Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0432222 (
SEM
)
47,337
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
We studied the effect of the opiate antagonist naloxone on the peripheral GH response to the alpha 2-receptor agonist clonidine in eight normally cycling women during the mid-luteal phase. In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design, each subject received clonidine and naloxone on one occasion and clonidine and placebo on the other. In seven of eight subjects, an attenuation of the GH response was associated with naloxone administration. The maximal GH increment above baseline (delta GHMAX) of 7.8 +/- 2.0 micrograms/L (mean +/-
SEM
) with placebo was higher than the delta GHMAX of 4.2 +/- 0.9 micrograms/L with naloxone (p = 0.05). Likewise, the area above baseline under the GH level-time curve following clonidine (delta GHAREA) was higher with placebo compared to naloxone (477 +/- 175 micrograms/L x min vs. 228 +/- 62 micrograms/L x min), although this difference was not quite statistically significant (p = 0.09). As expected, with placebo the increase in GH following clonidine was statistically significant by repeated measures analysis of variance (p = 0.001). The smaller increase in GH levels when naloxone was given was not significant. Both delta GHMAX and delta GHAREA values were significantly positively correlated with estradiol levels when placebo was given, but not when naloxone was given.
GHRH
was not detectable following clonidine administration under either the placebo or the naloxone conditions. Our data support the hypothesis that estrogen enhances the response of GH to provocative stimuli in women, at least in part by increasing endogenous opioid tone in the hypothalamus.
...
PMID:Effect of naloxone on the growth hormone response to clonidine in normal women during the mid-luteal phase. 254 99
We studied the response of plasma 7B2 to LHRH and ovine corticotropin releasing hormone (o-CRH) in healthy young subjects. The plasma 7B2 concentration significantly increased from 78.3 +/- 7.5 (mean +/-
SEM
) to 102.0 +/- 6.0 ng/L (142.7 +/- 12.7% of the basal value; P less than 0.01) following iv administration of LHRH in seven young subjects. On the other hand, no increase in plasma 7B2 was found after iv administration of o-CRH in six young subjects. These results, together with our previous report of no increase in plasma 7B2 after administration of TRH and
GHRH
in young subjects, suggest that pituitary 7B2 may be present in gonadotrophs and be released only by LHRH in physiological conditions.
...
PMID:LHRH increases plasma 7B2 concentration in normal human subjects. 255 42
We postulated that an increase in the biological effectiveness of somatostatin (SRIF) accounts, at least in part, for the decrease in basal and
GRF
-induced ovine GH (oGH) secretion observed around birth in the ovine fetus and neonate. To test this hypothesis, SRIF (SRIF-14; given as 30 micrograms/kg iv bolus, followed by 2 micrograms/kg.min for 75 min) was infused into chronically catheterized fetal and neonatal lambs, and the oGH response induced by
GRF
[
GRF
-(1-44) amide; 1 microgram/kg] in the presence of exogenous SRIF was compared to the oGH response induced by
GRF
in saline-infused controls. In fetuses of 115-122 days gestation, SRIF had no detectable effect on the oGH response to
GRF
[peak incremental oGH response (mean +/-
SEM
), 527 +/- 124 vs. 562 +/- 103 ng/ml in controls]. In neonatal lambs (3-17 days old), SRIF completely suppressed the immediate oGH response to
GRF
(peak incremental response, 0.8 +/- 1.3 vs. 111 +/- 34 ng/ml in controls; P less than 0.02). In late gestational fetuses (126-139 days old), a transitional pattern was observed (peak incremental oGH response, 207 +/- 56 vs. 324 +/- 30 ng/ml in controls; P less than 0.04). In the second part of this study, we explored, in the neonatal lamb, the hypothesis that SRIF withdrawal plays a role in pulsatile GH secretion and that the amount of
GRF
to which the somatotrope is exposed before SRIF withdrawal is a major factor in determining the amplitude of GH bursts. SRIF (SRIF-14; a 30 micrograms/kg bolus, followed by 2 micrograms/kg.min) was infused iv for 40 min,
GRF
[
GRF
-(1-44) amide; 1 microgram/kg] was injected iv 20 min after starting the SRIF infusion, and the oGH rise after SRIF withdrawal was evaluated. In one series of controls
GRF
was replaced by saline, and in the other SRIF was replaced by saline. The oGH rise during recovery after SRIF alone was lower than that after the combined administration of SRIF and
GRF
(peak oGH increment, 8 +/- 3 vs. 38 +/- 12 ng/ml; P less than 0.04). The amplitude of the GH pulse after SRIF and
GRF
was similar to the immediate oGH response to
GRF
alone. These studies show that SRIF is unable to suppress the immediate oGH response to
GRF
in the ovine fetus, and that the suppressive effect of SRIF on the immediate oGH response to
GRF
increases gradually in late gestation and sharply at birth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
...
