accumulated estrogen dose of 1500 mg or more had nearly twice the risk of breast cancer compared with nonusers. Short-term low-dose users showed no substantial increased risk. The Leisure World Study shows risks and benefits of ERT similar to other reports in the literature. For postmenopausal women generally, the benefits of ERT--preventing osteoporotic fractures, reducing heart disease, decreasing mortality, and possibly reducing risk of Alzheimer's disease-out-weigh the risks of endometrial and breast cancers. A woman must be fully informed of the risks and benefits of hormone therapy and play an important role in deciding whether to take hormones and which regimen to use.
 ...
PMID:Estrogen replacement therapy in the elderly. 870 21


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>