Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0432222 (SEM)
 47,337 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

It is recommended that cyclosporine dosing should be based on the whole blood level 2 h after a dose (C2), not the trough level (C0). Initial studies did not however establish the outcome of dosing according to C2 levels in long-term patients previously managed by C0 levels. C0 and C2 were measured in 152 stable patients receiving Neoral therapy, mean 86.9 months after transplantation. This showed that 38 (25%) had C2 levels above a target range of 700-900 microg/l. Higher C2 levels were associated with higher cholesterol levels (P = 0.0058) and higher diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.0163). Cyclosporine dose reduction was undertaken in 32 patients with high C2 levels. For logistical reasons, C2 was not performed regularly, but an individualized C0 level was set for each patient. A 16% reduction in mean cyclosporine dose was achieved, associated with a 28% fall in mean C0, from 212 to 153 microg/l, and a 25% fall in mean C2, from 1075 to 820 microg/l. There was no excess in adverse events in the dose reduction cohort, compared with patients with initial C2 levels <900 microg/l. Over a mean 15 month follow-up period in the dose reduction cohort, there was a 4.4% reduction in mean diastolic blood pressure, from 84.9 (SEM 2.1) to 80.2 (1.9) mmHg, P = 0.023; and a 10.4% reduction in mean cholesterol, from 5.71 (0.27) to 5.11 (0.25), P = 0.005 (patients starting on statin during follow-up excluded). In patients with initial C2 <900 microg/l, blood pressure did not fall and the cholesterol fell by 3.9%, from 5.27 (0.14) to 5.07 (0.15) mmol/l (P = 0.0405). In conclusion, cyclosporine dose reduction was safe in stable long-term renal allograft recipients with high C2 levels. There was an improvement cholesterol levels and a small improvement in blood pressure after cyclosporine dose reduction.
 ...
PMID:Cyclosporine dose reduction in stable renal transplant patients with high C2 level: simplified method of single C2 measurement and individualization of C0 target. 1594 59

The Mycophenolate Steroids Sparing (MYSS) study found that in renal transplant recipients who were on immunosuppressive therapy with the cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was not better than azathioprine in preventing acute rejection at 21 mo after transplantation and was 15 times more expensive. The MYSS Follow-up Study, an extension of MYSS, was aimed at comparing long-term outcome of 248 MYSS patients according to their original randomization to MMF (1 g twice daily) or azathioprine (75 to 100 mg/d). Primary outcome was estimated GFR at 5 yr after transplantation. Mean 5-yr GFR difference between azathioprine and mycophenolate was 4.67 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.43 to 9.77 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.07). GFR from month 6 (mean +/- SEM: 54.3 +/- 1.6 versus 53.9 +/- 1.5 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.83) to month 72 after transplantation (49.5 +/- 2.2 versus 47.3 +/- 2.4 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.50); GFR slopes (mean +/- SEM: -1.10 +/- 0.56 versus -1.23 +/- 0.31 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year; P = 0.83); and 72-mo patient mortality (4.0 versus 4.0% [P = 0.95]; HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.28 to 3.31; P = 0.95), graft loss (6.8 versus 6.1% [P = 0.82]; HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.32 to 2.46; P = 0.83), incidence of persistent proteinuria (25.0 versus 27.4%; P = 0.72), late (>6 mo after transplantation) rejections (25.3 versus 21.2%; P = 0.53), and adverse events were similar on azathioprine (n = 124) and MMF (n = 124), respectively. Outcomes in the two groups were comparable also among patients with or without steroid therapy, considered separately. In kidney transplantation, the long-term risk/benefit profile of MMF and azathioprine therapy in combination with cyclosporine Neoral is similar. In view of the cost, standard immunosuppression regimens for kidney transplantation should perhaps include azathioprine rather than MMF.
 ...
PMID:Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of chronic allograft dysfunction in renal transplantation: the MYSS follow-up randomized, controlled clinical trial. 1772 86