PMID:Hormone ontogeny in the ovine fetus and neonate. XXII. The effect of somatostatin on the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing factor. 256 81
Free cytosolic calcium concentration, [Ca2+]i, in single rat pituitary cells can be measured with the fluorescent, calcium-sensitive probe fura-2 and digital image analysis. A reverse hemolytic plaque assay (RHPA) identifies somatotropes in the mixed population of pituitary cells. Previous studies showed that
growth hormone releasing factor
(
GRF
) stimulates growth hormone (GH) release from pituitary somatotropes by increasing the influx of calcium into the cell. Somatostatin reduced [Ca2+]i and inhibits hormone release presumably by closing calcium channels in the membrane. The calcium-ionophore bromo-A23187 rapidly increased [Ca2+]i from a baseline of 226 +/- 38 nM to a peak of 842 +/- 169 nM (mean +/-
SEM
) which was reached 30 s after exposure to the drug. This spike was followed by a sustained phase of elevated [Ca2+]i approximately 370 nM. When somatostatin (SRIF) (10 nM) was combined with ionophore treatment, the initial rise was preserved. However, the second phase was abolished and SRIF lowered [Ca2+]i to 57 +/- 7 nM. Depolarizing the cellular membrane with high extracellular potassium (60 mM) increased cytosolic calcium as well (797 +/- 178 nM); however, this was not affected by the addition of SRIF (988 +/- 71 nM). KCl depolarization in calcium-free medium (+1.5 mM EGTA) provoked no rise in cytosolic calcium. In contrast, after ionophore, the initial spike was preserved while the sustained phase of elevated [Ca2+]i was abolished. We conclude from these data that (1) membrane depolarization and ionophore treatment lead to an influx of calcium into the cytosol of normal pituitary somatotropes. (2) SRIF inhibits calcium influx induced by ionophore but not influx after depolarization with high potassium concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Ionophore bromo-A23187 reveals cellular calcium stores in single pituitary somatotropes. 256 28
The aims of this study were: (1) to test the possibility that pre-
GHRH
plasma GH values could reflect the functional status of the hypothalamic-somatotroph rhythm (HSR) at testing, and thus explain if it is responsible for the marked variability in GH responsiveness to
GHRH
challenge and (2) to see if exogenous somatostatin (SS) could disrupt this endogenous HSR and thus make the GH responses homogeneous. (1) Two to 14
GHRH
acute tests (
GRF
-29, 1 micrograms/kg, i.v. bolus) were performed in 12 normal men and 10 normal women at the same time (0830 h) at random intervals (2 to 60 days). Blood samples to measure plasma GH were drawn at 15 min intervals before and after
GHRH
challenge. Given that the increments in pre-
GHRH
plasma GH values (I = value at 0 min minus value at -15 min) were highly correlated with either
GHRH
-elicited peaks of GH (men, r = 0.81; women; r = 0.69; P less than 0.0001) or the rise in GH after the challenge (r = 0.685; P less than 0.0001, in the total of tests performed), three theoretical HSR phases were proposed: (A) I greater than or equal to 0.4 microgram/l Secretory Phase; (B) I less than or equal to 0, (from GH at -15 min greater than or equal to 1.5 microgram/l), Secretion Plateau; (C) I less than or equal to 0, (from GH at -15 min less than or equal to 1.5 microgram/l), Refractory Phase. Individually, 91% of the men and 86% of the women showed a constant HSR phase when tested at the same time of day independently of the intervals between tests. GH responses (peaks, mean +/-
SEM
, g/l) in Phase A (women, 51.5 +/- 4.1; men, 31.4 +/- 3.2) were significantly higher (P less than 0.01) than those in Phase B (women, 22.6 +/- 1.8; men, 19.7 +/- 1.5), and these than those in Phase C (women, 9.2 +/- 1.5; men, 6.2 +/- 0.5). The great dispersion observed when GH peaks were analysed as a whole disappeared (except in Phase A in women) when they were evaluated according to the HSR Phase at testing. (2) In seven men and eight women 7 min after stopping an infusion of SS (250 micrograms/h for 3 h) a new
GHRH
test was performed. Plasma GH variations prior to SS infusion expressed the previous HSR Phase, while the
GHRH
-elicited peak of GH established the Phase at the moment of testing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
...
PMID:Reasons for the variability in growth hormone (GH) responses to GHRH challenge: the endogenous hypothalamic-somatotroph rhythm (HSR). 257 45
The maternal plasma concentrations of GH and PRL increase dramatically upon the initiation of lactation in the rat. In light of the fact that these two hormones have evolved from one common precursor, we sought to determine if the neuroendocrine mechanisms regulating their concomitant increase during lactation are common or if they are functionally distinct. To evaluate this, lactating rats were passively immunized with antiserum raised against
GHRH
and then monitored for changes in GH and PRL secretion in response to suckling. On day 9 or 10 postpartum, pups were removed from their mothers at 0800 h. At 1100 h mothers were injected with normal rabbit serum (NRS) or
GHRH
antiserum (
GHRH
-ab). At 1400 h a control blood sample was drawn. Pups were then returned to their mothers, with subsequent blood samples drawn over the next 60 min. Plasma concentrations of GH significantly increased to 12.3 +/- 1.0 ng/ml (mean +/-
SEM
) in NRS-treated females after the return of the pups. In contrast, there was no change in GH concentrations in the females treated with the
GHRH
-ab. Plasma PRL concentrations rose approximately 200 ng/ml in both the NRS-treated animals and the
GHRH
-ab-treated ones. Body weight gains of the pups during the 60-min period of lactation were similar in both groups. These results suggest that the neuroendocrine mechanisms regulating the increases in GH and PRL during lactation are distinct and that
GHRH
is the hypothalamic factor responsible for the increase in GH. Furthermore, these results suggest that acutely interrupting the increase in GH secretion that occurs during lactation does not compromise nursing behavior and performance.
...
PMID:Neuroendocrine mechanisms regulating growth hormone and prolactin secretion during lactation. 264 20
To investigate the cellular mechanisms underlying the unique GH secretory apparatus of the androgen-resistant testicular feminized (Tfm) rat we employed a reverse hemolytic plaque assay to assess GH secretion by individual cells from normal male, normal female, and Tfm rats. Acutely dispersed pituitary cells were incubated for 90 min with GH anti-serum in the presence of medium alone, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 nM
GHRH
, or 3 microM forskolin after which hemolytic plaques were developed over an additional 30 min. Body weights of the Tfm rats [318 +/- 7 g (mean +/-
SEM
)] were intermediate between intact males (372 +/- 18 g) and females (218 +/- 7 g). The total number of cells recovered from dispersion of Tfm rat pituitaries [3.20 +/- 0.42 X 10(6) (mean +/-
SEM
)] was greater than that from males (1.43 +/- 0.12 X 10(6); P = 0.001), but not distinguishable from that from females (2.31 +/- 0.30 X 10(6); P = 0.06). However, the absolute population of recovered somatotropes from the Tfm animals (1.24 +/- 0.22 X 10(6) exceeded both male (0.56 +/- 0.10 X 10(6); P = 0.002) and female (0.80 +/- 0.14 X 10(6); P = 0.046) values. Mean basal and maximal GH plaque areas were greater for cells from male rats than for those from either female or Tfm rats (P less than 0.05) regardless of whether
GHRH
or forskolin was used as the secretagogue. Plaque areas from female and Tfm cells were indistinguishable under all study conditions. These data suggest that a deficiency of androgen receptors prevents establishment of the greater GH secretory capacity of individual somatotropes characteristic of the adult male rat. This androgen receptor-dependent modulation of GH secretory capacity appears to occur at a step distal to the GHRH receptor. The data also suggest that an increase in the absolute population of somatotropes is an additional consequence of androgen receptor deficiency. This combination of individual somatotropes, each possessing a GH secretory capacity similar to that of cells from normal females, but present in greater absolute numbers, may explain the intermediate values found during previous studies of the Tfm rat GH axis which were based on assessment of large mixed populations of pituitary cells.
...
PMID:Growth hormone secretion by individual somatotropes of the testicular feminized rat. 264 10
Growth hormone (GH) secretory patterns were studied in a patient with ectopic
growth hormone releasing factor
(
GRF
) secretion and in normal men given continuous infusions of human
growth hormone releasing factor
(1-40)-OH (hGRF-40). In the patient with ectopic
GRF
secretion, GH secretion was pulsatile despite continuously elevated immunoreactive
GRF
levels. To determine if pulsatile GH secretion is maintained in normal subjects, we administered to six healthy young men vehicle or hGRF-40, 2 ng/kg per min, for 24 h and gave a supramaximal intravenous bolus dose of hGRF-40, 3.3 micrograms/kg, after 23.5 h of infusion. hGRF-40 infusion resulted in greater GH secretion than did vehicle infusion and pulsatile GH secretion was maintained throughout hGRF-40 infusion. During the 23.5 h of vehicle infusion, total GH secretion (microgram; mean +/-
SEM
) was 634 +/- 151 compared with 1,576 +/- 284 during hGRF-40 infusion (P = 0.042). The GH response to the intravenous bolus of hGRF-40 was greater after vehicle infusion than after hGRF-40 infusion; 877 +/- 170 and 386 +/- 125 micrograms of GH was secreted after the bolus on vehicle and hGRF-40 days, respectively (P = 0.015). The total amount of GH secreted during the 25.5 h of the two study days was not different; 1,504 +/- 260 and 1,952 +/- 383 micrograms were secreted during vehicle and hGRF-40 days, respectively (P = 0.36). Not only was pulsatile GH secretion maintained during hGRF-40 infusion, but there was augmentation of naturally occurring GH pulses, which is in contrast to the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone on gonadotropin secretion. We suggest that GH pulses are a result of
GRF
secretion that is associated with a diminution or withdrawal of somatostatin secretion.
...
PMID:Pulsatile growth hormone secretion in normal man during a continuous 24-hour infusion of human growth hormone releasing factor (1-40). Evidence for intermittent somatostatin secretion. 286 Jan 26
We have previously reported an impaired growth hormone (GH) response and abnormal prolactin release to insulin-hypoglycaemia in obesity. We suggested that obese women with an absent prolactin response to hypoglycaemia ('non-responders') have a disorder of hypothalamic function. We have now investigated the GH response to i.v.
growth hormone releasing factor
,
GHRF
(1-29)NH2, in 14 obese women and nine age-matched normal-weight women. We found a significantly reduced GH response to
GHRF
in the obese women as compared with controls (mean peak +/-
SEM
: obese 8.9 +/- 2 mu/l, controls 28 +/- 2 mu/l; P less than 0.01). When the obese women were divided on the basis of their prolactin response to insulin-hypoglycaemia (seven 'non-responders', mean weight 102 +/- 5 kg; seven responders, mean weight 108 +/- 8 kg) a similar GH response to
GHRF
was found between the two groups but the GH response to hypoglycaemia was significantly less in the 'non-responder' women (mean peak 'non-responders' 10.5 +/- 3 mu/l, responders 27 +/- 4 mu/l; P less than 0.05). We conclude that obesity may be characterized by an impaired GH response to both i.v.
GHRF
and insulin-hypoglycaemia, which suggests altered hypothalamic-pituitary function. The finding that the GH response to hypoglycaemia is significantly less in the obese prolactin 'non-responder' women supports the hypothesis for a hypothalamic disorder.
...
PMID:Impaired growth hormone response to growth hormone releasing factor and insulin-hypoglycaemia in obesity. 286 16
It is unclear whether
growth hormone releasing factor
(
GRF
) administration in vivo may desensitize the somatotroph. To investigate this possibility we have examined the effects of 10-h infusion of the equipotent 1-29 amide analogue of hpGRF on serum GH levels and on the subsequent GH response to a bolus dose of
GRF
(1-29). Four normal adult males received an intravenous infusion of 1-29
GRF
(1 microgram/kg/h) from 0800 to 1800 h, with blood samples taken at 10 min intervals. A 100 micrograms intravenous bolus dose of
GRF
was given at 1800 h, and sampling continued for a further 90 min. GH levels were near or below the limit of detection (0.5 mU/l) throughout the control 10 h period. During
GRF
infusion there was increased GH release with pulses of irregular frequency and amplitude (up to 80 mU/l) continuing throughout the entire infusion period. There was no apparent reduction in total GH released towards the latter part of the infusion. On the control day, 100 micrograms
GRF
bolus increased mean (+/-
SEM
) GH from 0.82 +/- 0.21 mU/l to a peak of 59.0 +/- 44.8 mU/l (P less than 0.002). Following 10-
GRF
infusion, responses to bolus injection of
GRF
were reduced, but variable. In two subjects a small rise in GH levels occurred (basal 6.4 and 7.2 rising to peak values of 11.2 and 23.0 mU/l respectively). In the other two subjects, GH levels fell but in these the
GRF
bolus had coincided with a GH peak. The loss of
GRF
responsiveness after
GRF
infusion may be due to 'desensitization'.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Does growth hormone releasing factor desensitize the somatotroph? Interpretation of responses of growth hormone during and after 10-hour infusion of GRF 1-29 amide in man. 287 48
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>